what would you do? (a semi-religious q)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I'm dating this guy who says he loves me, says he wants to be with me, blah blah, and usually we get on really well - until today.

We started talking about religion: he's Baptist and I'm a reformed Catholic who doesn't really believe in God, and he says that if we go to his parents' house for Easter (we've both been invited, and I've never met them) that I have to go to church with them. I'm the type of person that when I'm told I 'have' to do something, that makes me want to do it even less, and I'm really not feeling the desire to comply with this demand. He says "come on, it's only an hour, and it's the only way to get in good with my parents," but I think it's sort of hypocritical. I'm not even sure, at the ripe old age of 24, if I believe in God.

Should I grin and bear it, as the "only way to get in good" with his parents, or should I put my foot down and tell them that while I respect their religious beliefs, I don't hold them myself, and don't choose to join them?

loggedout, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:40 (nineteen years ago)

Would you refuse to go to someone's bar mitzah because it was held in a synagogue?

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:45 (nineteen years ago)

Of course not, but that's hardly the same issue. What I'm saying is that I'm being 'forced' to go worship at a church where I don't follow the religion. If I have to respect their religious beliefs, shouldn't they also respect the fact that I hold none of my own?

loggedout, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:47 (nineteen years ago)

It's tough, but this would establish a precedent that you must be prepared to live with. If you can't live with it, then don't try to. But be sure of your own mind before you announce you are entrenching your position.

BTW, there is an alternative method to getting in good with the bf's parents - he vouches for you, that you are a wonderful person he loves, and who makes him happy. If that isn't good enough for the parents, then beware of his having to choose between you and the parents - and let him know he would be expected to figure this out rather than throw the whole burden on you.

This is, as you might guess, a pretty common predicament. It can go either way, depending on the people involved - but it isn't as easy as falling off a log.

Aimless (Aimless), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:50 (nineteen years ago)

I personally couldn't date someone who believes in god(s). Maybe that makes me terrible, but it's honest. I am an atheist through and through. While everyone is entitled to believe as they see fit, for me love is about communication, and to disagree so fundamentally with my spouse about something that matters to me just doesn't make sense.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:52 (nineteen years ago)

Well, you aren't strictly taking part in the worship by being there, and no one can make you take communnion or whatever (depending on the church, you may not be allowed to anyway). So you're just accompanying your family-to-be (you know, hypothetically) to a festival that has meaning for them. Nothing to get all up in arms about unless you specifically have a problem with THAT church or that denomination.

I would also hazard that it doesn't mean you have to go with them ALL THE TIME, esp if you actually had a conflict or a desire to do something ELSE at the same time. But as long as you're celebrating a religious holiday/family occasion with them, it seems to me like you're kind of stuck with the church thing.

Laurel (Laurel), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

Attendance does not equal worship! I went to my wife's parents' church many times even though I'm a total heatheren. It was a way of being nice to people I liked, and more important, it was a way to be nice to my wife. Don't be so goddamn prideful. (It's a sin, you know.)

pixel farmer (Rock Hardy), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

See, that's pretty much exactly what I said. If you think I'm the one you want to be with, then why wouldn't that be enough for them? It would certainly be enough for my parents. Also, I don't want to set a precedent that I'm fairly certain, knowing myself as well as I do, that I'll come to resent if we do end up together.

loggedout, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:54 (nineteen years ago)

Let's set aside the touchiness of religion for a second here.

If the family was going out to dinner, would you refuse or would you go to be polite?

This is really only a big deal if you make it into a big seal. (That's a typo but I'm not going to change it.)

Dan (Arf Arf) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)

Dinner and church again, hardly the same thing. I stopped going to church because I think it's a load of shit. Why should I change something fundamental about myself to make someone else like me?

loggedout, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:56 (nineteen years ago)

To clarify my first post, if my significant other had religious parents I would happily accompany them to church, but wouldn't allow them to dictate, say, how I raise my children.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:56 (nineteen years ago)

don't evangelical groups love people like you because they see them as projects? it's especially true if you're jewish (obv not you)!

also, like lots of other people said upthread, just think of it as accompanying them to something that they find meaningful. and dan otm.

