Have Television Representations Of Women Improved Since Mary Tyler Moore Became A Working-Girl Icon In The 70's?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
An interviewer asked the co-founder of Bitch Magazine this question and here is what she said:

"No, I think they have devolved. Sitcom women have gone back to the role of the doting, harried wife, like in "The King Of Queens". Working women are more likely to be found on procedural dramas, like the various "Law and Order" or "CSI" shows."


First of all, I have never read Bitch Magazine. I'm sure it's wonderful. But the co-founder of Bitch Magazine needs to go back and watch a few episodes of The King Of Queens. Carrie Heffernen is most decidedly a working woman. She works a lot! And tons of episodes are devoted to her workplace and the problems she has there. And there are lots of other episodes that are all about her trying to change jobs and boy oh boy does comedy ensue. the episode where patton oswalt's character tries to help her lose her Queens accent so she can get a fancy job at some posh place is a good example. she even makes more money than her husband! and she is hardly doting. shrill and annoying and, yes, harried, but not doting. I know everyone on ILX hates The King Of Queens, but it bugs me when people get something so wrong just to prove a point. And does she have a point? working women are everywhere on t.v. and more common than not. sitcoms probably do have the higher percentage of momz who don't work (when the momz aren't dead), but still...

i am not a woman. though i am womanly and have womanly curves. honey, i have legs that go on forever! so, it would be nice to hear from some.


in conclusion, this is the thread where i defend The King Of Queens and people weigh in on how television has changed since MTM threw her hat in the ring.


and not to say that teevee isn't COMPLETELY sexist at times, but i don't think there was even one smart, competent, professional woman in a flak jacket who could trace the path of a bullet thru a human skull on t.v. in the 70's, let alone 400.


scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 6 August 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)

it is a good show, and that episode is a great example! but it's a great singular instance of carrie doing what mary did in nearly every episode, point out how tough it could be for a working woman. but I think you're way more right than the person in the quote.

what shows are there today of single working women?

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 6 August 2006 17:48 (nineteen years ago)

i would say the gilmore girls but that would be kind of perverse since it is a perverse fantasy of single-motherhood. (tho i love it of course)

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 6 August 2006 17:54 (nineteen years ago)

Recent/Upcoming comedy with non-shrewish housewive leads, just off the top of my head: Everybody Hates Chris, Boston Legal, 30 Rock, Will and Grace, Ugly Betty, How I Met Your Mother...

and aren't there like a dozen dramas (SVUs, CSI thingers, etc., with female leads? Patricia Arquette and Jennifer Love Hewitt, right?

Damn, Atreyu! (x Jeremy), Sunday, 6 August 2006 17:58 (nineteen years ago)

)

Damn, Atreyu! (x Jeremy), Sunday, 6 August 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

PLUS THE LADYPRESIDENT SHOW.

Damn, Atreyu! (x Jeremy), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:00 (nineteen years ago)

single working women (i think) w/ prominent roles on currently airing non-procedurals (or basically procedurals like house):

teri hatcher on desperate housewives
the redhead from melrose place on desperate housewives? (is she working on the show now?)
calamity jane, et. al on deadwood
the gilmore mom maybe
is that show w/ the cute redhead and andy dick and eric roberts still on? very mtm
candice bergen, the girl from happy gilmore, parker posey on boston legal
that new julia-louis dreyfus thing still on?
kate on lost?
there's probably one on er right?

gilmore and desperate housewives (and the julia louis-dreyfus and cute redhead ones if still on the air) strike me as only ones that could be said to be 'about' those characters

ruling out procedurals is sorta gaming the table

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)

also: large ensemble casts on the realities.

Damn, Atreyu! (x Jeremy), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:08 (nineteen years ago)

seriously how many tv shows currently on the air aren't either reality shows, procedurals, or large ensemble things w/out a central character? how's this discussion change if alias was back for one more season?

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

The procedurals are worse in some ways - female leads are always the sidekick (Law and Order's revolving ADA, fem-Horacio on CSI, the female partners on all Law & Orders generally take a backseat - the STAR is Chris Keller or Private Pyle).

