Sex While Drunk - Rape vs. Consent

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
There have been discussions here about rape vs. consensual sex, especially within the context of being drunk. Normally, it is recognized that you cannot give informed consent if you are heavilly intoxicated. Once again, however, we see that some myths just won’t die.

There was a rape trial going on in Illinois and one the of the things that makes this one unusual is that the rape was captured on video tape by the shitheads that did it. Normally, you’d think that would make it an open and shut case. Not this time.

This trial has so much stupidity attached to it that I’m not even sure which part is the most ridiculous. Originally, the judge had ordered the victim to watch the tape in court. He finally relented, and never really explained why he originally insisted on it in the first place. Can you imagine having to watch a video of your own rape? Nonetheless, the jury got to see the video over, and over, and over, and over again. In the end, the jury decided the guys were not guilty of rape because of some “movements” she made during the assault.

I’d have to see the video to be fair about this, but I’m inclined to be suspicious that a 16 year old girl is gung-ho about being left passed out with her pants (and only her pants, how romantic, no?) off and obscenities scrawled on her body. Actually, the most romantic part of the ever-so-consensual evening was probably the part where she passed out and they took turns spitting on her. That’s how most young women envision their wedding nights, it’s so sweet and romantic.

Okay, to be fair, romance doesn’t equal consent, but I have to admit, I’m astonished that what sounds strongly like a few drunken gestures made as someone drifts in and out of consciousness could be construed as consent. Even if you could make the nominal case for consent, what kind of fucked up woman-hating piece of shit do you have to be to cling to whatever sliver of an excuse you can find to spit and write obscenities on the passed-out body of a 16 year old girl that you just finished trophy-fucking? But I’m sure these guys were meticulous about getting her consent. Because they sound like the sort who’d care. Really. I’ll bet that her fun, much less consent, was at the top of their list of concerns.

Of course, everyone knows that 16 year old girls just naturally give their consent to be gang fucked while being videotaped, spat on, and having obscenities written all over their bodies, right?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-0603040162mar04,1,1855418.story?coll=chi-news-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true

petlover, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 01:44 (nineteen years ago)

Um, I think we agree with you.

Aimless (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 01:51 (nineteen years ago)

Right.

Then I shoulnd't have made this thread. Got it.

petlover, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 01:53 (nineteen years ago)

Well, we could all file through and ritually shake our fists in anger, but you seem to have said whatever needed to be said.

Aimless (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 01:56 (nineteen years ago)

Um, I don't agree with that.

Aimless (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 01:59 (nineteen years ago)

What's the big deal? People fuck with passed out people all the time.

Jeezuz, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 02:00 (nineteen years ago)

*note to self*

never create threads where you think the big majority most likely will agree with you.

(there goes a certain percentage of all ILE threads)

petlover, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 02:03 (nineteen years ago)

I'm serious. You weren't there and you didn't see the video. Obviously, the people who voted on this matter saw the video and decided SHE was guilty. I can imagine it well enough in my head to agree with them. Getting spit and drawn on does not equal "NO!" Get one good look at internet porn.

Jeezuz, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 03:00 (nineteen years ago)

I just saw an interview on the news with the last kid who was acquitted in this case and his comments included:
* denying that there was a rape involved
* feeling fucking sorry for himself and his "three and a half years of torture" after being "portrayed as a gang rapist"
* basically refusing to admit that he was sorry and would apologize to the girl if given an opportunity
* admitting to the reporter that he believes that his ordeal outweighs the ordeal endured by the girl who was raped
and finally, the real kicker:

"I just want to forget about that night, I want to move on."

MUST BE NICE TO BE ABLE TO FORGET ABOUT THAT NIGHT. Dick.

The Milkmaid (82375538-A) (The Milkmaid), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 03:07 (nineteen years ago)

jurors in being morons non-shockah

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 03:09 (nineteen years ago)

feeling fucking sorry for himself and his "three and a half years of torture" after being "portrayed as a gang rapist"

Can an individual really be a "gang rapist?"

