What did you say at yours.
― Pete, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
er...............damn.
― Ronan, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sarah, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Emma, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dan Perry, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Bob, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
CINEMAX LATE-NIGHT MOVIES ARE TRUE! I KNEW IT!
You say that this meeting is purely for clinical reasons, but we all know that it's only a matter of time before you all end up piling into the tub, giggles turning to moans of passion, four-inch heels waving dramatically in the air as the thrusting and nibbling reaches a fever-pitch...
― Now I know what goes on during "Ladies' Night"!, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Hank, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
*angrily* "What the hell are you looking at?" *seductively* "Would you like a closer look? Ooh..." *giggle*
] synth strings come up, water sprays in artistically-titillating fashion, camera zooms out to slo-mo pan shot with much hair-tossing, etc]
I was going to add more, but my latent shame-circuits have finally kicked in.
Do you need anyone to do nibbles when you have your chick party?
― katie, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― nickie, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
you were watching my what, you cheeky bastard?
― DV, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Maria, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― jel, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
] synth strings come up, water sprays in artistically-titillating fashion, camera zooms out to slo-mo pan shot with much hair-tossing, etc]"
My thoughts exactly. Genius.
― DG, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
correct me if i'm wrong, because i don't actually read playboy, but i thought playboy didn't show vaginas.
― di, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
give me strength.
and what the fuck is a normal/abnormal vagina anyway? who decides these things? vaginas are all beautiful so fuck it.
― electric sound of jim, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nicole, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― elizabeth anne marjorie, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Brian MacDonald, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― David Raposa, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Luke, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Pete, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Emma, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Well, not the bit I saw (I got bored with it after about 20 mins). It was the other way round. Women were having their labias reduced in size cause they were uncomfortable with them being so big (and yes, being visible through tight jeans, which prompted a 'WHAT?' from a friend of mine last night. I said these things do sometimes happen. Not that I'm staring. And I'm not sure I've ever noticed it with jeans. But thinner kinds of trousers and BICYCLE SHORTS, hell yeah.)
It wasn't all cosmetic. Much was about tightening vulvas following childbirth etc.
Top two quotes, both from female health professionals working in the area:
- Talking about a woman whose partner complained about her being too loose down there: "In this case I recommended that the patient find a man with a bigger penis. Or if this isn't possible, someone more understanding."
- Talking about a woman who said she had lost sensation during sex following childbirth: "I examined her and to be honest I wasn't surprised. You could have driven a double decker bus through there!". Charming..
― N., Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dan Perry, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
This surpasses the Salon article in wrongness, by the by.
― DG, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dan Perry, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)