AaronK (AaronK), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

If this is serious, it sounds like you need to have a long talk with him about how devoutly religious he is, whether he accepts your religious uncertainty, whether he is just assuming that you will adapt his own beliefs, and (possibly the most crucial point) what he is willing to do to please his parents (and how he expects you to cooperate).

x-post:

Dan totally OFF the mark. Of course it matters.

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

You're not changing anything fundamental about yourself by attending.

pixel farmer (Rock Hardy), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:58 (nineteen years ago)

No one is forcing you, you do have a choices.

-Participate in this family's normal holiday celebration (which happens to include a religious service) They would appreciate the gesture and therefore probably have warm feelings towards you.

-Or you could choose not to go because of your own religious beliefs (which really aren't being called into question here or threatened unless they plan to dunk you in a tub of water) and risk causing hurt feelings at refusing to be a part of a tradition of the family you wish to join.

Decide which outcome you like best and go with it.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:58 (nineteen years ago)

The problem with the "it's not so bad" suggestion is the ominous presence of this idea: this is the only way to get in good with these people. If you go ahead and get married, will they respect that you are not Baptist and compromise about interfaith marriage, or will they expect you perform a Baptist ceremony? What about their views on your children? Etc etc etc. You don't want to set a precedent just to be nice if it means they can walk all over what you want "or else".

It's one thing if the parents are not being demanding or rude about it, ie if you said you didn't want to go, they'd be cool with it, but they will invite you in case you'd like to share in their tradition. But if they'd decide to dislike you on the basis of this, that's another story.

Of course, your bf could be lying to you because he's too chicken shit to stand up to the 'rents. This is a distinct possibility so talk more with him?

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:58 (nineteen years ago)

My girlfriend asked that I go with her parents to church. I did. Big deal. I don't have to pray or sing or any of that shit. Neither do you. If you do it once, you'll probably be off the hook the rest of your life , having shown the goodwill to at least feign interest. Besides, you can go there and look at it not in a religious sense, but in a sociological one. Kinda like you would if you were to go to a cathedral in Europe or a buddhist temple in Japan.

Now, if he asks you afterward to convert and have a second baptism, well, you're on your own.

Alan Conceicao (Alan Conceicao), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:59 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, if my parents' church had recently made some horrible decision, like refused membership to a gay couple or something, I would be MORE THAN HAPPY to boycott their services indefinitely. But to hold against one little congregation the ills of the whole system? I dunno, it just doesn't hold up, for me.

XP: You're not changing anything about yourself! No one can make you say "I believe, I believe!!" You're just being polite by taking part in that family's customs, since you hope to join them. Or something.

Laurel (Laurel), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:00 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, it sounds like you're having more fundamental questions about whether things are going to work between you and your boyfriend given your differing beliefs. you should probably talk to him about that.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:00 (nineteen years ago)

big fuckin' deal - just mouth the words.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

Who the hell are you people dating that when your in-laws make sketchy "THIS IS THE ONLY WAY WE WILL LIKE AND RESPECT YOU" demands that doing it once "gets you off the hook"??

We really need to know what the context is of that comment before any of you have the right to say "this isn't a big deal".

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:02 (nineteen years ago)

Dinner and church again, hardly the same thing.

But see, if you're an atheist, they pretty much are! I mean, if my girlfriends parents thought Applebees was a good restaurant I'd still eat dinner with them, but there's no way in hell I'd think I was eating good food. As far as you're concerned, you're just hanging out. Don't participate in the prayers or whatever -- it sounds like you'd feel guilty or annoyed if you were to play along. If they don't respect that you're there as a spectator, then screw it.

mike h. (mike h.), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:02 (nineteen years ago)

I only see this as being a problem if you were of a certain religion or denomination and "have" to attend the services of a different one. Assuming the services have no meaning to you, just to them, what's the point in objecting? If pressed, though, I'd make it clear that you are attending only as a courtesy, and are not going to become ONE OF THEM.

oops (Oops), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:03 (nineteen years ago)

this is sort of happening to one of my flatmates. she met someone is christian a month or two ago. she isnt christian, and its something of a problem, his parents are disapproving of the whole thing at the minute. he wants her to go to bible reading classes, and a king james has appeared in the house. at the moment she thinks its just all a bit funny, and hasnt done anything about it. but i think she will have to face up to having to go soon.

