I'm so glad he's not my Senator anymore. Except now I have Cronyn and Hutchison. Shit.
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Monday, 3 July 2006 15:04 (eighteen years ago) link
― David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 3 July 2006 15:07 (eighteen years ago) link
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Monday, 3 July 2006 15:09 (eighteen years ago) link
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Monday, 3 July 2006 15:10 (eighteen years ago) link
this product should be well-suited for purchase and delivery over these "pipes" that the distinguished senator mentions.
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 3 July 2006 15:12 (eighteen years ago) link
looks like i'll be stuck with only purchasing these instead:
http://www.brooks.af.mil/History/images/Man-in-Space/MOL/F2a03_SF.jpg
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 3 July 2006 15:14 (eighteen years ago) link
what a glorious phrase
― aaron d.g. (aaron d.g.), Monday, 3 July 2006 16:12 (eighteen years ago) link
― David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 3 July 2006 16:13 (eighteen years ago) link
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 3 July 2006 16:19 (eighteen years ago) link
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 00:32 (eighteen years ago) link
― gbx (skowly), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 00:33 (eighteen years ago) link
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 00:41 (eighteen years ago) link
― kingfish cyclopean ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 28 July 2006 04:29 (eighteen years ago) link
― k!t brash (kit brash), Friday, 28 July 2006 07:40 (eighteen years ago) link
― Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Friday, 28 July 2006 08:51 (eighteen years ago) link
Hahah yeah I love that.
"We asked this scientician!" "...uhhh"
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 28 July 2006 09:00 (eighteen years ago) link
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Friday, 28 July 2006 09:13 (eighteen years ago) link
And now his house got raided today. Commence with the horrid "tubes" joeks!
http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2007/POLITICS/07/30/lawmaker.raid.ap/art.tedstevens.jpg
― kingfish, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 00:50 (seventeen years ago) link
huh.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 01:07 (seventeen years ago) link
Stevens, who has been in office since 1968 and is the longest-serving Republican in Senate history, said the interests of justice would be best served if he commented after the investigation.
"I continue to believe this investigation should proceed to its conclusion without any appearance that I have attempted to influence its outcome," Stevens said. "The legal process should be allowed to proceed so that all the facts can be established and the truth determined."
I think this is the first sane thing I've ever heard him say.
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 02:19 (seventeen years ago) link
I still agree with him that "the internet is not a truck"
― kingfish, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 03:29 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/washington/politics-usa-crime-stevens.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
breaking…
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 17:10 (sixteen years ago) link
Maybe he can call the Fantastic Four for help.
― libcrypt, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link
He might not need it:
The judge overseeing the corruption trial of Sen. Ted Stevens threatened today to throw out the case against the long-serving Republican after prosecutors turned up last-minute evidence defense lawyers said was exculpatory.U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan, visibly angry, set a hearing for 4:30 p.m. EST today to weigh a request from Stevens' lawyers to dismiss the seven-count indictment in which Stevens is charged with failing to include more than $250,000 in gifts and home improvements in Senate financial disclosure forms.The dispute centers on an interview between FBI agents and the government's star witness, Bill J. Allen, an Alaskan oilman who testified the last two days about how he oversaw the home renovations and gave Stevens other gifts and benefits.The government previously turned over a redacted version of the FBI interview with Allen to defense lawyers but conceded today they had erred and that portions of the summary should not have been excised. They turned over the new evidence after discovering the oversight Wednesday night.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan, visibly angry, set a hearing for 4:30 p.m. EST today to weigh a request from Stevens' lawyers to dismiss the seven-count indictment in which Stevens is charged with failing to include more than $250,000 in gifts and home improvements in Senate financial disclosure forms.
The dispute centers on an interview between FBI agents and the government's star witness, Bill J. Allen, an Alaskan oilman who testified the last two days about how he oversaw the home renovations and gave Stevens other gifts and benefits.
The government previously turned over a redacted version of the FBI interview with Allen to defense lawyers but conceded today they had erred and that portions of the summary should not have been excised. They turned over the new evidence after discovering the oversight Wednesday night.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 October 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago) link
<A href=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/27/stevens.jurors/index.html>THROW AWAY THE KEY!</a>
― There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Monday, 27 October 2008 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link
Biggest Nelson laugh in the world right now.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 27 October 2008 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link
If I were Palin I'd be all "Uh, yeah, never ever once liked the guy!" right about now.
looking forward to lolPalin response.
xp
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 27 October 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link
good fucking riddance
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 27 October 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link
rip
― omar little, Monday, 27 October 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link
a series of tubes mourns
― El Tomboto, Monday, 27 October 2008 20:50 (sixteen years ago) link
a dump truck rejoices
Do they have to rename half the state now?