Women get a better gig on the second-rate procedurals - Close To Home and all of those.

milo z (mlp), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

also: The Ghost Whisperer

milo z (mlp), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

i thought jayne mansfield's daughter was more the focus on l&o:suv? i've seen maybe 20 minutes of that show. hearing about how they wrote out the latest cute ada on l&o prime left a really really bad taste in my mouth. the csi's seem to give more balance to female sidekick - marg helgenberger and blonde republican from west wing definitely seem more prominent/less dr. watson than shirley bellinger on l&o:ci.

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:18 (nineteen years ago)

the female lead on csi vegas seems pretty strong, also the one on l&o:ci -- i mean sure goren is the star, but in the episodes where she was out (pregnant, i think?) you really missed her.

what about grass? (i have never seen)

also, certainly, the wives were the star on big love.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

i saw grass (and huff - decent - and that awful penn & teller show) on a free showtime weekend - it's pretty good though nothing i'd subscribe to showtime over (o man - the l word is another right? those women had jobs surely right?), very much about a working single mother and her 'job' obv. the wives on big love were wives sterl.

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

Grass = Weeds w/ Mary Louise Parker?

best/most three-dimensional character on Grey's Anatomy - Dr. Bailey

milo z (mlp), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:34 (nineteen years ago)

o man i forgot grey's anatomy

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:35 (nineteen years ago)

It seems like the King of Queens was a bad example, but I think I know what the Bitch writer was talking about, sort of Everybody Loves Raymond-type gender roles. Where the husband even sometimes complains about what an economic drain his non-working wife is, but there's no sense that there's space within the fictional world of the show for her to get a job.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:38 (nineteen years ago)

Grey's Anatomy has a really gross credit sequence, though, doesn't it? where high heeels and lipstick is meant to = lady doctor, right? that show makes me uncomfortable.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:39 (nineteen years ago)

and not to say that teevee isn't COMPLETELY sexist at times, but i don't think there was even one smart, competent, professional woman in a flak jacket who could trace the path of a bullet thru a human skull on t.v. in the 70's, let alone 400.


-- scott seward (skotro...), August 6th, 2006. (scott seward)


http://www.nostalgiacentral.com/images_tv/policewoman_672.JPG


also, crazy(like a fox) first lady seducing nixonian prex on 24 last season as a delay tactic and then wearing a wire to get him to confess and bringing him down - classic! (not the best example of "working woman" granted, but awesome nonetheless)

timmy tannin (pompous), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)

Horseshoe, I know the credit seq. that you mean, but I always thought it was more about trying to mantain the personal & professional? And standing out in the crowd, etc blah blah. Still trite, of course, but I think it's not meant to be taken so literally esp considering that there are more female characters followed than male ones (so the ratio of one pair of heels wouldn't be accurate).

Laurel (Laurel), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)

not to say that teevee isn't COMPLETELY sexist at times, but i don't think there was even one smart, competent, professional woman in a flak jacket who could trace the path of a bullet thru a human skull on t.v. in the 70's, let alone 400.

Of course, there's another way that representations of women could improve, and that would be, for instance, a more positive representation of any and all things feminine, including more positive representations of sissy, feminine men in the media. How's that project doing?

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:52 (nineteen years ago)

Also: liberation as the market versus liberation from the market. Any US sitcoms showing the latter rather than the former?

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:53 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, I've been sitting here trying to figure out what exactly the source of my discomfort with that credit sequence is. I like lipstick and high heels just fine, but coupled with how idiotically so many of the female interns on that show behave (in seemingly gendered ways: Izzy violating every ethical code in the hopes of saving a male patient she'd fallen in love with, for example), it seems maybe unintentionally telling to me. I know it's a soapy tv show, and I like soapy tv shows just fine, too, but they are doctors, for fuck's sake.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)

anyway, I do think sitcoms are the bastion of gender role tradition, although it's nice that King of Queens isn't. hour-long dramas tend to have gender issues, too, but they're not necessarily about reproducing a mythical family dynamic.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)

man, I watch too much tv.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)

"It seems like the King of Queens was a bad example, but I think I know what the Bitch writer was talking about, sort of Everybody Loves Raymond-type gender roles."

yeah, i get it. it's as old as the hills in sitcom land. honeymooners/ilovelucy/ad nauseum. and i would have taken raymond as a better example. still, her comment is weird. sorta like saying: no, things have gotten worse, except on these dozens of shows that gazillions of people watch! you know?

