the 'marie antoinette' trailer...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
features 'age of consent' by new order, and the film's title revealed in a never mind the bollocks typeface.

what do we think?


this is sofia coppola's biopic starring kirsten dunst (as marie) and jason schwartzmann (as louis xvi) by the way.

amateurist0, Monday, 13 February 2006 01:58 (nineteen years ago)

There better be a scene half way through where all the action stops and Kirsten and Jason confront each other over a table and say:

"I don't believe in reincarnation because I don't believe I can come back as a bug or a rabbit."

"You know, you're a real up person."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 13 February 2006 02:04 (nineteen years ago)

This is the thread where we anticipate Jason Schwartzman as Louis XVI

Yawn (Wintermute), Monday, 13 February 2006 02:05 (nineteen years ago)

It looks much better than I expected, but without any kind of dialogue or hint of what the story will be, I dunno.

Note the one super-generic indie shot you see in the trailer - a slow dolly back isolating Dunst against Versailles. Yuck yuck yuck. Garden State and Wes Anderson have ruined that move forever.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Monday, 13 February 2006 02:25 (nineteen years ago)

It certainly looks visually gorgeous.

chap who would dare to be slightly tipsy on the internet (chap), Monday, 13 February 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)

a slow dolly back

looked like a zoom to me.

amateurist0, Monday, 13 February 2006 02:56 (nineteen years ago)

It's been a week since I watched the trailer, you're probably/surely right.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Monday, 13 February 2006 04:11 (nineteen years ago)

i miss trailer dude's voiceover "In a world where Marie had everything......."

harry holt, Monday, 13 February 2006 04:16 (nineteen years ago)

(re slow zoom out:) i think that trick comes from her dad and his generation (the graduate, the conversation, etc.) as much as any recent films. i guess its ability to have an emotional effect depends on the larger context--of the film, that is. how is marie positioned in relation to her environment? does the device develop a larger theme of the film? and then there are just quetions of pacing, developing visual style, etc.

i wonder what she's going for by using this device in the film (if that part of the trailer ends up in the finished film). marie was to the manor born--surely she of all people would have felt at home, not alienated, in its monumental confines?

i'm looking forward to this, whatever my mixed feelings abt ms coppola's two previous films. for some reason the *idea* of this sort of hits the spot--i like that she's doing a period drama, and one about 18th-c. france in particular.

it definitely seems a "risk," but not in the vaguely moral sense implied by the entertainment news ("will the creditors stand for this?" "will she alienate the Academy?" "will this upset some middle-american straw men?"). just the basic artistic risk of taking on material that's been taken on many times before, but in a very new context.

amateurist0, Monday, 13 February 2006 05:06 (nineteen years ago)

that's... really... wierd...

What if that were a fake trailer for a completely different movie with all the same people?

ANTICIPATING!

Jimmy Mod (I myself am lethal at 100 -110dB) (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Monday, 13 February 2006 05:07 (nineteen years ago)

And that's def. a zoom, not a dolly. cf. Robert Altman

Jimmy Mod (I myself am lethal at 100 -110dB) (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Monday, 13 February 2006 05:08 (nineteen years ago)

Also, Sophia's signature has come to be the blue morning light shot...

Jimmy Mod (I myself am lethal at 100 -110dB) (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Monday, 13 February 2006 05:08 (nineteen years ago)

i'm really looking forward to this

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 13 February 2006 05:55 (nineteen years ago)

"marie was to the manor born--surely she of all people would have felt at home, not alienated, in its monumental confines?"

She often found herself left out in the cold at Versailles as she wasn't really a part of the elaborate rituals that revolved around her husband. In order to enjoy herself a little more she had a small model village built in the grounds, where she would hang out with all her friends and get away from it all.

It was her rejection by the court and ensuing boredom that led to her going out boozing, dining and gambling around Paris, something that turned much of the French population against her and led to her getting the chop post-revolution.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Monday, 13 February 2006 09:48 (nineteen years ago)

hm... sort of an eleanor roosevelt thing then.

i think a bigger reason she got the chop was because she was queen and they didn't want a figurehead for the counterrevolution out and about.

amateurist0, Monday, 13 February 2006 16:30 (nineteen years ago)

To clarify, I wasn't suggesting that she learned it from Anderson/Garden State, only that it's been ruined for me.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Monday, 13 February 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)

LET THEM EAT http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/content/images/2005_0340.JPG

mark s (mark s), Monday, 13 February 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

she should intone the line "let them eat...cake" in the same fashion as dracula's "i only drink...wine"

amateurist0, Monday, 13 February 2006 23:51 (nineteen years ago)

its 'i dont drink... wine' - why the fuck would dracula say he only drinks wine????

