I have a hole i n my shoes and I need another pair before I can get this ones fixed. I trolled all yesterday and couldn't find what I wanted (a pair of caper boots the same as the ones I own but a different colour but they don't exist). I have freakish narrow feet so very few shoes fit me well anyway.
― Ed, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― N., Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Jonnie, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Managed to trash shoes by going on ill-advised rural walk in the pouring (nay, horizontally slashing) rain. So now I need walking boots, AND new work/regular shoes, so more answers please.
― Alan Trewartha, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― chris, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
You can't go wrong with DM's!
― jel, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
In fact the original 'how many pairs of trousers do you have' conversation did move on to 'how many pairs of shoes do you have', the average being about 2-3 compared to my 30 or so (which isn't too bad for a girl, I reckon, really quite restrained).
― Emma, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Trainers, shoes, whatever. For the purposes the 'how many pairs of shoes do you have' thing, trainers count UNLESS they are trainers worn only in the gym / for sports. Slippers don't count either.
― DG, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
In favour of Docs : they're wide, they polish up nicely and scuffs come out OK. They have air cushioned soles. They're (takes off right Doc and looks at sole) oil/fat/petrol/acid/alkali resistant. Does acid resistant mean you can't TRIP? Geddit!
Also they're useful if you need to kick someone or a dog. Or a West Ham fan. Or stamping on indie-schmindie pointy boots.
― Dr. C, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I have 5 pairs of shoes that I currently wear, but I think there are something like 15 pairs scattered around the house. I should probably get rid of the useless 10 I'm never going to put on again.
― Dan Perry, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Alzheimer's?
Sometimes I have to say "no I don't wear shoes" as an excuse when our class is going to some shitty "you must wear shoes" nightclub. It's all a bit embarassing but I still won't wear them. I have about 5 pairs of trainers.
― Ronan, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
If you look very closely, you will see the giant hammer I am visualizing appearing over your head...
Shoes, pairs of -- I think have around four. I prefer my black Reebok sneakers.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
sneakers for sneaking?
― yves, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Michael Jones, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Yves Montand, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sean, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mandee, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― di, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
*cue random Wayne lyrical moment* "Let SLEEP-ING DOOOOGS DIIIIIIIIIIE." Oh dear.
― Ed, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nicole, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I have freakish narrow feet so very few shoes fit me well anyway.
― Steve.n., Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― David Inglesfield, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
there is *nothing* wrong with socks and sandles, puddles are a problem yes, but let's have no more of this visible sock discrimination.
― another james, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)
the ones on top are awesome but the color doesn't match anything I own, the ones on the bottom are too expensive.
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 22 January 2004 20:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Thursday, 22 January 2004 20:15 (twenty-two years ago)
What're some relatively cheap, relatively comfortable shoes (sneakers, tennis shoes, oxfords, whatevah) that won't associate me with specific subcultures the way chucks, reeboks, or doc martens would. Ok, that sounds dumb, but honestly I've been dressing like a mid-90s indie rocker for way too long.
― matlewis (matlewis), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)
adidas Superstars in atlantic blue
or
Superstars in original black
?
― milo z, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 20:08 (eighteen years ago)
BLUE!
― Abbott, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)
I have very fond memories of the black ones because it seemed every bloke I fancied in 1995 was wearing them.
― Madchen, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)
I just got these:
http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/51XDET33C0L._SS260_.jpg
― Virginia Plain, Sunday, 17 June 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)
ecco shoes!
[i work for ecco, so i may be somewhat biased - but they are they most comfortable shoes i've ever worn]
although i think british and US stores only sell a limited range, and only the ultra-conservative styles.
― Rubyred, Sunday, 17 June 2007 22:15 (eighteen years ago)
Milo, I'd go for the second pair. :-)
― nathalie, Monday, 18 June 2007 07:43 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.zappos.com/images/734/7341285/7769-466006-p.jpg ^^^ want
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 16 August 2007 15:59 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.zappos.com/images/733/7331953/3279-447272-p.jpg
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 16 August 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)
like the 1st ones - not so sure abt the bows tho
the 2nd ones would look nice w/a yellow speed skating outfit or something
― jhøshea, Thursday, 16 August 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)
I think wedges look weird, then again I never look at girls shoes, except to see if they are sensible or not, and I cry a little inside when I discover that they are not.
― Ed, Thursday, 16 August 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)
these are impractical and i will regret buying y/n http://www.zappos.com/images/731/7317516/5007-416840-p.jpg
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 16 August 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)
Those pink things are impractical and just looking at them makes my feet hurt, but my god, they are beautiful.
― Masonic Boom, Thursday, 16 August 2007 16:16 (eighteen years ago)
I really love the first ones. the pink ones are kind of impractical, yeah.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 16 August 2007 16:16 (eighteen years ago)
maybe just a bit toooo much, possibly sexy
these bows tho. if you took them off the shoes would look so weird. but then im not sure i like teh floppy contrast to smooth lines. looks like maybe someone found that spot initially problematic, plopped down a bow and said "there".
― jhøshea, Thursday, 16 August 2007 16:26 (eighteen years ago)
Look, this is going to be controversial but *all* Ecco shoes are too frumpy for me. They're like some bad mix between Naturalizer and Nine West. Also apart from my stunner pair of Berlin secondhand heels I cannot be doing with open-toe anything because I've spent entirely too much time looking at the hoary Claw Toes of middle-aged Bingo Lady types, and also if you get caught in the rain SQUELCH.
Ed, nobody is asking you to understand wedges.
Non-sensible shoes are those which cannot withstand a run for the bus, which in my case means four-inch heels are in the 'sensible' category.
― suzy, Thursday, 16 August 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)
I like the first two pairs, Allz. Where are they from?
― Virginia Plain, Thursday, 16 August 2007 19:09 (eighteen years ago)
The pink ones are great, the other two pair are just extremely meh. Impractical? Yeah, most probably, but extremely sexee'n'cute.
The first pair is just a bit too low for a wedge. The second pair are just... no. Like a slapped on fabric print.
― stevienixed, Thursday, 16 August 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)
I got some peep-toe wedges recently but have only worn them once. I like the first ones and always love pink.
― Ms Misery, Thursday, 16 August 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.net-a-porter.com/intl/images/product/26111/large/index.jpg
If I was single, this is what I would be getting (and probably not wearing). *slobber*
― stevienixed, Thursday, 16 August 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)
aw, I like a low wedge.
I'm basically saying the pink is impractical because whenever I buy things in that shade I chicken out of wearing them. but they are v. cute.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 16 August 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)
I've been thinking about these: http://images.channeladvisor.com/Sell/SSProfiles/23000127/Images/15/070002985__1.jpg
― Spencer Chow, Thursday, 16 August 2007 19:32 (eighteen years ago)
I wear as much pink as I can as often as possible. I will be a hideous old lady.
Nath, I think those are perfectly sensible for a married lady.
― Ms Misery, Thursday, 16 August 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)
i really like these dansko red brocade clogs:
http://content.nordstrom.com/ImageGallery/store/product/Large/18/_5489198.jpg
― get bent, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 02:33 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.hipgirlie.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/marc_jacobs_ugly_shoes.jpg
― Stevie D, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 02:41 (seventeen years ago)
Very close to ordering these Tigers: http://www.zappos.com/images/605/7165605/1733-143413-d.jpg
Any thoughts on style + care + maintenance of white shoes?
― vermonter, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)