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:57 (nineteen years ago)

sissy men hardly make compelling leads, nick.

i don't mean to be glib about it… but do you really want to sit through a show show featuring an indecisive, mincing, sissy male character making weak choices and girlin' it up? and even if you do, how much of the rest of the (american) viewing audience does?

Damn, Atreyu! (x Jeremy), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:58 (nineteen years ago)

also, my suspicion is that the Bitch cofounder feels like there's been a regression in gender politics in reality since the '70s, a feeling I'm sympathetic with, and therefore she's convinced TV has mirrored it. maybe what TV's done is in fact more interesting.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:59 (nineteen years ago)

i would say what is almost completely missing are working class women on t.v. now. unless they are characters that the wonderful e.r. doctors have to help in some way. most of the single women on t.v. have cool jobs or money or at least a nice apartment. even MTM had a nice apartment. you would have to go back to laverne & shirley to find working stiffs in a basement apartment. maybe. i might be forgetting something. even the working slob sitcoms like the one with jami gertz and michael rappaport aren't REALLY working slob sitcoms. they have jobs that they hate, but their houses are nice and they are definitely middle-class. i miss Roc sometimes. maybe the u.k. is different? i am not up on their current shows.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:06 (nineteen years ago)

i miss rosanne sometimes too. mostly for the factory days. not the later fabulism.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:09 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, that's totally true. the closest I can come up with is Veronica Mars, because it's about class in some sense, but part of the fun of watching the show is yearning for the rich kids' lives. Roseanne was the best show ever for this, and just for being awesome.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:09 (nineteen years ago)

indecisive, mincing, sissy male character making weak choices and girlin' it up

are those really (really?) the qualities in a man that you would characerize as feminine? curses for making me take a side with momus, but you've fallen in to his trap. i suspect he used the term sissy ironically, but uh, you didn't.

Kim (Kim), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:09 (nineteen years ago)

"indecisive, mincing, sissy male character making weak choices and girlin' it up"

Jack is back! (will&gracefanzunite)

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)

(I was being sort of sarcastic, you know.)

Damn, Atreyu! (x Jeremy), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)

i'm not trying to have a go at you, fwiw. and i'm not saying that a descrpition like that isn't referring to actual feminine characteristcs, it's more about the value being attributed to them and the terms chosen tend to be derogative instead of positive. behaviour characterized as "indecisive" for instance could also be described as moderate or considerate. indecisive as a negative femine trait implies that being decisive is masculine and is preferable. if things were flipped, we might instead be characterizing a decisive male as bossy, agressive or inconsiderate, so it's far more about the things we assume and attach than the actual behaviours.

Kim (Kim), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:26 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, that was indeed my trap. We're all quite sure that non-sexist means attributing (traditionally) masculine qualities to women, and that sexist means attributing (traditionally) feminine qualities to them. But both of these associations contain the assumption that (traditionally) feminine qualities (whether exemplified by women or by men) are "weak". And it's precisely in this assumption that the most egregious sexism lurks.

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)

i had a teacher try to explain this in highshool, saying how most female leads in hollywood are actually male characters, but it took me quite a few years to fully get what she meant. good on her though that i never forgot it.

Kim (Kim), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:34 (nineteen years ago)

I was actually thinking in dramaturgical/narrative terms, not social ones, Kim. Characters who are 'thoughtful' or 'moderate/considerate' in their slow or subtle choices on prime-time television do not make for nail-biting suspense. Nor riveting viewing. And while there is space for these characters in supporting or secondary roles, it's hard to drive forward the throughline of (even) a half-hour sitcom when the protagonist's primary characteristic is well-considered, intelligent and complex action.

Also, I was being slightly disingenous in my use of terms... overstatement to prove a point.

Damn, Atreyu! (x Jeremy), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:36 (nineteen years ago)

"We're all quite sure that non-sexist means attributing (traditionally) masculine qualities to women"

i don't see this. unless working hard is a masculine quality. i think non-sexist on t.v. can just mean showing people working and having a life and not being simply the "wife" or "girlfriend" or vehicle for T&A. and i do see that on t.v. not always, but its there more than it used to be. i think.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

"But both of these associations contain the assumption that (traditionally) feminine qualities (whether exemplified by women or by men) are "weak"."

i like how on Medium, Patricia Arquette's husband plays the traditional "wife" role. He is always reacting to what she says and does. "what's wrong honey, another bad dream(he has to say this every show, poor guy)". "another bad day at the murder scene, dear?" he's good at it too. and he is always left with the kids when she has to rush off to a serial killer somewhere.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:44 (nineteen years ago)

By this token,

I've always wondered why a lot of viewers (often speciously) ascribe dramatic action by female characters to a sterotypically masculine model of being. Hence the 'most female characters are really male' statement? I don't buy it -- it's dangerously close to the 'male authors can't write female voices right... but they can write serial killers, aliens, and rapists' line of reasoning, which I find profoundly upsetting.

