"I think things just got a little harder for a pimp."

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
NEW YORK (CNN) -- Republican Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa is hoping to stamp out the sex trade by taxing pimps and prostitutes, then jailing them when they don't pay.

The Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday morning approved a bill sponsored by committee chairman Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, authorizing at least $2 million toward the establishment of an office in the IRS criminal investigation unit to prosecute unlawful sex workers for violations of tax laws.

The bill's approval gives the IRS harsh new criminal penalties for use against those in the underground criminal economy. According to Grassley's office, the majority of the victims of sex trafficking -- those who are often smuggled in from other counties and virtually imprisoned in a house set up for prostitution -- are girls ages 13 to 17.

'A no-brainer'
"It's a no-brainer to have the IRS go after sex traffickers," Grassley said. "Prosecuting tax code violations can get these guys off the street and yank from their grasp the girls and women they exploit. This crime is right under our noses in the United States, and it's especially horrible when under-age girls are being held prisoner. The thugs who run the trafficking rings are exploiting society's poorest girls and women for personal gain."

Asked Tuesday about whether taxing sex workers would somehow lend legitimacy to them, a spokesman for Grassley said that the goal of the legislation would not be to legitimize the individuals but rather to find "yet another alternative to track the money flowing in this industry to get at potential criminals."

The bill also calls for more jail time for sex workers. According to Grassley's office, in the past, the IRS has been saddled with having to prove how much income a sexual worker earned in order to show that he or she has not been paying enough income tax. Grassley's proposal will help overcome those obstacles. For example, if a trafficker has failed to file W-2s for five women (employees), the maximum penalty would be 10 years in prison per failure to file, a total of 50 years.

Grassley used the example of gangster Al Capone, who was eventually jailed on tax evasion charges. The bill, according to a spokesman for Grassley, will use the federal tax code to shut down illegal sex workers who are hard to get by way of other federal criminal laws and are not targeted by state law enforcement.

"For the first time ever, the tax code would help put behind bars the criminals who are making money in the underground economy by selling sexual access to girls and women," the spokesman said in an e-mail statement.

Strip clubs a target?
Carol Leigh, a representative of BAYSWAN, a San Francisco Bay area sex worker advocacy network, criticized the legislation as being shortsighted.

"Forced labor, kidnapping should be targeted, but this legislation broadly targets the sex trade in general, and could target your local strip club," Leigh said. "Those of us who work in the industry understand that this does nothing to improve conditions in our industry.

"We want laws enforced against those who abuse us, against those who are violent, and enforcement of labor regulations. That is the only truly effective way to protect the welfare of the women who work in the industry."

The sex trafficking bill proposed by Grassley was part of a scheduled Senate Finance Committee good government tax bill.

Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 29 June 2006 11:00 (nineteen years ago)

theoretically, anyway.

i mean, how many pimps are gonna all of a sudden start declaring income, wtf?

Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 29 June 2006 11:02 (nineteen years ago)

well that isn't the point. unfortunately a law like this is more likely to be used against the prostitutes.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 29 June 2006 11:39 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.pimpdaddy.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/pd-ri-17500-tn.jpg

are the suits then tax-deductible?

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Thursday, 29 June 2006 11:50 (nineteen years ago)

business expense, surely.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 29 June 2006 11:52 (nineteen years ago)

HWO CAN U TAXES SOMETHIGNT WAHT IS ILLEGALS?

Jimmy Mod: NOIZE BOARD GRIL COMPARISON ANALYST (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 29 June 2006 12:23 (nineteen years ago)

Someone's been watching "The Untouchables"!

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Thursday, 29 June 2006 12:26 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/47/47_images/taxi1withkeitel.jpg

"so you're saying i can claim her as a dependent?"

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 29 June 2006 13:25 (nineteen years ago)

Seems a little shortsighted in light of the fact that sex traffickers who exploit unwilling women can already be prosecuted for a lot of things. Not to mention that some sex workers of the self-employed variety have seminars to learn how to report their income to the IRS. Did that article ever get linked around here? Probably still the minority, but some of the higher class prostitutes were reporting income as freelance artistic work for higher or something along that line.

I've voted against Grassley a couple times now, he's still there though :(

miguel "already hard for pimps in iowa" h. (mike h.), Thursday, 29 June 2006 13:44 (nineteen years ago)

well i'm gonna have that song in my head all day now

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Thursday, 29 June 2006 13:49 (nineteen years ago)

this is exactly how Iowa deals with marijuana possession: you have to have a tax stamp to possess it, only possession is illegal, but if they bust you for possession and you don't have yr stamp, you get busted twice

if it's not unconstitutional, it oughta be

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Thursday, 29 June 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

haha rrobyn you too?

when you tryin to get some money for the rent (nickalicious), Thursday, 29 June 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)

roffle at gypsy mothra

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 29 June 2006 14:52 (nineteen years ago)

i guess this will be replacing "7 oclock in the morning and the rays from the sun wake me" etc, which has been in my head since showing an uninitated friend the videos on youtube on saturday. i like how this can be belted out and embellished over and over.

taxes, grumble grumble etc.

For the Cadillacs and gas money spent (rrrobyn), Thursday, 29 June 2006 15:03 (nineteen years ago)

"On taxes y'all writing off hoes as dependents."

clotpoll (Clotpoll), Thursday, 29 June 2006 15:45 (nineteen years ago)

Yessss! Senator Grassley obviously recognizes that these wily pimps and whores escape conviction time and time again by intimidating or killing off the relevant witnesses, bribing police chiefs, tampering juries and hiring nothing but the finest Grade AAA criminal lawyers, all in an effort to shield their multi-million dollar criminal enterprises from the legitimate vengeance of The Law. But their frowsy little bookkeepers will be no match for the CPAs of the IRS!! They will crumple like paper tigers.

Aimless (Aimless), Thursday, 29 June 2006 16:10 (nineteen years ago)

HWO CAN U TAXES SOMETHIGNT WAHT IS ILLEGALS?

they've done this for years on illegal drugs, al capone was brought down on tax evasion because he didn't declare money from sale of alcohol. it's just another charge to throw on top of an existing charge.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Thursday, 29 June 2006 17:32 (nineteen years ago)

wtf did anyone notice that Colbert made the EXACT SAME JOKE as the thread title on last night's show?

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 June 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

haha, i can hear him saying that

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Friday, 30 June 2006 19:40 (nineteen years ago)

aren't there some other instances of jokes on ILX popping up on the Daily Show/Colbert Report or am I imagining things...?

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 June 2006 20:11 (nineteen years ago)

Probably Colbert's writers are lurkers. This explains why I find the Colbert Report funny though.

taco freebie (mike h.), Friday, 30 June 2006 20:15 (nineteen years ago)

This is kind of a different take on "Read my lips, no new taxes."

Earl Nash (earlnash), Saturday, 1 July 2006 02:36 (nineteen years ago)

they've done this for years on illegal drugs, al capone was brought down on tax evasion because he didn't declare money from sale of alcohol.
Kind of right. Tax evasion is tax evasion regardless of what's being sold - so the government uses it when they can't nail someone for selling cocaine or running refuse disposal services in New Jersey. They show that the person made X amount of money last year (as evidenced by these bank statements and these assets and etc.) and hid it.

milo z (mlp), Saturday, 1 July 2006 02:52 (nineteen years ago)

When Dworkin and MacKinnon were trying to ban porn in Minneapolis, my uncle ran its vice squad. He said, before the law they passed banning porn was struck down for clashing with the First Amendment, that there was no way to bust pimps for anything lasting/jailable BUT tax evasion.

suzy (suzy), Saturday, 1 July 2006 05:51 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.