"Man shot in anti-terrorism raid"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5040022.stm

The public aren't believed to be at risk, which begs the question, why did we shoot someone?

steal compass, drive north, disappear (tissp), Friday, 2 June 2006 09:38 (eighteen years ago)

police were at risk?

or the police fucked up.

Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Friday, 2 June 2006 09:39 (eighteen years ago)

I didn't shoot anyone

Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 2 June 2006 09:39 (eighteen years ago)

You know what we need right now? A good slice of ill-informed idle speculation. Sky News just aren't speculating wildly enough for my needs.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:01 (eighteen years ago)

jeez you guys wouldn't believe what homeboy's job was for the next while.

Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:02 (eighteen years ago)

Home Secretary?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:03 (eighteen years ago)

More importantly, was he Brazilian?

breathny spears let me see the sex that you did. (noodle vague), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:10 (eighteen years ago)

Was he the Deputy Prime Minister?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:11 (eighteen years ago)

Residents said Forest Gate was a typical east London "mixed" community with no white British people a large number of Bengali and Pakistani families, along with a recent influx of Eastern Europeans.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:14 (eighteen years ago)

Maybe he was playing croquet, that seems to be the crime du jour

Oh No, It's Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 2 June 2006 10:16 (eighteen years ago)

ILX's worst day of political commentary yet?

paulhw (paulhw), Sunday, 4 June 2006 00:56 (eighteen years ago)

I love the report in the News of the World:

One line of inquiry was that the gas was to be released in a busy and enclosed shopping centre, which mirrors the current plotline in the Sky hit drama 24 starring Kiefer Sutherland.

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/story_pages/news/news1.shtml

Gotta get that plug in somewhere.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Sunday, 4 June 2006 09:56 (eighteen years ago)

how do 250 police officers fit inside a family terraced house? and how long did it take them all to get in?

duff (duff), Sunday, 4 June 2006 10:11 (eighteen years ago)

They must have been stacked in several layers, I suppose.

Anyone else get the impression that this has been another major fuckup? Have they actually found anything in that house? Or have they been PWND by whoever told them the "OMG there's a chemical jacket in that house, I'm 105% sure!" story?

StanM (StanM), Sunday, 4 June 2006 10:18 (eighteen years ago)

The latest suggestion is that the police didn't shoot him, but one of the arrested men shot the other

Si.C@rter (SiC@rter), Sunday, 4 June 2006 10:42 (eighteen years ago)

Although the shot guy is protesting his innocence etc.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 4 June 2006 10:54 (eighteen years ago)

The latest suggestion is that the police didn't shoot him, but one of the arrested men shot the other

But this story, as DA Jack McCoy later demonstrated at trial despite the stonewalling of the Chief of Police, was an elaborate coverup

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 4 June 2006 11:21 (eighteen years ago)

Now that Jack McCoy is the face of TD's American branch he can't be trusted. Robot Insurance I could get behind, Ameritrade is a different can of worms all together.

Rufus 3000 (Mr Noodles), Sunday, 4 June 2006 13:34 (eighteen years ago)

The first thing that came to my mind was "HOW DO I SHOT ANTI-TERRORISM RAID *blam* oh like that ow ow ow" which is probably a big warning sign for me to get off the Internet.

Dan (Empathy Refill) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 4 June 2006 13:41 (eighteen years ago)

Both men released without charge.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Saturday, 10 June 2006 00:28 (eighteen years ago)

Regardless of whether there's any evidence connecting these fuckers to terrorist plots, in a sane world they would have been summarily executed simply for being jihadists (i.e. treasonous vocal supporters of our supremacist enemies during a time of war).

archer (archer), Saturday, 10 June 2006 22:55 (eighteen years ago)

...

tom west (thomp), Saturday, 10 June 2006 23:19 (eighteen years ago)

Pretty amazing press conference Abdul Kaha just gave. At one point the police asked him if he was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, because of some song on a record they found in his house.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 10:32 (eighteen years ago)

At one point the police asked him if he was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, because of some song on a record they found in his house.

Amerikkka's Most Wanted?

Venga (Venga), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 10:58 (eighteen years ago)

That'll be Handsworth Revolution by Steel Pulse, then.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 11:12 (eighteen years ago)

Maybe it was that Shins song about grabbing the controls from the pilot and crashing a plane into the sea...