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 27 October 2008 20:50 (sixteen years ago) link
http://www.dot.state.ak.us/anc/images/banners/home-bannerREV.jpg
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 27 October 2008 20:51 (sixteen years ago) link
oh keep it for fun
― Holdtransferanswerspeaker Featurerecallconfredail (Mackro Mackro), Monday, 27 October 2008 20:59 (sixteen years ago) link
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-StevensTrial.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Despite being a convicted felon, he is not required to drop out of the race or resign from the Senate. If he wins re-election, he can continue to hold his seat because there is no rule barring felons from serving in Congress.
But presumably he can't vote for himself?
― senator which fanta girl u blap? (Upt0eleven), Monday, 27 October 2008 20:59 (sixteen years ago) link
This almost seemed too easy. Is there going to be some sort of Disclosure style Plan B in effect?
― Holdtransferanswerspeaker Featurerecallconfredail (Mackro Mackro), Monday, 27 October 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link
Actually I was thinking he'd get acquitted. Pleasant surprise time!
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 27 October 2008 21:21 (sixteen years ago) link
2008 has kind of been one long "pleasant surprise time" imo
― omar little, Monday, 27 October 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link
He can hold the Senate seat, but he'll miss more votes than the dude with the stroke while he's in the pokey.
― Rock Hardy, Monday, 27 October 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/8320/stevenszm3.jpg
― № 1 (libcrypt), Monday, 27 October 2008 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link
Prison, it's not like a big building, it's more like a series of cubes.
― № 1 (libcrypt), Monday, 27 October 2008 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link
ha hah ahahaa
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Monday, 27 October 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago) link
Ted's going down fighting!:
E-mail just in from Sen. Ted Stevens' Senate office:'I am obviously disappointed in the verdict but not surprised given the repeated instances of prosecutorial misconduct in this case. The prosecutors had to report themselves to the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility during the trial for ethical violations. Exculpatory evidence was hidden from my lawyers. A witness was kept from us and then sent back to Alaska. The Government lawyers allowed evidence to be introduced that they knew was false. I will fight this unjust verdict with every ounce of energy I have.'I am innocent. This verdict is the result of the unconscionable manner in which the Justice Department lawyers conducted this trial. I ask that Alaskans and my Senate colleagues stand with me as I pursue my rights. I remain a candidate for the United States Senate.'(Update) Stevens' campaign sent out the same message a few minutes later with an additional sentence at the end:'I will come home on Wednesday and ask for your vote.'
'I am obviously disappointed in the verdict but not surprised given the repeated instances of prosecutorial misconduct in this case. The prosecutors had to report themselves to the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility during the trial for ethical violations. Exculpatory evidence was hidden from my lawyers. A witness was kept from us and then sent back to Alaska. The Government lawyers allowed evidence to be introduced that they knew was false. I will fight this unjust verdict with every ounce of energy I have.
'I am innocent. This verdict is the result of the unconscionable manner in which the Justice Department lawyers conducted this trial. I ask that Alaskans and my Senate colleagues stand with me as I pursue my rights. I remain a candidate for the United States Senate.'
(Update) Stevens' campaign sent out the same message a few minutes later with an additional sentence at the end:
'I will come home on Wednesday and ask for your vote.'
Please DO.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 27 October 2008 23:51 (sixteen years ago) link
Alaskans say things.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link
the darndest things (thankfully this one was an exception)
Stevens will get my vote on Nov. 4 Between Begich's newly reported, unreported gifts and Stevens' unreported gifts, who cares?Who has the track record for putting Alaska and its residents first? Who has held one of the most powerful positions in the U.S. Senate? I'm proud of Ted Stevens and all he has done. If he did get a few gifts and forgot to record them, then I forgive him. Our state and residents weren't harmed in any way. The rush to judgment on his conviction was appalling. After 40 years he deserves the appeal and our gratitude for all his years of service, and our vote. In the private sector he would have made an enormous income in comparison to his Senate salary for his expertise. Ted Stevens, thank you. I will be voting for you Nov. 4, proudly.-- Shiela Fern Palmer, Alaska
Between Begich's newly reported, unreported gifts and Stevens' unreported gifts, who cares?
