Mission: Impossible

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
can't help that i want to see this.

the Enrique who acts like some kind of good taste gestapo (Enrique), Friday, 5 May 2006 14:54 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, Vanessa Redgrave and Brian De Palma!

Ebert gave MI3 2-1/2 stars, which is like zero from a critic with actual standards.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 14:58 (nineteen years ago)

Like yourself.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 5 May 2006 14:59 (nineteen years ago)

Ebert's review is typically amusing though.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:00 (nineteen years ago)

And he gave Hoot 1 and a half stars or something.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:01 (nineteen years ago)

Truly impossible missions:

http://filmexperience.blogspot.com/2006/05/history-of-missions-impossible.html

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:02 (nineteen years ago)

Well it's true that Ebert does rate like a lot of the hoi polloi do, nothing gets less than 3 out of 4 unless it actually made him angry that he had to sit through it. There must be some pretty serious things wrong with MI3 from his standpoint, and as much as I would hate it and avoid it anyway, Ebert giving it 2.5 is a hefty caution.

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:02 (nineteen years ago)

otm

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:03 (nineteen years ago)

link to Ebert's review...? (incidentally no way in hell am I seeing this movie, I'm just curious and find Ebert's reviews chuckleworthy sometimes)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:04 (nineteen years ago)

better, Armond deals with it in a cold 100 or so words:

http://nypress.com/19/18/film/ArmondWhite.cfm

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:07 (nineteen years ago)

rogerebert.com

Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:08 (nineteen years ago)

I love De Palma and loved the first one. But this one...

J.J. Abrams
Director - filmography
(In Production) (2000s) (1990s)

Star Trek XI (2008) (announced) (attached)
The Good Sailor (2007) (pre-production)

Mission: Impossible III (2006)
... aka M:I-3 (USA: promotional abbreviation)
"Alias"
- Authorized Personnel Only: Part 1 (2005) TV Episode (minor segments) (uncredited)
- Authorized Personnel Only: Part 2 (2005) TV Episode (minor segments) (uncredited)
- The Telling (2003) TV Episode
- Almost Thirty Years (2002) TV Episode
- Truth Be Told (2001) TV Episode
"Lost"
- Pilot: Part 2 (2004) TV Episode
- Pilot: Part 1 (2004) TV Episode

"Felicity"
- Todd Mulcahy: Part 1 (1999) TV Episode
- Friends (1999) TV Episode

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:21 (nineteen years ago)

When all that stuff about Katie Holmes having to stay silent while giving birth was going on, did anyone use "Mission Impossible" as a headline?

Vitbe... *pause*... Is Good Bread (Dada), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:25 (nineteen years ago)

what really bugs me is that these movies are pretty much ethan hunt 007 movies... mission impossible is supposed to be about a cool TEAM!!

i like how they dispensed with that in the first one but they've really painted themselves into a corner

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:26 (nineteen years ago)

Tom is all about ensembles.

No Barbara Bain, no cred

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:31 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, I was just saying, the other day, how these movies are nothing like a mission: impossible

I really liked the first one and have seen it a few times, wasn't bothered about the second one and saw a wee bit of tit when it was on the telly once, not really interested in the third one and don't mind whether I see it or not

RJG (RJG), Friday, 5 May 2006 15:51 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, the only reason I'm interested in this one is to see PSH play a Bond villain.

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:03 (nineteen years ago)

a wee bit of tit ; )

RJG (RJG), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:10 (nineteen years ago)

Whose tit?

Vitbe... *pause*... Is Good Bread (Dada), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:10 (nineteen years ago)

http://mx13.free.fr/c1/acteurs/tom-cruise/tom10.jpg

RJG (RJG), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:13 (nineteen years ago)

it kind of annoys me that they even bother co-opting the Mission:Impossible name. they should just call it BOND USA or something.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:13 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, or Impossible Mission like the C64 game!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:17 (nineteen years ago)

'real' actors playing supervillains doesn't usually pan out, ie Walken in View to a Kill prefigured his subsequent sad-joke roles. otoh, Brandauer in Never Say Never Again...

(lotsa reviews say PSH doesn't get much meat in this)

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)

But yeah, as noted above, M:I was all about the team of skilled operatives doing skilled operative things, not just Action Dude with Sub-Bond Sidekicks.

Did anyone ever watch the 2nd one more than once? is there a point?

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:19 (nineteen years ago)

i really liked mi2 the first time i saw it and then i revisited it and wondered what the hell i was thinking the first time

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:21 (nineteen years ago)

You stopped loving doves filmed in slow motion.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:22 (nineteen years ago)

"'real' actors playing supervillains doesn't usually pan out,"

too true - cf. Malkovich, Dennis Hopper, tons of others.

