UK Law - Can your employer stop you from going home sick?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I only ask as this happened to me on Saturday. I've had a heavy head cold for more than a week, it's lingered on because I've not really had a rest. Work demanded that I come back from my sick leave on Thursday so I worked Thurs and Fri and Sat, knowing full well that I was very ill. My work had also placed me on a disciplinary for my sick absence, mostly caused by ongoing kidney stones which work is fully aware of.

So come Saturday, I was still feeling really ill and it was starting to affect my work. I went to my team leader and said "I need to go home sick". They said "Unless you need hosipitalisation, or have a doctor's appointment, you're not going home sick, and you'll only be allowed time for your doctor's appointment". After ringing my wife who was trying to get me into to see a doctor, my wife and I decided it wasn't worth the hassle and I handed in my immediate resignation (something that was going to happen in a few months time anyway once my wife returns to work after our baby is born).

But what I want to know is this - were my ex-employers acting unlawfully? Can they stop me taking sick leave if I want to take it? Opinions please.

Rob M (Rob M), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:17 (nineteen years ago)

Fuck man, that's really harsh. Employment law isn't really something I know anything about, but I can't imagine that what they did was lawful. It's not even in their best interests (I mean it made you resign for fuck's sake, that's going to cost them both time and money to recruit a replacement presumably) - it sounds like stupid, short-sighted management.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:20 (nineteen years ago)

my opinion is that it sounds ridiculous and I can't believe it is legal, really

crosspost

RJG (RJG), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:21 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think it is legal, but I've not got any legal qualifications.

Boris and the Johnsons (kate), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:21 (nineteen years ago)

you should have vomited on his clothes :-(

clodia pulchra (emo by proxy), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:24 (nineteen years ago)

I doubt if it is legal. There's no way as far as I know that a company can stop an employee going home sick. Actually, I've got a legal and ethics lecture this afternoon, I'll ask my lecturer. (You can tell I'm not thinking right as I've only just realised this now, two hours into being in college).

Vomiting on my bosses clothes? No, but I did hand my resignation to a previous team leader who was a right bitch to me for about a year, and when she said "It's been a pleasure working with you" I had to say "Well the reverse doesn't apply".

Rob M (Rob M), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:26 (nineteen years ago)

Fucking hell - you could probably sue them for constructive dismissal.

Archel (Archel), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:26 (nineteen years ago)

This sounds like a contravention of the Human Rights Act, nevermind Employment Law.

tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:30 (nineteen years ago)

What do you do? Whatever it is, their behaviour isn't legal, and they've binned you off thinking you won't do anything to them because you either don't know how or aren't smart enough to work out what 'constructive dismissal' is.

If you worked with food or in some other setting where fluey employees might affect the company's product, phone your city/council health department and detail all the health and safety violations you can think of pertaining to that place of business.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:30 (nineteen years ago)

I can't find anything on employment law websites about preventing an employee going home sick, mainly I guess because it never happens except if your employers are ARSEHOLES, as yours seem to be. Of course they can't prevent you physically from leaving the building, so if you had just gone home and then waited to see if they fired you, then you might have a clearer case for legal action against them.

I'm not sure they were legal in demanding that you returned from sick leave in the first place - thye are allowed to ask for a doctor's certificate but not to force you to come back, I don't think.

Archel (Archel), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:40 (nineteen years ago)

Rob, before you do anything get yourself to a doctor to get a sick note. Likely to be essential if you're going to claim unfair dismissal etc

Though, those with deeper knowledge of employment law could probably advise better.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:44 (nineteen years ago)

He has a clear case whether he offers a resignation or not; the manager has made it impossible to carry on working. Go to the doctor IMMEDIATELY today and get the sickie anyway.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:49 (nineteen years ago)

I'm with Billy. Get thee to a doctor, then to bed, then to a Citizen's Advice Bureau.

Mike W (caek), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:50 (nineteen years ago)

Out of interest, what kind of employer / job was it?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 20 February 2006 11:52 (nineteen years ago)

It was a call centre - taking outsourced customer service calls for Vodafone. The company probably won't care as there is a constant stream of new starters coming through who are invariably badly trained and last less than 3 months, as opposed to me who's been there for 4 years (admittedly not all doing Vodafone stuff).

I am going to the doctor's tomorrow and I am also seeing a consultant privately regarding the continuing kidney stones on Wednesday. These appointments were set up anyway before I did the deed on Saturday. I may not end up claiming unfair dismissal, I would rather never see anyone from that rotten company ever again.