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:03 (nineteen years ago)

it's not like baptist services actually require much other than occasionally standing up and singing or saying stuff. no body and blood of christ, no credibility.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:05 (nineteen years ago)

Who said that it was the only way they'd like or respect her as a result? I didn't get that vibe at all. It sounds like its a good way to make headway with the inlaws.

Alan Conceicao (Alan Conceicao), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:05 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I mean if you find out that they don't care or expect you to do this regularly/convert/etc and just thought it'd be nice to invite you, there is no reason not to go but it's v. v. important you find out what your BF meant by that comment. That's the more important aspect here, not whether or not you are an atheist or something.

xpost Alan did you read the very first post?

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)

For whatever it's worth, I went to Catholic services with my old boyfriend & his family -- even though I didn't know when to sit, stand, kneel, or recite, and I didn't take communion BECAUSE I'M NOT CATHOLIC...but I attended out of respect & sympathy (on one occasion it was a memorial service for a child who had died after a long illness; really awfully, terribly sad).

But right, okay, it seems like what we REALLY need to know here is whether it's necessary to "get in good" with his parents in this way. But it still strikes me as rude to partake of someone's holiday hospitality and then refuse to honor their traditions...if you can't go to church, maybe don't go over there...?

Laurel (Laurel), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)

Based just on inital post I would urge you to give his parents benefit of the doubt that they are reasonable, fair-minded people. If this going to church as family is regular (This is an Easter service, often the only service some people attend in a year) then would be the time to say although you enjoyed participating with them you share different beliefs and don't wish to be a regular pew-warmer.

I'm not trying to be rude (seriously, although I doubt that disclaimer works here) but wanting to be so strident and possibly dissendant about your views before you've even met the people is a bit immature. Give them a chance to meet them and get to know them first. I mean it's not like they're Neo-Nazis. Quite.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)

The problem with saying "you shouldn't mind" and "it's merely a polite formality" is that these are truths for the speaker, but not necessarily for loggedout. She needs to understand her own position, much of which shall be based on feelings, not rationality.

Try as you might, you can't pick and choose your feelings, only what you do about them. If your reason and your feelings conflict, you can choose to override your feelings and to act on your reason, which is sometimes the proper course to take - but you'll still be stuck feeling those feelings in spite of your actions. In a lifelong relationship with the bf's parents, that's a lot of feelings to overrride and supress.

xpost, of course

Aimless (Aimless), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)

xpost Alan did you read the very first post?

I did read it. It said "get in good", not "get in at all". Its like buying a fruit basket for the inlaws. Going to one church service with the parents to be nice isn't a big deal. I'm not automatically assuming the boyfriend's parents are hyperpsycho fundamentalists, nor should you.

Alan Conceicao (Alan Conceicao), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)

"XP: You're not changing anything about yourself! No one can make you say "I believe, I believe!!" You're just being polite by taking part in that family's customs, since you hope to join them. Or something.

-- Laurel (sininspac...) (webmail), Today 4:00 PM. (Laurel) (later) (link)"

exactly.

AaronK (AaronK), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

would you go to a friend's weddin if it was at a church?

AaronK (AaronK), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

My mind automatically thinks of what would happen during the actual service--when it came time to kneel, or bow one's head, or stand--whether to go through the motions, thereby being false to one's own values, or whether to decline the group calisthenics of the church at the risk of alienating the parents and possibly losing the approval one was seeking to begin with.

Bnad, Friday, 10 February 2006 21:11 (nineteen years ago)

Rockist, the situation described here is basically the exact situation I've lived very happily in for the past 12.75 years; it does not have to be a gigantic deal unless the original poster makes it a gigantic deal.

Ally, according to the original poster, they're just dating; they aren't engaged or married yet. I'm guessing they've got some time/leeway to negotiate each other's family rituals before throwing in the towel.

Aimless, your point is kind of a massive given on advice threads.

Dan (Mountain Out Of A Molehill) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:11 (nineteen years ago)

although, in her case, i think conversion will be expected

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:14 (nineteen years ago)

sorry for the derail but just a quick story.

I left the catholic church after I realized I really couldn't speak at Pro-Choice rallies and attend mass every weekend.