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 03:44 (nineteen years ago)

Does this case thus promote an argument in favour of varying degrees of rape a la murder? I'm not suggesting that these evil bastards should in any way be given room for maneuvre in cases like this but it seems that the way the rules are - black/white, acquit/convict - there is a far higher likelihood of an acquittal than if the jury had other options. I haven't particularly thought this through and it probably is a completely stupid idea but it seems that the extent to which the odds are stacked against the victim in these cases and the difficulty of proving non-consent makes a conviction far more difficult for a jury to reach than it should be.

uptoeleven (uptoeleven), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 03:58 (nineteen years ago)

yes hurting, if one rapes all the members off the Vice Lords.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 05:30 (nineteen years ago)

Is this the old "boys will be boys" argument?

In UK courts, the judge is bound by law to say something on the lines of "women in rape cases sometimes lie under oath", even if the whole thing was on Big Brother style TV coverage etc...

(like, nobody prosecuting might lie, or: defendants in rape cases might lie under oath. Or whatever)

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 11:08 (nineteen years ago)

File On Four last night was pretty depressing about this. I think it's odd that it should be standard practice for women to be cross-examined by the defence FIRST, meaning that the defendant sometimes doesn't even have to appear, if the defence can make something out of 'you were drunk'/'you can't remember if you consented therefore you did'/'you have slept around in the past'. Why is it the victim who often ends up on trial?

Only 6% of rape charges end in conviction. I've got no interest in jailing innocent men, but is it really likely that only 6% of women who claim they've been raped are telling the truth? It's not like the legal process is fun.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 11:20 (nineteen years ago)

i thought this might be about the rather depressing public reaction to this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4780992.stm

toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 11:42 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, I don't really get it. If the victim of a non-sexual violent assault couldn't remember exactly what happened, would it be automatically assumed that he/she wanted to be assaulted? Hardly.

I know that the physical evidence in rape cases is often ambiguous in a way that it's not in other attacks, but so much of it is overlooked as File on 4 found.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 11:50 (nineteen years ago)

It's the "Innocent until proven guilty" thing.

You have to 'prove' it.

Unless the law provides a 'statutory rape' charge facility on girls who are in no position to consent (verydrunk, anaesthitised, etc), I guess they need 'clarification'.

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 11:52 (nineteen years ago)

under what fucked version of sexual assault law does "a few drunken gestures" = consent? I mean, I don't even understand how this is open to the jury to decide!

If the issue was that the girl hadn't consented but the guys appeared to honestly mistake her gestures as amounting to consent, then maybe i could see how an acquittal might be a possibility...

(an even then, any test of the defendant's knowledge which doesn't also require that their mistake be reasonable as well as honest is pretty fucked up as far as I'm concerned)

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:20 (nineteen years ago)

it'd depend on the gestures i suppose. (in this case i'm imagining that it wasn't particularly suggestive, but then i haven't seen the video)

i had to jury on a knifepoint x2 rape case when i was on jury duty. it wasn't fun i tell ye :(

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:31 (nineteen years ago)

This sounds like "good" lawyering on the part of the defence. Here, with the nexus of rape, sex, and alcohol, evidentiary rules are made to be played. If the prosecution wasn't careful, something that could have led to an acquittal could have relatively easily been admitted to the record by the seemingly idiotic judge.

Could someone post the article from the Trib? I can't see it with the link from above.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:33 (nineteen years ago)

"Acquittal in video rape case
Advocates decry 2nd not-guilty verdict from '02 teen party

By Art Barnum. Tribune staff reporter Crystal Yednak contributed to this report
Published March 4, 2006
After repeatedly viewing a videotape that captured the alleged gang rape of a 16-year-old girl, a jury acquitted a Burr Ridge man Friday of sexual assault and child pornography charges.

The lawyer for Adrian Missbrenner, 20, went frame-by-frame through the video, taken during a party at which teens were drinking heavily Dec. 7, 2002, pointing to every gesture he said might indicate the girl's consent.

After four hours of deliberation, the Cook County panel of seven women and five men returned its verdict of not guilty.

"Now they know the truth," Missbrenner said as he left Cook County Jail late Friday with family members. "It wasn't what they said it was. They made it out to be something it wasn't."