Rob M (Rob M), Monday, 20 February 2006 12:57 (nineteen years ago)

You don't have to get your job back after winning a case.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 20 February 2006 13:02 (nineteen years ago)

I wouldn't go back if they paid me. I'll look into it but at the moment my main priorities are (a) getting myself healthy and (b) looking after my wife who'll be starting her maternity in 7 weeks.

Rob M (Rob M), Monday, 20 February 2006 13:05 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not sure they were legal in demanding that you returned from sick leave in the first place - thye are allowed to ask for a doctor's certificate but not to force you to come back, I don't think.

The last time my job were being arseholes in a similar way, they tried to phone me to tell me not to come back to work on a Sunday - Sundays being higher paid, and obviously it'd be suspicious if I just happened to be well enough again the day I could earn time-and-a-half, or something, after only having one day off anyway. Bunch of cunts.

Anyway: my sister who is Good With This Sort Of Thing was fairly adamant that once you've phoned in and confirmed with them that you're off sick, they're not actually within their rights to contact you about it at all. As far as my work goes, they can ask you to phone in yourself every day you're off or provide a doctor's note after five days, and refuse you sick pay if you don't, but they can't contact you to demand you come back.

Michael A Neuman (Ferg), Monday, 20 February 2006 13:27 (nineteen years ago)

No, you wouldn't go back if they paid you. They could, however, pay you not to come back, which I'm sure you would enjoy. My upstairs neighbour is an attorney and he got unfairly dismissed from his last job, so totally went for wiping the floor with his employers and won. He had already landed a better job by the time his relationship with the employer broke down, so

suzy (suzy), Monday, 20 February 2006 13:32 (nineteen years ago)

(aside) I rang work to say I had to stay at home and look after my ill daughter this morning and the reply was, believe it or not, "as you wish".

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Monday, 20 February 2006 14:13 (nineteen years ago)

was it said in a Darth Vader voice?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 20 February 2006 14:16 (nineteen years ago)

I'm kind of betting here that call centres aren't unionised?

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 20 February 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

You're right Dave B, there is no union joining encouraged, though some of the staff were trying to get into the Communication Workers Union, but it never happened.

Rob M (Rob M), Monday, 20 February 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

When they told you to come back to work you should have just said 'I would prefer not to'. Though maybe that only works in fiction.

Archel (Archel), Monday, 20 February 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

i think there must be some kind of call center management mentality that employees just do not matter at all. i used to work at one and, although they gave us sick time, you were penalized for using it. so, say you call in sick one day. you get an "occurrence". you can stay out 2 days with 1 occurrence, but after that they require a doctor's note. if you came back to work because you didn't have the doctor's note yet or something, felt bad, and had to leave mid shift, you'd be given another half an occurrence. bottom line was, they couldn't officially fire you for "being sick" but they could fire you for "too many occurrences" (you could also be given an occurrence for being late 3 min past your start time or clocking out before the end of your shift (even 5 seconds!)). this is not a standard u.s. employer's set of rules, just a set for a really evil corporation.

note - when they tried to screw me out of an annual raise after an excellent review, i handed in my resignation and ended up getting paid to not come to work for the 2 weeks, so maybe if you push the "you can't stop me from going home sick" card, you could get paid to not work, too! and i completely understand your desire to never set foot in that building again. i say good for you!! and good luck!

tehresa (tehresa), Monday, 20 February 2006 15:42 (nineteen years ago)

In France, if you call in ill, you have to see the doctor and get a note, even if it's just for one day. Of course, usually when you're ill, it's not worth seeing the doctor about cause it clears up of its own accord, but that's the law. But you go anyway, and they give you drugs. Their health service can somehow cope with this.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 20 February 2006 15:45 (nineteen years ago)

Suzy OTM throughout. Stomp all over the fuckers - what they have done is in clear breach of employment law.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 20 February 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

and human decency

Ed (dali), Monday, 20 February 2006 15:56 (nineteen years ago)

Conduit (oops, said their name, oh well...) worked to a similar scheme as Tehresa above - for each sick 'occurence' you lost 20% of your hard earned bonus, the bonus criterea changing every month and getting more and more ridiculous every time (the opening script was changed three times in one month, leading to almost everyone losing their bonus that month - we had to ask the customer's name and how we could help them before taking any customer acct nums or doing any DPA checks - what sort of arse over tit thinking is THAT?). They couldn't say I was a bad worker as I had hit my bonus targets three months in a row, just I ended up with no bonus as I was sick all the time.