This summer we went to a Catholic wedding (which of course means Mass). On our way inside was a table full of offensive pamphlets but the one that caught my eye said "You Can't Be a Catholic and Be Pro-Choice". Yeah I got that.

still, lovely wedding.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:14 (nineteen years ago)

if you didn't believe in enjoying the taste of peruvian food but his parents really liked peruvian food and invited you and him out to some peruvian food restraunt even though you couldn't stand those disgusting secos with ground barley and potato, unseasoned guinea pig (cuyes), wanlla and uchu, maybe a few fava beans, weak coffee and machica, YOU'D STILL GO, RIGHT? i mean it's just food.

ath (ath), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:15 (nineteen years ago)

xxpost, why gareth?

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

Alan it is quite apparent from logged out's concerns about being made to do this regularly, SAYING that her and her bf got into an argument over whether or not it would be "enough" that he cared about her for them to approve, bringing up child rearing, etc etc that, regardless of what you think, for some reason logged out does have this impression. Obviously, not having met these people, she got this impression from the BF which I find a little questionable on his part but that's another story. But I am assuming nothing at all other than this person needs to talk to her BF and have him clarify what the hell he means by these kinds of comments, instead of ask a bunch of people on the internet what they think about people they don't know.

What's funny about this is that I really don't think the people who are saying "Well maybe you should do what you feel is correct" are the ones assuming anything ill about the bf's parents at all. I'm kind of bothered by the amount of blind "Get over it, it's not a big deal" going on here when, obviously, something has been said to indicate to logged out that this IS a big deal. Not only that it is her own feelings and if this person is wholly against religion, maybe she should consider just not dating the religious. Both sides of a relationship have to be able to make compromises and if either his side OR her side cannot come to a reasonable decision, then obviously there isn't much point to any discussion.

in other words Aimless totally, totally OTM.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

I'm an atheist and probably would go to church if I were in your position. I mean, WTF, it's just an hour of your time and if it pleases your boyfriend...

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:18 (nineteen years ago)

Ally, according to the original poster, they're just dating; they aren't engaged or married yet. I'm guessing they've got some time/leeway to negotiate each other's family rituals before throwing in the towel.

And will you explain to me why the time to maybe consider discussing that shouldn't be when the couple gets into an enormous row about whether or not it would be a very big deal if one side didn't attend church?? Of course they have time/leeway but I'm not sure why this means it's "not a big deal" and logged out should stop being such a huge baby.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:19 (nineteen years ago)

but loggedout is basically asking "do you guys also think this is a big deal?", so why are you "bothered" by people saying "no, i don't think it is"?

oops (Oops), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:20 (nineteen years ago)

Where was this about child rearing? I just re-read the threads and didn't see it.

Anyhow, the whole premise is flawed. She's not being forced to become baptist or to pray or to do anything at the church. She's being asked to attend as a favor from him to his parents because it will make her look very good in their eyes. You do things for your mate's parents because they're not just gonna go away. They're the parents. Again, you're reading WAY too much into this and assuming his dad is Pat Robertson or something, and maybe she is too.

again: NO ONE IS FORCING HER TO CONVERT TO SOUTHERN BAPTIST OR WORSHIP CHRIST. JUST TO GO TO CHURCH ONCE WITH THE FAMILY AS A FAVOR.

Alan Conceicao (Alan Conceicao), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:21 (nineteen years ago)

i agree that what she really needs to do is find out exactly what was meant by the "only way to get in good" statement.

oops (Oops), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)

As a catholic you should already know protestant religions are fake, so what does it matter? Joking. Sort of. If its only one time, do it for your relationship with his family. If its all the time then you should think about telling them. OTM Ally. If this is the difference between these people liking you or not, fuck em.
My brother married a ukrainian orthodox woman. He does not believe in god. Once he attended a service in a harlem church with me. Halfway through he looked around the room at the worshippers, turned and said to me 'wow! brainwashed or what?'. Still, sometimes its important to his wife and her family to go to church so he goes along too and keeps his comments to himself. I don't thinks its hypocritical at all.

sunny successor (katharine), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)

but loggedout is basically asking "do you guys also think this is a big deal?", so why are you "bothered" by people saying "no, i don't think it is"?

Thank you.

Alan Conceicao (Alan Conceicao), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)

Both sides of a relationship have to be able to make compromises and if either his side OR her side cannot come to a reasonable decision, then obviously there isn't much point to any discussion.

agreed. So why can't she be the one to come to compromise here? This means a lot to other people. Would it be that difficult to put your views aside for the moment and do something for the benefit of people you are trying to get close to?