Damn, Atreyu! (x Jeremy), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:46 (nineteen years ago)

there are plenty of entertaining, protagonist worthy feminine traits though. obvious emoting for one - is the industry getting better at presenting this in a way that doesn't restrict an emotional person to the role of victim? i'm trying to think of examples. it seems more common or "allowed" for some male characters now (why will and grace is at least a stepping stone) so that's got to be a good thing.

discussed somewhere else here recently, but Ripley in Aliens is a good example of an exception to the man played by a woman thing.

Kim (Kim), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)

"obvious emoting for one - is the industry getting better at presenting this in a way that doesn't restrict an emotional person to the role of victim?"

yeah, sure. on the dramas anyway. hargitay's character on Law & Order comes to mind. complex, emotional, empathetic, and strong.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 6 August 2006 20:05 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, that's a good one. isn't it kind of interesting how Christopher Meloni's character on the same show gets very emotional as well but it always seems couched in terms of him feeling protective, frustrated or struggling with anger? Stabler is not often empathetic and they do show that his strength either runs hot or cold and sometimes limits or hinders him. i think we have a winner!

Kim (Kim), Sunday, 6 August 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)

Stabler's emotional problems are so fucking boring. Boo hoo hoo, you have dad issues, who cares.

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Monday, 7 August 2006 03:29 (nineteen years ago)

in other news, sesame street to introduce first major female character after 37 years. mention of mary tyler moore ensues:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/arts/television/06domi.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1154955618-qUPuq3De0nu2hParYhPOYg

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 7 August 2006 12:02 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe the counterpoint to competent career-women would not be "sissies" but deadbeats. After all, how is a housewife not a deadbeat on some level? Planning the dinner and driving the kids to play-groups while her husband brings home the bacon? Please. Before the shitstorm begins, let me just say that I was fortunate enough to BE one of these women when my kids were small, before the crash-and-burn of that relationship. And if my passive lard-ass professional-mommy act hastened the end of it, three fucking cheers.
What am I getting at? I shouldn't even BE in this conversation. I don't watch enough TV.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Monday, 7 August 2006 12:21 (nineteen years ago)

It's a holiday over here in Ireland today, and Mister Monkey and I are engaging in a Gilmore Girls marathon, and we have noticed the following interesting things about it wrt this conversation. 1) The guys are allowed to be sensitive, and caring, and still drive big pickups and make things out of wood, which is good, because a lot of guys I know are like that. 2) In one episode, Lorelai was even singing the praises of the good old-fashioned corporate wife, because she was defending her mother and pointing out how hard a lot of these women work to keep their husbands' businesses running smoothly. I like programmes where people can be loads of different things if they want to.
Also, despite the awful acting, Louis CK's sitcom portrays a very working class family living in a realistically working class situation, and everyone who watches it complains about the shitty cheap sets and the awful lighting. Well guess what, when you live in a shitty cheap apartment, your doors wobble when you bang them. And you often have crappy lighting. Can't have everything.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Monday, 7 August 2006 12:39 (nineteen years ago)

i don't mean to be glib about it… but do you really want to sit through a show show featuring an indecisive, mincing, sissy male character making weak choices and girlin' it up?

http://www.oddcouple.info/pictures/oc1.jpg

p@reene (Pareene), Monday, 7 August 2006 12:46 (nineteen years ago)

the number one sitcom has jon cryer in it too

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 7 August 2006 12:48 (nineteen years ago)

mega-poxy-fulery made me forget to ask Scott what he means by "at least you have Dawn French"? I think Dawn French is very pretty, but I don't think she's very funny.

Maybe a better example would be Victoria Wood? Is Dinnerladies the answer to whatever the question is?