Also dreadful sick pay - 14 days a year, adding a week for each year of service but it was a 'rolling' period, so if I'd had 28 days sick in a year (and I had, trust me, I had), in the new sick year I would still not got any sick until those 28 sick days were a year behind me.

The more I think about it, the better I feel about throwing in the towel there. I may go along to the CAB this week and see what they say - my lecturer typically was off sick (!) I'll let you know progress next Monday when I'm back in college and have net access. In the meantime, thanks for the advice one and all.

Rob M (Rob M), Monday, 20 February 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)

Rob, maybe a nice moderator will tweak your comany's name and de-index this thread.

I would say it is better to skip past the CAB straight to a lawyer, it will save time, as they will just point you to a legal body anyway.

If call centres were run along basic tenets of human decency we wouldn't have threads about their shitty employment practices, or Jon Ronson articles, or undercover telly exposes about how awful it is to work there. That said, because these places are widely regarded as high-turnover sweatshops where the workers are easily replaced, the efficacy of the service iself is subjected to diminishing returns as far as the wider public is concerned. Ultimately, the companies will suffer at shareholder level eventually because of these practices. The law will be on your side and you will look good as a man who has worked in these conditions for 4 years (kidney stones! it's such a perfect stress illness your lawyer will probably spontaneously sproik! himself) and really didn't want to change jobs what with a mouth to feed, and was happy to comply with doctors' notes and all that folderol. I mean this might be my inner editor talkin' but seriously, what newspaper do you want to be in?

Go to disclaw.co.uk for some info and a guide to getting a solicitor in your area. Here's some of their stuff.

CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL:
A useful summary of the position was provided by the EAT in a 2003 case in which the judge said that "In relation to constructive dismissal, in broad terms, there have to be four elements. There has to be a breach of contract by the employer which can be either an actual breach or an anticipatory breach, and the breach must be sufficiently important to justify the employee resigning; or it can be one of the last of a series of incidents which justifies leaving. The two other conditions normally are that the employee must leave in response to the breach and not for some other unconnected reason, and, finally, the employee must not take too long about it" (France v Westminster City Council, EAT on 9th May 2003).

Repudiation of contract: EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT 1996 ss.95 and 136

BASIC POSITION
An employer or employee who commits a breach of a fundamental term of the employment contract which is so serious that it goes to the very root or heart of the contract is said to "repudiate" the contract. The other party is then entitled (at his option) to treat the contract as at an end.

If it is the employer who is in serious breach of contract the (ex-)employee will be able to claim compensation for unfair dismissal and/or damages for wrongful dismissal .

The (ex-)employee will also be automatically released from all primary contractual obligations to the employer. Traditionally this was assumed to include automatic release from all restrictive covenants but the Court of Appeal has ruled that this is too simplistic an approach.

There is all kinds of info about the money but don't let's sit here Walter Mittying about settlements, get to work.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 20 February 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)

(I think when he noticed, he still had the ability to remove it)

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 20 February 2006 16:51 (nineteen years ago)

Great thread! Seriously, you need to worry about your rights in this. If you were 'coerced' into quitting, you need to look into what you can do about it...because to the point and simply put, it isnt just and you deserve to pursue it.

I am, ironically, at home today, having called in sick. For me it is stress related, i suppose. I was 'fired' for refusing to work an extra 9 hours on top of the 55 hours/5 days I already worked (this would make it 64 hours a week and six days a week!!!) where as my contract only stipulated I would work 40 hours. My employer seems to lack a heart entirely and the whole job has been nightmare.

So, like you, I am glad to never have to go in again (although I am currently in france where you need to stay at the job for 1 month after you are fired and we are now in week 3. The stress of being treated badly and not knowing what will happen [will they try to say that I did something wrong? How do I combat against any lies from this vantage point and in a country where I am not familiar with the laws?) and would love to avoid the stress of dealing with these people but there is that part of me that wonders what I can do for me. But there are other issues that come up...i think we are reluctant to be the 'victims' and pursue something that seems to put us in that role. Or perhaps that means they have won. Union or no union we do have rights...I am just not sure I have the energy to pursue them right now. But if I or you wait, it wil most likely be too late.

Take care of YOU in this,
Caroline (also known as the goose who recommends things for the gander she cant neccesarily do for herself)

Caroline F, Thursday, 23 February 2006 12:23 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.