The verdict appalled victims' rights advocates, who said the defense sought to affirm every rape myth.

"We're down to those same stereotypes--she was drinking, she was asking for it," said Linda Healy, executive director of Mutual Ground, a suburban counseling program for sexual assault victims.

"We hold the standards that the victim, who is almost always a woman, is somehow supposed to prevent this from happening if it's something she didn't want," said Polly Poskin of the Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault.

The case already had drawn fire from victims' advocates earlier this week, when Judge Kerry Kennedy threatened to jail the Naperville woman, now 20, for refusing to view the videotape during her testimony.

On Wednesday, Kennedy reversed that decision, but the 13-minute tape remained the focal point of the trial.

Reporters and other courtroom observers were not allowed to see the tape. Lawyers' descriptions indicate that it shows Missbrenner and codefendant Burim Bezeri having sex with the teen during the party in Missbrenner's home in the upscale suburb. The tape also shows the men and others spitting on the woman and writing on her naked body.

Defense attorney Patrick Campanelli relentlessly dissected the tape Friday, however, contending the accuser's actions indicated that she had not been coerced.

"She places her hand on Burim's head, she kisses him, that's consent," he said.

"She puts her hands on Adrian's head, rubbing his head . . . That looks like consent to me."

"She is smiling. This shouldn't be in court," Campanelli said.

John Gorman, spokesman for Cook County State's Atty. Richard Devine, said: "We don't agree with the decision, but we must accept it. The evidence was compelling, but obviously the jury didn't think so."

George Acosta, the accuser's attorney in a pending civil trial against the Missbrenners, said he, too, was disappointed.

"We believe the videotape shows she was drunk and vulnerable," he said.

When the verdict was read, about 30 of Missbrenner's family members and friends gasped and some began to cry. With a broad smile, Missbrenner hugged his attorney.

After the verdict, Dobrila Missbrenner, the defendant's mother said, "Her story kept changing from one time to another, from being unconscious, to being semi-conscious, to being too drunk to remember."

The woman was not in the courtroom for the verdict. A man answering the family phone said she had no comment"

Lovelace (Lovelace), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:36 (nineteen years ago)

Exhibit one as to why I will NEVER practice criminal law. NEVER.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)

getting back to the title question -- definitely consent, thanks.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:43 (nineteen years ago)

I heard this on the radio this morning, I've been utterly disgusted since. This whole case has just been fucked from the beginning and I can't even begin to imagine how horrible that girl must feel. Its as if the degrading nightmare she went through once wasn't enough, not she has to live forever thinking it was her fault. Fucking hell. Sorry I don't really have anything productive to add here, I'm just completely shocked by this... glad to see someone else thought enough to post this though.

jonviachicago, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:47 (nineteen years ago)

Exhibit one as to why I will NEVER practice criminal law. NEVER.

but we need your fine upstanding mountainous sort to battle these bad bastards innit

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:55 (nineteen years ago)

Mrs Missenbrenner sounds like such a treasure. Too bad Tennesse Williams is dead.

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)

Of course, everyone knows that 16 year old girls just naturally give their consent to be gang fucked while being videotaped, spat on, and having obscenities written all over their bodies, right?

Well, actually, yes, some women do.

Merryweather (scarlet), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:18 (nineteen years ago)

Merryweather's right: some girls like to be gang-fucked. To each his own. But I hardly think that girl wanted to be. :-(

Exhibit one as to why I will NEVER practice criminal law. NEVER.

You have to understand that every person is entitled to a (good) defense. If you can't get past that, you'll never get to be a lawyer. As a lawyer you need to defend your client, not judge him/her, I guess. I don't know, I'm not saying it right... But anyway, me saying this will probably make it appear I'm siding with these people. I'm not. I'm disgusted. It sickens me because not only does it now look as though the girl asked for it, it means that in the future girls/women (and guys) will hide the fact they were raped because they fear they'll be looked at as sluts who asked for it. :-((((( Again, uh, I'm rambling, but you know what I mean... I shouldn't be reading these articles, it sickens me and makes me very sad. :-(

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

Nat, I could not agree with you more. And I fully realize that, at some point in my legal career, I will probably be asked to defend some action by a client that I do not personally agree with. And I will do so with all due diligence and effort.

