defend the indefensible: use of the term "sense of entitlement"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
if you are looking for something that almost infallibly identifies a total asshole, then someone saying that someone else has "a sense of entitlement" is near the top of the list.

what the fuck does this phrase REALLY mean, anyway?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:08 (nineteen years ago)

it means you act like someone who feels that they're entitled to things merely because they're alive/rich/etc.

send your men of science quick (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:10 (nineteen years ago)

i think it's actually a pretty useful way to characterize people sometimes

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:11 (nineteen years ago)

You would.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:12 (nineteen years ago)

and i've met A LOT of people like this, esp. in my professional life. you'd think lawyers/investors would be the most horrible, but doctors are actually worse.

send your men of science quick (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:12 (nineteen years ago)

middle class 23 year olds

Marty Feldmen Books On Tape (sexyDancer), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:13 (nineteen years ago)

EVERYONE is entitled to my opinion.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:14 (nineteen years ago)

potential grad/phd students ("what do you MEAN i didn't get into stanford with a full ride and a research grant and a stipend? don't you know who i AM?")

send your men of science quick (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:16 (nineteen years ago)

see also: ILM

Huk-L (Huk-L), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:19 (nineteen years ago)

Well there are two parts of this, I think, one of which is political and one of which is social.

The political one is that there are a lot of college-aged middle-class straight white men who seem to presume that their station in life is assured for them -- they've never had any reason to imagine that they won't live about the way their parents did. In a lot of ways, that's perfectly human and natural, but of course it has this huge classist current. I think the last time I thought about this one was on the thread here where some guy was helping his friend lie on his resume to get an office job. The notion seemed to be that he was a middle-class person and so of course he deserved an office job, since that's just what middle-class people do -- and presumably some guy mopping up in a fast-food joint shouldn't lie to get that same office job. So there's this reliance on class being heriditary, still, and no notion of being at all responsible for earning its maintenance, even to the point of cheating and/or "expecting" continued success.

Okay right but the more interesting one is the social part, which seems to have to do with the same kind of people -- except here the problem is that it almost seems like they have no notion that anything bad can ever happen to them. How could it? They're middle-class! They're "nice" and "normal" and "upstanding!" And so they seem to expect that a lot of really awful and/or annoying shit they do should fall under the banner of "good fun" or almost "boys will be boys" thinking, even though they'd never extend the same courtesy to anyone else. I have no idea how much they actually think this through, but they go around happy-go-lucky behaving in ways they probably wouldn't tolerate among lots of other classes of people. They have no sense of being "outside" anything, and that's problematic.

That second one isn't entitlement having to do with money or strictly class so much as it has to do with believing that you are the absolute mainstream of America, and that of course this country should be built to accommodate whatever you want. (There's plenty of political stuff that stems from that, too!)

I have about a third of a novel written that's actually kind of about that second sense of social entitlement. Part of why I started on it was that I felt like that kind of thing might be growing on us, hardcore. And demographically I imagine it'll keep growing, because we have a huge cohort of same-age folks growing up right now, and I get the feeling that being part of a birth-boom greatly enhances that sense that you're the absolute normal center of the universe and aren't expected to earn anything from the outside. I also worry that the forms of it we already have are finding creepy expressions -- this is me making a "trend" out of nothing, cable-news style, but I feel like I continually hear about serious crimes (beating up homeless guys, burning churches) committed by well-educated middle-class white teenagers who are basically just having a laugh.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)

Okay right but the more interesting one is the social part, which seems to have to do with the same kind of people -- except here the problem is that it almost seems like they have no notion that anything bad can ever happen to them. How could it? They're middle-class! They're "nice" and "normal" and "upstanding!"

yeah, I think we've talked about this before. It's like with charitable giving only when major disasters happen vs routinely supporting your local anti-poverty/homeless shelter efforts. i.e. the identification with the other person being the key to whether you extend help to them or not(e.g. financial, the resume-fixing, etc)

kingfish ubermensch dishwasher sundae (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:33 (nineteen years ago)

Oh also the funny thing about the "social" part is that it mostly bugs me when I meet guys who are fairly nice -- the problem is actually that they have this earnestness and honesty and confidence that seems to stem from always having been normal and inside, always being in a situation where they're the celebrated norm, and never having thought for a moment about what it might mean to be on the other side and have to navigate that. They (and people like them) form the center of their known universe, and everything outside of that constitutes some strange, comical variation, and usually ones they're not particularly interested in anyway. So they actually get to be quite psychologically healthy, really fun and confident and non-repressed -- but it's galling, because they have no notion whatsoever of what other people have to repress to allow them to be that way! They seem confused by the very idea that other people aren't in the same position as them, and when they do figure it out, they get very defensive. (Cf the UK right-winger that was on here once saying "b-b-but some white people are now a minority in their own post codes!")

