Bush criticises Record Which has The US anthem Sung In Spanish

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
George Bush has entered a row about the US national anthem, criticising a Spanish version featuring Wyclef John and Gloria Trevi.

"I think the national anthem ought to be sung in English," he said when asked at a news conference.

But Adam Kidron, the British-born producer behind Nuestro Himno, said: "There's no intent to usurp anything."

"I wanted to show my thanks to these people who buy my records... and do the jobs I don't want to do," he added.

The record is released in the US on Friday.

The song also drew derision from Mark Krakorian, head of a US think-tank called the Center for Immigration Studies.

"Would the French accept people signing the La Marseillaise in English as a sign of patriotism? Of course not."

Controversy

A remix version due to go on sale in June will contain several lines in English that criticise US immigration law, such as: "These kids have no parents, 'cause of all these mean laws... let's not start a war with all these hard workers, they can't help where they were born."

Bryanna Bevens who writes for a web magazine about immigration called Vdare.com, said she was unhappy with the remix.

"It's very whiny. If you want to say all those things, by all means, put them on a poster board, but don't put them on the national anthem," she said.

Hip hop star Pitbull, whose real name is Armando Perez, also features on the track.

He said the US was built by immigrants and "the meaning of the American dream is in that record: struggle, freedom, opportunity, everything they are trying to shut down on us".

Urban Box Office records, who are releasing the single, are urging Hispanic radio stations to play the track at 7pm EDT (2300 BST) on Friday as a sign of solidarity.

James Gardner of the Smithsonian National Museum of American History said Americans have long enjoyed different versions of the Star Spangled Banner, including gospel and country interpretations.

"There are a number of renditions that people aren't happy with, but that's part of it - that it means enough for people to try to sing."

Will people actually care about this?

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Friday, 28 April 2006 18:57 (nineteen years ago)

I doubt Bush would criticize Hendrix version would he? (cue accusations of Bush being a rockist!)

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Friday, 28 April 2006 18:59 (nineteen years ago)

Just out of curiosity, what publication is this story from? I ask because it doesn't appear to be one rigorous enough in its reporting to fact-check the spelling of "Wyclef Jean" (assuming that's not a oh-so-meta Easter Egg joke about linguistics).

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:07 (nineteen years ago)

a web magazine about immigration called Vdare.com

Uhhhhh . . . yeah. Someone misspelled "white supremacist mouthpiece site."

As you can guess, the other quoted source -- which is described of course only as a "think-tank" -- is associated with FAIR, better known as the "no darkies in my neighborhood plz" lobbying group.

phil d. (Phil D.), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)

oops I thought I posted it. It was the BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4955360.stm

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)

that is a pretty funny "typo."

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:17 (nineteen years ago)

"it's pretty whiny. if you want to say it, by all means say it, but preferably in a soundproofed room of which you are the only occupant"

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:18 (nineteen years ago)

geez this whole immigration thing is straight outta the Simpsons "bear tax" episode. election year misdirection bullshit.

"Immagints, I knew it was them!" - Mo Syzlak

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:19 (nineteen years ago)

First stanza of the Star Spangled Banner translated from English to Dutch to English to Japenese:

O, you say, it is possible, or barely is quickly, as for us is the ‚» of some hail'd ‚ê end wide line gleaming? Whose clearness ASTRE and thro ' as for dangerous fight and O'er as for watch'd where us meets to this methodological inflated in the doctor of disaster, this method bravely streaming? As for And in bewijsthro the flag which does those ASTRE which ' the night to of the the shining where the rocket which destruction intensity it could point with the air is red it gave and is our flag boom o calls still, is inlaid there was done, was, in spite even to that as for waveO'er on the other hand the country and the house of brave so?

God bless the free online translator!

Fluffy Bear Hearts Our Mother Tongue (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:21 (nineteen years ago)

house of brave so? is zhang yimou's next movie.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:23 (nineteen years ago)

If only our national anthem contained the word "methodological!"

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:31 (nineteen years ago)

"Would the French accept people signing the La Marseillaise in English as a sign of patriotism? Of course not."

apparently being an american now means making all your decisions based on what hardcore french nationalists would do

+-++-++-, Friday, 28 April 2006 19:33 (nineteen years ago)

If only our national anthem contained the word "methodological!"

Or "doctor of disaster".