BUT - this doesn't mean that I need to go SEEKING those opportunities. While I consider myself an intelligent and pretty well-adjusted person emotionally, runnin a criminal defense practice would necessitate too much mental gymnastics for me. I don't want to have to begin medicating - self or by prescription - in order to deal with my job.

That said, yeah these guys deserved a defense. Totally. It just seems that, based on what the article presented, the prosecution had a wealth of stuff with which to work.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

I'm still mad about this -- I stewed about it overnight and yep -- still mad. If NOTHING else, the boys should have been forced to formally apologize to the girl for treating her in a degrading way.

I agree with what someone said about degrees of rape -- there really are so many different circumstances under which sex can be coerced, forced, whatever. I don't know that they're all punishable by law, but those wormy little bastards deserve to know that what they did was wrong.

The Milkmaid (82375538-A) (The Milkmaid), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:40 (nineteen years ago)

What would be the the factor(s) upon which you would differentiate b/t the different levels of rape?

For example, with killing a human, provocation/level of premeditation are two really big ones in determining the level of "murder."

Possibles: Consent, degree of resistence, previous sexual encounters b/t the participants, types of sexual encounters previously b/t the participants

I throw these out there off the top of my head - I automatically see various problems therewith, but am interested what others may say while I try to get some work done.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:46 (nineteen years ago)

Have the defendants' names been published? The court of public opinion could crucify them for this.

Dan (Forever The Rapists) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:54 (nineteen years ago)

The one guy who is named in the article has at least - I haven't taken the time to look further. And yeah, good luck getting a date anywhere near that area.

Man, I am so glad that, somewhere along the way, I had the fear of God put in me with regard to mistreating women. I was an idiot when I was 17, but at least I knew that this type of shit was totally out of bounds.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:00 (nineteen years ago)

My general rule regarding the topic:

Both people drunk? Really hard to work out issues of consent unless someone has clearly said "yes" or "no." If someone does say yes but later realizes it was because of intoxication, it sucks but... yeah.

One person drunk? The other probably shouldn't assume any sort of permission no matter what the drunk person says unless there's a certain measure of trust. Still kind of shady.

Multiple people involved like in the case in question? There's no fucking way that's consent. From the (likely a jerk) mother of a defendant: "Her story kept changing from one time to another, from being unconscious, to being semi-conscious, to being too drunk to remember." Guess what, none of those states of consciousness are good enough for giving consent! I'm sorry, but at some point one dude was aware that his friend was having sex with a drunk girl, and that's enough detachment to make even a drunk guy wonder what's going on.

mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:00 (nineteen years ago)

Oh yeah -- they've been all over the place. Missbrenner is the kid's last name, the one I saw in the interview yesterday.

I can't believe that they think that her "rubbing his head" qualifies as consent. I admit it: I'm offically appalled.

The Milkmaid (82375538-A) (The Milkmaid), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:00 (nineteen years ago)

Smiling = consent? SINCE WHEN?

"She places her hand on Burim's head, she kisses him, that's consent," he said.

"She puts her hands on Adrian's head, rubbing his head . . . That looks like consent to me."

"She is smiling. This shouldn't be in court," Campanelli said.

The Milkmaid (82375538-A) (The Milkmaid), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:05 (nineteen years ago)

"Whahayyy, give her one from me" Campanelli said.

(obviously not, legal team)

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:06 (nineteen years ago)

It should be taken that, once a person is drunk - not tipsy, having a few drinks or a little slurry, but DRUNK - they cannot give consent. At all. Intoxication is not a defense for ANYTHING, unless it was forced upon you (roofies, etc.). Why should it provide a setting for a finding of consent like it does here?

