The Cos: "Mr. Dyson is not a truthful man."

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Story.

Some background.

Your thoughts?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 13:13 (nineteen years ago)

They're both right and they're both wrong. They both seem to be putting complete blame on either side, when the responsibility lies on both sides - and this feud is counterproductive.

dave's good arm (facsimile) (dave225.3), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 13:33 (nineteen years ago)

LIES!~

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 16:41 (nineteen years ago)

Cosby may be nuts, but I've seen Dyson on numerous TV appearences, and he strikes me as an attention-craving hustler.

shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 18:25 (nineteen years ago)

You only say that because he reminds you (i.e. me) of Jackie Chiles.

dave's good arm (facsimile) (dave225.3), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

Jerk. Cosby's not nuts; he's just a typical older person who's worked hard to accomplish things and gets annoyed watching people younger than him do any less. He's also comes from a generation of black people who bootstrapped like nuts against disgusting odds, and thus have pretty much no patience for anyone today who's not even trying at all. (A generation of black people who had a vision of their efforts leading to all black people taking up positions of refinement and dignity that hadn't been available to them -- and thus are horrified to find black people not always being any more covetous of that refinement and dignity than anyone else; that's a problem of theirs, actually, this need to come to grips with the fact that the future they've made possible for other people belongs to the other people, and they may not spend that future the way their predecessors imagined; so it is with parents and kids, man!) And while you can find this same dynamic with plenty of white people his age, the whole thing is of course brought to a higher level of seriousness by the Big Ongoing Question of how black people as a community are going to make their situation better.

And Dyson's not a hustler, and it pisses me off when people say this about academics who circle around African-American studies, because part of what's fascinating about the whole field is that it's an academic specialty that's actually of personal interest to lots of non-academic black people, which means that people like Dyson and West and Gates run an interesting double duty in terms of maintaining academic work while at the same time actually trying to bring that work to laymen outside that circle -- that's not hustling, that is in fact something most people spend a lot of time hand-wringing and wondering why academia can't accomplish.

Dyson's also perfectly right, in large part because he's talking from a whole different role as Cosby. Cosby takes the role of an angry coach, telling folks to shut up and get in the game and win, no excuses. And that makes Dyson's role a lot more like color commentary: explaining why sometimes the team isn't winning, and explaining something Cosby could never address flat-out -- the question of why his conception of getting in the game and winning seems to hold a lesser (or at least more complicated) appeal to people of younger generations. The funny thing is that both of these viewpoints can mesh very handily -- it's actually really easy to find people for whom understanding the kind of stuff that Dyson talks about leads to exactly the kind of motivation and will that Cosby's cheerleading for.

Unfortunately, instead of addressing that, they both seem to circle around details that aren't really the issue, and make both of them look bad to the other's idea-base. Cosby's apparently too old to go distinguishing light cultural signifiers (like baggy clothes and, sometimes, slang) with actual lack of will and motivation, in a way that's purely time-based. (Though clothes are interesting here, because Cosby's from a whole generation of black people who spend half their lives overdressing to prove their own dignity to others.) And Cosby's easy to pick on around this point, the way he's had his black culture and isn't interested in letting the young folks have theirs until they've accomplished the things he's been waiting on.

But really, in the end there's no reason the crotchety straight-talking old-man exhortations can't fit perfectly with the inquisitive more relativist probing of someone like Dyson -- who, if you asked him about the practical everyday things he'd like to see black people accomplishing, would surely say the same stuff as Cosby: get educated, be economically successful, have strong communities and families; everyone agrees on the script.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, I think we kind of forget the psychology of a lot of black people around Cosby's age, the whole psychology of the civil rights movement: these people were brought up in an America where to be black was to be considered lowly and uncouth, and they come from the moment where black people very self-consciously rejected that, and very self-consciously aspired to that whole dignity/refinement thing; the ones who turned out successful (like Cosby) were often the ones who took on the biggest burden of proving themselves in exactly that way. So it's both sensible and ironic now that they, having shouldered that burden, expect younger people to keep on shouldering it, to go on proving the worth of black Americans -- they don't recognize that part of what they accomplished was to relieve that burden, such that younger people feel significantly less oppressed by it. (And it is a burden! We congratulate the dignity-against-all-odds of that civil rights generation, but at the same time that dignity was a kind of neurosis, a direct result of ill treatment and a reaction -- sometimes an over-reaction -- against it.)

And Dyson's kind of right that Cosby of all people should sort of understand that -- he's right to bring up Fat Albert, which you could easily see as having to do with that burden lifting, and the celebratory (and just as often exploitative) black culture of the 70s. I mean, this was Cosby being able to offer a vision of "black culture" that wasn't self-consciously proving its own dignity, right? (Versus, ha, I Spy?)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 19:10 (nineteen years ago)

Dyson is indeed smarmy, and hardly in the same league as West and Gates. Pick up and read any page of his leering book "Why I Love Black Women," one of the most unintentinally hilarious books ever published, right up there with Kenny & Julia Loggins "The Unimaginable Life."

