http://youtube.com/watch?v=X99n9BveKns
― sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:22 (nineteen years ago)
― sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:29 (nineteen years ago)
― sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)
― sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:37 (nineteen years ago)
― sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:38 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:41 (nineteen years ago)
― sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:46 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:49 (nineteen years ago)
Very much agreed.
I see no reason to watch Waking Life ever again
I want that 90 minutes of my life back.
― sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 18 May 2006 23:52 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 19 May 2006 01:53 (nineteen years ago)
Oh you people hate fun.
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Friday, 19 May 2006 01:58 (nineteen years ago)
milo this is stupid and lame.
― Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Friday, 19 May 2006 08:23 (nineteen years ago)
the actual book horrified me and turned me vegetarian.
― pisces (piscesx), Friday, 19 May 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)
― The Milkmaid (82375538-A) (The Milkmaid), Friday, 19 May 2006 14:05 (nineteen years ago)
― pisces (piscesx), Friday, 19 May 2006 15:21 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 19 May 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 19 May 2006 15:25 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Friday, 19 May 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)
Indeed. Sean Astin has optioned Isaac's Storm by the same author.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 19 May 2006 16:56 (nineteen years ago)
Fast Food Nation is based on the best-selling non-fiction book by Eric Schlosser, who co-wrote the screenplay with Linklater.
It intertwines three fictional stories: Mexican illegal immigrants entering the US to work at a meat-processing plant; a fast food executive's investigation into the discovery of cattle faeces in burgers; and a high school student and burger bar worker who takes her first steps as an activist.
So Traffic, then. What will the color schemes be?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 19 May 2006 20:40 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Friday, 19 May 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 19 May 2006 20:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 19 May 2006 20:45 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Friday, 19 May 2006 20:50 (nineteen years ago)
(punny!)
― sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Friday, 19 May 2006 23:10 (nineteen years ago)
man noooooooooobody saw this movie, huh?
it is what it is, i guess. the stuff w/ greg kinnear is not very well dramatized. it's an adaptation of a didactic (not in a bad way) nonfiction book and it shows. if he had just made a movie about the mexican immigrants and the local high school students this could have been good, although it wouldn't have been an adaptation of the book in that case. also, wilder valderama (sp?) is a problem.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 00:09 (fourteen years ago)
i really want linklater's films to be really good, b/c he's obviously capable of making super-duper movies (before sunrise/sunset, slacker, even 80% of school of rock) but this and other of his films are kind of modest and anonymous to a fault. you'd think they were made by michael winterbottom or some other, less heralded, less interesting filmmaker.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 00:12 (fourteen years ago)
I turned it off because I started falling asleep. I thought it was going to be a documentary.
― โตเกียวเหมียวเหมียว aka Trucks of my Tears (Mount Cleaners), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 00:14 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i think it's the category error that kept most folks from seeing this.
i guess the film is a little misbegotten. it's also a little toothless until the end.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 00:24 (fourteen years ago)
it probably turned a few folks vegetarian, though.
i kinda dug it, warts and all. dug bruce's cameo, dug a lot of the performances incl. valderrama who i usually cant stand, dug how strong linklater's feel for the setting was - that in particular really carried the movie for me. the characters & their milieu, though thinly drawn 'types', still rung true. and some scenes had some real kick. not just the slaughterhouse stuff, but like with bobby cannavale's predatory factory floor manager - his scenes made me as uneasy in a primal sort of way as any of the butchery scenes. its too thinly written to be a really good movie, but i'd say its still an interesting one. never read the book tho
i think this is probably true: if he had just made a movie about the mexican immigrants and the local high school students this could have been good
― RudolfHitlerFtw (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 02:27 (fourteen years ago)
also the movie does indulge in some 'fiery latina' stereotyping that i think is a little ugly, in retrospect
― RudolfHitlerFtw (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 02:28 (fourteen years ago)
you mean the moreno character's best friend?
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 03:41 (fourteen years ago)
i really liked this movie tbh!
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 03:42 (fourteen years ago)
it was def on my top 10 the year it came out
i'm probably letting its low reputation influence my judgment.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 03:49 (fourteen years ago)
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, February 20, 2012 10:41 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark
ya
― RudolfHitlerFtw (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 03:49 (fourteen years ago)
i have to admit i shut it off at the scene with all the awkward banter between ethan hawke and patricia arquette. but then i turned it on again the next day.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 03:52 (fourteen years ago)
i guess just making a movie that has undocumented workers as sympathetic and somewhat omplex protagonists is a good thing.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 03:53 (fourteen years ago)
also wtf is up with the avril lavigne cameo? was this part of an abortive attempt to establish her as a triple double threat?
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 03:59 (fourteen years ago)
also i do like, in theory, the subplot about the dawning social-political consciousness (and conscience) of a group of small-town teenagers. and there are some really good scenes. but as you mentioned it's kind of thinly written and too schematic in practice. a bit like an afterschool special.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 04:02 (fourteen years ago)
I thought Linklater structured the film really well, for being basically a Soderbergh/Traffic patchwork. I really liked that the muckraking started with the most sterile examples of fast food nefariousness (i.e. testing out chemicals meant to enhance flavor) and ending with the slaughterhouse footage you spent most of the movie dreading.
― dead-trius (Eric H.), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 04:03 (fourteen years ago)