― Kris, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Gale Deslongchamps, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Brian MacDonald, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Hank, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― DG, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
i think the prime minister is only allowed in the house of lords once a year, to hear the queen's speech: he is at that time not allowed to speak
kris do you really want to master all of brit parliamentary practice: it will cause you to do drugs i promise — there is some convention whereby if you are wearing a *top hat* in parliament then you can say or do something you are not allowed to otherwise; please god if i remember i will be carried off gibbering
― RickyT, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
If a Member of Parliament feels that another member has broken these rules they are permitted to interrupt the debate by rising from their seat and saying `Point of Order, Mister Speaker'.
The Member then explains their reasons for believing the rules of the House have been broken and the Speaker must decide whether the MP has a valid point of order or not. The Speaker's decision cannot be challenged.
MPs wishing to raise a point of order during a division were required to wear a hat so that they can be more easily seen by the Speaker when other MPs are crowding into the Chamber to cast their votes.
Two collapsible, black opera hats were kept in the Commons Chamber at all times for this purpose.
That practice has now been decided to be old-fashioned, and in future MPs will merely have to move nearer to the Speaker to make their point of order. "
― goeff, Thursday, 24 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)