(exception = Pacino in Dick Tracy!)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:24 (nineteen years ago)

what about HANS GRUBER

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:24 (nineteen years ago)

or even HANS GRUBER'S BROTHER

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:26 (nineteen years ago)

gene hackman as Luthor?

Terence Stamp?

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:27 (nineteen years ago)

yaeh, real actors play FUNNY supervillains more successfully... no one shivered at Big Boy Caprice did they? Hackman as Luthor, David Warner in Time Bandits, etc.

I liked Malkovich in that Eastwood pic.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:28 (nineteen years ago)

Hackman bugs me, in general.

Kneel Before Zod = teh classic, of course.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:29 (nineteen years ago)

i'd say real actors as villains works out as much as it doesn't work out

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:29 (nineteen years ago)

hackman was a BRILLIANT luthor.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:29 (nineteen years ago)

But i will agree that "realistic"-type acting does not tend to go all that well in the exaggerated world of Bond/superheroes, etc.

for example, (ignoring the plot) Timothy Dalton & Robert Davi in License to Kill.

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:29 (nineteen years ago)

Warner's hilarious in Time Bandits. not bad in Tron either. (not sure what qualifies him as a "real" actor - did he do Hamlet or something?)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:30 (nineteen years ago)

oh waitamin, what about Batman Begins & Xmen(1/2)?

xpost Warner is classically trained, right? Also did outstanding voicework in Baldur's Gate 2 as the villain.

also, Peter Cushing in SW

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:31 (nineteen years ago)

remembered another pointless mid-90s villain turn - Irons in Die Hard 3.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:31 (nineteen years ago)

okay I'm comin around to s1ocki's POV

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:32 (nineteen years ago)

yes, Warner played Hamlet with the RSC. I saw him do Undershaft in Major Barbara on Broadway, two days after 9/11.

(OK, how about solid actors who get to use more than 5% of their chops playing big baddies? I think Brandauer and Malkovich qualify here.)

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:37 (nineteen years ago)

warner in time after time

RJG (RJG), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

in fact, I enjoyed the first two X-flicks b/c they had such strong actors in the 3 leads(2 were shakespearean britishes and one did show tunes)

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

What actress could pull off a bond/supervillian?

we can pretty much rule out sharon stone.

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:47 (nineteen years ago)

gloria stuart?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:48 (nineteen years ago)

what's her face from that movie where she was naked a bunch. The Last Seduction. I had big crush on her, but she was pretty evil in that movie.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:53 (nineteen years ago)

Sigourney could do it (I'm surprised she hasn't already)

X-Men movies are great, kingfish otm for why too. (next one's gonna BLOOOOOOWWWWWW)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:54 (nineteen years ago)

Why didn't Dr. Evil kill off the very concept of the post-1967 supervillain?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

Alice Krige?

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 17:01 (nineteen years ago)

Angelica Huston

remy (x Jeremy), Friday, 5 May 2006 17:02 (nineteen years ago)

were there really that many supervillains pre-1967?

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

I saw the new one this afternoon and I hope I never have to look at Cruise or his wet eyes again. The movie was ok, just exhausting. My bladder was tired.

WmC, Monday, 26 May 2025 22:36 (nine months ago)

3 is the straightest movie alive and i will never not be pissed when they don’t film tom cruise stealing the rabbit’s foot so we can watch his teammates pray for him or whatever. weak shit

ivy., Tuesday, 27 May 2025 02:12 (nine months ago)

i am a diehard abrams hater tho. none more hack

ivy., Tuesday, 27 May 2025 02:12 (nine months ago)

Tombstone is the straightest movie alive

Its big ball chunky time (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 27 May 2025 03:11 (nine months ago)

that can’t be true

ivy., Tuesday, 27 May 2025 03:14 (nine months ago)

it is true in certain localized parts of the universe

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 27 May 2025 03:26 (nine months ago)

I’ve only seen the De Palma and Brad Bird entries, but Walter Chaw’s review suggest I might actually have to catch up with the whole series:
https://filmfreakcentral.net/2025/05/mission-impossible-the-final-reckoning-2025/

cryptosicko, Tuesday, 27 May 2025 12:24 (nine months ago)

um i feel like you need to excise one major character/performance from Tombstone to get it anywhere near straight

waste of compute (One Eye Open), Tuesday, 27 May 2025 13:57 (nine months ago)

is Vanessa Redgrave in this

hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 27 May 2025 13:57 (nine months ago)

it’s gay as fuck!!!

ivy., Tuesday, 27 May 2025 13:58 (nine months ago)

xp

ivy., Tuesday, 27 May 2025 13:58 (nine months ago)

I suppose my response to tombstone is how delighted everyone is to swing their dicks out there. It’s not a note!

