24 Hour P*rty People

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So I've seen it. In a screening full of I Was There types and Dave Gorman, who plays Jon the Postman. And, well, first impressions are thus:

Filmed in DV, clumsily. Coogan *way* too much like Alan Partridge - watching him do l'accountant flambé in the midst of the Haçienda was not pretty. As far as pacing goes I *did* like the first act of the film, which essentially went up to Ian Curtis' death - the guy playing Curtis was great. But lots of PoMo self-referencing and magic realism bits - with jokes which reference this voiced by Anthony H.

If you are anal about MCR you will not like this film. If you are stoned and know the in-jokes you will understand the filmmakers' mindset (funniest scene is the Ryder brothers' pigeon massacre or the H Devoto moment) but that doesn't mean you'll appreciate the decisions they made even if most of the cameos were wicked. But mostly it seems to me as if nobody was able to keep Coogan in check and the cast is like watching too much BBC2.

suzy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nice one, top one, sorted, new answers-uh.

suzy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I haven't been following this. Who is Coogan playing? Tony Wilson? And what's DV?

N., Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Coogan plays Wilson. And the film is shot in digital video, hence DV. The dogme of Coogan?

suzy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Is it enjoyable? If you liked the music at the time, or if you like it now, is it still a movie to go see?

Alan Trewartha, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Of course if you are unaware of BBC2 it may just look like it is full of unknowns. Got to say this seemed like a desperately flawed project from the beginning and I was never convinced of the casting of Coogan. As you say Suzy, the spectre of Partridge (a man who takes himself far too seriously) hangs over Wilson - but in a very different way. I expect the jerky DV is being used to make it look raw and not soaped over biopiccy, but that is not necessarily and excuse for it being poorly done. That said I think Winterbottom has made quite a few good movies and would be surprised if the cinematography (videography?) was that poor.

The scale of the project seems too large too. You can't tell the Factory Records story without it being necessarily downbeat (unhappy ending) - yet the film is supposed to be celebrating a scene. There's more than enough story (albeit downbeat) in the Joy Division years without getting on to the Mondays.

Magic Realism - aarggh. Is this the spectre of Velvet Goldmine coming back to haunt us?

Pete, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm looking forward to it, although I fully expect:

(i) to think it completely misses the point of Factory Records

(ii) lengthily to lament the omission of any Stockholm Monsters content

(iii) to look a fool on account of (i) and (ii) above.

Tim, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

is it acceptable to describe the Dirty Vicar as jerky?

mark s, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Pete, the Winterbottom presence was on everyone's lips after the screening because we didn't understand how maker of Jude and Wonderland could have also made THIS. Robby Muller is the cinematographer and he's fantastic, but it doesn't work here. Part of the reasoning behind my opinion is that DV keeps the viewer close to the story and here is a subject that needs a bit of distance, because in my mind the stories are too immediate in terms of history and my own connections to them. Lots of people who are critics seeing this film will feel this way, and it's going to hurt the film. The other part of the reasoning is the jerkiness is probably meant to convey a kind of POONKness but it doesn't work on that level either.

Overall, the problem is that it just looks like Coogan's production company got a stranglehold on proceedings. I thought it would be really good casting initially - SC's brother was a Mock Turtle, etc, he really knows everything there is to know about that scene - and a director with MW's clout would be able to keep his excessiveness/Partridgeness in check. But sadly not. Steve Coogan will not cross over until he is able to submerge a bit into his roles. Understand as well that I know him vaguely and there's way too much of the person I know there. That's to his detriment - he could sell rollerskates to paraplegics so I can imagine him in a production meeting getting his way.

Comparisons with Velvet Goldmine depend on what you thought of the film - and I liked Velvet Goldmine LOADS due to its queerness quotient an' that. I think VG dealt with the subject matter in it much better than 24PP does with its own. Also I was never as sold on the Mondays as the rest of the world - thugs on drugs not being my scene. They have not dated as well as Joy Division etc so it's hard to get 'involved' with them as they appear on screen. I'm looking forward to someone good getting hold of the Deborah Curtis book because that will make an excellent film (Danny Boyle's option may have run out).

But if the soundtrack has Voodoo Ray on it I will be ver' happy.

suzy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

u mean u aint got voodoo ray then?

XStatic Peace, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Its a strange one, in as much as the target audience (we wuz there types) may well have the most to nitpick about it. Certainly the critics from the style mags etc will certainly be too close as you suggest, though I wonder what the critics at large will say.

I suppose it may well be about the tone of the film (here comes the inevitable Lord Of The Rings comparison). Is it a film made for fans by insiders, or has it tried to open out the story to make it accessible and try and explain why this was important to a world which probably regards the whole Factory Records scene in the eighties as a footnote at best (which to be fair - it is).