Maybe instead of "immature" I should have said "selfish".

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:26 (nineteen years ago)

Oh I forgot to add something very important in LTR. You do this, BF knows you're not thrilled about. Down the line when he doesn't want to do something important to you just whip this situation out.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:27 (nineteen years ago)

Oh I forgot to add something very important in LTR. You do this, BF knows you're not thrilled about. Down the line when he doesn't want to do something important to you just whip this situation out.

Haha! Totally OTM. I've never held onto that card too long. I think I used it like the next day after I went with my girlfriend's family to have her pay for dinner.

(the dinner, however, was tasty)

Alan Conceicao (Alan Conceicao), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:32 (nineteen years ago)

but if your beliefs are that being a churchgoer and doing all these sort of rituals is kind of ridiculous and basically meaningless, than how better to show that than, as a non-believer, TO go? to me it's akin to not believing in ghosts and saying "sure wtf i'll stay in this*makes huge quotes in the air* haunted house."

oops (Oops), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:59 (nineteen years ago)

Book Of Life? Do you mean "Joy Of Cooking"? Then I am already a convert.

Alan Conceicao (Alan Conceicao), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:00 (nineteen years ago)

This thread is a lot more interesting if you imagine that "logged out" is male.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:01 (nineteen years ago)

xpost: Whichever one rests on the lap of the infinte.

senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:02 (nineteen years ago)

This is a tough question. I'd say as long as the bf and his parents accept your religious position and understand that this isn't an act to fool them into thinking you're baptist/christian/whatever, I would go. And if it still makes you uncomfortable under those conditions, well, don't go; if everyone can't accept that then things probably would have been more difficult/strained later on, right?

inert false cat (sleep), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)

but who cares about later on? why sacrifice now in favour of some probably-ill-placed worry about later on?

given that this is EASTER, and every fucking heathen kid in the world gets dragged into church by their parents on easter, I'd say there's little risk of this being construed as "oh, my son is dating a lovely devout christian girl"

jackl (jackl), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, I sort of skipped over the Easter part when reading the initial post. Yeah, sure, fuck it, I'd go. But still, like Ally said, the idea that this is the only way to get in good with these people is ominous.

inert false cat (sleep), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:12 (nineteen years ago)

if it's anything like my wife's parents, it's probably more like NOT going would be seen as very odd and the parents would probably think you're some kind of extremist/weirdo for taking a stand against what they see as a very ordinary tradition.

and you know what? by refusing to sit through ONE ordinary church service, you probably ARE an extremist...

jackl (jackl), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:16 (nineteen years ago)

by refusing to sit through ONE ordinary church service, you probably ARE an extremist...

wow! not really!

inert false cat (sleep), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:20 (nineteen years ago)

they see as a very ordinary tradition.

ding ding ding, exactly. i think that for many folks, you go to church twice a year, once on easter, once on christmas eve. It becomes part of the family ritual(like, say, visiting the family on those holidays).

kingfish has gene rayburn's mic (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:21 (nineteen years ago)

they see as a very ordinary tradition.

this cuts both ways, really.

inert false cat (sleep), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think loggedout's problem is with religion. I think her problem is that this has been framed as a way to "get in good" with the parents -- and because of that, she feels she'd be acting, lying, maybe even prostituting herself in order to get their approval. Hence all the talk about "changing who I am."

But loggedout, you have to reject your boyfriend's framing. When he says this is "the only way to get in good with my parents," chances are he doesn't actually mean that: probably he means something more like "if you don't go, it'll force an issue between you and my parents, and make the getting-in-good part a lot harder." It will not be hard at all for you to be who you are, in a totally non-pandering manner, and still go with them: you just go, like everyone has said, as an observer, as a guest. You will sit and be introduced to some people and listen to some nice music and go home. You should actually be happy about this, because it gives you loads of information. You think religion might be a point of conflict between you and his family? What better reason to go to their church and see what kind of religion they're all about? (If he really does mean church is the only only way to get along with them, you'll probably get strong whiffs of this, and you'll know what to do.)

