― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 17:55 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)
It's an observation. Are whites more afraid to change subway cars by walking in between them when the subway's in motion?
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.detroitfocus.org/Issues/0502/ToddWeinstein/Photos/010.jpg
― lord pooperton (yes ok?; next question!) (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)
(b) One reason for this might be that the main people walking between subway cars are homeless people and teenagers/schoolkids, both of which groups are, in New York, mostly non-white. Especially the latter.
(c) I assume you're asking because you're worried that recent rule-changes that officially prohibit car-changing would thus have disproportionate racial impact, and you want to confirm before you start in with the protests.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)
Most of the car-switching I've ever seen consists of Puerto Rican, black, or Dominican kids who are just headed home from school, and move between cars because, you know, their entire 9th-grade class or whatever is straggled out along the length of the train. Plus I live on the Upper West Side, so it's usually kids who are headed up toward Washington Heights or possibly up to the Bronx, so they have a lot of time to kill socializing.
Apart from them and homeless people, I can't think of any particular types of people who routinely change cars. Maybe just "people who grew up in the city," which again = largely non-white.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)
So why are kids constantly changing cars? Hormones? Restlessness? Because it's fun? To impress each other? To talk to as many peole as possible?
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:37 (nineteen years ago)
-- shookout (shookou...), December 17th, 2005.
a bunch of upper middle class white people calling each other racists, sexists, and homophobes.
-- shookout (shookou...), January 19th, 2006.
Cosby may be nuts, but I've seen Dyson on numerous TV appearences, and he strikes me as an attention-craving hustler.
-- shookout (shookou...), May 17th, 2006.
As hung-up on race as Chang seems to be, he failed to notice that 8of the 21 pieces in the current, Matt Groening-edited edition are about artists of color.
-- shookout (shookou...), December 8th, 2003.
the idea that white people co-opted rock and roll is simlistic and stupid.
-- shookout (shookou...), March 23rd, 2005.
don't you know that people not in power can't be sexist or racist, etc?
That is pure white liberal theoretical liberal arts college crap.
-- shookout (shookou...), April 26th, 2004.
R. Kelly - "Happy People" (2 matching messages)
It's not as good as "I'm Gonna Piss on You.
So you like pedophile music?
-- shookout (shookou...), April 12th, 2004.
I really like Big Sur. It might be my favorite Kerouac book.
-- shookout (shookou...), February 1st, 2005.
― and what (ooo), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:38 (nineteen years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:38 (nineteen years ago)
NB "black people" is off-base here; "non-white" is a better description. And of course it's not so much that non-white people are more likely to car-switch; it's that car-switchers are largely non-white. Or actually I'd imagine it's more that car-switchers are largely working-class native New Yorkers.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:38 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:38 (nineteen years ago)
― jinx hijinks (sanskrit), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:39 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:40 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:41 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)
Well then technically they should install a huge gate around the entire track like they have at a handful of stops (the shuttle btwn GC and TS is what I'm thinking of immediately), because more ppl have died or been injured from shoving/jumping/falling there than by walking car to car.
So sad ;_;
― Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
You're wrong, ord pooperton, all sorts of people play on the platform.
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
― jinx hijinks (sanskrit), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
hello douchebag at Delancey Essex!
Asian musicians play on the platform
have you seen the tap dancer / trumpeter?
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
err, this is true -- I think my point was I usually see "OLD BLACK DUDE WITH GUITAR" or "ETHUSIASTIC NON WHITE DUDE WITH ACCORDIAN" walking around on the trains
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:44 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:44 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:46 (nineteen years ago)
Anyway: I actually do think white people are more afraid to change cars.
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)
Train-walking = vocal-harmony groups (black) and mariachi-style singers (Latino)
Tunnels = Andean pipers, solo trumpet or violin (good reverb!), or young man with acoustic guitar singing early Beatles
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)
The creepiest thing in the stations are the guys doing the Latin dancing with female dummies strapped to their feet. It looks like they're dancing with a corpse.
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:51 (nineteen years ago)
Dummy-dancing = yes, creepoid. Though not as creepoid as the great singing-saw lady at 42nd who for some reason makes this weird, blissful, and totally frightening face while she's playing.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:52 (nineteen years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Washable School Paste (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)
i agree! xpost
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:57 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (tripod?) (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 18:58 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:03 (nineteen years ago)
No Woman, No Cry (Sorry, Bob)Knockin' on Heaven's Dorr (Sorry, Bob)
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:05 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:07 (nineteen years ago)
rasta asked little kid what his teddy bear's name was, then improvised a song based around "Jackson, the Teddy Bear". kid was smiles ear to ears and i saw Dad palm him a twenty.