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 11:32 (eighteen years ago)

Probably that Soul Coughing track that goes "A man drives a plane into the Chrysler Building"

StanM (StanM), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 11:37 (eighteen years ago)

is there a transcript of it anywhere?

Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 12:04 (eighteen years ago)

Raid brother tells of death fears
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5075352.stm

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 14:07 (eighteen years ago)

"Raid Brothers"? What are they, the Mohammed & Mary Chain?

StanM (StanM), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 14:23 (eighteen years ago)

Regardless of whether there's any evidence connecting these fuckers to terrorist plots, in a sane world they would have been summarily executed simply for being jihadists (i.e. treasonous vocal supporters of our supremacist enemies during a time of war).

I thought this was Archel! Ho ho ho.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 15:39 (eighteen years ago)

Yea, I saw co.uk and assumed!

lord pooperton (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 16:05 (eighteen years ago)

Whatever happens, police will make a lot more jihadists out of guys like this than any imam ever could. Yet more evidence that police are almost all completely fucking thick.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

This was a massive Intelligence failure and a disaster operational exercise by the police.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 18:54 (eighteen years ago)

Dare I suggest ... systems theory?

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 18:57 (eighteen years ago)

You could, but you'd have to explain it to me first as I can never get my head round it.

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 19:33 (eighteen years ago)

woah the BBC didn't edit the 'fuck' out of Kaha's statement this time (it's gone 10pm, but still...i've never heard 'fuck' on BBC News before)

i just think it should be the police involved who should be giving a press conference, not these guys. make them explain themselves, if they actually can.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 20:15 (eighteen years ago)

woah the BBC didn't edit the 'fuck' out of Kaha's statement this time (it's gone 10pm, but still...i've never heard 'fuck' on BBC News before)

I just said that very same thing to the mister. Somehow, even though I am almost immune to the effects of swearing, on television and elsewhere, this made the story more shocking, seeing it broadcast, unedited, on the main BBC News.

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 20:19 (eighteen years ago)

5Live broadcast the press conference so there were two "fucks" (in "the first thing the police said to me was 'shut the fuck up'") live in the afternoon. After the first one, it was kind of gratifying to realise that the producers knew what they were saying was important enough not to pull the feed.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 20:20 (eighteen years ago)

i do think it might be useful if the media talked to at least one non-Muslim civilian when they talk about how 'the community' relations with police are deteriorating as a result of this shambles. non-Muslims are outraged or concerned by the events too.

and now more trivial not-particularly-helpful observation: the raided house in question has remarkably ornate and elaborate (but tacky) railings for a terraced house in outskirts of East London. v odd choice that.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 20:21 (eighteen years ago)

i just think it should be the police involved who should be giving a press conference, not these guys. make them explain themselves, if they actually can.

-- Konal Doddz (stevem7...), June 13th, 2006.

i think they can't cos there's a report being done on it + u can't talk about intelligence and stuff?

it is a colossal fuck-up but i don't think it's right to claim that this will produce jihadists; in the same way i think the councillor itnerviewed on c4 news who said that the 7/7 bombings were the fault of the government for invading iraq was wrong.

Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 07:50 (eighteen years ago)

i think they can't cos there's a report being done on it + u can't talk about intelligence and stuff?

mmm, they've got it all figured out.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 08:16 (eighteen years ago)

well yeah it looks fucked but what do you propose here?

Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 08:24 (eighteen years ago)

Well, it certainly doesn't help because we've all encountered police who use 'terrorism' as an excuse to be annoying, furtive, or worse - try sketching the trees in Green Park if you don't believe me. Of course it's utterly convenient to be able to keep schtum about intelligence, but their tone suggests a contempt for everyone who wants an explanation - which must be an awful lot of taxpayers by now.

Also can anyone here back me up on a style point? Among the devout of many cultures, the tacheless beard is a marker of pacifism. The brothers are devout Muslims who've called themselves pacifists, and a commentator remarked that it seemed a common style there.

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 08:37 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.holycrosslivonia.org/amish/amishfaq.htm#beard :

Why do Amish men have beards, but not mustaches?