The problem you're going to have is sitting there and wondering how the whole act is being interpreted. You'll wonder: does his family know I'm here as an observer, that I'm just being respectful of their beliefs? Or does this gesture actually mean, to them, that I believe, in which case I'm knuckling under? (You probably wouldn't have this issue if this were some kind of obscure Shinto ritual, right, and it'd be because that wouldn't be at issue -- it'd be clearer to everyone that you were just there to look and learn and all.) Now that part is hard, and it'll probably bug you the whole time, and you may even want to make some gesture to remind the folks: I'm just here as a guest, I'm not implying that I agree with you. But it might just be worth swallowing your pride on that one. You know what it means to you, and that's sufficient enough that it might not be worth making an explicit issue of the whole thing. And if the explicit issue comes up down the road, you'll always be able to say that: "Look, I've always been polite and respectful about your beliefs, haven't I?"

So you don't have to think of it as prostituting yourself. It's like someone said upthread: you're a vegetarian at a barbecue. Don't get paranoid about whether the meat-eaters think you're one of them or not.

(P.S.: you're young and you might have to get used to this. You are gonna meet family and in-laws and co-workers and all sort of people in your life and they are gonna be sitting home watching Bill O'Reilly and they'll say "pull up a seat, this guy's the best," and in a lot of cases you really just have to not be a brat about it and say "he's really not my style" and sit politely. You get used to this. Sometimes it's just not that important to force the issue. And someday you'll probably appreciate it when someone does the same for you, you know?)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:25 (nineteen years ago)

precisely.

jackl (jackl), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:28 (nineteen years ago)

the real problem is you're dating a hillbilly

senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_gospels/the_final_appearance/jn21_15b.jpg

jackl (jackl), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:33 (nineteen years ago)

i'd go. invariably, my life is better when i take actions that benefit someone other than myself--it's some kind of trippy law of the universe or something! and church is always a good place to space out for a while or check out what people are wearing.

dan (dan), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)


http://www.thebricktestament.com/acts/pauls_speech/ac20_09a.jpg

jackl (jackl), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:38 (nineteen years ago)

The other things:

(a) It's also possible to let it be known that you don't normally go to church -- boyfriend himself can tell his parents that you're not much of a churchgoer and that you're a little "nervous" about it. If they're ordinary nice Christian types, chances are they'll chuckle a little about that, go out of their way to make you feel comfortable, and then afterward make a few lame inquiries about what you thought. This would make it clear that you're not pretending to be anything you're not. And it would also make it clear that you're a person who cares enough about them and their son to make an effort to participate in their social activities.

(b) No matter how much you feel like you're being oppressed on this one, think about the fact that it might one day come around the other way. Right now, you're visiting their house, and you can kind of bite your lip and be a part of their culture. But if things went really, really well, someday they could be coming to your house, even watching you raise their grandkids. And if they weren't so hot on some of your habits, wouldn't you rather they just smiled, had respect for the way you do things, and gave it all an open-minded shot?

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:45 (nineteen years ago)

"I personally couldn't date someone who believes in god(s)."

This is crazy. I'm a 'spiritual' person (I call myself a 'cultural Christian' but am honestly something more like a pantheist) and I'm seeing someone who's made it clear that she has absolutely NO spiritual leanings whatsoever. We fundamentally disagree on whether there is something grander in the cosmos, and I couldn't care less. She doesn't seem to care at all, though I think she finds me a bit superstitious, she'll walk through a church with me just to look at the pretty windows, if nothing else. I would never hold someone's atheism against them.

That said, I would probably have a difficult time with a 'real' christian... I see the Bible as metaphor, not reality, and this could cause problems. Unless they were Orthodox, which is hot.

andy --, Friday, 10 February 2006 23:08 (nineteen years ago)

And if they weren't so hot on some of your habits, wouldn't you rather they just smiled, had respect for the way you do things, and gave it all an open-minded shot?

If they're the sort of people who require that potential son/daughter-in-laws attend religious services with them, rather than accepting a respectful 'I'd rather not' - how likely is that?

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:13 (nineteen years ago)

Erick, there are a lot of very normal, respectful people out there who just happen to like when the whole family goes to church for easter. So I'd say quite likely, actually.

jackl (jackl), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:17 (nineteen years ago)

Who can't respect the fact that someone else might not be comfortable doing so? Um yeah.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:18 (nineteen years ago)

Pretty much every single argument on this thread can be flipped either way. Ideally, none of this is a big deal to anyone involved and everyone is willing to comprimise and/or accept each other.