― jinx hijinks (sanskrit), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:09 (nineteen years ago)
er, is NYC "largely" non-white? new Orleans (before Katrina), Detroit sure, but even today i think the sizable "white' pop is a rather large minority, any stats on that? (sorry for nit-picky). but you're right about maybe being a native thing, I would do this a lot back in the day(often due to seat, odor or ac issues, but sometimes just cuz i could)
― timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:15 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:17 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:18 (nineteen years ago)
― timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:18 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:19 (nineteen years ago)
But the demographic of "kids who ride the subway home from school through Manhattan" is definitely not-very-white.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:21 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:27 (nineteen years ago)
― timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)
― timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:31 (nineteen years ago)
(xpost yeah, Timmy, I think those enclaves have diminished somewhat, at least closer to the city core. But yeah, when it comes to white native New Yorkers who aren't just wealthy, the bulk of those I encounter are either Italian or Jewish.)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:37 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:39 (nineteen years ago)
According to the census, whites have been a minority in NYC since the '80s. And the same will be true of NY state in a few years, according to the New York Times on 3/7/06
Page 1New York TimesMarch 7, 2006Whites to Be Minority in N.Y. Soon, DataShowBy SAM ROBERTSThe influx of foreigners to New York and its suburbs and the continuing exodus of non-Hispanic whites to other parts of the country have transformed the face of metropolitanNew York so profoundly that whites will constitute a minority of the region's populationwithin a few years, demographers say.The shift would make New York the first large metropolitan area outside the South andWest in which whites do not make up a majority, according to an analysis of 2004Census estimates by the Brookings Institution that was released yesterday.The analysis also reveals a historic reversal: For the first time since at least the 19thcentury, the black population of both the city and, to a lesser extent, the region, hasdeclined. In the five boroughs, according to the estimates, the number of blacks declinedby about 30,000 since 2000, dipping below 30 percent of the overall population, as themigration of blacks to the suburbs and areas like the South outpaced immigration fromthe Caribbean and Africa.In contrast, the analysis found that while the greater New York region over all lost162,000 non-Hispanic whites and several hundred blacks from 2000 to 2004, the regiongained 288,000 Hispanic people and 201,000 Asians — more Asians, in fact, than anyother metropolitan area.Increasingly, the New York region's growing multiracial makeup reflects the changingface of the inner ring of suburbs as many new immigrants bypass the city altogether ormigrate from the city to neighboring counties after a generation or less.What makes the city and the region unusual, though, is that among the nation's 88metropolitan areas with half a million or more people, New York is one of only three —Houston and Honolulu are the others — where the proportion of blacks, Hispanics andAsians each exceeds their share of the national population.Whites have been a minority in New York City since the 1980's. But now that shift isextending to the wider metropolitan area, driven by immigration and higher birth ratesamong immigrants. Already, non-Hispanic whites are a minority of the metropolitanarea's population younger than 15."New York is still the classic melting pot, with a whole diverse array of immigrantscoming in, but the suburbs are now becoming part of this bigger melting pot," saidWilliam H. Frey, the Brookings Institution demographer who conducted the analysis."The suburbs are now tasting this new diversity."Page 2His analysis found that whites declined to 52.2 percent of the population in 2004 from54.2 percent in 2000 in the census-defined metropolitan area, which includes the city,Long Island, the northern suburbs, northern New Jersey and northeastern Pennsylvania,but not Connecticut."We went down 2.1 percent from 2000 to 2004," Dr. Frey said. "If we go another 2percent before the end of the decade, you're there." He added: "The suburbs are nowcontributing to this. They've all shown a decline in the percent of whites since 1990."The approaching statistical milestone in the New York region has not been unexpected bydemographers."What this shows is that the pattern is spreading out," said Andrew A. Beveridge, ademographer at Queens College of the City University of New York, "and the non-Hispanic white population is continuing to dwindle.""The New York metropolitan area is becoming more like the city, and the nation'smetropolitan areas are becoming more like New York," Dr. Beveridge said.The trend was foreshadowed in an earlier analysis by New York's Department of CityPlanning, which found that while the region's ethnic and racial numbers had been drivenfor several decades by changes in the five boroughs, those changes were also beingmirrored in the suburban counties closest to the city."The inner-ring suburbs are emulating the city," said Joseph J. Salvo, director of thedepartment's population division.What's happening in New York has already occurred in metropolitan areas in the Westand South, including Los Angeles, Miami, Houston and San Francisco.The proportion of whites has also dipped to just over a majority in the San Diego,Washington, Dallas and Las Vegas metropolitan regions as Asian and Hispanic peopledisperse beyond central cities and their suburbs and as blacks migrate to the South. Ineach of those areas, whites are already a minority of the population under age 15.Atlanta led large metropolitan areas in black population growth and is poised to overtakeChicago as the region with the second-highest black population in total numbers, afterNew York.In 1990, metropolitan Los Angeles and New York accounted for 30 percent of thenation's Hispanic population. By 2004, those two regions were home to only 23 percentof Hispanic people."For immigrant minorities, especially, friendship and family networks have drawn themto traditional ports of entry, even during times when labor market considerations wouldsuggest they move elsewhere," Dr. Frey wrote. "Blacks, as well, have tended to followwell-worn patterns, initially out of the South and, later, to a network of cities across theNorth and West."Page 3But more recently, he concluded, "many