Who has the track record for putting Alaska and its residents first? Who has held one of the most powerful positions in the U.S. Senate?
I'm proud of Ted Stevens and all he has done. If he did get a few gifts and forgot to record them, then I forgive him. Our state and residents weren't harmed in any way.
The rush to judgment on his conviction was appalling. After 40 years he deserves the appeal and our gratitude for all his years of service, and our vote.
In the private sector he would have made an enormous income in comparison to his Senate salary for his expertise.
Ted Stevens, thank you. I will be voting for you Nov. 4, proudly.
-- Shiela Fern
Palmer, Alaska
― Holdtransferanswerspeaker Featurerecallconfredail (Mackro Mackro), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link
Mudflats visits the welcome home party
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 30 October 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link
Stevens tries to redefine the word "convicted"
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1132ap_stevens.html
also
Alaska's junior senator, Republican Lisa Murkowski, sat with Stevens in the editorial board meeting and was more critical of Republicans turning on Stevens."For all of them, it's a very close election. I think they're looking to their own political skin. If it helps them in their effort to gain re-election, they will, unfortunately, throw Ted under the bus," she said.
"For all of them, it's a very close election. I think they're looking to their own political skin. If it helps them in their effort to gain re-election, they will, unfortunately, throw Ted under the bus," she said.
At least the view from the bus is real pretty
http://photos.igougo.com/images/p135800-Alaska-Bus_Tour_Through_Denali.jpg
― Ragnar's Savoury Pockets (If You Whiz) (Mackro Mackro), Friday, 31 October 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link
Unless I'm wrong, didn't Palin throw him under the bus this week?
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 31 October 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link
and that little dog McCain too
Then again, one of the few things Palin is good at is throwing her GOP peers under the bus, so that's hardly a surprise.
― Ragnar's Savoury Pockets (If You Whiz) (Mackro Mackro), Friday, 31 October 2008 16:09 (sixteen years ago) link
of course it does, this is Dr Morbius you're talking to
― BADGES DON'T GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO WALTZ OFF WITH A BABY (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 15:31 (fifteen years ago) link
max, i understand that.
You find a way to continue the case, the way you find a way to get the fuck out of Afghanistan.
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 15:37 (fifteen years ago) link
I'm not embarassed for jackshit re: this case. If the prosecutors fucked up then Stevens' should go free. That's the law, that's how it works, and that's how it SHOULD work. I am not okay with prosecutorial misconduct, even if it leads to Ted Stevens dying in prison. Don't get me wrong, I hate Ted Stevens and wish him a painful, ignominious death. But even so, setting the legal procedural issues aside, a) his crimes were pretty small potatoes, garden variety corruption with a minimal impact on the rest of us and b) as max says this has nothing to do with Bam and Holder, they didn't build this case, so why hold it against them exactly?
― This House is a Prison on Planet Bullshit (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 15:41 (fifteen years ago) link
no, morbs, YOU find a way to continue the case
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 15:42 (fifteen years ago) link
as max says this has nothing to do with Bam and Holder, they didn't build this case, so why hold it against them exactly?
again, you are talking to Dr Morbius
― ur an ugly hamster-abusing "girl" or whatever u are, gtfo (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 15:43 (fifteen years ago) link
will get right on it. xp
Nina Totenberg:
With more ugly hearings expected, Holder is said to have decided late Tuesday to pull the plug. His decision is said to be based on Stevens' age — he's 85 — and the fact that Stevens is no longer in the Senate. Perhaps most importantly, Justice Department officials say Holder wants to send a message to prosecutors throughout the department that actions he regards as misconduct will not be tolerated.
Uh, WHICH IS IT, Neen?
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 15:44 (fifteen years ago) link
It has to be just one?
― WmC, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 15:45 (fifteen years ago) link
sug'banning Dan is pointless, amirite
Bam & Holder, like all prezzes and AGs, break international law everyday. They choose the spots to get idealistic, like freeing Harry Reid's "distinguished colleague."
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 15:46 (fifteen years ago) link
aren't the spots where they break international law examples of them getting idealistic as well--what about swiss bank accounts, nuclear dolphins, the secret KGB tennis courts--how do these things figure into your world view Morbs?
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 15:49 (fifteen years ago) link
very fringily
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 15:55 (fifteen years ago) link
so is talking to you about politics, so we seem to be about even
― ur an ugly hamster-abusing "girl" or whatever u are, gtfo (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:00 (fifteen years ago) link
so is talking to you about politics
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link
Morbs, you were a very pleasant and valued poster for a couple of weeks there, sorry to see it end.