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:34 (nineteen years ago)

(x-post)

Not to mention France doesn't have a large English-speaking minority.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:35 (nineteen years ago)

does anyone actually like our national anthem?

gear (gear), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:36 (nineteen years ago)

would the british accept people singing 'god save the queen' in english as a sign of patriotism??

-++-+++-, Friday, 28 April 2006 19:37 (nineteen years ago)

Nothing new. They got their panties in a wad over Jose Feliciano thirty years ago as well.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)

does anyone actually like our national anthem?

I can't stand it. When I saw the thread subject, all I could think of was that the only way I could even imagine the national anthem being listenable on an album is if it was done by Seu Jorge in the style of the Life Aquatic soundtrack.

josh in sf (stfu kthx), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)

To Anacreon in Heaven, where he sat in full glee,
A few sons of Harmony sent a petition,
That He their Inspirer and Patron would be;
When this answer arrived from the Jolly Old Grecian
"Voice, Fiddle, and Flute,
"no longer be mute,
"I'll lend you my Name and inspire you to boot,
"And, besides, I'll instruct you like me to entwine
"The Myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's Vine.

The news through OLYMPUS immediately flew;
When OLD THUNDER pretended to give himself Airs
"If these mortals are susser'd their Scheme to persue,
"The Devil a Goddess will stay above the Stairs.
"Hark, already they cry,
"In transports of Joy,
"Away to the Sons of ANACREON we'll fly,
"And there, with good Fellows, we'll learn to entwine
"The Myrtle of VENUS with BUCCUS'S Vine.

"The YELLOW-HAIRED GOD and his nine lusty Maids
"From Helicon's Banks will incontinent flee,
"IDALIA will boast but of tenantless Shades,
"And the bi-forked Hill a mere Desart will be
"My Thunder, no fear on't,
"Shall soon do it's Errand,
" and, dam'me! I'll swinge the Ringleaders, I warrant,
"I'll trim the young Dogs, for thus daring to twine
"The Myrtle of VENUS with BACCUS'S Vine.

APOLLO rose up; and said, "Pr'ythee ne'er quarrel,
"Good King of the Gods, with my Vot'ries below:
"Your Thunder is useless." - then, shewing his Laurel,
Cry'd, "Sic evitabile fulmen, you know!
"then over each Head
"My Laurels I'll spread;
"So my Sons from your Crackers no Mischief shall dread,
"Whilst snug in their Club-Room, they jovially twine
"The Myrtle of VENUS with BACCUS'S Vine.

Next MOMUS got up, with his risible Phiz,
And swore with APOLLO he'd cheerfully join
"The full Tide of Harmony still shall be his,
"But the Song, and the Catch, & the Laugh shall be mine
"Then, JOVE, be not jealous
Of these honest Fellows.
Cry'd JOVE, "We relent, since the Truth you now tell us;
"And swear, by OLD STYX, that they long shall entwine
"The Myrtle of VENUS with BACCUS'S Vine.

Ye sons of ANACREON, then, join Hand in Hand;
Preserve Unanimity, Friendship, and Love!
'Tis your's to support what's so happily plann'd;
You've the Sanction of Gods, and the FIAT of Jove.
While thus we agree
Our Toast let it be.
May our club flourish happy, united and free!
And long may the Sons of ANACREON intwine
The Myrtle of VENUS with BACCUS'S Vine.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)

ADAM KIDRON

Andy_K (Andy_K), Friday, 28 April 2006 20:04 (nineteen years ago)

Is no one else annoyed by this?

James Gardner of the Smithsonian National Museum of American History said Americans have long enjoyed different versions of the Star Spangled Banner, including gospel and country interpretations.

Did they totally change the words in the gospel or country "interpretations"? How anyone can possibly think this won't be totally inflammatory boggles my mind. I really hate to sound reactionary, but look, I have no effing idea what's being sung. And then you tell us not only is there a Spanish version, but there's a version written to criticize immigration policy... Come on!

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Friday, 28 April 2006 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

SO STOKED FOR MAY 1

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 28 April 2006 20:29 (nineteen years ago)

election year misdirection bullshit

So, what, you're saying that the Republicans have hired a British producer to record a song that will irritate the hell out of their electoral base so as to get out the vote? Get real.

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Friday, 28 April 2006 20:29 (nineteen years ago)

(In case it wasn't clear, what I posted were the original lyrics to the tune of the National Anthem, not a mere unfunny overlong Momus joke.)