I am looking forward to it - because I really never thought it could be done.

Pete, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Has it got a FAC number?

N., Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

OF COURSE I HAVE VOODOO RAY YOU EEEDJIT, first pressing an' that. It's a record I will never tire of and I never did - not at the Hacienda, nor 808 State, nor Sound Factory, nor Area, nor Mars, nor Luv'Dup, nor Milk Bar, nor any late '80s/early '90s house club in NYC, London or Detroit you might care to mention. And oddly certain Class A's were not part of the equation for me which is why I can remember what guest lists I was on.

They played it for 30 seconds in the film and I perked up and got all smiley.

suzy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

FAC 401, Dastoor. It sez on the bottom of the Production Notes badly compiled by some jobsworth at Freud PR.

suzy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But when's it out properly, so I can see it and moan afterwards?

DG, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

So why would it bother you if it was on the soundtrack album or not?

(She was there, you see).

As for Velvet Goldmine, I liked all the singing bits but the rest Ia bit tedious (though not as tedious as Haynes previous move Safe which is possibly the dullest film ever made). There was also the odd "its not David Bowie but it is" side to it, "And its not Iggy Pop either its Ewan MacGregor with his cock out". I was decidedly underwhelmed by it.

Pete, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

voodoo ray is great, obviously.

i don't like films about going out, and i don't like films about music. so, theres probably not that much to interest me here.

gareth, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Because my copy is VINYL and I have NO DECKS. I will be sent a comp of the OST and then I can access it at will. Lovely.

Film out 5th April, DG.

suzy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But a cheap Bush £30 record deck who fits on mine-systems. Your vinyl playing drought will be over.

Pete, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm with Gareth on this one. Human Traffic springs to mind as the most cringe inducing film in years. It was so fucking blunt like "WE WANT TO PROMOTE ECSTACY CULTURE, ITS FUCKING GREAT WE THINK YES WE DO".

And it seems hard to replicate good nights out on camera, you end up thinking "I'd hate to go out with those bunch of dicks" or "what a crap looking club".

Ronan, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

For some reason I find this thread really depressing.

I'm going to see it on Thursday so I imagine I'll have more to say then.

Andrew Williams, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Whilst I thought Human Traffic contained possibly the single most embaressing scene ever committed to celluloid (the National Anthem) in general I rather liked its energy. Was it promoting ecstasy culture or merely documenting it - as I found the rather downbeat ending almost shoe-horned in as an argument against. Isn't John Sim in 24 Party People as well?

Pete, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think the source of the embarassment was that it was promoting e culture for a considerable part of it. And shameless promotion of particular drugs is usually pretty cringe-inducing. The fact that the promotion was mixed badly with the documentation and they kept switching over in the film made it seem fake and sort of contrived, like one of your mates interrupting a conversation and shouting "acid is great" or something.

Ronan, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Inclined to agree with you about Coogan's performance, Suzy. Too much the Coogan/Partridge persona to really convince. I have to say I enjoyed the film though, for all its faults - the "I'm sure it didn't happen quite like that" moments, Shaun Ryder's role being taken by some ham off Corrie who really was trying way far too hard.

No, no Stockholm Monsters for Tim. Bits of Durutti/ACR but as you can imagine JD/NO/Mondays occupy the bulk of the story. But I think they were at least partly successful in capturing Factory's chaotic and bloody-minded modernity.

Paddy Considine truly marvellous as Rob Gretton. Ralf Little "why bother" as Peter Hook. Ian Curtis, pretty good. Martin Hannett, pleasingly psychotic. Bez's arrival - top comedy.

And some of the music brought me out in goose flesh.

Tag, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Good Lord was that Human Traffic film BAD.

DG, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

for the record, i enjoyed human traffic.

Alan Trewartha, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

What about the Smiths cameo, then?

Smiths saddo, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

None, sadly, Nicole. I was looking out for it too, considering SPM was one of the lucky 43 at Sex Pistols gig which kicks off the film. And J Marr's best friend was the Hacienda hairdresser.

Fuck, all this stuff is creeping out from strange parts of my brain...

suzy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I once (only the once) performed with a Factory recds group onstage. Anybody care to guess which group? I don't expect to see them (or me) in the film!

Dr. C, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

J Marr's best friend was the Hacienda hairdresser.

Who made a bid for baggy-era fame with his own record. What's was his name again? [googles] ah yes, Andrew Berry - 'Kiss Me, I'm Cold'. Not very good.

N., Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

the wake?

gareth, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

the names?

MarkH, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

a certain ratio perhaps?

MarkH, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm sure Dr.C has imparted this info before on IL*. I remember someone being impressed. But I can't remember what band it was.

N., Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

None, sadly, Nicole. I was looking out for it too, considering SPM was one of the lucky 43 at Sex Pistols gig which kicks off the film. And J Marr's best friend was the Hacienda hairdresser.

They were supposed to have made a little cameo iirc (gleaned from some music rag or other) so it must have got cut.

Much as I liked Alan Partridge that doesn't sound like quite the right vibe for Tony Wilson. Still, if it ever does get released in the US I will probably end up going to see it. Especially if it does have a Howard Devoto moment.

Nicole, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No, I left it out of my 'musical CV' as it was a one-off and was actually quite embarrassing.

No-one's got it yet.

Dr. C, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ralf Little doesn't sound right for Hooky either.

MarkH, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Tim Spall = Hooky

Dr. C, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

cameos: Vini Reilly, Tony Wilson, Mark E Smith-uh, Devoto (y'all will be screaming with giggles on the floor) but NO MOZ. I would definitely have spotted this. SPM probably being too busy playing Hide the Soap with Silverlake cabana boyz.

suzy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Actually, I have Inside Info on Moz's current flame, who he's actually been with for a couple of years. Turns out said flame is a slightly older UK expat in LA who runs a movie memorabilia shop -- apparently quite friendly and polite, according to my friend who knows him. Go figure!

Velvet Goldmine = roolz. AND I'LL SAY IT AGAIN. But let's have some Crispy Ambulance in this film, then.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ned, that makes total sense. So do we refer euphemistically to this guy as Waldo Lydecker or what?

suzy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, I will grant that Velvet Goldmine had cute boyz, which is something a movie featuring Shaun Ryder and Tony Wilson surely will not have. I still haven't decided whether I love VG or despise it.

Nicole, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dr. C:

The Wendys? Northside? The Adventure Babies?

My theory is you guested on kilt duty with the Wendys.

Tim, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, I move that *no* men on Factory good-looking at all, with closest being Barney Sumner.

Anyway I think this fillum suffers from Music Industry Humour, if you know what I mean...

suzy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No - earlier than that, Tim. 1985 to be precise.

Clue - The band released 2 albums and 2 singles on Factory.

Dr. C, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Quando Quango?

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

52nd Street? X-O-Dus? This is getting silly.

Tim, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Section 25?

N., Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Swamp Children!

N., Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

YARGO!

Peter Mills, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

[God, Factory was rubbish]

N., Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yargo weren't on Factory. The rest - all fine bands (except for Swamp Children) but wrong!

Dr. C, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Drat. But they did do the theme song for The Other Side Of Midnight, dodgy one-in-the-morning Granada arts review presented post- modernally by "A H Wilson."

What about Marcel King, then - ex-Sweet Sensation frontboy?

Peter Mills, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Biting Tongues (and that's my last guess).

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not Royal Family & the Poor!!!???

N., Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Kalima? To Hell With Burgundy? The Royal Family & the Poor?

Nick's absolutely right, this is a list of not-great bands. I think I should stop guessing too, otherwise I'll be guessing Meat Mouth or something.

Still suspect kilt action.

Tim, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

ND just gets in there first. Yes RFT+P. I 'helped' him by operating tapes and drum machines and such at a gig at Reading Carribean club supporting the mighty Stockholm Monsters.

Embarrassing a) because he/they were crap. b)because I was too pissed to do the job properly and kept missing cues. At one point I stopped a tape mid-song by accident.

Dr. C, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm impressed: 44 answers and only 2 people have seen the film. All I can add is that I interviewed the filmmakers last year (about their previous film) and their approach to 24 Hour Party People was grounded in love for the music etc... The screenwriter, Frank Cottrell Boyce, said “You can imagine lots of British film makers doing the Ian Curtis story, or the Happy Mondays story, or the Hacienda. I can’t imagine anyone else who would say: lets do ‘76 to ‘92, the whole fucking lot in 90 minutes. There is a whole history of Britain in there.” Laudable ambition, but perhaps that's the problem. Anyway, I might add something in a fortnight's time when I've actually seen the bloody thing.

Mark Morris, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ned, that makes total sense. So do we refer euphemistically to this guy as Waldo Lydecker or what?

Chris or Craig or Cliff or something is his name. I'll dig up reconfirmation.

Meat Mouth? Is there a webpage that covers the Shit of Factory?

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Maybe that Factory logo tattoo isn't such a good idea after all.......

electric sound of jim, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Apparently it's coming out in the States around June? It says so in my Entertainment Last Weekly.

Andy K, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

F.A.O (mainly) Tim Hopkins. There are now THREE Stockholm Monsters CDs coming out in March!

Details here : http://home.wxs.nl/~frankbri/index.html Scroll down a bit for LTM discog.

Dr. C, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Songs *never before heard*? Stockholm Monsters material so good that it was unsafe to release it into the wild before now? I can hardly contain my excitement.