,,, Monday, 13 February 2006 23:54 (nineteen years ago)

hahaha!

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 13 February 2006 23:57 (nineteen years ago)

"And I know the peasants were all depressed- "
"I think you mean 'oppressed'."
"Whatever. They were cranky."So they're, like, 'Let's lose some heads'. Uhhh! That's fair. And, and Marie Antoinette cared about them. She was gonna let them have cake!"

Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 00:36 (nineteen years ago)

actually i guess it's "NEVER drink...wine"

but whatever

i've been pwned

amateurist0, Tuesday, 14 February 2006 00:43 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
I had zero interest in this project before seeing the trailer but now I really want to see it. It looks gorgeous and Kirsten Dunst has never looked better.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Friday, 31 March 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
French trailer with dialogue (in English)

http://www.allocine.fr/webtv/acvision.asp?nopub=1&cvid=18603777&emission=&player=QT&debit=HD

milo z (mlp), Monday, 15 May 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)

Those kids and their Ceremony...

Jimmy Mod is a super idol of The MARS SPIRIT (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Monday, 15 May 2006 22:45 (nineteen years ago)

Bourbon family still all cunts shockah.

Hilariously executed cunts.

Action Time Version (noodle vague), Monday, 15 May 2006 22:52 (nineteen years ago)

"I just saw Sofia Coppola's Marie-Antoinette," says a French film critic whose name I should probably keep under wraps. "Empty shell, boring as hell. Don't know if the Cannes jury is gonna buy it, but the average moviegoer will suffer deeply watching gilded 18th-Century types people get bored, eat, drink, and get bored again. Movies about boredom and filling spaces are tricky to film. Coppola did it right with Lost in Translation, but this time she fails completely, in my opinion. You were right about the parallel between Marie Antoinette and the Paris Hilton crowd . It's here. The rock soundtrack works in the beginning, but quickly turns into a gimmick that doesn't hold for two hours."

milo z (mlp), Monday, 15 May 2006 23:32 (nineteen years ago)

I'm hyped! It might be like... last days of disco.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 15 May 2006 23:34 (nineteen years ago)

Why "Ceremony" for the French and "Age of Consent" for the Americans? I wonder...

sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Monday, 15 May 2006 23:42 (nineteen years ago)

passion

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 15 May 2006 23:44 (nineteen years ago)


"Coppola did it right with Lost in Translation..."

Well, those who disagree can hope, then.

Sofia interview:

http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/6749567.html#cutid1

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 15:43 (nineteen years ago)

...and apparently the music is part of a full-on Alex Cox (or Derek Jarman?)-style conceit, "totally a punk rock period drama." (dread creeping in)

http://pitchforkmedia.com/news/06-05/18.shtml#shieldsbowwowwow

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 19 May 2006 19:41 (nineteen years ago)

I'm hyped! It might be like... last days of disco.

OMG my head just exploded considering this...

Jimmy Mod is a super idol of The MARS SPIRIT (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Friday, 19 May 2006 19:49 (nineteen years ago)

"They actually based Marie Antoinette, from a styling point of view, on [Bow Wow Wow singer] Annabella Lwin," explained the band's manager, Nicole Powers. "They drew parallels from the fact that they were both young girls who found fame and fortune at a ridiculously early age."

milo z (mlp), Friday, 19 May 2006 19:50 (nineteen years ago)

Goddamn Last Days of Disco had a great trailer...

Jimmy Mod is a super idol of The MARS SPIRIT (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Friday, 19 May 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)

mediocre disco-era period pieces always have great trailers (see also "summer of sam")

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 19 May 2006 20:02 (nineteen years ago)

Last Days of Disco is a real good film. (I dislike disco.)

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 19 May 2006 20:04 (nineteen years ago)

It's a shame this looks kind of rubbish because I do like the idea of it. The dialogue in the French trailer looks awful. It seems like they're having some people do over-the-top French accents and some keeping their American accents, which is kind of distracting.