― WmC, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:06 (fifteen years ago) link
you mean morbs has been BANNED???
― mmmm space tang (stevie), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link
srsly i'm all for prosecutorial misconduct if it leads to Ted Stevens dying in prison.
you are a hateful, hateful man
― I just take my louis jag out and wave it round in the air (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link
RIP Morbs--someone start a tribute thread
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:08 (fifteen years ago) link
naifs all (interpreted generously)
curt1s I woulda put the bullet in Nixon's head, how's that?
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:11 (fifteen years ago) link
man--what are political threads going to be like now that Morbs is gone forever
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:11 (fifteen years ago) link
http://sp5.fotolog.com/photo/21/5/49/nikremeras/1236048676022_f.jpg
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link
http://www.theflagpole.com/images/eagle_cry_white_backgnd3.jpg
― WmC, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:14 (fifteen years ago) link
― I just take my louis jag out and wave it round in the air (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, April 1, 2009 11:07 AM (7 minutes ago)
Crutis, you gotta admit that that makes him fit in pretty well here.
― WmC, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:15 (fifteen years ago) link
if i like circle jerks, and i like Circle Jerks, why are metaphoric circle jerks a bad thing? xx-post
― I think no pants is sexy. (Matt P), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:16 (fifteen years ago) link
i mean, answer me that.
ha, morbs, i am transcribing a keith morris interview right this very second
― mmmm space tang (stevie), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:16 (fifteen years ago) link
imagine, the justice department making judgments based on its past behavior, and deciding the law is more important than getting a scalp, whatever will the country come to under these people
― laying | (goole), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link
it's not going to come to anything. STEADY AS SHE GOES
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:21 (fifteen years ago) link
what?
― laying | (goole), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:23 (fifteen years ago) link
god i can't believe morbz bit the big one, internetally
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 16:50 (fifteen years ago) link
Dudes this conviction would have never held up on appeal. Its a non issue.
― mayor jingleberries, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 17:06 (fifteen years ago) link
Who - Morbius'?
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 17:09 (fifteen years ago) link
i don't give a shit about Ted either
ABRIL FOOLE
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link
Maybe I shouldn't have banned him after all. :(((
xpost HAHAHA YOU LYING FUCKER, WAY TO SAVE FACE
― WmC, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 17:24 (fifteen years ago) link
dude, banning Morbs on April Fool's Day was pretty harsh
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 17:28 (fifteen years ago) link
i banned you all years ago, with my ex-boyfriends
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 17:52 (fifteen years ago) link
Banning Morbs has made me so sad it's like Lisa Kudrow dying all over again.
― Event Horizon (Nicole), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 18:14 (fifteen years ago) link
in retrospect it was a mistake but if Morbs has taught me anything it's sticking to my guns no matter how divorced from reality it seems
― WmC, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 19:01 (fifteen years ago) link
Really? He taught me that people really DO still use pay phones.
― guys i need to eliminate this business associate and im really nervous (Laurel), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 19:03 (fifteen years ago) link
hahaha
― WmC, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 19:07 (fifteen years ago) link
i never liked morbius, but he brought some fun to the political threads
RIP mets fan
― brocktune (jeff), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 19:22 (fifteen years ago) link
Uh oh: Ted Stevens believed to be in plane crash.
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 14:02 (fourteen years ago) link
So what's the deal? All I'm hearing is that there was a crash. Is there any word on survivors or not?
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 14:04 (fourteen years ago) link
More here:
http://www.adn.com/2010/08/09/1402798/plane-with-8-on-board-crashes.html
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 14:18 (fourteen years ago) link
Assuming he was one of the victims, can't wait for Sarah's weepy eulogy.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 14:27 (fourteen years ago) link
Funny how Ted almost seems palatable now in comparison to Sarah.
― ô_o (Nicole), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 15:00 (fourteen years ago) link
He'll turn up somewhere in South America enjoying his millions.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 15:56 (fourteen years ago) link
and now he's dead.
― kate78, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 18:01 (fourteen years ago) link
Here's to hoping heaven is a series of tubes.
― Fetchboy, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 18:02 (fourteen years ago) link
Optimistic
― ô_o (Nicole), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 18:08 (fourteen years ago) link
only the good die young
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 18:39 (fourteen years ago) link
^^ A+
― a mix of music (Lionel Ritchie) and kicks (my tongue) (Phil D.), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 18:41 (fourteen years ago) link