Actually, I am genuinely, extremely excited. It hadn't occurred to me that I would ever hear any new Stockholm Monsters material. Fantastic.

Tim, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've never heard any Stockholm Monsters songs. What other bands do they sound like?

MarkH, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Glad to bring newz to brighten yr day.

Dr. C, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've never heard any Stockholm Monsters songs. What other bands do they sound like?

Abba and REM.

Michael Jones, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

seriously?

MarkH, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

He means Bread and Cud

mark s, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Cud? Now there's a band I haven't thought of in a while. I seem to recall they were a bit shit

electric sound of jim, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, so I really liked it. It does lose shape a little (maybe getting a bit baggy?) in the second half (Mondays/Madchester), after a storming punk/Joy Division bit. But once I got over the fact that Steve Coogan didn't even look like he was attempting a Wilson impression, I was won over. It's a film that lays its cards on the table with the opening scene: I think it will lose a lot of people right there, and it means to (to explain would be to spoil it). And you have to accept that the fact that for the purposes of the story, the only Factory bands were Joy Division/New Order, ACR, Durutti Column and Happy Mondays. And I've definitely seen worse looking films, esp DV ones.

Mark Morris, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

And although there are bits which look like Velvet Goldmine's infamous magic realism, I think they all occur when the characters are wasted, which doesn't count, surely?

Mark Morris, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, most importantly: IT'S A COMEDY. Don't go see if that idea bothers you.

Mark Morris, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Morris goes 24HPP MENKAL!

I'm all anticipation now. Still I fear the Coogan.

Tim, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

two weeks pass...
I play myself in the film. I have seen it twice now. The first time was weird, but the second time was brilliant. Watched it on the back row with Hooky a few seats away, heckling. We all agreed at the end that we enjoyed it. The movie had been edited this time, and flowed much better. Some of you will love it, some will hate it. It's a comedy/drama. Some emotional scenes and lots of laughs. Great cameos. Ian Curtis is played magnificently by Sean Harris! I can't wait to see it again!

Rowetta, Monday, 25 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Now there's a review. :-) Hell, if Peter H. was having fun with it, that's a good sign (my respect for him just shot up a bit having learned that he approached James Dean Bradfield a year or so after Richey Edwards disappeared into the Great Beyond and said something like, "Sorry to hear about that -- at least we had a body!").

Ned Raggett, Monday, 25 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't care whether 24HrPP is good or bad anymore, I JUST WANT TO SEE IT! GAH! Why April? Why?

DG, Monday, 25 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

one month passes...
just want to revive this thread instead of starting a new one, now that it is out and most people will have at least had the chance of seeing it, well in the uk any way....

i saw it and quite enjoyed it, though it was basically 2 hr long i'm alan partridge with loads of stuff going on in the background. funnily enough i went to see it thinking that steve coogan would ruin it, and i came away thinking that it would have been awful if steve coogan HADN'T been in it.....

any more thoughts?

ambrose, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I still haven't seen it, gah! especially after that documentary last week made me want to watch it, being busy for the rest f this week means it's going to be next week now, boo.

chris, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought it was a good film. I was glad I broke my now overly talked about cinema boycott.

I thought it was a bit of an emotional seesaw. The first act was completely and utterly depressing and bleak. The second act was hyper mentalism and gave as good an impression of what it's like to be in a good club as any film I've seen has done. When it ended my friend and I were like "LET'S GO CLUBBING!", it really had the right amount of energy to it.

Ronan, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"i went to see it thinking that steve coogan would ruin it, and i came away thinking that it would have been awful if steve coogan HADN'T been in it..."

Me too, exactly. Obv his face is a bit distracting (generally and in terms of detracting from successful Wilson impersonation) but in terms of intonation and mannerism he got close-enough-w-distance for it to work, for me, anyhow, and more or less quash Partridge-ness. Like lots of people have said, the first act - pacing, pitching of narrative in an interesting place between knowing myth reinforcement and social context/realism - was spot on, I thought, and the second half does suffer a bit by comparison. I though the grounding went awry a bit in the second half; in the first part the mythmaking is set against a context of almost domestic intimacy (Ian Curtis goes home to his little terrace to watch Fassbinder and hang himself, and there's something painfully sad about the washing up in the sink in the bright sunlight), people bumping up against each other in a grass roots kind of way (literally and metaphorically); in the second half the 'realism' is gestured at through heaving club scenes and awkwardly cut in Wilson telly news reports and something human gets lost, maybe? I was also a bit meh about cutting in original footage with staged recreations, but then it is kind of hard to see how anyone might resolve that satisfyingly.

Ellie, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

one month passes...
I've just seen it. UGH. Actually, I thought it was quite good, but horrible. I'll have to think about this.

Graham, Saturday, 18 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.