Cathy (Cathy), Friday, 19 May 2006 20:07 (nineteen years ago)

And a few English accents thrown in for good measure.

Cathy (Cathy), Friday, 19 May 2006 20:08 (nineteen years ago)

four months pass...
I saw this tonight at the Variety screening/Q&A at the Arclight. Still trying to process what I saw...

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 28 September 2006 06:11 (nineteen years ago)

It's visually stunning, but tempered by lots of back zooming as described above. Not surprisingly, it'll have a lock on a costuming Oscar and probably a nod for cinematography.

On the other hand... It spectacularly jump the tracks at the two-thirds mark, fast-forwarding through to the end without much of a conclusion. I get the feeling that the Jaime Reid typography and the Gang Of Four opening are only there because Coppola thought they were cool, not as any tangible thread to draw together the disparate elements of political/class disconnection which are scattered about. The Paris Hilton connection noted above is glaringly obvious, but there's no follow through. At the 90 minute mark, I was thinking "could we FINALLY have some angry mobs?"

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 28 September 2006 06:32 (nineteen years ago)

The soundtrack was very well matched and not intrusive at all... Fave part was a ginormous masquerade ball set to "Hong Kong Garden."

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 28 September 2006 06:34 (nineteen years ago)

this sounds like the worst movie ever made! but an interesting tranwreck...

service comedy (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 28 September 2006 06:35 (nineteen years ago)

It's not the worst movie made, but I can't figure out why it exists? Why this story? Why now? WTF?

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 28 September 2006 06:45 (nineteen years ago)

Hold on - hasn't this come out in the US yet?

Baaderonixx in the year of the locusts (baaderonixx), Thursday, 28 September 2006 07:04 (nineteen years ago)

the ads and posters are some of the more exciting visuals, for a bunch of reasons, ive seen this year (the punk aesthetic against the colouring, the ugliness against the prettiness, the layers of artifice, the subtle noting of the new wave soundtrack)

b/w that adn the trailer, might be worth my 7 bucks

and it exists cause we are in the middle of a royal resurgance (and that stupid bio)

and its about her realtionship with her father, apparently

anthony easton (anthony), Thursday, 28 September 2006 07:05 (nineteen years ago)

i feel oddly protective of this movie. maybe it's the negative hype it's been getting, but i really like the basic concept and i like the idea of a movie that's about the french revolution without actually really depicting it. i suspect there's a strong possibility that it'll be awful, but i'm really looking forward to it at the same time.

has anyone read the antonia fraser book?

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 28 September 2006 07:17 (nineteen years ago)

sofia should've filmed fraser's "cromwell: our chief of men" starring john lydon as cromwell and malcolm mclaren as charles I.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 28 September 2006 07:17 (nineteen years ago)

i can't believe these fuckers have the nerve to put "ceremony" in their movie trailers. wes anderson tried it too, with life aquatic. fucking hell, there is no movie that is even worthy of being the trailer for that song, it's so epic.

what would be funny is if the movie has a scene with marie saying "let them eat cake!" and a cake song starts playing. or if they subtitle it "a knight's tale 2: period drama with modern soundtrack."

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Thursday, 28 September 2006 07:38 (nineteen years ago)

xpost: Ah, Arclight is in Hollywood, right?

Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Thursday, 28 September 2006 08:43 (nineteen years ago)

schwartzman was a casting coup!

(hence the French "don't-touch-the-revolution" hate reaction etc etc).
― Marco Damiani, Tuesday, May 11, 2010 9:13 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark

some french, but cahiers et al really liked it.

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

the whole "natural's not in it" thing is like half an interesting idea (if quite on-the-nose). proudly wearing artifice on its sleeve and all that. but that's pretty much as far as the idea goes, aside from a general (and vague) rhyme between artifice and the "artificial" world of the versailles court.

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

i mean i hate to get all canonical and shit but visconti did this a long time ago, like 10,000x better. even in "ludwig."

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

do people even remember visconti anymore? i mean aside from "the leopard" which everybody knows.

i mean if you were ever mystified by the way the french toss about that term "mise-en-scène," just find an opportunity to see "senso" on the big screen. hay-yo.

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

Most of his films are rather awful (The Leopard and bits of Rocco and Senso excepted).