Man, the rape discussion we had in my Crim Law class first year was BRUTAL. Lots of feelings on the table, a class of more than 50% women, some idiotic dudes trying to play devil's advocate in a manner that was TOTALLY insensitive to, going by the numbers, the probable presence sexual assault/rape victims in the room - ugh, it just fucking sucked. Our professor, a stand-up and brilliant guy, was just DRAINED by the end of it, as we all were.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:12 (nineteen years ago)

One of the things the defense lawyer said is that the case belongs in a counseling center, not the legal system. He stated to the jury that if they acquit the defendants, that doesn't mean that they agree with what was done to the girl, just that they are not guilty of criminal rape (or whatever it's called.)

To me, if these boys aren't punished for what they did, which was clearly cruel and unusual, that signals that the parameters for what constitutes "rape" need to be expanded and divided into various sections for the various ways in which sexual assault can (and DOES) occur.

The Milkmaid (82375538-A) (The Milkmaid), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:17 (nineteen years ago)

Campanelli added that, "in [Missbrenner's] state of mind, he had consent."

Directly addressing the jury, Campanelli added, "If you say he's not guilty, that doesn't mean you approve of what happened."

Schroeder reminded jurors of testimony they heard Thursday about Missbrenner's flight to Europe in 2004 and his surrender in Serbia-Montenegro after nine months on the run.

Missbrenner was convicted last year of violating his bail bond and sentenced to 6 months in jail.

"He [Missbrenner] claims the tape exonerates him, but then why did he flee the country?" she asked. "For once in his life, hold this kid, Mr. Burr Ridge, responsible."

Gorman would not say whether the verdict affects pending charges against Bezeri, who is believed to have fled the county about the same time as Missbrenner and remains at large.

Sonny Smith of Brookfield, who operated the video camera, was convicted of child pornography and sentenced to the Illinois Department of Corrections boot camp. Christoper Robbins of Brookfield was acquitted of sex crimes last year. He admitted having sex with the accuser but said it was consensual.

The Milkmaid (82375538-A) (The Milkmaid), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:17 (nineteen years ago)

I shoudn't be reading this. It makes me so sad. On top of that, being a new mother, having a daughter, this shit scares me so much. I think I'll just lock up my daughter until she's no longer a possible victim. :-(

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:22 (nineteen years ago)

I know - I need to stop too. It's making me crazy monster mad.

The Milkmaid (82375538-A) (The Milkmaid), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:25 (nineteen years ago)

Nat, totally OTM. My wife and I constantly go back and forth about our fears about either sex, and, while more of a pain in ass growing up, boys seem to be the kind you can push out of the nest with less fear of shit like this happening to them.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:26 (nineteen years ago)

After the verdict, Dobrila Missbrenner, the defendant's mother said, "Her story kept changing from one time to another, from being unconscious, to being semi-conscious, to being too drunk to remember."

Real proud.

Also: Christopher Robbin??

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)

Here is more info about this case:
http://www.belleville.com/mld/belleville/news/state/14016548.htm?source=rss&channel=belleville_state

In September, Missbrenner was sentenced to three years probation for bail jumping and fleeing to Europe to avoid prosecution in the case. He surrendered to U.S. authorities in Serbia and returned to Illinois in May -- eight months after initially jumping bail.

One man has been convicted in connection with the alleged attack. Sonny Smith, 20, of Brookfield, served time in an Illinois Department of Corrections boot camp after pleading guilty to child pornography charges for making the videotape.

Burim Berezi, of Brookfield, is accused of being the second man to have sex with the woman in the video. Authorities say he has fled to Albania and has not been captured.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:43 (nineteen years ago)

Let's cut a break for a lady named DOBRILA.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:49 (nineteen years ago)

In response to a question regarding the existence of varying degrees of rape, my Criminal Law professor had this to say -

"Yes - there is - some jurisdictions have grades like forcible rape, non-forcible rape, gross sexual imposition, indecent exposure, etc."

So, I guess that rape, like murder, has varying degrees based on certain circumstances. That said, I have no desire to further explore this via Westlaw or Lexis.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)

xpost A lady wouldn't raise a rapist.

I know, I know, I said I shoudln't be reading this thread. So why do I come back again and again? Like a wound I keep scratching.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:51 (nineteen years ago)

"gross sexual imposition"?