Ideologically, I'd definitely side with someone who refuses to participate in a religious ceremony over someone who refuses to accept someone else if they don't participate in a particular religious ceremony. But of course there's a lot more complexity to the situation than that. Pragmatically speaking, if you like the guy enough it is probably best to just tag along, keeping in mind what nabisco said as a kind of disclaimer: (If he really does mean church is the only only way to get along with them, you'll probably get strong whiffs of this, and you'll know what to do.)

inert false cat (sleep), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:20 (nineteen years ago)

Ah, yes, well I didn't make it clear because I was seeing red earlier (and also I didn't have all of the facts, but have gleaned the following information in subsequent conversations): I would absolutely be REQUIRED to attend every religious service these people go to while I am around them, and were we to marry, I would be REQUIRED to convert and to raise any potential offspring Baptist. According to him, if I was an atheist, it would be a deal breaker. Hrm.

I'm not a baby - I have no objection to attending one service (or even once a year on a holiday, which I also have no real objection to), but this appears to mean a hell of a lot more than a one time thing , and honestly, I had no idea this guy was THIS religious. I know he went to church with them when he went home for Christmas several times, but I figured that was just a family thing, and didn't realize it was going to start being a thing. Clearly there are issues here we need to work out.

Then again, maybe I should start dating a hot atheist and leave ths guy to pick up a church lovin' lady.*

(*I'm pretty sure I'm not serious about this)

loggedout, Friday, 10 February 2006 23:25 (nineteen years ago)

geez just go. what's the worst that could happen?

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:26 (nineteen years ago)

I mean I guess God might strike you down with a thunderbolt for your heathen ways, but how likely is that?

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:27 (nineteen years ago)

oh fuck that then.

oops (Oops), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:29 (nineteen years ago)

dump his ass.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:31 (nineteen years ago)

Wowza that changes everything. Are you his conversion project or something?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:32 (nineteen years ago)

that totally changes everything. is he going out with you or his parents? tell the loser to grow a pair and/or get ready to say goodbye to the heathen pussy.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, that's what I figured, that there was underlying serious disagreement. you have to decide if the relationship is worth working through the disagreement, which will probably involve a bunch of conversation that's painful for both of you. and you have to be prepared for the possibility that compromise might be impossible.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)

Ah, yes, well I didn't make it clear because I was seeing red earlier (and also I didn't have all of the facts, but have gleaned the following information in subsequent conversations): I would absolutely be REQUIRED to attend every religious service these people go to while I am around them, and were we to marry, I would be REQUIRED to convert and to raise any potential offspring Baptist. According to him, if I was an atheist, it would be a deal breaker. Hrm.

Yeah, tell him he can go to the church social and pick up a new girl there, then.

Alan Conceicao (Alan Conceicao), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:34 (nineteen years ago)

(sorry, channeling Dan Savage for a minute there)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:34 (nineteen years ago)

mmmm heathen pussy

hot atheist guy (Oops), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:37 (nineteen years ago)

I would just be worried about the Baptist thing. In America, they are the most actively recruiting of the evangelical protestants, the most politically vocal, and often the weirdest (penecostals excepted). Most of the big southern mega-churches are Baptist. If he was a Methodist or something, I wouldn't be concerned.

andy --, Friday, 10 February 2006 23:37 (nineteen years ago)

All the mainstream Protestants are weird, Anglicans excepted. Church of Christ, Pentecostal, Baptist, Methodist - they're all wacky in their own way. (Or maybe it's only southern white Methodist churches that lean heavily conservative evangelical.)

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:39 (nineteen years ago)

(xpost)So you wouldn't be worried about the conversion thing? Or the raise the children religious thing? Or the forced to go to church thing? Just the Baptist thing?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:41 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, just the baptist thing.

andy --, Friday, 10 February 2006 23:44 (nineteen years ago)

This new information completely makes me change my mind; I wouldn't even go visit the family if I was in this situation.

(xpost: The Baptist thing is the big red flag in my mind; that is a flavor of Protestantism that I fundamentally disagree with. If it was Episcopalian or Unitarian I wouldn't have an issue.)

Dan (Oh Fuck That) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:48 (nineteen years ago)

"All mainstream Protestants are weird" -- how are you defining "mainstream" here? If you mean theologically mainstream, then you're just wrong: Lutherans and Presbyterians and such strike me as prety non-weird. And lots and lots of Baptists are unweird, man.