lower-skilled Hispanic migrants are moving tofast-growing areas of the country, in response to retail, service and construction jobgrowth, while higher-skilled minority migrants are following the same professionalopportunities that have attracted whites."Copyright 2006The New York Times CompanyMinorities avoid wilderness activities,advocates look for fixBy MICHAEL HILLAssociated Press WriterAugust 25, 2005, 11:01 AM EDTBunyan Bryant has camped by the shores of Lake Huron for decades and usually sees thesame thing: green trees, blue skies and white people."I seldom see other African-Americans or even other minorities camping," said Bryant,director of the Environmental Justice Initiative at the University of Michigan."Sometimes they might be with another church group or something like that, but trulyspeaking it doesn't happen."It's the same story from New York's Adirondacks to Arizona's canyons: there's a lack ofethnic and racial diversity in the outdoor areas where people hike, camp, mountain bike,paddle and picnic. In a time when minority populations are growing, wildernessadvocates and administrators are reaching out to blacks, Hispanics and Asians to changethat."We're only serving part of the public now and we aspire to represent many, many peoplewho are not using all the public lands," said Neil Woodworth of the AdirondackMountain Club.The Outdoor Industry Foundation this summer reported that 79 percent of people takingpart in outdoor activities like hiking and kayaking last year were Caucasian, 6 percentwere black and 4 percent were Hispanic.Blacks and Hispanics combined make up 27 percent of the U.S. population.The U.S. Forest Service found similar trends in Arizona, where whites accounted for 88percent or more of the visitors to the six national forests in that state, even thoughHispanics make up about a quarter of the state's population.Page 4Economic and geographic conditions have something to do with it _ think of a citydweller who lacks a car, or even the money to buy a tent. But money has become less afactor as more blacks and Hispanics enter the middle class, said Alan Spears, associatedirector of cultural diversity programs at the National Parks Conservation Association.Advocates and academics say cultural factors can play a large part. Marta Maldonado ofIowa State University's sociology department said the concept of "wilderness" is awestern European idea, not one necessarily shared by minority groups. As U.S. ForestChief Dale Bosworth noted in a speech early this year, "the face of conservation hastraditionally been rural and white. "For blacks descended from sharecroppers, camping might have associations of living on afarm and of poverty, Bryant said. Hispanics whose families are new to this country mighthave the same sort of negative associations with roughing it, Spears said.While reasons for avoiding the woods can be different for different groups, there mightbe a common feeling among minorities that it is unwelcome territory."It's all couched under a larger fear that maybe with some of these public lands, you'regoing to run into white supremacists in camouflage clothing running seven-man assaultdrills or something like that," Spears said.Whatever the reasons, advocates for public land use are concerned. Aside from wantingto make sure the widest range of people take advantage of natural areas, the AdirondackMountain Club's Woodworth noted that minorities represent a growing constituency whowill be weighing in on land use policies.Woodworth's group has a number of programs aimed at introducing minority children tothe outdoors. The Breakfree program run by its mid-Hudson Valley chapter takes highschool students in Poughkeepsie out to climb mountains, camp overnight or paddle up theHudson."We have to make the effort to say `You're welcome here,"' said Breakfree's Tom Lint.Similarly, the National Wildlife Federation's Earth Tomorrow program targets inner-citykids in Houston, Atlanta, Detroit, Seattle and elsewhere. The kids fish, hike or listen totalks on endangered species.Federal officials also have been trying to make parks more hospitable to a wider array ofpeople.Improvements to the Applewhite Picnic Area in California's San Bernardino NationalForest include bilingual signs, hosts that speak Spanish and larger picnic tables toaccommodate bigger groups. Now, about 80 percent of people using Applewhite areHispanics, an increase from years past, said Deborah Chavez of the service's PacificSouthwest Research Station.Page 5Chavez notes that it can be difficult to promote park areas to Hispanics since they tend torespond more to word of mouth than advertisements and brochures.That's why so many advocates focus on outreach: once people start showing up inwilderness areas, the problem often takes care of itself."Once you get people to the Grand Canyon," Spears said, "you don't have to do a lot oftalking."___On the Net:Environmental Justice Initiative: http://eji.snre.umich.edu/index.htmlThe Outdoor Industry Association: http://www.outdoorindustry.org/U.S. Forest Service: http://www.fs.fed.us/Adirondack Mountain Club: http://www.adk.org/National Wildlife Federation: http://www.nwf.org/
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:41 (nineteen years ago)
another thing white guys in business suits are apt to do: spread out their fucking newspapers to the fullest as they're reading them, no matter how full the car is.
― horseshoe (horseshoe), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:42 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:44 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)
No, just referring to the old expression -- "dog bites man, that's not news; man bites dog, now that's news."
This would have been news either way, but obviously there's something odd and inverted about a black man throwing a rock through a white person's window because there are too many of them around and "there goes the neighborhood," etc.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 19:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 20:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 20:19 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 20:21 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 21:31 (nineteen years ago)
― lord pooperton (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 22:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)
but, officially, yeah, nobody's supposed to walk thru even the unlocked ones on the number lines either.
kids mainly walk thru cars for the adventure component, yeah, and i think that yeah you'll have lots more black and latino kids riding the subway to/from school than white ones for a thousand reasons having to do w/ demographics and the weird way the ny school system works in assigning kids to schools and etc.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:01 (nineteen years ago)