Its big ball chunky time (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 27 May 2025 14:18 (nine months ago)

To be fair that makes it sound like the opposite of the straightest movie ever

omar little, Tuesday, 27 May 2025 14:24 (nine months ago)

Which is half of why it’s a fun time, just the campy banter coupled with sweaty dudes eyeing each other

omar little, Tuesday, 27 May 2025 14:25 (nine months ago)

campy banter coupled with sweaty dudes eyeing each other

You need to see Walter Hill's Extreme Prejudice, like, yesterday.

Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Tuesday, 27 May 2025 14:26 (nine months ago)

Oh, I’ve seen that multiple times. Powers Boothe is a crucial common denominator there.

omar little, Tuesday, 27 May 2025 14:28 (nine months ago)

when I got to the end of this one I was thinking about the tweet that read something like “me and my friends would have killed ET with hammers” re: the Entiry

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 28 May 2025 02:24 (nine months ago)

big credit for not making the submarine sequence into a glory heist like the “duck in, grab the NOC list” one from the first movie they kept alluding to. just a punishing bit overall, even if it did nod to the turbine sequence from the other earlier movie at the end

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 28 May 2025 02:26 (nine months ago)

I don’t regret seeing this, and there were awesome moments, but what a mess.

Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 28 May 2025 16:18 (nine months ago)

Half the movie is characters doing this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmHeP9Sve48

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 28 May 2025 16:24 (nine months ago)

watched 5 last night. bittersweet to be entering “the mcquarrie era” of the rewatch speedrun. while they’re all good films, switching directors each time was a great bit (though tbf 4 feels very of a piece with the mcquarries). it’s a good movie but i feel like they’ve “gone rogue” in every single one and have seriously obit who cried wolfed the stakes

flopson, Thursday, 29 May 2025 12:19 (nine months ago)

two months pass...

guys i’m an hour into Final Reckoning and i just

this is so fucking bad

can we kidnap them & force them to make a better movie WHAT IS THIS HORSESHIT

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 21 August 2025 03:01 (six months ago)

ok yeah that was fucking stupid and boring and unbelievably shitty

i’m quite mad about how crap this was tbh

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 21 August 2025 05:00 (six months ago)

hanging on for a fanedit that condenses the first hour into a montage of 3 mins faces & exposition fading in and out of a dotted line on a map tracking Ethan hang gliding off the train at the end of the last one, dot dot, setup setup setup, map map map, premise premise premise, dot dot dot, then cut to him dropping into the water and getting picked up by the gay submarine (and stripping to his jocks asap after clocking the vibe)

Nancy Makes Posts (sic), Thursday, 21 August 2025 05:43 (six months ago)

i think having sat through part 1 with ever increasing disbelief that _this is the plot_ i could only really ever see myself sitting down to watch part 2 in a atwell_pants fan supercut tbh

tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Thursday, 21 August 2025 07:20 (six months ago)

theres a lot of talk about what next presuming cruise cant do forever and what is needed imo is a ten part series about sean harris breaking out and starting his next criminal superclub from scratch

the best part of this universe, and no more close ups of the MI crew trying to act, in particular pegg who is better than good in his lane but utterly wet and wretched when called upon to be emotionalbenji.gif

tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Thursday, 21 August 2025 07:24 (six months ago)

I haven’t watched this yet but I remember thinking how terrible and tedious part 1 was…

AlXTC from Paris, Thursday, 21 August 2025 10:34 (six months ago)

i really loved part one, especially on revisit. still, haven’t heard anything about final reckoning that’s made me rush to see it. someday

ivy., Thursday, 21 August 2025 12:16 (six months ago)

Sic and VG OTM

I could not in good conscience advise anyone to this see this movie without a bullet list of considerations

Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 21 August 2025 12:54 (six months ago)

Like, there is 60-75 minutes of cool shit in there! But then there’s the wasteland of the rest

Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 21 August 2025 12:56 (six months ago)

If Final Reckoning accomplishes anything, it makes Dead Reckoning seem a little better by comparison

Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 21 August 2025 13:00 (six months ago)

huh i thought final reckoning rocked. submarine behring strait and prop plane chase were two of the best set pieces of the series. rolf saxon and his wife were great

i also found the suggestion that after the film ends ethan is going to fuse his brain with the entity and become an omnipotent benevolent god that rules the world to be a hilariously pure expression of cruise’s megalomania

flopson, Thursday, 21 August 2025 14:28 (six months ago)

making half the movie a congratulatory victory lap celebrating and revisiting selected events from the entire series was a bit much

we have a series that does that with regularity: Fast & Furious

slowly imploding (mh), Thursday, 21 August 2025 14:51 (six months ago)

xp it's also a fine endpoint of the Ethan Hunt character trajectory of: good spy in a bit over his head -> world's best spy -> superhero -> literal messiah who literally comes back from the dead.

lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 21 August 2025 15:13 (six months ago)

i enjoyed the flashbacks as mcquarrie’s totalitarian desire to rationalize the films before he took over and bring them under his control. but i can’t forgive him for explaining the (hilariously never explained) rabbit’s foot macguffin from iii and shoehorning it into the entity

(feels weird to use spoiler hiders in these movies where the plot is so stupid)

flopson, Thursday, 21 August 2025 15:15 (six months ago)

set pieces worked great for me but connective tissue was way below standard for the series.

ryan, Thursday, 21 August 2025 16:10 (six months ago)

Also someone please cast Hayley Atwell in more stuff my god

ryan, Thursday, 21 August 2025 16:11 (six months ago)

sic otm

this was like the zombified corpses of like, three half-movies stitched together and animated with lightning jolts or whatever
but hey look at our shiny SET PIECES you guys (just dont look at literally anything else like plot, story, dialog (definitely noy dialog) or character)

literally held together w narration (! SO MUCH NARRATION)
flashbacks (at least 50% flashbacks)
and at some points dialogue is even adr’d over actors standing in shadow (esai morales for example) because they clearly didnt have a working script and were just whatevering their way through this massive budget movie wasting a thousand people’s time & good effort because those people thought they were making a movie and not “finding” the story while they were shooting/editing etc

this franchise has always been dumb fun but never so clearly, actually cravenly shitty (imo)

like just scooping out this cobbled together expensive garbage and throwing it on our plates because we the stupid sheeple will pay to see it based on good will that was genuinley earned and now completely wasted

to pull these run and gun b-movie dodges when they have all the fucking money in the world is kind if shameful to me?

cheap movies do these things because they cant AFFORD to do more

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 21 August 2025 18:18 (six months ago)

I didn't like the last one, and literally couldn't muster the energy to see this one. Like, I want to say three times I was prepared to see it but at the last minute just kind of noped out. And it's not even that long! Just seemed ... exhausting. Even the trailer made me tired.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 August 2025 18:35 (six months ago)

Did they ever figure out who had the key?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 August 2025 22:59 (six months ago)

i hate that key

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 21 August 2025 23:42 (six months ago)

but hey look at our shiny SET PIECES you guys (just dont look at literally anything else like plot, story, dialog (definitely noy dialog) or character)

i didn’t find it exceptionally bad itr relative to the other recent movies in the series tbh

some parts of the plot/story that were enjoyable:

- set up to the behring strait sequence had some good iterations of the classic MI scene where ethan explains his plan to an incredulous audience. “so how are they supposed to know which random 4 square foot circle of ice to cut and collect your near-death hypothermic body from, out of the entire sea?” “by making an educated guess”
- ethan’s in the decompression chamber responding in the most asexual way possible to hayley atwell’s embraces
- showing up at rolf saxon’s house but the russians beat them to it was tense and suspenseful
- the subplot with angela basset and nick offerman actually successfully threw me on some red herrings (i thought offerman was compromised) and succeeded in having some decent jarring plot twists. i love basset so much in this role

flopson, Friday, 22 August 2025 13:29 (six months ago)

one thing i could see being annoying about final reckoning is it relies extremely strongly on the assumption that the audience an emotional connection to the series and characters. but i do (lol) so a lot of that worked

flopson, Friday, 22 August 2025 13:35 (six months ago)

Just struck me how funny it would have been if Tom Cruise's character had died heroically in each installment, but then showed up again in the next with no explanation.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 22 August 2025 13:54 (six months ago)

It IS Paramount, go full Kenny-in-South-Park.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 22 August 2025 14:10 (six months ago)

Mission Impossibly Long and Poor.

completely suited to the horny decadence (Capitaine Jay Vee), Friday, 22 August 2025 19:07 (six months ago)

Shea Wigham lookin' like a velociraptor.

completely suited to the horny decadence (Capitaine Jay Vee), Friday, 22 August 2025 19:09 (six months ago)

This shit is stupid. They are all sitting around talking bout The Thing and what is going to Happen with The Thing and what they will do or need to do because what if AI but oh no. And the first half an hour was basically a Clip Show!

How did they get so many good actors to sign up for this shit. Travis Trammell, Nick Offerman, Mark Gatiss, Hannah Waddingham, I am disappoint. Stop associating with this scientologist POS.

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Saturday, 23 August 2025 02:37 (six months ago)

(I am not actively watching it. My bf has a terrible habit of finding THE WORST movies and watching them on weekends, like sub-5 star shit).

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Saturday, 23 August 2025 02:38 (six months ago)

I still love 4-6 but I really don't think I'm gonna watch this one.

Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Saturday, 23 August 2025 03:05 (six months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.