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 28 April 2006 20:32 (nineteen years ago)

I can't understand why anyone would have a problem with the anthem being sung in a different language. ::boggle::

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 28 April 2006 20:34 (nineteen years ago)

uh no mitya I meant that the fact that the president is even talking about it and that the nat'l media are reporting on it are part of a larger effort, stemming from ulterior motives, to propel this issue to the forefront of nat'l dialogue.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 28 April 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

It seems competely self-evident to me.

How different is a song with different words from a "stars and stripes" that was black and orange instead of red and blue?

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Friday, 28 April 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)

but translating something doesn't change the words! The same meaning is still there!

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 28 April 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)

Do we know that as a fact? I haven't seen that written explicitly. And, anyway, that's almost beside the point. The majority, probably the vast, majority won't understand.

And as far as meaning goes, well, when Dubya says "liberty" and I say "liberty" the words aren't changed, but the meaning is. I just don't buy it. This is a completely symbolic thing, not the instructions for a driver's licence or whatever.

xpost to Shakey:

Sorry to be lazy, but talk me through it, then. The media were reporting on it before Bush commented and not just Fox. There are lots of potential criticisms of the media, including on this issue, but you (seemed to) suggest it was part of an effort to relieve stress on the ruling party.

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Friday, 28 April 2006 20:49 (nineteen years ago)

perhaps I can best illustrate my position by asking a question: what has changed regarding immigrants and US immigration policy in the last oh, I dunno, let's say 8 years that has made immigration such a crucial issue at this particular juncture?

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:15 (nineteen years ago)

of course the answer is nothing. There has been no massive influx of illegal immigrants recently - its been the same stready stream as it has been for decades. No one can conclusively prove that illegal immigration affects the economy negatively. So who cares? Racists and political opportunists who see an opening for scapegoating and grandstanding - its an issue which cannot be "resolved" but can be used for political gain, ergo its perfect in an election year when the ruling party has nothing but a scorecard of one failure after another. Instead of talking about the war, or about the fucked federal budget, or about energy policy, or about Katrina, or a host of other issues we are told to all of a sudden be concerned about IMMIGRANTS! Ohmigod, they're ruining the country! And when one asks how, exactly, you get a litany of responses that are either racist, historically ignorant, or economically innacurate.

Now I'm not saying immigration is not a fit topic for debate - sure it is, we need to address how to deal with illegal immigrations, have a policy that is humane and effective, etc., but focusing on it NOW, at the exclusion of other issues, particularly during this election, at this particular point in our political history when there is so much more at stake is highly highly suspicious.

Really illegal immigrants in '06 = gay marriage in '04.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)

Question: Mr. President... a cultural question for you... there is a version of the national anthem in Spanish now. Do you believe it will hold the same value if sung in Spanish as in English?

Bush: No I don't. Because I think the national anthem aught to be sung in English. And I think people who want to be a citizen of this country aught to learn English and they aught to learn to sing the national anthem in English.

Jeff LeVine (Jeff LeVine), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:27 (nineteen years ago)

lmao @ g-dub defending use of english

-++-+-+-, Friday, 28 April 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)

xpost

I understand what you're getting at, but unfortunately that's a dead end for me, as I have only returned to the US last summer. I've been asking myself the same question since I've been here. It does seem, though, that something has changed relatively recently: the immigrant community has never been so active in my memory. Marches all around the country? Boycotts?

In my less misanthropic moments, the whole thing reminds me of the controversy around Islam. What (or who) your average American really hates are terrorists and those who support them. Unfortunately the most prominent terrorist have identified themselves with Islam, thereby playing into the racism that's just under the surface for a lot of people. Similarly with immigration: what your (again) "average American" gets emotional about is illegal immigration. If all this "immigrant activism" is about people who are legally in the US, then they are doing an absolutely terrible job of communicating what their problems are.

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:30 (nineteen years ago)

might i remind you dude is bilingual just like everybody singing the song

-+-+-, Friday, 28 April 2006 21:31 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think Bush was actually criticizing any particular song, if you listen to what he was actually asked and his answer. You can watch the video on CSPAN.com - comments come at 13.50 in the 4.28 video "Bush remarks on Economic News."