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 7 August 2006 16:24 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, Dinnerladies is an excellent example of hard-working women in general. I love that programme. I think it's one of the most under-rated comedy programmes in years. I saw Victoria Wood on that death of the sitcom programme complaining about the fact that she wasn't allowed to make it any more unconventional, it had to be filmed with the old sitcom four-camera setup, and then along came The Royle Family.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Monday, 7 August 2006 19:04 (nineteen years ago)

West Wing is a pretty complicated case, I'd say. A lot of what's encouraging about it gender-wise is due to Allison Janney, I'd say, and a lot of what's mildly to moderately sexist is due to Sorkin. and I couldn't stand Amy Gardner (that's Mary Louise-Parker's character, right?) as written (Sorkin's fault!) Is Nancy McNally Anna Deveare Smith? Anna Deveare Smith is beautiful! (But I take your point, she's not mainstream attractive.)

horseshoe (horseshoe), Monday, 7 August 2006 19:16 (nineteen years ago)

blount, one of the wives on big love worked!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 7 August 2006 19:30 (nineteen years ago)

Also, apparently Geena Davis sponsors some research group that looks at the media's attitude to women, and it starts young. They measured the male-to-female character ratio in the top-grossing children's movies of the last ten years, and it's something like three to one. They even measured the ratio of males to females in crowd scenes and found it stacked against women. Which I thought was quite interesting.

Additionally, I wonder if Bitch Mag. thought to account for demographics in popularity. Sitcoms are the same old target that they have been for years (are their depictions perfect? No. Are they better than they were 10-20 years ago? Yes.), but I would argue that shows like "Laguna Beach" (which are popular with kids) are pretty regressive.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Monday, 7 August 2006 19:55 (nineteen years ago)

what about the women on the two comedy centrals shows, Dog Bites Man and Reno 911, who are just as inept and bumbling as their male counterparts?

kingfish cyclopean ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 7 August 2006 20:52 (nineteen years ago)

Back to the West Wing, I don't actually think any of the male leads outside of Rob Lowe are conventionally attractive either.

(going on whether yer average punter in the street would rate them highly based on a mugshot - I could have a crush on most of them, really, based on character, but on looks alone...)

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 7 August 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)

(I'm possibly doing Jimmy Smits a disservice, I don't know)

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 7 August 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

sterling all of the wives on big love were WIVES!!! decidedly not 'single working women'!

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 7 August 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)

i think i asked this above but how many workplace sitcoms are there going right now?

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 7 August 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)

Erm, The Office?

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 7 August 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)

that's set in a workplace????!!!

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 7 August 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

"mega-poxy-fulery made me forget to ask Scott what he means by "at least you have Dawn French"? I think Dawn French is very pretty, but I don't think she's very funny."

i think she is pretty too! and i thought french & saunders was funny. i was just using her as an example of a big woman who was a central character on a sitcom. they are uncommon here. (and they are usually black woman - often used as comic relief - or they are conchata ferrell. who i love. now she is on two and a half men with charlie sheen. her one glorious shining moment was the one and only time that she was the lead in a movie. *Heartland* with rip torn in 1979. nobody saw it. blount, i think, mentioned that sitcom with andy dick and eric roberts and that woman whose name i can't remember. she was a big girl. it wasn't very good though. and it didn't last long. but it did stand out and she was the star of it.) what really made rosanne revolutionary though was that she was a big woman (who looked like a lot of her audience. thus, a normal woman.) who got to have a sex-life. this was pretty major. the only recent example in the u.s. of plus-size women as somewhat major characters in a GOOD show that i can think of would be the gilmore girls. three characters even! although two of them are played for laughs pretty consistently.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 8 August 2006 03:04 (nineteen years ago)

Which co-founder was this, may I ask? Lisa or Andi?

Paul Eater (eater), Tuesday, 8 August 2006 03:08 (nineteen years ago)

The West Wing hit some wrong notes when CJ became Chief of Staff. Like they wanted to hit 'oh, sexist men will think this women is incompetent' as a plotline but instead just made her incompetent.

SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

.

.
.
.

The series finale was the worst. Girls work for girls! Donna has been a major player in a two-term Presidency, one near-winner Presidential primary campaign and a Presidential campaign, but she gets stuck with the First Lady. WTF? Oh, and Jimmy Smits' Congressional Aide (Rana? Ranna? the lesbian) doesn't even get a policy job, she's now MRS. LANDINGHAM


.

.
.

.


SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

milo z (mlp), Tuesday, 8 August 2006 03:14 (nineteen years ago)

"Which co-founder was this, may I ask? Lisa or Andi?"

The Bitch magazine woman? Yes, her name was Andi. The only character she seems to like on television is the one played by Mary Lynn Rajskub on 24. Except she can't watch 24 because it makes her too tense.


I thought it was kinda cool that the two founders of Bitch were both interns at Sassy. I don't know why I have never read Bitch. I'll buy anything. Is it better than Bust?

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 8 August 2006 03:43 (nineteen years ago)

Can we stop hating on Andi Zeisler and start hating on Deborah Solomon? Fight the real enemy, etc, etc. NYT in bitching about "third-wave" feminism non shocker.

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Tuesday, 8 August 2006 11:30 (nineteen years ago)

blount when did "single" become the key here!?!!?

anyway, have we discussed crossing jordan? it seems to be only about 1/4 procedural. (ok, maybe a half)

also howabout lucky louie, where the doting harried wife also makes much more money?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 10 August 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

'crossing jordan' is secretly noise

gear (gear), Thursday, 10 August 2006 19:07 (nineteen years ago)

'the closer'! is that any good? i've never seen it. but i like the cast.

gear (gear), Thursday, 10 August 2006 19:07 (nineteen years ago)

oh yeah the closer is pretty good. also a procedural, but yeah clearly with a strong female lead -- the "life interest" stuff they give her feels irritating and tacked on mainly tho, except insofar as it deals with the hostility of some of her male subordanates to her, seeing her as "girly" and etc.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 10 August 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)

but the whole point of big love was that the wives' status as wives was stifling their development, right? (i thought this was particularly the case for Margie, but certainly for all three of them).

horseshoe (horseshoe), Thursday, 10 August 2006 19:34 (nineteen years ago)

i thought the point was that it was funny?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 10 August 2006 19:46 (nineteen years ago)

that show is so boring! it's tragic if it was trying to be funny!

horseshoe (horseshoe), Thursday, 10 August 2006 20:18 (nineteen years ago)

OMG! I had no idea that the actress who plays rose on two and a half men (the charlie sheen/jon cryer sitcom) was the girl in Heavenly Creatures!!! the one who wasn't Kate Winslet. I can't believe I didn't know that. Of course, i haven't seen Heavenly Creatures in a zillion years, but still... i love her!

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 12 August 2006 02:59 (nineteen years ago)

Murphy Brown to thread

Sir Dr. Rev. PappaWheelie Jr. II of The Third Kind (PappaWheelie 2), Saturday, 12 August 2006 03:37 (nineteen years ago)

scott, that news is almost as exciting to me as the news of Andy Garcia's conjoined twin. Genuinely exciting, in other words.

I hate The Closer. All the annoying camerawork of Steven Bochco, all the boring of the Inspector Lynley Mysteries.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 13 August 2006 07:47 (nineteen years ago)

And there's something quite weird happening with Kyra Sedgewick's voice.

MTM was the best, she'd get tired after a hard day at the office just like a real woman.

sandy mc (sandy mc), Sunday, 13 August 2006 09:10 (nineteen years ago)

seven months pass...
Liz Lemon!

scott seward, Saturday, 17 March 2007 18:19 (eighteen years ago)

I can encompass the improvement in two words: Charlie's Angels.

However, soft porn of all sorts has increased exponentially with the expansion of cable tv and network tv's fight to retain audience share. It is just that soft porn can hardly even be regarded as a "representation of women", as there is so little to it beside the brandishing of tits and ass upon the thinnest pretexts.

Given both these trends are working simultaneously, I'd vote it a push.

Aimless, Saturday, 17 March 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah Liz Lemon is totes the new Mary Richards

A B C, Saturday, 17 March 2007 19:51 (eighteen years ago)

I think what we overlooked in the Bitch magazine's original example was that King of Queens is about him rather than her, and why couldn't it be about her? Why couldn't it be called Queen of Queens? Why is the woman in a sitcom almost always "the wife" whatever she does for a living?