Nabisco, I've wondered before: are you black? Because you're all over every racial post offering your insights into black psychology. I'm hoping you are and not some cracka upper middle class african american studies major.

shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 19:15 (nineteen years ago)

Cuz if someone who were white said that, it would be less accurate?

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)

Who said you were accurate?

shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 19:44 (nineteen years ago)

from the wdyll thread:

http://neon.mems.cmu.edu/photoalbum/images/Picnic%202_jpg.jpg

nabisco on the right, spencer on the left.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 20:00 (nineteen years ago)

Well, me -- it's implied. I don't know what you have a bug up your ass about, but if you disagree with something I'm saying, then feel free to discuss why; if not, then I really don't know what the problem is.

I mean, if you're just pissed that I called you a jerk for calling Cosby nuts, I'd suggest that you take that "jerk" about as lightly and non-personally as you'd want Cosby to take your "nuts" -- i.e., no big.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 20:02 (nineteen years ago)

cosby cld also be criticizing dyson for misrepresenting him (vis a vis truthfulness) which is perhaps reasonable given that dyson is pretty shallow. since his pac biography, dyson's been increasingly more commentator and less serious scholar too is the thing. shookout otm in that dyson isn't in the same category as west or say robin kelly who have lots more serious research & thought under their belt. he's been more culturecommentariat than academic from day one pretty much.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 20:05 (nineteen years ago)

what an adorable couple.

but seriously: Cosby is a little unhinged. Most comedians are. And come on, have you seen any of Dyson's appearances on Politically Incorrect or Bill Mahar? The guy's full of it, a blowhard who oozes meglomania, who pays more attention the cadence of his language than the actual content.

and nabisco, I have a bug up my ass about you jumping to a conclusions because I think Cosby's gone dotty in his autumn years.

shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah Sterl but my point is I don't necessarily like when that role is cast off as hucksterism, because this is one of very few fields where there's an actual valid spectrum between academics and commentary; the accusation is almost that there's something we should distrust about Dyson simply because he's not a full-on academic, which seems ... bizarre. Academic qualifications are not particularly at issue here -- it's an argument with Bill Cosby.

xpost Shookout I didn't jump to any conclusions other than I disagree with you and I think you're a jerk for saying that -- Cosby's views on this aren't particularly different from a hell of a lot of black people his age, so if you think they're nuts you're attacking a pretty broad strain of thought.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think Cosby's nuts for his viewpoins, I think he's nuts because he has to slip women roofies to get laid.

I think you're greatly over-estimating Dyson's intellectual contribution. My problem with him has nothing to do with whether or not he's a professor, it's just that what he SAYS is usually not that deep or interesting.

shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

So what you're saying appears to be "I don't care a whit about the substance of their disagreement, and just generally piss on them as individuals."

(Which, by the way: I'm not "overestimating" Dyson, I'm saying I don't see anything in his professional history that makes me take any less seriously the arguments he's making on this immediate topic -- as a person to speak here I really don't see what in his history makes him any more shallow or blowhardy than any of the other folks who regularly talk about these things.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

I think they deserve each other.

shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 20:35 (nineteen years ago)

Dyson, I'm so disappointed that this thread isn't about you. "If you're having a problem, visit the Jesus in your heart."

Kim (Kim), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

It's not? Oh, thank god!

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 18 May 2006 00:25 (nineteen years ago)

Even tho we think Thermo may be a little bit of a liar ;)

/oldthreadref

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 18 May 2006 01:34 (nineteen years ago)

And Dyson's kind of right that Cosby of all people should sort of understand that -- he's right to bring up Fat Albert, which you could easily see as having to do with that burden lifting, and the celebratory (and just as often exploitative) black culture of the 70s.

exactly! see "fat abbot" from south park.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 18 May 2006 01:59 (nineteen years ago)

Cosby takes the role of an angry coach, telling folks to shut up and get in the game and win, no excuses.

How apt, given the forthcoming DVD release of this. (His character was a more laidback coach, though.)

Shout! Factory Reintroduces Everyone's Favorite Phys Ed Teacher

THE BILL COSBY SHOW (1969-71)


http://www.tvparty.com/bgifs7/cosbyshow1.jpg


http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/newsitem.cfm?NewsID=5600

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 18 May 2006 15:39 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.lawson-his.co.uk/images/Dyson/dc04.jpg
"Oh yes I am!"

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 19 May 2006 08:36 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.