Jeff LeVine (Jeff LeVine), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:32 (nineteen years ago)

xpost to jeff:

Did Bush spell out his response to the question? Yeah, he's an idiot, but if you're going to take shots at him, at least take good ones.

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)

well the immigration community is just responding because its being threatened (see also Prop 187 in California - which was pretty much the same phenomenon only on a smaller scale). The scale of activity seems heightened, I agree, but I think that's in response to this being a national debate with rather draconian measures on the table.

Me personally, I live in a working class latino neighborhood in California and its always been pretty politically active.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)

If I actually gave a fuck about the sanctity of the national anthem, I might have an opinion on this : )

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.univision.com/content/content.jhtml?cid=848897

you can listen to it in full there.

but I don't really recommend you do.

Cathy (Cathy), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah - the quote I typed out above was his complete "response" to the question asked...

Jeff LeVine (Jeff LeVine), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:38 (nineteen years ago)

Jeff, my point was that YOU typed it out. If "aught" and "ought" are what you're on about, they're homonyms, at least in some parts of the country. If "ought" is wrong in that sentence, it's not horribly so for colloqual English, IMO.

Now I'm not saying immigration is not a fit topic for debate - sure it is, we need to address how to deal with illegal immigrations, have a policy that is humane and effective, etc., but focusing on it NOW, at the exclusion of other issues, particularly during this election, at this particular point in our political history when there is so much more at stake is highly highly suspicious.

That I can buy, I guess. And it only takes a couple of key commentators (cue Lou Dobbs) to take an issue and make it the center of debate.

My gut tells me that one of the reasons its surfacing is exactly because so many things are going badly. Even though many economic numbers seem good (did I hear today that we had the highest quarterly GDP growth in years?), most people feel very very uncertain about job security, and they've got pressure from gas prices. And when you're looking for a scapegoat for why you might lose your job (or why your health care benefits are being cut back or...), immigrants are an easy target.

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:41 (nineteen years ago)

err, homophones

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:43 (nineteen years ago)

there is some guy shouting "sigue luchando" (keep fighting) and "somos iguales" (we're equal) over it towards the end. can anyone make out the other added bits? or are the spanish lyrics online somwhere?

I just read the English lyrics and I have no idea what they mean, so I can't tell how literal a translation it is in general.

Cathy (Cathy), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:51 (nineteen years ago)

I just read the English lyrics and I have no idea what they mean, so I can't tell how literal a translation it is in general.

So, by definition, the words can't mean the same thing, then, can they?

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:58 (nineteen years ago)

Allow me to translate, Cathy:

Wow, you see that? You can just make it out now that the sun's rising. It's our flag, still standing from last night. Remember, there was that big battle going on, and we looked up and we were like "check out that flag, man." And then there were bombs going off all night and all kinds of crazy explosions and stuff, but it was pretty cool, because every time there was an explosion, you could see the flag was still there, so we were all like "sweet." Anyway, check it out -- you see? It's still over there, still waving and shit.

I.e. we still have the defensive "can't bring us down" anthem of a plucky upstart nation.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 28 April 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)

right, sorry - I should have typed "ought"

Jeff LeVine (Jeff LeVine), Friday, 28 April 2006 22:06 (nineteen years ago)

Our anthem is basically "I Will Survive" for flags.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 28 April 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)

Aww. Now I see!

Cathy (Cathy), Friday, 28 April 2006 22:09 (nineteen years ago)

Found the Spanish lyrics:

Amanece: ¿no veis, a la luz de la aurora,
Lo que tanto aclamamos la noche al caer?
Sus estrellas, sus barras flotaban ayer
En el fiero combate en señal de victoria,
Fulgor de cohetes, de bombas estruendo,
Por la noche decían: "!Se va defendiendo!"

Coro:
!Oh, decid! ¿Despliega aún su hermosura estrellada,
Sobre tierra de libres, la bandera sagrada?

En la costa lejana que apenas blanquea,
Donde yace nublada la hueste feroz
Sobre aquel precipicio que elévase atroz
¡Oh, decidme! ¿Qué es eso que en la brisa ondea?
Se oculta y flamea, en el alba luciendo,
Reflejada en la mar, donde va resplandeciendo

Coro:
!Aún allí desplegó su hermosura estrellada,
Sobre tierra de libres, la bandera sagrada!

