What's your favourite position?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

If I had to choose just one, I'd say doggystyle. Though the regular one is nice for kissing and all.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 28 July 2006 10:23 (nineteen years ago)

And by "regular" I mean regular for people who mostly have straight sex. The question must be different for queer folks.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 28 July 2006 10:24 (nineteen years ago)

it burns it burns, branded images across my brain

― Ed (dali), Friday, 28 July 2006 10:25 (nineteen years ago)

Because you've met me?

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 28 July 2006 10:25 (nineteen years ago)

Face down in the gutter

― Sploshette Moxy (Dada), Friday, 28 July 2006 10:26 (nineteen years ago)

Counting down the time until *that* pic of Tuomas gets posted to this thread...

― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Friday, 28 July 2006 10:26 (nineteen years ago)

President

― Konal Doddz (blueski), Friday, 28 July 2006 10:34 (nineteen years ago)

shortstop

― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:03 (nineteen years ago)

one where i have an advantage in a bargain

― ken c (ken c), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:05 (nineteen years ago)

Counting down the time until *that* pic of Forest Pines gets posted to this thread...

― teh_kit is jayne without the tits (g-kit), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:06 (nineteen years ago)

http://static.zoovy.com/img/thechessstore/Bffffff/kingsidecastleafter.jpg

― Sploshette Moxy (Dada), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:07 (nineteen years ago)

The one where I'M FUCKING HER FUCKING BRAINS OUT.

― Andrew (enneff), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:07 (nineteen years ago)

I really should delete that pic some time.

― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:10 (nineteen years ago)

silly mid off

― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:13 (nineteen years ago)

Actually that's a lie - that's a terrible position - as you're likely to be bashed round the head.

― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:17 (nineteen years ago)

Still, it beats third man.

― NickB (NickB), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:18 (nineteen years ago)

Can't beat 1st or 2nd slip

― Sploshette Moxy (Dada), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:18 (nineteen years ago)

What pic? I never saw it. :-(((((((((((((((

― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:19 (nineteen years ago)

The deep lying centre forward role, as pioneered by Nandor Hidegkuti for MTK Budapest and for the Hungarian national side of 1950s

― Sploshette Moxy (Dada), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:21 (nineteen years ago)

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c131/pjankowski53024/11.jpg

― the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:25 (nineteen years ago)

my inner perv is a little disappointed that we can't actually have the sort of thread Tuomas intended, but the alternative is roffly enuf

― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:40 (nineteen years ago)

back to topic
http://www.srht.nhs.uk/SAH/AboutSAH/complications_files/image002.jpg

― ken c (ken c), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:52 (nineteen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/de/World_Wrestling_Entertainment.jpg/300px-World_Wrestling_Entertainment.jpg

― ken c (ken c), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:56 (nineteen years ago)

we were... inverted

― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 28 July 2006 11:56 (nineteen years ago)

pole position

― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:00 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.yeodoug.com/resources/faq/faq_images/slidechart_01.jpg

― Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:02 (nineteen years ago)

http://community.theolympian.com/albums/album375/0116third_position.jpg

― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:06 (nineteen years ago)

The Missionary Position - one of the all time best evers, until I ruined it.

― Dave B (daveb), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:06 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.christiananswers.net/kids/figure_a.gif

― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:08 (nineteen years ago)

I like them all. The idea of choosing just one = mentalism.

― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:23 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.limbermen.com/Ritchie/headstand%20lotus.jpg

― the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:25 (nineteen years ago)

CEO.

― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:29 (nineteen years ago)

http://athena-positrons.web.cern.ch/ATHENA-positrons/wwwathena/graphics/anderson-positron.jpg

― Earwig oh! (Mark C), Friday, 28 July 2006 21:50 (nineteen years ago)

have we had the explicit convo thread bet/w tuomas & rumpie yet?

― kingfish cyclopean ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 28 July 2006 22:06 (nineteen years ago)

The one where my cock's in a girl's cunt.

― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Friday, 28 July 2006 22:35 (nineteen years ago)

leave that to yr other boards "raw patrick".

― michael wells (michael w.), Friday, 28 July 2006 23:19 (nineteen years ago)

no lube for him

― mark grebt (sanskrit), Friday, 28 July 2006 23:56 (nineteen years ago)

tuomas what exactly do you get out of these threads? apart from the obvious.

― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 29 July 2006 00:30 (nineteen years ago)

Hahahaha "is this the Norah Jones of sexual positions?"

― JTS (JTS), Saturday, 29 July 2006 05:55 (nineteen years ago)

Any, just as long as it's balls deep in a Tuomas sundae!

― ALLAH FROG (Mingus Dew), Saturday, 29 July 2006 07:07 (nineteen years ago)

tuomas what exactly do you get out of these threads? apart from the obvious.

Actually, I'm always hoping they'll spark up a bit of honest conversation. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 29 July 2006 07:35 (nineteen years ago)

tuomas what exactly do you get out of these threads? apart from the obvious.

please, jd, don't DON'T provoke him!

― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Saturday, 29 July 2006 07:49 (nineteen years ago)

if you actually demonstrated any, say, self-deprecation or occasional awkwardness about these subjects like, oh i don't know, every other sane fucking human being on the face of the earth instead of just using threads like this as an excuse to shove your creepy self-righteous libertine bullshit in our faces YET AGAIN, maybe people might have reactions other than "ugh, gross" to you starting yet another TMI "discussion."

x-post: eh, too late.

― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 29 July 2006 08:01 (nineteen years ago)

ihttp://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/QN3KRAUwU6lroQXjUfFb8c6mH8IoGQAsLPEbT6MhHm2CKUQGALUzu3xfUXPlem3YlPbELj6SITT3SxmcYqE4odO_2cBenxc/GRAPHICS/0_GebSkyGod.jpg

― Butt Dickus (Dick Butkus), Saturday, 29 July 2006 08:07 (nineteen years ago)

don't think sanity has much to do w/ it

― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 29 July 2006 09:39 (nineteen years ago)

You're a stuck up puritanical fuck who should lighten the fuck up. It's obvious from the thread title what it's about, so if you don't like it then don't fucking read it! Honestly, what is wrong with someone being unashamed of his sexuality?

― Andrew (enneff), Saturday, 29 July 2006 10:35 (nineteen years ago)

pwnt tbh

― teh_kit is jayne without the tits (g-kit), Saturday, 29 July 2006 10:41 (nineteen years ago)

I would probably agree with Andrew if the thread title contained the word "sexual". As it stands, it's pretty presumptuous to assume everyone is going to look at that and think it's a sex thread.

― Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Saturday, 29 July 2006 10:50 (nineteen years ago)

unashamed =/= IN YOUR FACE. dickwaving is okay, just don't swing it in my direction. and, yes, you can ignore the thread, but you can also say you don't like it. hey, that's FREEDOM of speech. :-)

― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Saturday, 29 July 2006 11:05 (nineteen years ago)

Position for least # of butt shots

― Zwan (miccio), Saturday, 29 July 2006 12:17 (nineteen years ago)

Andrew otm, but OK I see Dan's point.

― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

how is andrew on the money? not liking that someone is blatant about his sexuality makes one a puritanical fuck (seems like a contradiction?)

― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Saturday, 29 July 2006 20:11 (nineteen years ago)

So -- who's up to dressing in piss-soaked trenchcoats and flashing an old folks home, followed by a session of bitching about the resultant fogey-furor and run on coronary meds?

― Damn, Atreyu! (x Jeremy), Saturday, 29 July 2006 20:25 (nineteen years ago)

What I find mildly irritating is the generally thoughtless and inelegant way Tuomas phrases his questions:

Though the regular one is nice for kissing and all.

And by "regular" I mean regular for people who mostly have straight sex.

Also, is there a baby in the room this time or not?

― Bob Six (bobbysix), Saturday, 29 July 2006 21:02 (nineteen years ago)

I believe english is tuomas' second language. his english phrasing surely beats anyone else here's finnish phrasing?

I agree w/andrew and dan.

― Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 29 July 2006 21:21 (nineteen years ago)

i always agree with ken c

― mookieproof (mookieproof), Saturday, 29 July 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)

gee, nothing like a bunch of people all going "i agree with him!" "and i agree with both of them!" to make you realize the error of your ways.

― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 29 July 2006 22:06 (nineteen years ago)

so if no one finds this thread creepy, why did no one post a serious reply?

― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 29 July 2006 22:06 (nineteen years ago)

WHEELBARREL

― Supercalifragilisticexpiala Brosius (chaki), Saturday, 29 July 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)

don't think you could really think this thread "creepy"

isn't particularly to my taste, either, but I did click on it, too!! (even though I assumed it would be what it is (and even though it probably even crossed my mind it might be tuomas))

being upset about this or tuomas's lack of hang-ups or self-consciousness (on the internet) is pointless

― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 29 July 2006 22:23 (nineteen years ago)

how is andrew on the money? not liking that someone is blatant about his sexuality makes one a puritanical fuck (seems like a contradiction?)

No, making conditions for how T could be like a "sane human being" for being blatant about his sexuality makes JD one.

― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Saturday, 29 July 2006 23:15 (nineteen years ago)

I can see how the premise of this thread could be seen as crude, or rough, or not befitting our elevated presence, but creepy???

― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Saturday, 29 July 2006 23:23 (nineteen years ago)

o sorry presuming to defend t i never answered the actual question did i? anyway

1) what tuomas said rowr rowr 2) being sat upon rowr 3) holding hands phwoarr etc 9) three-quarter salchow *faints* 5) penis in vagina yo! MWWH 6) power force motion drive blblbl 6) mutual half-asleep sideways mmmm 4) gimme the lead gimme the lead oh no sorry that's #143

(?)

― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Saturday, 29 July 2006 23:59 (nineteen years ago)

well jd i challenge you to prove ken c wrong then.

frankly i love them all. there's a lot to be said for being able to kiss at crucial moments; there's also a lot to be said for situations in which this is more difficult.

― mookieproof (mookieproof), Sunday, 30 July 2006 00:05 (nineteen years ago)

JD, I don't think I actually said anything that contradicts what you said, if it makes you feel any better.

― Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Sunday, 30 July 2006 00:38 (nineteen years ago)

[tuomas-underwear-ridingcrop.jpg]

Allow me to be frank at the commencement. You will not like me. The gentlemen will be envious and the ladies will be repelled. You will not like me now and you will like me a good deal less as we go on. Ladies, an announcement: I am up for it, all the time. That is not a boast or an opinion, it is bone hard medical fact. I put it round you know. And you will watch me putting it round and sigh for it. Don't. It is a deal of trouble for you and you are better off watching and drawing your conclusions from a distance than you would be if I got my tarse up your petticoats. Gentlemen. Do not despair, I am up for that as well. And the same warning applies. Still your cheesy erections till I have had my say. But later when you shag - and later you will shag, I shall expect it of you and I will know if you have let me down - I wish you to shag with my homuncular image rattling in your gonads. Feel how it was for me, how it is for me and ponder. 'Was that shudder the same shudder he sensed? Did he know something more profound? Or is there some wall of wretchedness that we all batter with our heads at that shining, livelong moment. That is it. That is my prologue, nothing in rhyme, no protestations of modesty, you were not expecting that I hope. I am John Wilmot, Second Earl of Rochester and I do not want you to like me.

― Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 30 July 2006 00:44 (nineteen years ago)

is that a durst quote?

― mookieproof (mookieproof), Sunday, 30 July 2006 00:49 (nineteen years ago)

Sex Positions

sex positions?

The Missionary Position

― Bob Six (bobbysix), Sunday, 30 July 2006 00:50 (nineteen years ago)

Britney's best on-screen question: "What's your favorite sex position?"

The answers:

Felicia, Britney's assistant: "I don't know. I've never done it before."

N Sync's JC Chasez: "I like a lot of positions," he says, making sexual movements with his hips. "Not all of them, but a lot of them."

Britney: On camera, she teasingly tells her Mom, Dad and younger sister Jaime-Lynn to ignore her answer, and then says, "I'm not gonna answer that."

― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 30 July 2006 00:58 (nineteen years ago)

Thank you. Now I'm curious which sexual positions JC Chasez doesn't like.

― Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 30 July 2006 01:03 (nineteen years ago)

i'm guessing "not a lot of them, just a few of them. like... the ones that involve females"

― tehresa needs more out of this relationship than she's willing to put in (tehres, Sunday, 30 July 2006 01:06 (nineteen years ago)

Least sexy thread ever?

