This is the thread to show off your HTML skillz

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://site.sportsrockshop.com/IMAGES/TSH0164.jpg

Big Loud Ape Mountain (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 18 May 2006 17:22 (nineteen years ago)

http://site.sportsrockshop.com/IMAGES/TSH0164.jpg

Big Loud Ape Mountain (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 18 May 2006 17:24 (nineteen years ago)

http://site.sportsrockshop.com/IMAGES/TSH0164.jpg

Big Loud Ape Mountain (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 18 May 2006 17:24 (nineteen years ago)

http://site.sportsrockshop.com/IMAGES/TSH0164.jpg

Big Loud Ape Mountain (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 18 May 2006 17:26 (nineteen years ago)

OLD DIRTY

Big Loud Ape Mountain (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 18 May 2006 17:27 (nineteen years ago)

http://site.sportsrockshop.com/IMAGES/TSH0164.jpg

Big Loud Ape Mountain (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 18 May 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)

http://ilx.p3r.net/newanswers.php?board=20

sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 18 May 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)

der wald

lf (lfam), Thursday, 18 May 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)

that probably isn't html but whatevs

lf (lfam), Thursday, 18 May 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)

That frightened me.

chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Thursday, 18 May 2006 17:49 (nineteen years ago)

Sizing!

I hate sizes on graphics.

Time was, if a page had javascript in it, you had to put heights and widths on every graphic of that page or the javascript would freak out. No longer. Now I don't see the point. If the image is larger than what you've resized it to, you're wasting bandwidth. If it's smaller, you're losing resolution. Plus if you replace that image with an image of slightly different dimensions, you can't just save over it, you have to go into the HTML and fix the height and width.

I'm not trying to rain on your parade, Big Loud Mountain Ape, it's just that this thread is one of the few times/places in the entire world where people actually might give a shit about such thoughts.

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 18 May 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

sometimes I explicitly set image sizes to something other than the actual and then use dhtml (prototype.js) to reveal the full sized version.

only useful if you don't think separate thumbnail gfx are useful

JW (ex machina), Thursday, 18 May 2006 18:00 (nineteen years ago)

hello world!

dar1a g (daria g), Thursday, 18 May 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)

check out my home page!!!!

dar1a g (daria g), Thursday, 18 May 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)

sorry

dar1a g (daria g), Thursday, 18 May 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)

I was just looking to test out some HTML tags. Sorry if I offended anyone.

Big Loud Ape Mountain (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 18 May 2006 18:12 (nineteen years ago)

I was just looking to test out some HTML tags. Sorry if I offended anyone.

Big Loud Ape Mountain (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 18 May 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah well, too late buddy!

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 18 May 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

Jon yeah, if the full-sized imgs were less than like 20K, and depending on how many of them there were, that's like the ONE instance where I could see it.

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 18 May 2006 18:15 (nineteen years ago)

http://static.flickr.com/27/45718334_bcd57b061b.jpg

Big Loud Ape Mountain (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 18 May 2006 18:16 (nineteen years ago)

> I hate sizes on graphics.

yes about the resizing thing, bad idea. but the main need for specifying the image sizes in html is so that the browser can render the page leaving a big enough space for the yet-to-be-downloaded picture which means it doesn't need to reflow the entire thing when it finds out the image size. (i hate scrolling down the page to the bit i want only for the text i'm reading to creep down as images with unspecified sizes in the top part are downloaded and inserted)

koogs (koogs), Friday, 19 May 2006 07:56 (nineteen years ago)

Hello. Might somebody with a few more skillz than me (not hard) be able to tell me why the text in the top row of this table is coming out up and to the left rather than centred?


<table border=1 width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" bgcolor="blue">
<tr>
<td align=center valign=middle colspan=5><H1>Flashback</H1></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align=center valign=middle><a href="home.html"><H2>news</H2></a></td>
<td width="20%" align=center valign=middle><a href="upcoming.html"><H2>upcoming<br>events</H2></a></td>
<td width="20%" align=center valign=middle><a href="past.html"><H2>past<br>events</H2></a></td>
<td width="20%" align=center valign=middle><a href="contact.html"><H2>contact<br>us</H2></a></td>
<td width="20%" align=center valign=middle><a href="SR.html"><H2>Spinal<br>Research</H2></a></td>
</tr>
</table>

theantmustdance (theantmustdance), Saturday, 20 May 2006 10:58 (nineteen years ago)

It's centred! Tried it in Internet Explorer and Firefox. However, I don't see the links in your second row, blue background + blue text = five blue boxes.

StanM (StanM), Saturday, 20 May 2006 11:13 (nineteen years ago)

Well I think it should be centred but it just doesn't look like it on my screen using both FF and IE. The CSS is telling the links to be a lighter blue - might it have something to do with that?

theantmustdance (theantmustdance), Saturday, 20 May 2006 11:34 (nineteen years ago)

I don't have that stylesheet here, so that's probably the reason I only see one kind of blue here, yeah.

Can't that style sheet have something to do with the centred text as well? Here it's exactly above the 3rd cell (of the five, so it's in the middle of the page).

StanM (StanM), Saturday, 20 May 2006 11:56 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.