¡Oh así sea siempre, en lealtad defendamos
Nuestra tierra natal contra el torpe invasor!
A Dios quien nos dio paz, libertad y honor,
Nos mantuvo nación, con fervor bendigamos.
Nuestra causa es el bien, y por eso triunfamos.
Siempre fue nuestro lema "¡En Dios confiamos!"

Coro:
!Y desplegará su hermosura estrellada,
Sobre tierra de libres, la bandera sagrada!

Cathy (Cathy), Friday, 28 April 2006 22:11 (nineteen years ago)

(This is the point in the thread where I jump in and say it's "sauce" and not "salsa," right?)

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:16 (nineteen years ago)

OH! Thanks John. You just reminded me of something.

Safety First (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:16 (nineteen years ago)

so i guess the spanish language version of "hotel california" a refusal of classic eagles hits and the dancehall version of "oh donna" is a refusal of the genius of richie valens

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:18 (nineteen years ago)

tracer, do you really not understand the difference, or are we just sniping at each other for the fun of it?

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:20 (nineteen years ago)

the difference is those damned spaniards want to bring their windmills and almodovar films to these shores and i'll be damned if i'll let that happen on my watch.

gear (gear), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

xpost

(or perhaps I should say, "the difference I have tried to argue")

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:23 (nineteen years ago)

200+ posts and no-ones done Jose can you sí yet?

Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:23 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, honestly i don't get it mitya!

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

mitya, the thing that still strikes me as troubling about your post is that in order to react to speaking one language like that, that it's a refusal to speak another, one would have to be in the position of never having to translate one's own words. in other words, it still seems to be about power and delusions of losing it, to me. but yeah, as I was typing my last post, I had "agree to disagree" in a Ron Burgundy voice in my head.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)

what pisses me off is that this song comes out just when i've finally mastered how to sing every note of hendrix's version! those divebomb whammy-bar sections are a bitch - it'll be a relief to have a new way to denigrate my nation's history and culture

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:34 (nineteen years ago)

uh oh the terrorists have won

mookieproof (mookieproof), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)

Don't people like to toss around the factoid about how salsa is the best-selling condiment in the U.S. and has been for several years now?

Except there are thousands of types of salsa and only basically one type of ketchup so it's not really a fair comparison.

n/a (Nick A.), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)

i'm out y'all - mitya i'd like to understand the difference between your point of view on this novelty single and the point of view right-wingers take on gay marriage - both issues, as was pointed out upthread, involve interpreting a minority group's fervent desire to be included as mainstream citizens as a denigration of the mainstream itself

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:37 (nineteen years ago)

Just like how there are thousands of types of foreigner and only basically one type of whitey.

n/a (Nick A.), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:37 (nineteen years ago)

xpost to Tracer, way up there

I guess I put this in before you joined the thread. Hotel California and Oh Donna are just pop songs. SSB is a song specifically adopted by the US government as the country's official anthem.

A couple of times I also suggested - perhaps tendentiously - this official status meant singing the anthem with different words as a show of patriotism was not although different from waving a green white and orange stars and stripes.

Okay, enough of this thread for me, really. I get enough negativity off the telly, don't need to find more here.

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:38 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't read this thread but

saying someone can't sing the lyrics (in whole or part) of a national anthem on a record somewhere or as part of a record in a language other than that nation's first is v strange/stupid, I feel

if people were lobbying for the national anthem (in schools and at events and so on) to always be sung in a language other than that nation's first would also be v strange/stupid, I feel

only one of these is happening, I think

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:38 (nineteen years ago)

Except there are thousands of types of salsa and only basically one type of ketchup so it's not really a fair comparison.

Heniz family to thread!

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)

At least now we finally know why Jimi Hendrix was murdered by the CIA.

n/a (Nick A.), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)

hey n/a congrats!

mookieproof (mookieproof), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:40 (nineteen years ago)

Congrats for being ostentiously faux-racist on the Internet for ROFFLES?

n/a (Nick A.), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:40 (nineteen years ago)

I guess I put this in before you joined the thread. Hotel California and Oh Donna are just pop songs. SSB is a song specifically adopted by the US government as the country's official anthem.

thanks for pointing this out

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:41 (nineteen years ago)

wow hey congrats : D

gear (gear), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:42 (nineteen years ago)

thanks for pointing this out

why the sarcasm?