Loggedout: well then I take all that back -- if they're making clear that this is a requirement, then forget it. One good start might be to say that you'd like to visit, and you'd even be happy to be a guest at their services -- but guests are invited, not compelled, and you won't go anywhere with those kinds of requirements. Yeah, yeah, if this is a thing, and not just a "don't want to go to church" thing, you've got every reason to kick back at the whole thing.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:48 (nineteen years ago)

I mean weird in the sense Andy's talking about - politics, morality, judgement. And mainstream in the sense that I can't throw a Molotov cocktail without hitting one of their churches (ooof, too early for church-fire jokes, I suppose).

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:51 (nineteen years ago)

xxpost, why gareth?

oh, he wants her to become christian, and the family wont be happy if not either. he needs a christian wife, and kind of needs to find out if this is going to happen soonish, so hes not wasting his time

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:53 (nineteen years ago)

(xpost- Actually alot of black Christian churches are Baptist and Penecostals - but didn't we have a thread along time ago about the white liberals who despise white evangelicals but respectfully refer to black evangelicals as 'people of faith'?)

andy --, Friday, 10 February 2006 23:55 (nineteen years ago)

there are reasonable moderates and crazy hardcores in every protestant denomination. don't base your decision on the denomination.

but yes, this changes everything. If he can't respect your beliefs, what's the point? I'd make sure that he really means what he's saying, and understands that you're not willing to change. If he still feels the way he does, drop him. It's really not worth the effort and inevitable fighting/pain.

jackl (jackl), Saturday, 11 February 2006 00:20 (nineteen years ago)

Part of the question here is whether he shares his parents' religious views, or whether he just hasn't asserted himself in this regard. It's not entirely clear from what you've written. If he is that religious, then it seems pretty obvious that the relationship is going to dead-end sooner or later.

I'm curious what would happen if you threw back that you would expect to raise any children Catholic, and not Baptist.

Mitya (mitya), Saturday, 11 February 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

I would go along for the experience. Why not? And if this guy loves you, and you love him, what's the problem?

Also, a true atheist is comfortable with a believer of any denomination, surely (or perhaps you disagree, I can't say I've thought this through very hard)? Because an atheist has no religious article of faith, she has no religious position to defend. Let people believe what they want! But if they start stepping on your toes, telling you you have to believe this or that, leave them alone.

ratty, Saturday, 11 February 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

125xpost

They shouldn't get hung up on whether you're religious, and you shouldn't be bothered by their religion. Religion is a personal thing, right? But it's early on in the relationship and first impressions and all .. so after you get to know each other you can be more assertive about your religious preferences.

But right now they may or may not be alright with someone who isn't religious. And sounds like you're not cool with someone who pushes their religion - but you be the bigger person here and just roll with it. It'll work out eventually. Don't let this get in the way.

Dave will do (dave225.3), Saturday, 11 February 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)

Because an atheist has no religious article of faith, she has no religious position to defend.
Not so much.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Saturday, 11 February 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

"All mainstream Protestants are weird" -- how are you defining "mainstream" here? If you mean theologically mainstream, then you're just wrong: Lutherans and Presbyterians and such strike me as prety non-weird. And lots and lots of Baptists are unweird, man.

This is correct -- actually "mainstream" or "mainline" Protestantism is distinct from, and kind of in opposition to, the evangelical tradition. The mainline P denominations include the Methodists, Episcopalians, Lutherans, Presbyterians, and I'm probably missing some but you get the idea. Not to say that individual synods or congregations can't have leanings one way or the other, but generally historically speaking, mainline denominations have picked up the social justice sorts of causes and are usually pretty cool, both theologically and practically.

Sorry! Back to the topic.

Laurel (Laurel), Sunday, 12 February 2006 02:15 (nineteen years ago)

I would absolutely be REQUIRED to attend every religious service these people go to while I am around them, and were we to marry, I would be REQUIRED to convert and to raise any potential offspring Baptist. According to him, if I was an atheist, it would be a deal breaker. Hrm.

yeah, as everyone else has said, this is the kicker. this is where things change.

kingfish has gene rayburn's mic (kingfish 2.0), Sunday, 12 February 2006 03:37 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.