black evangelical political views

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
i live in atlanta, home to the nations largest black gay population & where the progressive status of civil rights leaders & black pastors is largely a given, so even tho im still frequently, painfully reminded of the national & local trend of homophobia & insane pro-life rhetoric in the black church (from co-workers, friends parents, etc) its still disturbing to read this from steven waldman's slate article on the religious left-

Ethnic churchgoers: In this group are African-Americans, Hispanics, and Muslims, who together accounted for about 19 percent of the Kerry vote in 2004. Though they also opposed the Iraq war and share the views of other religious lefties about the importance of fighting poverty and protecting the environment, they differ from the other groups on abortion and, even more so, gay rights. Sixty-four percent of African-Americans oppose gay marriage. Analysts think this opposition accounts for the significant black support that Bush enjoyed in Ohio in 2004, which helped tip the state (and the election).

While many national black leaders support gay marriage, local black clergy have bristled at the comparison made by gay rights activists to the 1960s civil rights struggle. Black clergy also have been supporters of President Bush's faith-based initiative. And while many secular liberals mock or bristle at Bush's religious rhetoric, African-Americans polled on the topic have said they wished religion influenced the president even more.

so how come more than any other minority (see waldmans column debunking the myth of hispanic conservatives - gay marriage approval at 54%, the national average) black voters lean towards the chrsitian right, especially on abortion & homosexuality? how did the fundamentalist views of falwell & robertson become so ingrained in a population that otherwise skews overwhelmingly left, in an institution that birthed martin luther king and sojourner truth? im wary of conflating religious belief with conservatism, but in this case theyre so intertwined its nearly impossible not to. and im distinguishing this from the separate phenomenon of a relatively ineffectual economic conservative segment of the black upper/middle class, which i think mostly brushes away religious justifications for bush voting & general assholism. but this, this is a legitimate populist grassroots movement, one that white republicans are happy to exploit and white democrats are terrified of confronting, for fear of outstepping their political & racial bounds (except for mouthy 'condi = uncle tom' assholes who dont count in any serious discourse) or of biting the hand that increasingly chooses not to feed them. but as the right cranks up their 'culture wars' rhetoric, its an issue i feel is becoming more important with every election, and one i have no idea how to confront

-++---++-+-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 14:42 (twenty years ago)

Why do you need to 'confront' it at all? Who elected you, etc.?

Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 14:51 (twenty years ago)

yeah why confront anything you think is bad

-++-+--, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 14:53 (twenty years ago)

Presumably, if you don't want an asshole who's boosting the anti-gay marriage position, you need to know how to get people who are voting based on that issue to reprioritize (ie, "Would you vote for someone who was anti-gay marriage who also wanted to reform housing standards such that it is harder for people in your demographic to buy a home or find a decent, affordable apartment?" etc etc).

Dan (Just A Hunch) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 14:56 (twenty years ago)

I've wondered this same thing, esp. how gay marriage could be a vote-swinging issue for religious black voters.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 14:58 (twenty years ago)

xpost to eth: yeah I guess Dan OTM (although what the hell would HE know about this issue anyway), it's more like 'what do you mean by CONFRONT,' isn't it a matter of 'what can you do to effect change'?

Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:00 (twenty years ago)

FAILURE OF VISION

Fight the Real Enemy -- Tasti D-Lite (ex machina), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:01 (twenty years ago)

If I could understand the train of thought that makes other people's relationships my business, I would have a better answer for this thread. Really the crux of the problem is religion's appropriation of the term "marriage"; if the legal rights associated with marriage were secularized, I think this would be a weaker political issue (by which I mean not that it would be less important, but rather that it would be a less effective fulcrum for the people who are attempting to turn discrimination into law).

I think American society needs to figure out if its laws are supposed to grant rights or proscribe freedoms before this issue can be solved. It's completely asinine to me that people think they have the right to tell someone else who should be eligible beneficiaries of their health insurance or granted rights as next-of-kin, etc etc etc.

(xpost: yeah I guess Dan OTM (although what the hell would HE know about this issue anyway) ... Wow, I just ran out of middle fingers.)

Dan (Nuke Everyone And Start Over) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:05 (twenty years ago)

ok wtf do you think i meant by 'confront' besides this being a changeable issue?? do you think i meant like with a rocket launcher & knife in my teeth???

-+-+---, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:06 (twenty years ago)

xpost dan i think haikunym was being sarcastic there, supporting the ilx bullshit status quo that only you & nitsuh have any right to talk about anything involving black ppl

-+-+---, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:07 (twenty years ago)

I realized that the instant after I hit submit, which made me feel good about putting that comment in a joking syntax.

Dan (Too Touchy) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:09 (twenty years ago)

(Hahahaha I guess the "lurker" who keeps making "DAN PERRY IS A FATTEY" posts got to me after all)

Dan (;_;) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:10 (twenty years ago)

'trife shouldnt you stick to discussing the congressional wigga caucus or something??'