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:44 (nineteen years ago)

well, no. congrats for more straight white reasons.

mookieproof (mookieproof), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:49 (nineteen years ago)

i literally couldn't remember which song the US government had specifically adopted as the country's official anthem, "the star spangled banner" by francis scott key or "oh donna" by mr. vegas ... and now this new joint just muddies the waters further!

xpost

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:51 (nineteen years ago)

fine, tracer wins.

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:55 (nineteen years ago)

look mitya i really do have to go and sorry, but just repeating yourself and telling me what song the US has adopted as its official anthem isn't really explaining the difference between the spanish hotel california and the spanish star-spangled banner. both were written out of love and homage, both hoped to create a new space within the old space that legitimized in some way the culture of the singers within the culture of the pre-translation work. but to be fair i don't share you fascination with and respect for things this country has officially adopted as its symbols - birds, flags, pendants, etc. (i imagine you would also support a flag-burning amendment)

you also haven't explained the difference between your problem with this song and right-wingers' problem w/gay marriage, to me both positions are pointless, selfish, exclusionary and above all, deeply paranoid

in other words, rjg otm

xpost HA HA BY THE POWER OF GREYSKULL

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 22:56 (nineteen years ago)

you can contextualize hotel california all you want, tracer, but that doesn't mean that a pop song is the same as an official state symbol. to me that's the difference and i don't know how to explain it any differently. i have offered the flag example multiple times on this thread as some kind of parallel, and not once has anyone addressed it.

you imagine wrong on the flag-burning amendment. and i have no problem per se with the spanish-language version EXCEPT to the extent that people want to argue that it's the same or patriotic or an obvious expression of common values or whatever.

and i just hadn't gotten to the gay marriage issue, although frankly i probably won't get to it. i have no problem with gay marriage whatsoever, and i don't care whether the two positions or logically consistent or not.

truce, okay?

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 23:07 (nineteen years ago)

(and, most importantly, i have house and lost to attend to)

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 23:08 (nineteen years ago)

since when was patriotism a good thing LOL

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 23:10 (nineteen years ago)

i am violently opposed to the "singing" of the national anthem with excessive vibrato and other voice-as-Yngwie supposedly-popist bullshit on top. en espanol i can't be bothered.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

I am also opposed to the singing of the national anthem outside a radius of 35 miles of Baltimore, MD.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 23:13 (nineteen years ago)

And the United States of America is not the descendent of a French colony or a Spanish one.

Hahahah -- OK, what now? I mean, get one Louisiana Purchase, plus maybe Florida, etc. and there are some German-speaking Pennsylvanians who almost won the early "official language" debate who want to talk to you. Some Dutch-speaking New Yorkers, too.

phil d. (Phil D.), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 23:26 (nineteen years ago)

I guess I put this in before you joined the thread. Hotel California and Oh Donna are just pop songs. SSB is a song specifically adopted by the US government as the country's official anthem.

...and this spanish version of SSB is, effectively, just a pop song in a way, yes? So whats the big deal again?

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 23:31 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.gettysburgflag.com/images/RainbowOGflag.JPG

END THIS EXCLUSIONARY SEAMSTRESSING

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 4 May 2006 00:17 (nineteen years ago)

It doesn't matter than he campaigns in that language, he's really not good at it or something: today

McClellan Says Bush's Spanish Not Good

Thu May 4, 11:48 AM ET

WASHINGTON -
President Bush likes to drop a few words of Spanish in his speeches and act like he's proficient in the language. But he's really not that good, his spokesman said Thursday.

"The president can speak Spanish but not that well," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said. "He's not that good with his Spanish."

McClellan's comment was noticeable because presidential press secretaries usually boast about a president's ability rather than talk about any shortcomings. McClellan is in the last days of his job, leaving the White House next week.

McClellan made his remark in response to a report that Bush had sung the Star-Spangled Banner in Spanish during the 2000 campaign. Just last week Bush said the national anthem should be sung in English, not Spanish.

"It's absurd," McClellan said of the report, suggesting that Bush couldn't have sung it in Spanish even if he had wanted to.

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 4 May 2006 21:19 (nineteen years ago)

I also think it's ridiculous for anyone to pretend that the the Anglo community (at least) will not see it as a refusal to sing the English one

Yeah, there is a big weird leap in here that will forever be baffling to me.

