Lengthy explanation here.
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Friday, 17 February 2006 01:01 (nineteen years ago)
-- It does not exploit any security holes; rather it uses "social engineering" to get the user to launch it on their system
-- If you're not running as an admin user, it will silently fail to infect most applications
-- It doesn't actually do anything other than attempt to propagate itself via iChat
-- It has a bug in the code that prevents it from working as intended, which has the side-effect of preventing infected applications from launching
-- It's not particularly sophisticated
I'm not exactly shaking in my boots here.
― Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Friday, 17 February 2006 01:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Japanese Cartoon Watcher, Friday, 17 February 2006 01:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Mitya (mitya), Friday, 17 February 2006 03:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Friday, 17 February 2006 03:41 (nineteen years ago)
― pixel farmer (Rock Hardy), Friday, 17 February 2006 03:48 (nineteen years ago)
I'd just like to point out that with a firewall and minimal/no virus updating I've avoided virii for pretty much my whole PC life. Its just a matter of damn common sense, what programs you use and how you configure and use them. People who randomly click links, open attachments, surf shitty porn or warez pages or use Outlook, are asking for it really.
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 17 February 2006 04:06 (nineteen years ago)
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Friday, 17 February 2006 04:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Friday, 17 February 2006 04:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Friday, 17 February 2006 04:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 17 February 2006 04:52 (nineteen years ago)
or internet explorer! or install plugins to view porn....
also:
In the English language, the standard plural of virus is viruses. This is the most frequently occurring form of the plural, both when referring to a biological virus and when referring to a computer virus.The less frequent variations viri and virii are virtually unknown in edited prose, and no major dictionary recognizes them as alternative forms. Their occurrence can be variously attributed to hypercorrection formed by analogy to Latin plurals such as radii; idiosyncratic use as jargon among a group, such as computer hackers; the incorrect assumption that the word is of Greek origin, requiring an -i plural; and deliberate word play, such as on BBSs (see, e.g.: leet).
The less frequent variations viri and virii are virtually unknown in edited prose, and no major dictionary recognizes them as alternative forms. Their occurrence can be variously attributed to hypercorrection formed by analogy to Latin plurals such as radii; idiosyncratic use as jargon among a group, such as computer hackers; the incorrect assumption that the word is of Greek origin, requiring an -i plural; and deliberate word play, such as on BBSs (see, e.g.: leet).
― A BOLD QUAHOG (ex machina), Friday, 17 February 2006 04:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Friday, 17 February 2006 08:26 (nineteen years ago)
I know I'm not supposed to use those programs but I'm too lazy to find alternatives when those work fine. I tried Mozilla once but it was SLLOOOOOOOWWW. That was on my old PC though, probably works fine on our current one.
― Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Friday, 17 February 2006 10:23 (nineteen years ago)
― tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Friday, 17 February 2006 11:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Loose Translation, Friday, 17 February 2006 16:27 (nineteen years ago)
― A BOLD QUAHOG (ex machina), Friday, 17 February 2006 16:34 (nineteen years ago)
er, only insofar as "why would anyone write a virus for the mac given that its user base is so small?" it seems a truism that, if/as market share increases, there'll be more people trying to write malware etc. the fact we're not all rife with it suggests that, y'know, OS X is pretty secure.
it seems this trojan claims to be a JPEG ... which then asks you for yr password when you double-click on it! now, come on. you'd have to be pretty damn dense not to realise something was up. TBH, i'd hope anyone stupid enough to fall for that wouldn't have an admin password anyway ;)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 17 February 2006 16:38 (nineteen years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 17 February 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)
xpost
― Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Friday, 17 February 2006 16:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 23 February 2006 09:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Thursday, 23 February 2006 12:27 (nineteen years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 23 February 2006 12:29 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2008/01/16/mac_malware_concern/
the register always runs this boilerplate every time somebody comes out with some lame trojan that targets macs. eh
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 17 January 2008 00:55 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00001388.html
ok lol
― El Tomboto, Friday, 29 February 2008 03:57 (seventeen years ago)
I called Apple and spoke with a couple of their reps. ... The reps were incredulous about the existence of malware specifically targeting Macs. They looked up articles about it while we were on the phone — they wouldn't believe me until they looked it up for themselves.