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

"most"? the only ones i'm not fond of are the strange, the damned, and death in venice (which were all made in a short period, ironically at the height of his international profile).

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

the strangeR

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

honestly though most of your posts seem either pretentious or callow so i'm not taking your opinion too srsly.

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.goodlightscraps.com/content/hugs/hugs-15.jpg, etc.

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.skeetermonkey.com/images/skeeter-attitude-1.jpg

sir gaga (s1ocki), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/.a/6a00d83451583769e201116893a7ad970c-800wi

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

I have no problem with seeming callow when discussing pretentious swill like The Damned and Death in Venice.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

i liek this movee

plax (ico), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

I bought this for £2 when Zavvi were selling off all their stock earlier this year, but haven't got around to watching it yet. Maybe that sums it up for me.

BLOODY BOLLOCKS HELL! (aldo), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

sinker repped for it in his films of the year for sight and sound if that = strong partisan.

― toastmodernist, Tuesday, May 11, 2010 3:15 PM (7 hours ago) Bookmark

... and pirates of the caribbean 2 iirc!

i think this movie is ok... kirsten dunst is easy to watch. don't think i'd bother with it a second time or anything.

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

easy to watch, hard to listen to.

tylerw, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

schwarzmann the best thing in it by far. have yet to see him in something where he wasn't enjoyable, he makes whatever shitty thing he's in better.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

Funny People, for ex.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

wait, we're still talking about the trailer, right?

sir gaga (s1ocki), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

Wow, Shakey. Our opinions are 180 degrees apart: I find him insufferable, and he's a drag in whatever he's in -- except here! His petulance is used to shrewd effect.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 23:05 (fifteen years ago)

even the Fantastic Mr. Fox?

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 23:08 (fifteen years ago)

mark sinker's public tastes in film have a touch of chuck klosterman. sort of wilfully cheeky and aggressively idiosyncratic. i think mark is brilliant, though, unlike klosterman.

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 23:27 (fifteen years ago)

the orthography of "fantastic mr. fox" is extremely pleasing.

http://www.downoncemore.com/image_samples/fantastic_mr_fox_title.jpg

i mean, isn't that nice? it just looks nice, sounds nice.

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 23:29 (fifteen years ago)

let's try that again

http://www.webwombat.com.au/entertainment/movies/images/trailer-fantastic-mr-fox.jpg

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 23:30 (fifteen years ago)

"i mean i hate to get all canonical and shit but visconti did this a long time ago, like 10,000x better. even in ludwig".

I think Coppola and Visconti have very different approaches: at least to me, Marie-Antoinette is like a totally American teen movie accidentally shot in Versailles. And I mean this in a good way!

And talking about Visconti, why none ever talks about Ossessione, by far his best film (ok, maybe with Senso)? :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rj5_n3EHOwU

Marco Damiani, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 09:53 (fifteen years ago)

it's like a totally plotless american teen movie consisting of a series of tableaux and montage sequences, no? that's not a criticism, but if it can be likened to a "teen movie," one have to admit it approaches the category sideways...

by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 10:07 (fifteen years ago)

"it's like a totally plotless american teen movie consisting of a series of tableaux and montage sequences, no?"

Definitely: it is somehow aimless and there's no real narrative core, but in some way this mirrors the actual feeling of being young, carefree, even a little dumb. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think Coppola tells about Versailles thinking of Hollywood spoilt children.

Marco Damiani, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 10:33 (fifteen years ago)

teen movie without any funny dialogue?

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 10:42 (fifteen years ago)

Definitely: it is somehow aimless and there's no real narrative core, but in some way this mirrors the actual feeling of being young, carefree, even a little dumb. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think Coppola tells about Versailles thinking of Hollywood spoilt children.

I don't know about any of your experiences with 'teen movies' but all of the ones I have watched have an intensely strong narrative core – but a hackneyed one. I can't actually name any teen movies (err, since the breakfast club) that consist of a series of tableaux and montage sequences that aim to mirror the experience of being young and carefree.

ampersand (remy bean), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 10:42 (fifteen years ago)

Marie Antoinette is totally aimless and lacking most any narrative, sure, but that is pointedly not a condition of any teen movie i have ever seen

ampersand (remy bean), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 10:43 (fifteen years ago)

"I can't actually name any teen movies (err, since the breakfast club) that consist of a series of tableaux and montage sequences that aim to mirror the experience of being young and carefree"

Marie-Antoinette is exactly this movie: far from perfect, but personal and that's what I like about it.