-++-+--+, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:14 (twenty years ago)

league of stuntaz votaz

-+-+++-+-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:14 (twenty years ago)

how did the fundamentalist views of falwell & robertson become so ingrained in a population that otherwise skews overwhelmingly left, in an institution that birthed martin luther king and sojourner truth?

uh, they live in the South?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:18 (twenty years ago)

I was setting things up for an OMG DAN'S BLACK? joke but you guys figgered me out. I AM A SHIT DISTURBER TODAY.

Ethan I generally picture you with a knife in your teeth at all times. Make sure it's pointing outwards, though. SRSLY though, I think this shows the limitations of your CONFRONT mode. Why is it your issue? What are you really going to do? If you are pro-actively politically active, is there an opportunity for you to take this burden on? Or are you just talking about 'how do I get my head around this apparently contradictory information?'

Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:19 (twenty years ago)

Because I think it is definitely tied into a) black religious culture, and b) black feelings about masculinity and femininity, neither of which any of us (including Dan or Nitsuh) has the right to say 'I MUST CHANGE THAT SHIT RIGHT AWAY'

Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:22 (twenty years ago)

i watched some of this fun thing about Southern Jews on PBS last night called "Shalom, Y'all." one of the themes was tension between sort of an inherent Jewish separatism and the Southern predilection for conformity.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:22 (twenty years ago)

i think its partly 'my' issue because i work in a largely african american sector of the entertainment industry which has the potential to educate & inform ppls political beliefs???

--++--+-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:23 (twenty years ago)

xpost southern jews are pretty right leaning too - id like to see that pbs show!

--++--+-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:24 (twenty years ago)

And it's not like any of us have the right to go around changing white religious (did I really just mean 'evangelical' or 'Christian' there?) culture and white feelings about masculinity and femininity either. Like Dan says, it's about seeing the big picture and making ALL one-issue voters (like my mom!) see that they are being kind of stupid.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:25 (twenty years ago)

well yeah & this is obv but ask black christians about iraq or the economy or social services or affirmative action or whatever and youll get a vastly different picture than asking white fundamentalists the same qns

--++--++, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:26 (twenty years ago)

Right, I'm just consistently surprised that folks would privilege one issue that mostly affects OTHER people over numerous others that affect them directly.

xpost

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:27 (twenty years ago)

Ethan i agree with you about that, except for the part where you compare "christians" to "fundamentalists", not the same innit

Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:29 (twenty years ago)

(it was sort of a personal thing - this guy spends lots of time visiting his family - but pretty well-done. it was mostly LA- and FL-focused, though, which i knew about. i wanted to know where in between Jews lived (tho it left the impression that most have moved to the big cities, and maybe they were pretty dispersed(/maybe even itinerant) to begin with).)

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:29 (twenty years ago)

Who do you work for, Ethan? Or do you just mean you write about hip-hop? (This is not meant as a challenge, btw -- I'm genuinely curious.)

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:30 (twenty years ago)

also plz do not forget hispanic pentecostals and evangelicals, the numbers of which are booming EVERYWHERE, that's gonna be a huger pctg of voters in 2008 than anyone thinks

Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:30 (twenty years ago)

ive done promo for labels, press kits for artists & mixtape djs, some general blend/remix shit, grunt work like putting up flyers, etc - i dunno im not russell simmons or nothing but i feel like i have influence in some respects, yeah probly most as a writer tho

-+-+-+, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:33 (twenty years ago)

i think in 06 the republicans are gonna shoot themselves in the foot over immigration and lose alot of hispanic voters attracted to bush's easy going open borders spanish mangling charm

-++---, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:34 (twenty years ago)

KREWE DU JIEUX

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:34 (twenty years ago)

You of all people must be aware of the dangers of a white person trying to tell black people how to think, so I'm not sure what you as an individual can do about this particular issue. But with your position of respect among black people, you can presumably find out more than most white people (and I'm sure you care more than most white people) about the deeper, or more nuanced, or more culturally specific aspects of the issue, which may at least help you to understand why there are some people who feel like this.

So perhaps whatever you can do to confront/campaign against this kind of intolerance should done in a non-race-specific way. What you can actually do I dunno - how are you going to change people's views when they're based on pure prejudice/instinct/ignorance?

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:47 (twenty years ago)

http://www.uncf.org/

Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:54 (twenty years ago)

The reason this works as a single-issue vote swing is the same old thing about "values," which has been repeated and analyzed to the point of seeming dull and meaningless but is actually huge: when people talk about "values" that way, it seems like they're talking less about specific moral/ethical values and more about basic worldview. And if your basic worldview is that people of the same sex don't get married -- and you hold this view not on a logical plane but just on a gut-level "the sky is blue" plane -- then of course this single issue will completely wipe out any trust you might have in a candidate you think disagrees with you. Economic stuff is just numbers; all the candidates claim they want to make your economic life better, and the differences in their plans can seem like just a matter of figures and arguments and techniques. But "value" issues like this can hit at the gut -- either the candidate shares the fundamentals or your worldview or not. Would you vote for an otherwise-perfect candidate who insisted the Earth was flat?

