Everything old is new again! First gay marriage, now more terror threats!

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

If it worked for the 2004 election, why not the 2006? bring on the orange alerts!

― kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:24 (nineteen years ago)

The next attack here, officials predict, will bear no resemblance to Sept. 11. The casualty toll will not be that high, the target probably not that big. We may not even recognize it for what it is at first, they say. But it's coming — of that they seem certain.

Ahahaha

― steal compass, drive north, disappear (tissp), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:38 (nineteen years ago)

Sounds like a Banana skin bombing campaign in Winchester.

― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:44 (nineteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_fear

― Courtney Gidts (ex machina), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:44 (nineteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_terrorists_have_won

― Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:47 (nineteen years ago)

Police in Toledo, Ohio, busted another cell in February. This one consisted of three men training to attack U.S. forces overseas. Once again, luck played a role. When they tried to enlist someone in their mosque to help, he turned them in.

Wow I'm quakin in my fuckin boots here.

― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:48 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.coldwarpeacemuseum.org/images/duck-n-cover-280.jpg

― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 14:15 (nineteen years ago)

"The Atlanta men are charged with videotaping domestic targets, including the U.S. Capitol and the World Bank."

We are no longer allowed to watch what the outside of the government is doing. If we let people be arrested for bullshit charges, the terrorists have won.

― Davyd Von Greener (thatblastedhound), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 22:47 (nineteen years ago)

Yawn.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 14:35 (nineteen years ago)

"LEZH-BY-ONIC MAWWIAJE!"

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40165000/jpg/_40165015_rainbow_b203_ap.jpg

― ((((((DOPplur)))n)))u))))tttt (donut), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:21 (nineteen years ago)

I think Bush has been missing the key angle here:

GAY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!

― ((((((DOPplur)))n)))u))))tttt (donut), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:22 (nineteen years ago)

aka morrissey's house

― sometimes it takes an earthquake to know where the fault lies (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

GAY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!

Britishes innovate:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v453/strictlytrue/mail.jpg

― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

Sounds like the next awkward race-related moment in film to me!

― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:50 (nineteen years ago)

gayllegal

― and what (ooo), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:51 (nineteen years ago)

gaylien sounds better.

― scnnr drkly (scnnr drkly), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:52 (nineteen years ago)

"In space, no one can hear you..."

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:53 (nineteen years ago)

You can't top gaylien. But if I were aiming something a little more subtle and sinnister, I'd go with The Agenda.

― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:56 (nineteen years ago)

homexican

― and what (ooo), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

fagtino

― and what (ooo), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

You can't top gaylien.

shows how much you know about gayliens!

― scnnr drkly (scnnr drkly), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 17:06 (nineteen years ago)

Are you saying they're bottoms?

― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 17:19 (nineteen years ago)

GAY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!

reality trumps satire pt. 357

― Renard (Renard), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 17:32 (nineteen years ago)

Wow, gaylien fear mongering. Talk about issue specific!

― Fluffy Bear (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

say, why not a constitutional convention?

― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:47 (nineteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.