Ethnic churchgoers: In this group are African-Americans, Hispanics, and Muslims, who together accounted for about 19 percent of the Kerry vote in 2004. Though they also opposed the Iraq war and share the views of other religious lefties about the importance of fighting poverty and protecting the environment, they differ from the other groups on abortion and, even more so, gay rights. Sixty-four percent of African-Americans oppose gay marriage. Analysts think this opposition accounts for the significant black support that Bush enjoyed in Ohio in 2004, which helped tip the state (and the election).
While many national black leaders support gay marriage, local black clergy have bristled at the comparison made by gay rights activists to the 1960s civil rights struggle. Black clergy also have been supporters of President Bush's faith-based initiative. And while many secular liberals mock or bristle at Bush's religious rhetoric, African-Americans polled on the topic have said they wished religion influenced the president even more.
so how come more than any other minority (see waldmans column debunking the myth of hispanic conservatives - gay marriage approval at 54%, the national average) black voters lean towards the chrsitian right, especially on abortion & homosexuality? how did the fundamentalist views of falwell & robertson become so ingrained in a population that otherwise skews overwhelmingly left, in an institution that birthed martin luther king and sojourner truth? im wary of conflating religious belief with conservatism, but in this case theyre so intertwined its nearly impossible not to. and im distinguishing this from the separate phenomenon of a relatively ineffectual economic conservative segment of the black upper/middle class, which i think mostly brushes away religious justifications for bush voting & general assholism. but this, this is a legitimate populist grassroots movement, one that white republicans are happy to exploit and white democrats are terrified of confronting, for fear of outstepping their political & racial bounds (except for mouthy 'condi = uncle tom' assholes who dont count in any serious discourse) or of biting the hand that increasingly chooses not to feed them. but as the right cranks up their 'culture wars' rhetoric, its an issue i feel is becoming more important with every election, and one i have no idea how to confront
― -++---++-+-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 14:42 (twenty years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 14:51 (twenty years ago)
― -++-+--, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 14:53 (twenty years ago)
― Dan (Just A Hunch) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 14:56 (twenty years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 14:58 (twenty years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:00 (twenty years ago)
― Fight the Real Enemy -- Tasti D-Lite (ex machina), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:01 (twenty years ago)
I think American society needs to figure out if its laws are supposed to grant rights or proscribe freedoms before this issue can be solved. It's completely asinine to me that people think they have the right to tell someone else who should be eligible beneficiaries of their health insurance or granted rights as next-of-kin, etc etc etc.
(xpost: yeah I guess Dan OTM (although what the hell would HE know about this issue anyway) ... Wow, I just ran out of middle fingers.)
― Dan (Nuke Everyone And Start Over) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:05 (twenty years ago)
― -+-+---, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:06 (twenty years ago)
― -+-+---, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:07 (twenty years ago)
― Dan (Too Touchy) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:09 (twenty years ago)
― Dan (;_;) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:10 (twenty years ago)
― -++-+--+, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:14 (twenty years ago)
― -+-+++-+-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:14 (twenty years ago)
uh, they live in the South?
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:18 (twenty years ago)
Ethan I generally picture you with a knife in your teeth at all times. Make sure it's pointing outwards, though. SRSLY though, I think this shows the limitations of your CONFRONT mode. Why is it your issue? What are you really going to do? If you are pro-actively politically active, is there an opportunity for you to take this burden on? Or are you just talking about 'how do I get my head around this apparently contradictory information?'
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:19 (twenty years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:22 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:22 (twenty years ago)
― --++--+-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:23 (twenty years ago)
― --++--+-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:24 (twenty years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:25 (twenty years ago)
― --++--++, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:26 (twenty years ago)
xpost
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:27 (twenty years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:29 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:29 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:30 (twenty years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:30 (twenty years ago)
― -+-+-+, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:33 (twenty years ago)
― -++---, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:34 (twenty years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:34 (twenty years ago)
So perhaps whatever you can do to confront/campaign against this kind of intolerance should done in a non-race-specific way. What you can actually do I dunno - how are you going to change people's views when they're based on pure prejudice/instinct/ignorance?
― Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:47 (twenty years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:54 (twenty years ago)
Hence gay marriage, an issue which has practically zero personal effect on the average voter, can -- yes -- swing something.
I'm not sure exactly what the question is here, though. If we're asking why an otherwise-progressive black population would have these beliefs, I'd say the reasons are pretty obvious -- in a lot of ways they're very much like their white evangelical counterparts. (And the ways in which they're different from their white counterparts link up pretty well with the "otherwise-progressive" part of their political beliefs.) If we're asking how much of a problem this is, or how liberals can address it, I suppose that's bigger, but the answers seem like the same boring ones as always: point the audience toward the things liberals can do for it, stress the basic socioeconomic importance of those things, respect the basis of those other beliefs but make sensitive reasonable arguments for why you believe something else, and try not to look like a tool with a rod up your ass clapping off-beat when the choir starts singing.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:54 (twenty years ago)
xpost w/ nitsuh roffles re: 'clapping off-beat when the choir starts singing' - oh kerry :-/
― -++-++-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 15:57 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:05 (twenty years ago)
As for specific techniques in terms of linking these two issues to the black community (which for the record does think of itself as The Black Community plenty of the time):
(a) Break down perception of homosexuality as some sort of decadent white-people behavior by stressing the number of gay people within black communities, both urban and not, both present and historical. One huge thing here would be to have public and visible models of gay black people who aren't perceived as having flown the coop of blackness -- i.e., not rich folk or arty or showbiz (and not backlashed down-low). [Trickier argument that no one will make: that the down-low and all its worst consequences exist in some part because of a community that pushes same-sex sexuality into shady sidelines either way.]
(b) When forced to address abortion to this sort of audience, talk about empowerment and control for young black women in particular -- tell a tale of bootstrapping and infinite possibilities and explain how having reproductive control is essential to allowing black women to continue their upward rise into the middle class. Mingle this talk in terms of "responsibility" and having the opportunity to exercise that responsibility, starting in terms of birth control and sexual education and so on -- and then cast abortion as a regrettable end point. The focus: that the important part is for young black women to have the opportunity to change their lives.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:10 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:12 (twenty years ago)
― -++--+-+-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:12 (twenty years ago)
― -+-++-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:13 (twenty years ago)
so people who are rich, but don't have a 'rich' image, then?
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 16:17 (twenty years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 17:06 (twenty years ago)
-- gabbneb (gabbne...), April 19th, 2006.
^^^ predilection for conformity
― --+--+-+++, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 17:09 (twenty years ago)
That said, it obviously wouldn't hurt if an openly-gay friend-and-neighbor black man magically became famous for something.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 17:11 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 17:18 (twenty years ago)
Politicians are always promising black people economic power. Gay people are almost always richer than average and homosexual cities (like the #1 San Fran and NYC) are also the richest cities in America in terms of income per capita.
1. I say we take the really, really femme gay guys from San Fran, all the closeted actors in Los Angeles, the art freaks in NYC and the pedos in Massachusetts...
2. bus them into the inner cities to work and live...
3. ???...
4. Black America is the fastest growing economy in America.
What do you guys say?
― Cunga (Cunga), Thursday, 20 April 2006 07:34 (twenty years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 20 April 2006 07:42 (twenty years ago)
― Luke J, Thursday, 20 April 2006 14:59 (twenty years ago)