"I think we just have to accept it, that people have a right to say what they want to say, and to have an acceptance of that and recognize that the terrorists, Zarqawi and bin Laden and Zawahiri, those people have media committees. They are actively out there trying to manipulate the press in the United States. They are very good at it. They're much better at (laughing) managing those kinds of things than we are, and we have to recognize that we're not going to lose any battles out in the global war on terror out in Iraq or Afghanistan."
What other government news/statements/interviews/policies will eventually be syndicated on the SCI FI channel?
― Fluffy Bear Hearts (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 18 April 2006 15:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Fight the Real Enemy -- Tasti D-Lite (ex machina), Tuesday, 18 April 2006 15:35 (nineteen years ago)
― lucky longleif, Tuesday, 18 April 2006 15:44 (nineteen years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 18 April 2006 15:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 18 April 2006 15:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Fluffy Bear Hearts Inanity (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 18 April 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Fight the Real Enemy -- Tasti D-Lite (ex machina), Tuesday, 18 April 2006 15:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 18 April 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)
"Every four years, tens of dozens of Americans line up in front of antique, steam-powered voting booths to elect a new emperor. And every four years, Comedy Central heroically covers this mutant cross between a really boring circus, a national popularity contest, and a post-apocalyptic Thunderdome."
― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 18 April 2006 16:15 (nineteen years ago)
― elmo argonaut (allocryptic), Tuesday, 18 April 2006 16:16 (nineteen years ago)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/91/JessicaLynch02.jpeg
― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 18 April 2006 16:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:26 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Fluffy Bear Hearts Novakula (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Thursday, 20 April 2006 12:21 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 20 April 2006 12:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Thursday, 20 April 2006 14:18 (nineteen years ago)
Dystopian novel/movie/opera reference: Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale. (When it is re-made as a True Story on Sci-Fi, I want to make my acting debut as one of the Handmaids, okay?)
― Sara Robinson-Coolidge (Sara R-C), Friday, 12 May 2006 20:02 (nineteen years ago)
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/538/scanner9ie.jpg
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 29 June 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Thursday, 29 June 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 29 June 2006 22:20 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Thursday, 29 June 2006 23:14 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 29 June 2006 23:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Friday, 30 June 2006 07:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Friday, 30 June 2006 12:31 (nineteen years ago)
Straighten up and fly rightSheriff's droning publicity stunt crashed.June 26, 2006LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF Lee Baca's plan to use unmanned, remote-controlled surveillance planes hit unexpected turbulence last week. It wasn't just the crash landing of a drone at a media demonstration or the opposition of privacy rights activists; it was the Federal Aviation Administration's objection that the drones had never been cleared for takeoff. But the controversy, while undeniably entertaining, has been blown out of proportion. The planes — essentially motorized kites fitted with batteries and low-quality cameras — would quietly survey the landscape at an altitude of less than 300 feet (comparable to a model aircraft) and beam pictures to deputies flying them from below. They would move at less than 30 miles per hour, too fast to see through windows but too slow to aid in Los Angeles' favorite pastime, the high-speed chase. The Sheriff's Department, which helped develop the planes, says the drones in the pilot program will have limited uses, such as searching for lost hikers.Given the primitive nature of the drones' technology, it's hard to see how the Sheriff's Department could tout them as the future of policing. At the same time, it's hard to get too worked up about the concerns of privacy activists. Forget fears that a candid-camera-in-the-sky could identify anyone — a brown beanie would be indistinguishable from a brown head of hair. The most a deputy flying the current prototype could determine would be details such as gender, clothing color and approximate height. And with a small battery, a small fleet and the personnel costs to operate the planes, the chances that an unnoticed aerial guest could be used to check out the hot tubs of Malibu (or Van Nuys, for that matter) are virtually nil.But the FAA was correct to ask questions about the program. The Sheriff's Department noted that recreational model aircraft that fly at a low altitude do not have to obtain a certificate of authorization. But a mini-squadron of low-flying police drones — the next step after last week's demonstration at an abandoned field — raises more safety concerns than a father and son flying a model plane on the beach.Perhaps future drones may be able to catch a thief or identify a criminal on the run. Until then, Baca could best serve the public by keeping the prototype out of the hands of paparazzi.