Marco Damiani, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 10:49 (fifteen years ago)

Marie Antoinette is totally aimless and lacking most any narrative, sure, but that is pointedly not a condition of any teen movie i have ever seen

― ampersand (remy bean), Wednesday, May 12, 2010 5:43 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark

right, that was my point.

by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

i was agreeing with you, sir

ampersand (remy bean), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

well, then, i raise my glass to you!

by another name (amateurist), Thursday, 13 May 2010 03:59 (fifteen years ago)

im so happy

split bieber (s1ocki), Thursday, 13 May 2010 04:32 (fifteen years ago)

if only robespierre et al were this conciliatory

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 13 May 2010 07:49 (fifteen years ago)

Like The Dammed, with all its pretensions!

One of ilx crew's best habits is to keep in mind films/music/bks that everyone else has forgotten or passed anyone else by!

More good than ill in this 'fashion designer's' film. If you compare to things like A single Man, for example. But both I wouldn't mind catching on the film screen, then forget about it to then be reminded of its existence on ilx many months later.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 13 May 2010 09:18 (fifteen years ago)

or years later as the case may be!

by another name (amateurist), Thursday, 13 May 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

five months pass...

I'm just rewatching this right now... it somehow seems even more naive than when I first saw it.
It completely changes history as though the values of the upper-middle class that supplanted the upper class in the 19th and 20th centuries -were- the original values of the upper class, doesn't it? So confusing...

jeevves, Wednesday, 13 October 2010 03:40 (fifteen years ago)

u gotta admit it's a great trailer tho

ilxinho (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 13 October 2010 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

seven years pass...

so, so ahead of its time. would be a hit today. common critique i remember "she didn't get the history right!" is so stupid. the death of stalin came out at exactly the right time.

flappy bird, Sunday, 5 August 2018 05:00 (seven years ago)

Watched it for the first time the other week. I remember seeing the trailer when it came out (I guess I would’ve been about 20) and mentally marking it as something to avoid, knee jerk reaction to a kind of cute My Mix Tape Movie! sorta thing. Appreciated the angle she was going for now that I’m some years removed. It was good.

circa1916, Sunday, 5 August 2018 05:50 (seven years ago)

I'd like to see a version of this scored with period music. Regardless of SC's intent.

Roomba with an attitude (Sanpaku), Sunday, 5 August 2018 06:16 (seven years ago)

Yeah, curious how or if it would really work that way.

It was nice. Seriously doubt it would be a hit today though. It mostly really made me want to re-watch Barry Lyndon.

circa1916, Sunday, 5 August 2018 06:29 (seven years ago)

well, as much as a hit as the death of stalin. maybe more. it certainly wouldn't get trashed like it did in 2006, and that's obviously far more important to a film's reputation & legacy than its box office numbers.

flappy bird, Sunday, 5 August 2018 06:37 (seven years ago)

Weird timing - I’d never seen this having retrospectively hated LiT and reacting the same way to the trailer. But I picked up the DVD for two bucks at a market to show my daughters for the costumery and the patisserie, basically. I liked it more than I expected, and my sixteen years old said dad I literally want to live in this movie. Which I think is the point - fuck history, how would it feel to go back and live that person’s life as me?

an incoherent crustacean (MatthewK), Sunday, 5 August 2018 06:42 (seven years ago)

Saw this at the cinema aged 18 and definitely wanted to live in it (I went and bought loads of velvet-embossed stationery immediately afterwards and started listening to New Order all the time), then was disappointed when every person I showed it to subsequently found it incredibly boring. I guess it is slightly over-long, but I still find it great fun. Sophia Coppola is a master of disaffected rich youth and I admire that she’s never really deviated from portraying what she intimately knows.

tangenttangent, Sunday, 5 August 2018 09:45 (seven years ago)

i remember liking it. reminded me a little of baz luhrmann's romeo + juliet

marcos, Sunday, 5 August 2018 12:20 (seven years ago)

I kinda love this movie

brimstead, Sunday, 5 August 2018 16:38 (seven years ago)

it was stuck in my mind for days after seeing it. really left an impression.

brimstead, Sunday, 5 August 2018 16:39 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.