The public aren't believed to be at risk, which begs the question, why did we shoot someone?
― steal compass, drive north, disappear (tissp), Friday, 2 June 2006 09:38 (eighteen years ago)
or the police fucked up.
― Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Friday, 2 June 2006 09:39 (eighteen years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 2 June 2006 09:39 (eighteen years ago)
― Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:01 (eighteen years ago)
― Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:02 (eighteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:03 (eighteen years ago)
― breathny spears let me see the sex that you did. (noodle vague), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:10 (eighteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:11 (eighteen years ago)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:14 (eighteen years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:16 (eighteen years ago)
― paulhw (paulhw), Sunday, 4 June 2006 00:56 (eighteen years ago)
One line of inquiry was that the gas was to be released in a busy and enclosed shopping centre, which mirrors the current plotline in the Sky hit drama 24 starring Kiefer Sutherland.
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/story_pages/news/news1.shtml
Gotta get that plug in somewhere.
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Sunday, 4 June 2006 09:56 (eighteen years ago)
― duff (duff), Sunday, 4 June 2006 10:11 (eighteen years ago)
Anyone else get the impression that this has been another major fuckup? Have they actually found anything in that house? Or have they been PWND by whoever told them the "OMG there's a chemical jacket in that house, I'm 105% sure!" story?
― StanM (StanM), Sunday, 4 June 2006 10:18 (eighteen years ago)
The latest suggestion is that the police didn't shoot him, but one of the arrested men shot the other
― Si.C@rter (SiC@rter), Sunday, 4 June 2006 10:42 (eighteen years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 4 June 2006 10:54 (eighteen years ago)
But this story, as DA Jack McCoy later demonstrated at trial despite the stonewalling of the Chief of Police, was an elaborate coverup
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 4 June 2006 11:21 (eighteen years ago)
― Rufus 3000 (Mr Noodles), Sunday, 4 June 2006 13:34 (eighteen years ago)
― Dan (Empathy Refill) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 4 June 2006 13:41 (eighteen years ago)
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Saturday, 10 June 2006 00:28 (eighteen years ago)
― archer (archer), Saturday, 10 June 2006 22:55 (eighteen years ago)
― tom west (thomp), Saturday, 10 June 2006 23:19 (eighteen years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 10:32 (eighteen years ago)
Amerikkka's Most Wanted?
― Venga (Venga), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 10:58 (eighteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 11:12 (eighteen years ago)
― Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 11:32 (eighteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 11:37 (eighteen years ago)
― Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 12:04 (eighteen years ago)
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 14:07 (eighteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 14:23 (eighteen years ago)
I thought this was Archel! Ho ho ho.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 15:39 (eighteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 16:05 (eighteen years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 17:23 (eighteen years ago)
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 18:54 (eighteen years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 18:57 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 19:33 (eighteen years ago)
i just think it should be the police involved who should be giving a press conference, not these guys. make them explain themselves, if they actually can.
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 20:15 (eighteen years ago)
I just said that very same thing to the mister. Somehow, even though I am almost immune to the effects of swearing, on television and elsewhere, this made the story more shocking, seeing it broadcast, unedited, on the main BBC News.
― ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 20:19 (eighteen years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 20:20 (eighteen years ago)
and now more trivial not-particularly-helpful observation: the raided house in question has remarkably ornate and elaborate (but tacky) railings for a terraced house in outskirts of East London. v odd choice that.
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 20:21 (eighteen years ago)
-- Konal Doddz (stevem7...), June 13th, 2006.
i think they can't cos there's a report being done on it + u can't talk about intelligence and stuff?
it is a colossal fuck-up but i don't think it's right to claim that this will produce jihadists; in the same way i think the councillor itnerviewed on c4 news who said that the 7/7 bombings were the fault of the government for invading iraq was wrong.
― Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 07:50 (eighteen years ago)
mmm, they've got it all figured out.
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 08:16 (eighteen years ago)
― Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 08:24 (eighteen years ago)
Also can anyone here back me up on a style point? Among the devout of many cultures, the tacheless beard is a marker of pacifism. The brothers are devout Muslims who've called themselves pacifists, and a commentator remarked that it seemed a common style there.
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 08:37 (eighteen years ago)
Why do Amish men have beards, but not mustaches?
There are quite a few scriptures that mention beards in the Bible. An example would be Psalm 133:1,2. An Amishman does not shave his beard after he becomes married. A long beard is the mark of an adult Amishman. Mustaches, on the other hand, have a long history of being associated with the military, and therefore are forbidden among the Amish people.
http://cfpm.org/~majordom/memetics/2000/1207.html :
Alexander was the first to command that his soldiers shave their beards, since having a beard provided an enemy, in the type of close quarter fighting that was common with swords and hand weapons, a purchase, a handle, especially to raise the chin for the purpose of throat cutting. So, a soldier in Alexander's army was close-shaven.
And so, to me, the beard has always been the mark of the pacifist.
― StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 08:48 (eighteen years ago)
No direct apology to the brothers yet, though. This is insufferably
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 08:53 (eighteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 09:41 (eighteen years ago)
Security concerns after terror raidhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5072960.stm
Due to the secret nature of M*I*5 - we don't know if the home secretary & Tony Blair are asking tough questions of why there has been a failure of evaluating intelligence.
I also wonder if the intelligence analysts inside M*1*5 are ashamed of themelselves and if they are being disciplined.
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 10:03 (eighteen years ago)
i'm sure i heard on tv that uk are also supposed to have the best antiterrorist thingies because of all those years of IRA bombings and stuff. what happened to that?
― ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 10:03 (eighteen years ago)
― Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 10:14 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1796925,00.html
― StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 10:15 (eighteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 10:23 (eighteen years ago)
i'll tell you one thing: if the police came barrelling into my house at dawn and shot me in the fucking chest, i might well want to become a terrorist after that. it's to kahar's incredible credit that he's saying he continues to support the police.
The people that deserve a critical bashing are the Intelligence community, however most of the mainstream media focus on just the "Operational end" i.e the Police.
yes, the "intelligence" bods are a joke. but, then again, it's not them running into houses, shouting "shut the fuck up" and allegedly firing without identification or warning. the problem here isn't one little part of the cop show; it's the whole sodding mess.
i see a muslim met chief super is saying that the force is "going through a very difficult time". jesus wept. what, it's a bit upset, and that's why it's going on rampages like this? it's fucking terrifying, it really is.
oh yeh: the same cop says we should wait for the inquiry before making any judgement. pardon me while i spend the rest of my life laughing hollowly.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 11:06 (eighteen years ago)
Depends how long your beard is.
That sentence will probably be used against you in the fullness of time.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 11:12 (eighteen years ago)
The Crown Prosecution Service has advised police not to bring child pornography charges against a man shot during a terror raid in Forest Gate.
Mohammed Abdul Kahar, 23, was shot in the shoulder by police at his east London home on 2 June.
He and his brother Abul Koyair, 20, were later released without charge.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6092624.stm
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Friday, 27 October 2006 18:19 (eighteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 27 October 2006 18:27 (eighteen years ago)