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)

Reading this, http://www.nbc5.com/family/7757451/detail.html , it's evident that the prosecutors totally fucked up.

petlover, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)

Also: "Fled to Albania and has not been captured" = justice takes many forms.

Albania, people

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

It's evident that the prosecution fucked up from the verdict!

As Dan said, we can hope for the best (the rest of all their lives is crap and they die miserable 4 years from now) and do our part by reminding people that anybody named Missbrenner is a shit.

Kobe Bryant also still at large.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:57 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah - like anything else, terms for various criminal offenses can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Who knows what "gross sexual imposition" means? I mean, I COULD find out, but, I really don't want to.

Ally, would you like for me to run a cursory Westlaw search? I could do so with little to no effort.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:58 (nineteen years ago)

I'm intrigued by what it includes but if you really don't want to find out don't do it for me!

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

I would like to know too.

The Milkmaid (82375538-A) (The Milkmaid), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.highlandcoso.com/2907.05.htm

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:02 (nineteen years ago)

"She places her hand on Burim's head, she kisses him, that's consent," he said.

"She puts her hands on Adrian's head, rubbing his head . . . That looks like consent to me."

"She is smiling. This shouldn't be in court," Campanelli said.

WTF? It's suddenly, like, controversial or news or something that drunk people react inappropriately, or in ways they wouldn't when they were sober? Jesus wept.

phil d. (Phil D.), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:03 (nineteen years ago)

Tom I wasn't about to google "GROSS SEXUAL IMPOSITIONS" while at work. Thank you though.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:07 (nineteen years ago)

I cannot believe it is apparently on the tape that Serbia dude actually SAID drugs had been used and this still even went on. This country is full of imbeciles and disgusting individuals.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:07 (nineteen years ago)

Here's the part of that "gross imposition" statutory language to REALLY be pissed off about:

(A) No person shall have sexual contact with another, not the spouse of the offender; cause another, not the spouse of the offender, to have sexual contact with the offender; or cause two or more other persons to have sexual contact when any of the following applies:

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:11 (nineteen years ago)

Sorry...

A) No person shall have sexual contact with another, not the spouse of the offender; cause another, not the spouse of the offender, to have sexual contact with the offender; or cause two or more other persons to have sexual contact when any of the following applies:

Hello, Ye Olde Marital Rape Exceptione...

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:12 (nineteen years ago)

Marital Gross Imposition shrly

Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:15 (nineteen years ago)

I'm at the point with US rape cases that I am with my job, I have gotten so worn out from being frustrated and angry and grinding my teeth and glaring at everyone 100% of the time that jocularity is my only response anymore. I mean yes, fuck the human race they're all horrible, OTOH, drowning is the number one cause of death in waste water treatment plants - life on this planet is a goddamn joke & I've given up any chance at getting off of it.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:26 (nineteen years ago)

Tom, what is it that you do?

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

someone said that only 6% of rape charges end in conviction. would you care to provide a link if possible? I'd appreciate that.

petlover, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 17:41 (nineteen years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4296433.stm

NB UK only.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 17:49 (nineteen years ago)

thank you.

i can't imagine that the figures in the US would be drasticly different.

petlover, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 17:51 (nineteen years ago)

I'd like to know how many of those cases were dropped by the victim before trial. I'm guessing the percentage would be in the upwards of 75%+.

Oh, and as sad as it is, many men and women get raped and report it, but have no clue who their attacker is. What exactly do you expect the legal system to do about cases such as that??

mantilla, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

I feel really bad for that girl. Having gone to high school in suburban Illinois, where I was shocked as a Freshman by how proud my female classmates were to blow varsity football players at parties, I can imagine this scenario--some subgroup of the school party guys, the ones whose company enhance social status, choose a lucky girl to come hang out with them. She's thrilled. Maybe she's a nice girl who's never been intoxicated before. Maybe she's the one who brought the booze and the drugs. These are not nice guys; they are the mean guys who'd do something like spit on a girl, and write on her. Maybe she doesn't know that already, but this being high school, she probably does. What goes wrong is there's a tape that documents this fun time. People see it. All of a sudden the viscerality of the visuals stigmatizes the girl. Instead of a fun, party girl, she's slutty. Insults and social ostracism ensue. Law suit time.

neil s, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:12 (nineteen years ago)

It's detectives who are in charge of doing something about that, not the legal system you berk.

xpost, obv

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, and as sad as it is, many men and women get raped and report it, but have no clue who their attacker is. What exactly do you expect the legal system to do about cases such as that??