June 26, 2006
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF Lee Baca's plan to use unmanned, remote-controlled surveillance planes hit unexpected turbulence last week. It wasn't just the crash landing of a drone at a media demonstration or the opposition of privacy rights activists; it was the Federal Aviation Administration's objection that the drones had never been cleared for takeoff. But the controversy, while undeniably entertaining, has been blown out of proportion. The planes — essentially motorized kites fitted with batteries and low-quality cameras — would quietly survey the landscape at an altitude of less than 300 feet (comparable to a model aircraft) and beam pictures to deputies flying them from below. They would move at less than 30 miles per hour, too fast to see through windows but too slow to aid in Los Angeles' favorite pastime, the high-speed chase. The Sheriff's Department, which helped develop the planes, says the drones in the pilot program will have limited uses, such as searching for lost hikers.
Given the primitive nature of the drones' technology, it's hard to see how the Sheriff's Department could tout them as the future of policing. At the same time, it's hard to get too worked up about the concerns of privacy activists. Forget fears that a candid-camera-in-the-sky could identify anyone — a brown beanie would be indistinguishable from a brown head of hair. The most a deputy flying the current prototype could determine would be details such as gender, clothing color and approximate height. And with a small battery, a small fleet and the personnel costs to operate the planes, the chances that an unnoticed aerial guest could be used to check out the hot tubs of Malibu (or Van Nuys, for that matter) are virtually nil.
But the FAA was correct to ask questions about the program. The Sheriff's Department noted that recreational model aircraft that fly at a low altitude do not have to obtain a certificate of authorization. But a mini-squadron of low-flying police drones — the next step after last week's demonstration at an abandoned field — raises more safety concerns than a father and son flying a model plane on the beach.
Perhaps future drones may be able to catch a thief or identify a criminal on the run. Until then, Baca could best serve the public by keeping the prototype out of the hands of paparazzi.
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 30 June 2006 13:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Friday, 30 June 2006 13:26 (nineteen years ago)
ways in which the whole world resembles etc:
food riots!
― tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 14:29 (seventeen years ago)
ARRRRRGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why can't things just simply be "fucked-up", and not completely, totally, obscenely, ARRRRGGGGHHHH super-super almost beyond belief level of fucked-upness?
― dell, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 15:02 (seventeen years ago)
That's so tragic.
― Abbott, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 21:26 (seventeen years ago)
http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j278/oilyrags/foodriots.jpg
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 22:33 (seventeen years ago)
report from a homie who works for a risk management firm:
bro: my region is going to shit this week. haiti is rioting bc of food prices and we had to upgrade it to possible evacuation status. there is gonna be a general strike in the dominican republic tomorrow, there's the torch in san francisco, and they've barricaded the mexican senate in preparation for calderon's presentation of his prospoal to open up the energy industry to foreign investment
me: they've barricaded the senate??
bro: they've put up a security fence and closed all the surrounding streets bc obrador claims he is gonna shut down mexico city with protests
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 22:36 (seventeen years ago)
I'm starting to get the feeling that the world IS a badly written dystopian screenplay, and we live in the ubiquitous Science Fiction Evil Empire.
― adamj, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 01:54 (seventeen years ago)
/white middle class guilt
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080408101021.6yrxk1d7&show_article=1
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 02:12 (seventeen years ago)
I don't see anything particularly sci-fi about food shortages and people getting angry that they are starving.
― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 02:19 (seventeen years ago)
"global food riots" just seems like one of those things that always on tv in the background of robocop or children of men or whatever. dystopias are all about the massive societal breakdown.
― tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 02:54 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, I guess the "global" part of it especially
― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 02:56 (seventeen years ago)
Well, I'm just glad that we passed the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, to make sure that we substantially increase biofuel production over the next 15 years. That way, even more farmers will switch from soy and wheat to corn, escalating global grain prices, and meat and poultry prices by extension. Or wait...
oops, sorry world
― Z S, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 03:00 (seventeen years ago)
How easy is it to resuscitate farmland that's been built over with worthless condos?
Probably not very easy, I'm guessing.
― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 03:02 (seventeen years ago)
(or worthless mcmansions)
obrador claims he is gonna shut down mexico city with protests
Gotta say, go to it, Sr. Obrador! Too fucking right.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 03:14 (seventeen years ago)
when are we going to hold a K street Lie-In and shut down this fucking joint is what I'm wondering
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 03:16 (seventeen years ago)
I mean you can't pass legislation if all the people that write it can't get to their office, right? Oh wait, e-mail.
shut down the blackberrys you might get somewhere.
― tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 04:21 (seventeen years ago)