(For the record, my typing the sentence above should not be construed as a "refusal" to type other sentences expressing similar thoughts.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 4 May 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)

Scotty must be pissed

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 4 May 2006 21:38 (nineteen years ago)

after all he's done for Bushy

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 4 May 2006 21:39 (nineteen years ago)

say, since Scripture has already been posted today, why not some more:

"The alien living with you must be treated as one of your native-born. Love him as yourself, for you were aliens in Egypt."
-- Leviticus 19:34

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 4 May 2006 22:29 (nineteen years ago)

'aliens in egypt'! that's some art bell shit right there

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 4 May 2006 22:31 (nineteen years ago)

hey, it worked for him! you see his new wife?

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 4 May 2006 22:35 (nineteen years ago)

i think that was more 'check in the mail'

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 5 May 2006 00:55 (nineteen years ago)

AP, 1998:
Helping matters, Bush also speaks fluent Spanish. So does his brother, Jeb Bush, who is married to a Mexican-American and was elected governor of Florida, thanks in part to a strong Hispanic vote.

Portsmouth Herald, 1999:
Bush also took a question from a Spanish reporter and answered in fluent Spanish.

Pat Robertson on CNN, 2/24/2000:
ROBERTSON: Well, I think he could say that, but I think he's made it clear. He said it in Michigan. He said, "Look, I'm not anti-Catholic, and I don't support racism." I mean, this guy has put together a coalition in Texas of Hispanics -- he speaks fluent Spanish -- of -- of African- Americans, of Democrats. I mean, he is a very, very tolerant, broad-based guy. And I think that the media's spinning this thing way out of proportion to what really happened. That's my feeling.

New York Times, 2/28/00 (Nicholas Kristof reporting):
He also showed off his Spanish, which is fluent, by firing off a sentence in Spanish.

McLaughlin Group, 6/2000:
MR. O'DONNELL: Absolutely, and they both -- they both do it well. I mean, George W. Bush is fluent in Spanish.

National Review, 4/2000:
Yes, indeed. He was fluent in Spanish, which appeals to that minority, and he was fluent in gibberish-the touchy-feely Clintonian hogwash that the elusive "soccer mom" is said to go bananas over.

PBS, 5/9/2000:
RICHARD RODRIGUEZ: I was listening the other day to Governor Bush speak fluent Spanish to Hispanic voters when it struck me that Spanish is becoming unofficially, but truly, the second language of the United States.
(this presumably could be referring to Jeb Bush, but there's no distinction made and since this was in the middle of the 2000 election I assume he meant George)

CNN 8/2000:
PRESS: Well, I wonder how good George Bush's Spanish is. Did he know what the lyrics were before he said they ought to play the song at the convention? I don't know.
O'BRIEN: Yes, he says he's fluent.

Morning call, 4/22/06:
It's also good to see President Bush, (a fluent Spanish-speaker, by the way), leading the vision for comprehensive immigration reform based on three elements: border security, effective immigration law enforcement, and very importantly, a temporary worker program.

Scott McClellan today:
White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the assertion did not ring true to him because, "The president speaks Spanish, but not that well."
"I'm saying that not only was that suggestion absurd, but that he couldn't possibly sing the national anthem in Spanish. He's not that good with his Spanish," McClellan said.

Mike Dixn (Mike Dixon), Friday, 5 May 2006 03:42 (nineteen years ago)

does anybody know if he's as verbally dyslexic in spanish as he is en ingles?

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 04:14 (nineteen years ago)

speaking of pronunciation, i swear i just heard bill o'reilly say "xenophobe" as EX-ON-O-PHOBE.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 5 May 2006 07:12 (nineteen years ago)

I thought I saw a quote somewhere from a Mexican legislator or someone who said that he spoke "confidently but poorly." Easy for people to perceive that as "fluent" if they don't speak Spanish themselves and people are too polite to correct his mistakes.

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Friday, 5 May 2006 10:14 (nineteen years ago)

"Fluent" and "perfect" are two very abused words as descriptors of people speaking foreign languages. They are generally used to mean "better than I could", "better than I'd think possible for this person", or "I once saw a movie in that language and didn't always read the subtitles. Please hire me."

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 5 May 2006 10:21 (nineteen years ago)

gypsy, maybe he meant Exxonophobe.

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Friday, 5 May 2006 12:15 (nineteen years ago)

The First Stepford Wife flip-flops on the issue IN 25 SECONDS! Check yr watches!

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/04/laura-flip-flop/

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.