― Ruthie Tooth (Ruthie Tooth), Friday, 2 June 2006 13:01 (nineteen years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 2 June 2006 13:05 (nineteen years ago)
― timmy tannin (pompous), Friday, 2 June 2006 13:07 (nineteen years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 2 June 2006 13:09 (nineteen years ago)
― breathny spears let me see the sex that you did. (noodle vague), Friday, 2 June 2006 13:10 (nineteen years ago)
― not-goodwin (not-goodwin), Friday, 2 June 2006 13:37 (nineteen years ago)
Pull yourself up and leave.
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 2 June 2006 13:39 (nineteen years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 2 June 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Friday, 2 June 2006 13:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Crimea River (Mark C), Friday, 2 June 2006 13:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Ruthie Tooth (Ruthie Tooth), Friday, 2 June 2006 13:59 (nineteen years ago)
What does it matter what I would do? It's YOUR relationship. Some would stay, some would go. Ultimately it's your decision. Are you in love with your partner? What do you expect from your partner?
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)
― not-goodwin (not-goodwin), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)
I am beginning to question the degree of significance of your SO.
― M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:05 (nineteen years ago)
I'd like some respect, a whole lot of it actually, from my partner. I'm not getting respect from late nite sex from which I'm asked to leave. Oh, I'm so ashamed of myself.
― Ruthie Tooth (Ruthie Tooth), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:08 (nineteen years ago)
― harmonic generator, haircuts are for losers (kate), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
― not-goodwin (not-goodwin), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Ruthie Tooth (Ruthie Tooth), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:18 (nineteen years ago)
Ditch him pronto.
― M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)
― harmonic generator, haircuts are for losers (kate), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Nicholas Passant (Nicholas Passant), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:43 (nineteen years ago)
It's an enormous dud obviously, there's nothing wrong with having a relationship based solely on sex and nothing else but if you start throwing words like "love" around in any sense of the word you're getting into frankly dishonest territory.
(I have historically not been the best person at practising what I preach in this regard, but still...)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 2 June 2006 14:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Ruthie Tooth (Ruthie Tooth), Friday, 2 June 2006 15:59 (nineteen years ago)
it's not a bad sign, it's fucking retarted. if that's not a definition of being used, i don't know what is (unless there is a REALLY good reason for it, like parents suddenly coming over)
"I love you, but I'm not IN love with you" in most cases, i suppose equals "I don't love you but I think saying that will upset you which i want to avoid so i'd say 'i love you' because it can mean a lot of things, like 'love you as a friend'".
― scnnr drkly (scnnr drkly), Friday, 2 June 2006 16:09 (nineteen years ago)
And yeah, he totally said something to the effect of "Well I tell all of my good friends that I love them, that doesn't mean I'm in love with them, too." to which I responded "Yeah, but you don't sleep with THEM do you?" to which he did not reply.
― Ruthie Tooth (Ruthie Tooth), Friday, 2 June 2006 16:28 (nineteen years ago)
― matlewis (matlewis), Friday, 2 June 2006 16:38 (nineteen years ago)
- Sorry Ruthie, i should've made it clear - that's how i actually understood it from your post. still retarded. from all evidence sounds like you're being used.
― scnnr drkly (scnnr drkly), Friday, 2 June 2006 16:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Friday, 2 June 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Friday, 2 June 2006 19:20 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 2 June 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Friday, 2 June 2006 19:38 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0140195831/qid=1149280788/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-2793042-3379201?s=books&v=glance&n=283155
worth reading even if you're not into buddhism, short and to the point.
― scnnr drkly (scnnr drkly), Friday, 2 June 2006 19:41 (nineteen years ago)
Well, I haven't read it myself, so I can't vouch for it personally. I guess it's probably the sort of message that might be just what someone might need to hear at a certain point, but for those who are not at that point, it might be sort of obvious.
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 2 June 2006 19:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Friday, 2 June 2006 19:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Friday, 2 June 2006 19:47 (nineteen years ago)
― ryan (ryan), Friday, 2 June 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Ruthie Tooth (Ruthie Tooth), Friday, 2 June 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Friday, 2 June 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Ruthie Tooth (Ruthie Tooth), Friday, 2 June 2006 20:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Friday, 2 June 2006 20:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Ruthie Tooth (Ruthie Tooth), Friday, 2 June 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)
― scnnr drkly (scnnr drkly), Friday, 2 June 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)
No, it's not too much to ask. If that's what you really want, then I'm sure that you'll find it sooner or later (hopefully sooner).
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 2 June 2006 20:13 (nineteen years ago)
(xpost)
― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 2 June 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Ruthie Tooth (Ruthie Tooth), Friday, 2 June 2006 20:18 (nineteen years ago)
-- harmonic generator, haircuts are for losers (masonicboo...), June 2nd, 2006. (later)
I didn't catch this one before. It's spot on, though. Thank you.
― Ruthie Tooth (Ruthie Tooth), Friday, 2 June 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)