― paulhw (paulhw), Sunday, 30 July 2006 01:49 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know why I haven't responded till now, but I am compelled to tell you that I am partial to being in an inverted position with your tongue jammed in my ass.

― dissonance in the divine accord (unclejessjess), Sunday, 30 July 2006 03:46 (nineteen years ago)

So -- who's up to dressing in piss-soaked trenchcoats and flashing an old folks home, followed by a session of bitching about the resultant fogey-furor and run on coronary meds?
-- Damn, Atreyu! (rem...) (webmail), Saturday 4:25 PM. (x Jeremy) (later)

finally, a FAP worth attending

― sunny successor (katharine), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:26 (nineteen years ago)

aw mookieproof <3!

― ken c (ken c), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:49 (nineteen years ago)

not liking that someone is blatant about his sexuality makes one a puritanical fuck

not really.

― Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:59 (nineteen years ago)

oh now i get it, sorry, no, nathalie otm, andrew not.

― Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:00 (nineteen years ago)

I like how it's the blokes that are 10x more creeped out by Tuomas than any of the female posters. Actually, until Nathalie posted upthread I'd never known any female poster to actually say they found him creepy.

― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:04 (nineteen years ago)

(Admittedly I haven't been looking very hard)

― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:05 (nineteen years ago)

just goes to prove that girls are also creepy.

― ken c (ken c), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:06 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not creeped out by Tuomas (or his threads generally) but it's just not a great question and will (as the other older threads wil testify) lend itself to flippancy. But if you really want to know...erm...reverse cowgirl is pretty cool...

― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)

What has happened to ILX? Why are people getting upset about someone asking about favorite sexual positions? Is there some kind of meme I'm missing out on here? Or has ILX been invaded by complete cretins?

― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:13 (nineteen years ago)

Tuomas talks about sex a lot.

― Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)

Whereas most of us just think about it.

― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

xpost He does indeed. The question is, more than he fucks? Only Tuomas will/would answer.

Thank you. Now I'm curious which sexual positions JC Chasez doesn't like.

Probably doggie style. Oops, I mean, he doesn't like to dogs. Which of course means he'll never do me in whatever position he fancies. Alas. :-(

I like how it's the blokes that are 10x more creeped out by Tuomas than any of the female posters.

Count how many females came on this thread. Did I just say came? Oh NOES!

I'm not creeped out by the thread, I just find it extremely nonsensical. I mean, who the fuck cares what some poster likes to do in the bed (or shower or couch or in the bushes... or someone's bush - damn, I like to use puns in this post).

― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, who the fuck cares what some poster likes to do in the bed

Considering the above-linked Missionary Position thread is one of the finest ever ILE threads there's clearly gold in them hills.

― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

I dunno, it seems a pretty harmless question to me. One of the threads linked to above, The Missionary Position , I remember as being highly entertaining in places. (x-post haha you too, eh.) I'm not creeped out by Tuomas, personally.

― Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:31 (nineteen years ago)

Talking openly about sex is not creepy or whatever.

Talking openly about sex constantly might be tho.

It MAY all be context-dependent...

But yeah I wonder if Tuomas thought 'this would be a good thread to start on ILE given my rep and the prospect of some interesting answers that may challenge my own views!' (srsly?)

― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

obv. my initial response to such questions can only be of the 'jokey' 'ah but you didn't say SEXUAL positions' type.

― Konal Doddz, 14 (blueski), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:35 (nineteen years ago)

i'm not creped out by tuomas, i just don't get why he doesn't get that most ppl here (it seems to me) don't think a lack of hang-ups (or the mutability of gender roles, the fundamentality of equality, etc etc etc) is that remarkable, or worth revisiting time and again.

(or, what Nathalie said)

― gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:36 (nineteen years ago)

Also, people might find the knowledge comes in useful some time.

― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:36 (nineteen years ago)

i hate this thread because i want to hear what ilx's favourite dispositions are, but stevem will get upset and delete that because he'd reckon it's just a parody thread.

― ken c (ken c), Monday, 31 July 2006 16:12 (nineteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.