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:38 (nineteen years ago)

Oh also the funny thing about the "social" part is that it mostly bugs me when I meet guys who are fairly nice -- the problem is actually that they have this earnestness and honesty and confidence that seems to stem from always having been normal and inside, always being in a situation where they're the celebrated norm, and never having thought for a moment about what it might mean to be on the other side and have to navigate that. They (and people like them) form the center of their known universe, and everything outside of that constitutes some strange, comical variation, and usually ones they're not particularly interested in anyway. So they actually get to be quite psychologically healthy, really fun and confident and non-repressed -- but it's galling, because they have no notion whatsoever of what other people have to repress to allow them to be that way! They seem confused by the very idea that other people aren't in the same position as them, and when they do figure it out, they get very defensive. (Cf the UK right-winger that was on here once saying "b-b-but some white people are now a minority in their own post codes!")

possibly the most OTM thing you've ever said.

send your men of science quick (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:45 (nineteen years ago)

OMG yes but then when you FIND them galling, it's YOUR fault!! For having ISSUES and begrudging them their happiness/coolness/middle-of-the-roadness. AAAARGH.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:49 (nineteen years ago)

"i had an AMAZING childhood! stop bitching about yours."

send your men of science quick (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:51 (nineteen years ago)

Haha, yes. Or sometimes they do not in fact think that all was roses, they might believe that they've had fairly tough times/suffering/misfortune and you're just misunderstanding how hard they've had it...but regardless of what's happened to them, it was never enough to shake their basic complacency, so wtf?

Okay yes obv I am thinking of specific people, here.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:54 (nineteen years ago)

Ha, it only just occurred to me: most mainstream portrait of US entitlement = CARTMAN. Like in every way.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 March 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)

Well, Cartman and The Bachelor, in some weird way.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 March 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)

They seem confused by the very idea that other people aren't in the same position as them, and when they do figure it out, they get very defensive. (Cf the UK right-winger that was on here once saying "b-b-but some white people are now a minority in their own post codes!"

oh nabisco, you just described my weekend. :(

i am not a nugget (stevie), Monday, 27 March 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

i think everybody should feel entitled.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 27 March 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)

I love how I can tell it's going to be nabisco after I've skimmed the first paragraph. Thanks for describing in detail the concept that weighs so heavily on my mind after hanging out with certain friends and coworkers. That postcode concept blows my mind when I think how many levels of inherent assumptions and "facts" put it together.

mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:02 (nineteen years ago)

You know when any popular file-sharing program goes down for 10 minutes and ILM gets flooded with hysterical noobs screaming for their downloads? That's why we need this term.

Why does the birds always shitting on me? (noodle vague), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)

So when we say "entitlement," we mean "narcissism," not self-love per se but an inability to step outside of oneself, a tendency to treat everyone outside of oneself as mere supporting players in one's own mad parade, a relative lack of empathy, a refusal to respond rationally to criticism, etc.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:12 (nineteen years ago)

So when we say "entitlement," we mean "narcissism,"

actually, i think that narcissism is only a part of it. Yeah, they're narcisissistic, but to a point where a certain level of expectation is part of it, and loud mewling results when those expectations are not perceived as being met.

kingfish ubermensch dishwasher sundae (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:15 (nineteen years ago)

You know when any popular file-sharing program goes down for 10 minutes and ILM gets flooded with hysterical noobs screaming for their downloads? That's why we need this term.

http://wizardishungry.com/no/gmail.jpg

R.I.P. West Village Bird Shaman ]-`: (ex machina), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, that's the social part, except that it's not about "refusal" -- it doesn't seem stubborn, or pointed. They seem instead like the idea has never occurred to them, like they're incapable of thinking that way because they've never had to. They may not even be aware that those modes of thinking exist.

For the record, in most varieties of this I don't really "blame" the people -- or at least I don't feel very moralistic or pissed-off about it. It usually seems clear where they're coming from -- it's just interesting, and not always a good thing.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:18 (nineteen years ago)

i think i used this to describe ben domenech on the ben domenech thread. on further reflection...yeah, that asshole has a real sense of entitlement.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

they (and people like them) form the center of their known universe, and everything outside of that constitutes some strange, comical variation, and usually ones they're not particularly interested in anyway. So they actually get to be quite psychologically healthy, really fun and confident and non-repressed -- but it's galling, because they have no notion whatsoever of what other people have to repress to allow them to be that way! They seem confused by the very idea that other people aren't in the same position as them, and when they do figure it out, they get very defensive.

I think most of what you're saying is extremely OTM, Nabisco, but I also think there's a danger of making assumptions there.

I remember once a friend of mine in college said something to me along the lines of "You seem like a guy who has everything worked out." I was really taken aback -- I felt terribly depressed at the time and had a low opinion of myself, but he seemed to be describing me exactly the way you're describing "those people." Truthfully he did come from worse circumstances than I did. His parents were somewhat abusive and had divorced, he had grown up in a more-or-less working class beach town and didn't have any financial help from his folks. On the other hand, here he was getting the same college education I was and having basically the same economic opportunities upon getting out.