I know there are exceptions, like the mighty Liz Lemon, but it does kind of seem to hold true in a lot of American sitcoms, at least.

accentmonkey, Saturday, 17 March 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)

popular stand-up comedians get their own deals and their name in lights. like seinfeld. though elaine was no wife! and there was Ellen. and Roseanne. And Brett Butler's show. And others I'm probably forgetting starring popular stand-ups. Oh, Sarah Silverman! hahaha.

scott seward, Saturday, 17 March 2007 22:34 (eighteen years ago)

husband/wife battle royale is STILL the easiest sell in hollywood when it comes to sitcoms. been that way since lucy. kids are optional. t.v. and sex clashes go together like a horse and carriage. even since radio. okay, since forever really.

http://thursdays.com/pic200/ameche1692p.jpg

scott seward, Saturday, 17 March 2007 22:48 (eighteen years ago)

Elaine is the best female sitcom character of all time, but she's exceptional. and I don't know if a show like Roseanne could get made today.

horseshoe, Saturday, 17 March 2007 22:50 (eighteen years ago)

Don't open that closet!!!! hahaha, they kill me.


http://scoop.diamondgalleries.com/news_images/7035_18927_1.jpg

scott seward, Saturday, 17 March 2007 22:50 (eighteen years ago)

you want a trailblazer, i give you gertrude berg:


"In many ways the program that Gertrude Berg devised in 1928 and sold to NBC radio the following year was unique. No other daily serial drama reflected so explicitly its creator's own ethnic background, and few other producers retained such close control over their work. Until the late 1930s, Berg herself wrote all the scripts, five to six fifteen-minute stories per week, and even after hiring outside writers continued to act as producer; she performed the role of the main character herself throughout the show's thirty year history on radio and television."

"In 1939 the show's setting shifted from the Bronx to the Connecticut town of Lastonbury, in keeping with its narrative of American assimilation. Yet Berg never lost sight of the specifically Jewish ethnic background that made the Goldbergs unique in network radio and television. One memorable episode, aired 3 April 1939, invoked Krystallnacht and the worsening situation in Nazi Germany as the Goldberg's Passover Seder was interrupted by a rock thrown through their living room window. Other stories referred to family members or friends trying to escape from Eastern Europe ahead of the Holocaust."


http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/G/htmlG/goldbergsth/goldbergsthIMAGE/goldbergsth.jpg

scott seward, Saturday, 17 March 2007 22:56 (eighteen years ago)

seven months pass...

i am not a woman. though i am womanly and have womanly curves. honey, i have legs that go on forever!

Heave Ho, Sunday, 11 November 2007 16:41 (seventeen years ago)

is this a revivalism

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 11 November 2007 17:14 (seventeen years ago)

I dunno, he likes his legs it seems!

Mark G, Monday, 12 November 2007 16:05 (seventeen years ago)

three months pass...

i don't understand, was Mary Tyler Moore not supposed to be a good representation of a working woman? i think she's swell

Surmounter, Sunday, 9 March 2008 17:50 (seventeen years ago)

of course, i can't be bothered to read an intro post that long so i'm not really informed on the gist. guess i just wanted to say that i don't see much wrong with MTM or her awesome show =P

Surmounter, Sunday, 9 March 2008 17:51 (seventeen years ago)

surmounter, read the post

max, Sunday, 9 March 2008 18:09 (seventeen years ago)

best theme song ever

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Sunday, 9 March 2008 18:16 (seventeen years ago)

two years pass...

MTM is guesting on that sitcom w/ Betty White tonight

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:01 (fourteen years ago)

Maybe it will be like that St. Elsewhere episode where a psych patient kept addressing guest star Betty White as "Sue Ann."

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:33 (fourteen years ago)

Do you think 30Rock is subliminally retrograde? I feel like there's something about the way it affirms Baldwin's traditional masculine power even if it does so with a wink. And much of the humor is about Lemon's underlying anxiety at her lack of a relationship or kids. OTOH I guess Baldwin's relationships with a congresswoman and a maid are equally fraught.

hey boys, suppers on me, our video just went bacterial (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:38 (fourteen years ago)

all my fave wed. shows are new tonight. dunno what bitch magazine would think of cougar town and modern family and the middle.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:02 (fourteen years ago)

so sad that one of my fave t.v. nights is blighted by the horrible Better With You. HORRIBLE.

and its sad that one of my fave big ladies of teevee from the gilmore girls is on such a bad sitcom. mike & molly. it could have been good. but that big guy love interest is so horrible. the whole show should be about swoosie kurtz.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:07 (fourteen years ago)

and my fave Parenthood RULES for women. great characters on there.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:08 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.