There are quite a few scriptures that mention beards in the Bible. An example would be Psalm 133:1,2. An Amishman does not shave his beard after he becomes married. A long beard is the mark of an adult Amishman. Mustaches, on the other hand, have a long history of being associated with the military, and therefore are forbidden among the Amish people.


http://cfpm.org/~majordom/memetics/2000/1207.html :

Alexander was the first to command that his soldiers shave their beards, since having a beard provided an enemy, in the type of close quarter fighting that was common with swords and hand weapons, a purchase, a handle, especially to raise the chin for the purpose of throat cutting. So, a soldier in Alexander's army was close-shaven.

And so, to me, the beard has always been the mark of the pacifist.

StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 08:48 (eighteen years ago)

Also I am sure there are a few smart, good cops who are just waiting to leak something a little bit damning of procedure in this case (my uncle used to do this if he got really fucked off and this is the level of work he did). FFS one of them had applied to join the police as a community officer! From what I gather there was an informant who dropped the brothers in it for some reason that has nothing to do with terrorism (instinct tells me that would be someone who didn't want a cop from their hood cramping style). Better police investigation of the informant might have ensured no waste of man-hours and the completely unnecessary injuries and humiliations dished out to people who are later cleared.

No direct apology to the brothers yet, though. This is insufferably

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 08:53 (eighteen years ago)

Police would only try to spin this more. ("The survival of Mr. Kaha is positive proof that we have learned lessons since last year: we only shot him once for descending his staircase half asleep in a threatening manner. Last year we put six bullets in a Brazilian for terroristically lying still, don't you remember?" (applause) )

StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 09:41 (eighteen years ago)

The people that deserve a critical bashing are the Intelligence community, however most of the mainstream media focus on just the "Operational end" i.e the Police.

Security concerns after terror raid
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5072960.stm

Due to the secret nature of M*I*5 - we don't know if the home secretary & Tony Blair are asking tough questions of why there has been a failure of evaluating intelligence.

I also wonder if the intelligence analysts inside M*1*5 are ashamed of themelselves and if they are being disciplined.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 10:03 (eighteen years ago)

i think the police should release footages to TV when they have done a successful raid, just so that i can be reassured that these do happen and that the police aren't complete fucktards who make me feel more unsafe than just there being terrorists.

i'm sure i heard on tv that uk are also supposed to have the best antiterrorist thingies because of all those years of IRA bombings and stuff. what happened to that?

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 10:03 (eighteen years ago)

simon jenkins article in the guardian is excellent.

Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 10:14 (eighteen years ago)

This?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1796925,00.html

StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 10:15 (eighteen years ago)

excellent indeed.

StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 10:23 (eighteen years ago)

i worry about why i'm not angrier here; what kind of fucking state i live in where my reaction is more a weary "oh no, not again" shrug rather than a white-hot rage. am i really so desensitised to this kind of fucking horror? do i really just expect police operations of this kind to be a terrible, sick joke?

i'll tell you one thing: if the police came barrelling into my house at dawn and shot me in the fucking chest, i might well want to become a terrorist after that. it's to kahar's incredible credit that he's saying he continues to support the police.

The people that deserve a critical bashing are the Intelligence community, however most of the mainstream media focus on just the "Operational end" i.e the Police.

yes, the "intelligence" bods are a joke. but, then again, it's not them running into houses, shouting "shut the fuck up" and allegedly firing without identification or warning. the problem here isn't one little part of the cop show; it's the whole sodding mess.

i see a muslim met chief super is saying that the force is "going through a very difficult time". jesus wept. what, it's a bit upset, and that's why it's going on rampages like this? it's fucking terrifying, it really is.

oh yeh: the same cop says we should wait for the inquiry before making any judgement. pardon me while i spend the rest of my life laughing hollowly.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 11:06 (eighteen years ago)

i'll tell you one thing: if the police came barrelling into my house at dawn and shot me in the fucking chest, i might well want to become a terrorist after that.

Depends how long your beard is.

That sentence will probably be used against you in the fullness of time.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 11:12 (eighteen years ago)

four months pass...
Oh, hello.

The Crown Prosecution Service has advised police not to bring child pornography charges against a man shot during a terror raid in Forest Gate.

Mohammed Abdul Kahar, 23, was shot in the shoulder by police at his east London home on 2 June.

He and his brother Abul Koyair, 20, were later released without charge.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6092624.stm

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Friday, 27 October 2006 18:19 (eighteen years ago)

The "specialized knowledge" bit of that report is actually rather strange.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 27 October 2006 18:27 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.