Anyway, I WOULD describe myself as a person with some sense of entitlement, but it's counterbalanced by guilt and fear. And part of that fear is based on an inkling that I have that a sense of entitlement actually helps you succeed in life and if I let go of it I'll end up worse off in life.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:31 (nineteen years ago)

And on the other hand (how many other hands do I have again?) I tend to get annoyed at the New York 20-something media intern/freelance crowd who read An7a Kam3n3tz and think the fact that they don't have health benefits for making copies and writing concert blurbs somehow puts them in the same boat with low wage workers.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:35 (nineteen years ago)

I remember we were talking about this in a discussion of our fair president, and someone(nabisco, probly) made the point that the guy is the type who seriously has this condition. That's why he's complained during the 2004 debates and sporadically onward about all the "hard work," as if he'd never had to actually do it before, and doing it now makes him all frowny face.

kingfish ubermensch dishwasher sundae (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)

xpost

for making copies and writing concert blurbs somehow puts them in the same boat with low wage workers.

HA! where's that webcomic somebody posted on the noize bored about a blue collar guy wondering why this hipster kid was drinking PBR...

kingfish ubermensch dishwasher sundae (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

do they really think they're "in the same boat"? or do they just think they should maybe be able to get health insurance? i mean, to some extent they are in the same boat, thanks to our stupid country.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

ding ding ding

here we go: I think we can all relate to this webcomic.

kingfish ubermensch dishwasher sundae (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:38 (nineteen years ago)

Do they really think they're "in the same boat"? or do they just think they should maybe be able to get health insurance?

Well, they think they should get paid what they want to do what they want, which is pretty much the definition of "sense of entitlement."

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:39 (nineteen years ago)

I thought that was the definition of "having a goal."

Gilbert O'Sullivan (kenan), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:43 (nineteen years ago)

Well Kenan yeah but I think your disagreement hinges on the word "should" as opposed to "would love to" or something like that.

Hurting, just a couple things: (a) I really want to be clear that I don't resent the people I'm describing here or really think they're terrible -- it's just a personality trait that's interesting to me and yes, occasionally annoying; and (b) I don't think it's just about "things working out" in one's life. Lots of people have lots of privileges, but manage to run into at least one or two experiences that sensitize them a little bit to what it might be like to the "outside" or "minority" or "non-privileged" in whatever sense. And by that I don't even mean political stuff -- I mean even just everyday social stuff! And so most of the people I meet who have had stuff work out for them don't necessarily have this kind of "entitlement" personality we're talking about. Not just about that. (Though I say that as someone who's been handed a good lot in life!)

I think the "entitled" term kind of implies more of the political side here. As for the social part, what's funny is that we have a name for children who act the way we're talking about, and it's "brat" and/or "spoiled brat." A lot of the behaviors that relate to the "entitled" personality seem like adult analogs of brattiness, overgrown Dennis-the-Menace "but I'm so sweet" stuff.

See also the etymological tie-ins we could create here -- "entitled" as in artistocracy and heriditary privilege!

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:54 (nineteen years ago)

I think we can all relate to this webcomic.

Yeah but the kid in that comic 10 years down the road could have a law degree or a masters and the other guy will still be working construction. And Wal-Mart managers probably aren't earning 30,000 a year.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 27 March 2006 22:21 (nineteen years ago)

hurting and kenan/kingfish are talking about two different things.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Monday, 27 March 2006 23:10 (nineteen years ago)

An old friend of mine (a white, male fanzine kid) once wailed: where are they handing out this white male privilege stuff? Nobody told *me*.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 08:55 (nineteen years ago)

nabisco knows what other people are/are not repressing?

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 09:09 (nineteen years ago)

Nabisco has wide-ranging experiences of being othered by very complacent people, yes. So do many of us, and usuallly for things we can do nothing about because they're a result of environment, gender or heredity. Also there is no human alive that isn't acting all repressed about SOMETHING.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 11:36 (nineteen years ago)

well yes indeed, which is why i was responding to this:

So they actually get to be quite psychologically healthy, really fun and confident and non-repressed [...]

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 12:33 (nineteen years ago)

"being othered"

m coleman (lovebug starski), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 12:36 (nineteen years ago)

George W Bush = living embodiment of term in question

m coleman (lovebug starski), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 12:38 (nineteen years ago)

most people of wealthy background I've met have a degree of natural-born s of e UNLESS they've consciously labored to broaden their perspective or been thown a few curveballs by LIFE. of course all sorts of other people display s of e as well but it's more of an acquired trait for them? sense of entitlement, nature or nurture?

m coleman (lovebug starski), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 12:46 (nineteen years ago)

it actually makes it kind of worse, if it's an acquired trait, doesn't it?

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 12:48 (nineteen years ago)

So they actually get to be quite psychologically healthy, really fun and confident and non-repressed [...]

well if you're psychologically healthy and confident you have nothing to repress innit

send your men of science quick (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 13:03 (nineteen years ago)

rollocks.

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 13:04 (nineteen years ago)

so much for 'indefensible'

eisbar must be repressing his disappointment

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 13:27 (nineteen years ago)

Internet Boys: Standing Up To Repression Since Usenet.

(...oh, right...)

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.