Hence gay marriage, an issue which has practically zero personal effect on the average voter, can -- yes -- swing something.

I'm not sure exactly what the question is here, though. If we're asking why an otherwise-progressive black population would have these beliefs, I'd say the reasons are pretty obvious -- in a lot of ways they're very much like their white evangelical counterparts. (And the ways in which they're different from their white counterparts link up pretty well with the "otherwise-progressive" part of their political beliefs.) If we're asking how much of a problem this is, or how liberals can address it, I suppose that's bigger, but the answers seem like the same boring ones as always: point the audience toward the things liberals can do for it, stress the basic socioeconomic importance of those things, respect the basis of those other beliefs but make sensitive reasonable arguments for why you believe something else, and try not to look like a tool with a rod up your ass clapping off-beat when the choir starts singing.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:54 (twenty years ago)

well i think the 'we're your friends & neighbors' stuff works well against black homophobia (like it does with all homophobia!), as do the comments of ppl like coretta scott king ('i believe all americans who believe in freedom, tolerance and human rights have a responsibility to oppose bigotry and prejudice based on sexual orientation'). working in rap music im constantly aware how its the #1 exporter of paranoid homophobia & reductive masculinity, and i really do try to fight against that but like i said in atlanta theres a shaky tolerance of gay rights that i doubt exists in places where the black gay population doesnt have such a strong foothold (i.e. 'we're your friends & neighbors' is an inescapable reality here, not just rhetoric), and so its hard to gauge how that affects homophobia on a national scale - seems like rappers here all got gay cousins theyd go to war for so i see more 'i dont get involved' type shit instead of active anti gay posturing

xpost w/ nitsuh roffles re: 'clapping off-beat when the choir starts singing' - oh kerry :-/

-++-++-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:57 (twenty years ago)

"we ain't club nouveau"

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:05 (twenty years ago)

xpost

As for specific techniques in terms of linking these two issues to the black community (which for the record does think of itself as The Black Community plenty of the time):

(a) Break down perception of homosexuality as some sort of decadent white-people behavior by stressing the number of gay people within black communities, both urban and not, both present and historical. One huge thing here would be to have public and visible models of gay black people who aren't perceived as having flown the coop of blackness -- i.e., not rich folk or arty or showbiz (and not backlashed down-low). [Trickier argument that no one will make: that the down-low and all its worst consequences exist in some part because of a community that pushes same-sex sexuality into shady sidelines either way.]

(b) When forced to address abortion to this sort of audience, talk about empowerment and control for young black women in particular -- tell a tale of bootstrapping and infinite possibilities and explain how having reproductive control is essential to allowing black women to continue their upward rise into the middle class. Mingle this talk in terms of "responsibility" and having the opportunity to exercise that responsibility, starting in terms of birth control and sexual education and so on -- and then cast abortion as a regrettable end point. The focus: that the important part is for young black women to have the opportunity to change their lives.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:10 (twenty years ago)

public and visible but not rich or arty or showbiz?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:12 (twenty years ago)

plenty of visible celebrities arent considered rich, arty or showbiz by the public

-++--+-+-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:12 (twenty years ago)

and yeah great post nitsuh

-+-++-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:13 (twenty years ago)

plenty of visible celebrities arent considered rich, arty or showbiz by the public

so people who are rich, but don't have a 'rich' image, then?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:17 (twenty years ago)

lol @ "Southern predilection for conformity"

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 17:06 (twenty years ago)

martin luther king and sojourner truth?

uh, they live in the South?

-- gabbneb (gabbne...), April 19th, 2006.

^^^ predilection for conformity

--+--+-+++, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 17:09 (twenty years ago)

I didn't just mean celebrities, guys -- I meant taking people who can speak to the experience and maybe helping them find more of a platform to do it. I'm sure there are already plenty of activists and speakers and organizers in exactly the position, doing exactly that work. Nobody needs to kidnap Maya Keyes or anything.

That said, it obviously wouldn't hurt if an openly-gay friend-and-neighbor black man magically became famous for something.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 17:11 (twenty years ago)

yeah, i'm totally unfamiliar with southern weirdness

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 17:18 (twenty years ago)

You guys got it all backwards.

Politicians are always promising black people economic power. Gay people are almost always richer than average and homosexual cities (like the #1 San Fran and NYC) are also the richest cities in America in terms of income per capita.

1. I say we take the really, really femme gay guys from San Fran, all the closeted actors in Los Angeles, the art freaks in NYC and the pedos in Massachusetts...

2. bus them into the inner cities to work and live...

3. ???...

4. Black America is the fastest growing economy in America.

What do you guys say?

Cunga (Cunga), Thursday, 20 April 2006 07:34 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand Cunga, what do the pedos in Massachusetts have to do with gay people?

Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 20 April 2006 07:42 (twenty years ago)

This thread is hateful and racist? Black people can be intelligent enough to see through the homosexual agenda too.

Luke J, Thursday, 20 April 2006 14:59 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.