The same thing they do about any crime in which the perpetrator is unknown??????

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)

okay.

what about those cases where the alleged victim drop the case before the trial?

mantilla, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)

what the fuck do you think we expect them to do about dropped charges?

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:18 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, what point are you trying to prove? A good portion of dropped charges AREN'T because the crime didn't actually occur, you know this right?

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:19 (nineteen years ago)

No! I'm trying to think of one major reason why the convictions are so low.

And yes I know that last point you make, but is that to be blamed on the legal system entirely?

mantilla, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)

If there's any point you're trying to make, mantilla, then you'd need to show that crimes across the board have a similar percentage of charges dropped before trial. I'm betting that wouldn't be the case. So why are so many rape charges dropped? Could it possibly be because it's uniquely the crime where the (alleged) victim is subjected to a lengthy character assassination by the defence?

Raw, Uncompromising, and Noodly (noodle vague), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)

Because a lot of time it comes down to one person's word against another and on that alone it's very hard to get a conviction.

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

Unless they go on Judge Judy

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:34 (nineteen years ago)

It's detectives who are in charge of doing something about that, not the legal system you berk.

dude you never seen an episode of "law and order?"

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:39 (nineteen years ago)

In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: the police, who investigate crime; and the district attorneys, who prosecute the offenders. These are their stories.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:40 (nineteen years ago)

No, I don't think anyone in their right mind would blame that purely on the legal system.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)

This is why people invented God, so he could blow the shit out of whole villages when crap like this went down

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 19:33 (nineteen years ago)

ok stence i know you've been successful recently with checking my facts but i think you'll find the responsibility for identifying and apprehending the perpetrator of a violent crime is the PO-lice (which has very little to do with "the legal system")

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:15 (nineteen years ago)

perhaps you need the BAH-BONG noise after the intro?

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

JUSTICE is a totally different word than LEGAL, stence.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)

it's a total misdirected side issue, anyway, since the perp is usually very identifiable

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:44 (nineteen years ago)

cops are people, too.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:54 (nineteen years ago)

and they're equally important to the district attorney.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

mantilla's just stirring some ign'ant shit, i think we all understand each other here rite?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

no, where does civil law fit into this so-called "legal system?"

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 21:11 (nineteen years ago)

or perhaps small claims court?

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 21:12 (nineteen years ago)

We should ask the guy who claimed this was a "lawsuit" and that he got blow jobs from drugged up honeys all during his high school years as a QB in Illinois or whatever.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 21:17 (nineteen years ago)

yes, he will have the answer.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 21:18 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

My Spring Weekend Nightmare
A Firsthand Account Of Sexual Assault On 'The Rape Trail'
By: Melissa Bruen
Posted: 5/2/08
The next time I am asked, "How was your last Spring Weekend?," it will be far too soon.

Last Saturday morning I got out of bed after a few hours of restless sleep, more than a little hung over. It is when I looked in the mirror and saw the handprints on my biceps that the events of the previous night came flooding back. I saw that my phone was shut off, and I was thankful that I would not have to answer any calls, until I realized the UConn police officer I spoke with the night before would be calling me to make a written statement. I had to decide if I wanted to press charges.

In nine days I graduate from the University of Connecticut, but my last week is not that of a typical student. I have spent more time in bed this week than I have for most of the semester.

I am almost able to go about my daily routine without thinking about what happened to me. Then I take a shower and see the bruises on my arms and legs and right cheek. My arms still ache and I am emotionally and physically exhausted.

I am a strong person - I have a swimmer's build with broad shoulders - but now I feel weak and timid. What if I hadn't fought back? Would I be physically and emotionally stronger today? If I hadn't been so stubborn and embarrassed when the police refused to let me go to my friend's apartment in Celeron maybe I would not have been alone or a target on the Hunting Lodge Road Trail - the three-quarter-mile-long paved, well-lit path from North Hillside Road to Celeron - known as "the rape trail."

As a freshman I was told "the rape trail" led to the off-campus apartments where the big parties UConn was known for were held. Four years later, I am able to understand why it is called so.

Students are always told not to walk alone, especially at night, and that it is safer to travel in groups. This is a lesson I will not forget. I have always felt safe walking alone around UConn at night. Having worked for The Daily Campus for four years made this a necessity. So Friday with so many people, and police, around, I didn't think twice about heading back to campus alone from Celeron.

I called a friend at around 1 a.m. and asked her to pick me up at the end of the path by Northwest. I had three beers and two screwdrivers. It was while I was on the phone, sitting on the ground with my back against a telephone pole in order to hear her, that I was picked up by my shoulders, pinned up against the pole and "dry humped" by a stranger. At first I thought it was one of my friends' attempt at humor, until I heard the man moaning.

I hung up the phone, and shoved the man off me. I am 5'5". He was around 5'11".

"My, aren't we feisty tonight," he said.

--

I was assaulted when I was very young - I wasn't about to let it happen again. When he came toward me, I grabbed him by the shoulders and pushed him down to the ground. I held onto his shoulders and climbed on top to straddle him. He started thrashing side to side, but I was able to hit him with a closed fist, full force, in the face.

A small crowd had gathered, mostly men. Now they seemed shocked. I was supposed to have been a victim, and I was breaking out of the mold. I hit him in the stomach, while clenching my legs around him to prevent another man from pushing me off. In all, it took three men to pull me off my assailant.

He got up and ran off, yelling at me, as if I were the would-be rapist.

"You just assaulted me," I yelled in my own defense - first to him and then, to anyone who would listen, "He just assaulted me."

Since the police were shutting down the parties at Celeron, there were thousands of people on the path.

Another man, around 6'1", approached me and said, "You think that was assault?" and he pulled down my tube top, and grabbed my breasts. More men started to cheer. It didn't matter to the drunken mob that my breasts were being shown or fondled against my will. They were happy to see a topless girl all the same. I punched him in the face, and someone shoved me into a throng of others. I was surrounded, but I kept swinging and hitting until I was able to break free of the circle they had formed.

I started running barefoot toward Celeron, but ended up throwing myself on the ground, crying and screaming hysterically. I saw a friend in the crowd, and all I could do was scream his name over and over. I could see the ambulance and police checkpoint in the distance.

--

This Spring Weekend there were 51 arrests, 10 fewer than last year. I have no idea how many went unreported, or in my case, reported with no arrest. I was able to give descriptions of my assailants to the police, but the sheer volume of people on the path made it impossible to find my attackers. Earlier in the evening I had seen many undercover policemen and members of UConn's Student Affairs administration who had blended in with the crowd. It made me laugh and smile to know they were watching out for us. As editor of The Daily Campus, I was the one who proposed an editorial that ran earlier in the week, which said the university worked hard to make this Spring Weekend a safe experience. I believed that then. I believe it now.

I have spent this last year trying to make campus a safer place. I worked with Betsy Cracco of the Violence Against Women Prevention Program to have a Media Responsibility forum, sexual harassment training for Daily Campus editors and I am on the Campus Climate/ Task Force for the Prevention of Violence Against Women On Campus.

UConn should be a safe, respectful community. We have a new and very visible president, Mike Hogan, who truly cares for students. He was at one end of the Celeron Path wishing people a safe and good night. I was at the other. Most members of the administration will listen if you approach them.

When I went to UConn Police Saturday, I learned that at least one other woman was jumped by two men on the Celeron Path that night. I can't help asking myself what would have happened if I hadn't fought back.

I was raised to fight back, so I made sure to get a few good swings in. My bruises will fade, and I will move on. But if you ever see someone being assaulted, do the right thing.

Contact Melissa Bruen at Meli✧✧✧.Br✧✧✧@UC✧✧✧.e✧✧.

danbunny, Friday, 9 May 2008 02:16 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.