Those Brits sure love their Thatcher

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
THIS IS FROM THE GUARDIAN What should we do with the 'Marble Lady'? You are logged in as guest. You need to log in to post messages. | Started by GuardianPolitics at 12:31pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT

An 8ft statue of Margaret Thatcher was unveiled today - but there may not be anywhere to display it.

The statue is destined for a vacant plinth in the members' lobby - but under current tradition it can't be placed there until five years after Lady Thatcher's death.

Should an exception be made? Or should they stick to tradition?

Read the story here: http://politics.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,9174,643354,00.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- pragmatic - 01:13pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#1 of 16) Can someone please stick it up her arse

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beseeingyou - 01:20pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#2 of 16) 'nuff said.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fudgepacka - 01:34pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#3 of 16) Isn't it obvious?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- roses50 - 01:37pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#4 of 16) Put Thatchers statue up in Trafalgar Square and then make sure the local pidgeons are well fed.

ascloseascanbe@aol.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- thegiantrobot - 01:44pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#5 of 16) Does marble burn?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- stinkies - 01:49pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#6 of 16) Sell it to the highest bidder in the interests of free enterprise, commission a statue of a starving miner then position it in her hallway. Which brings us back to Pragmatic's more colourful suggestion. Meanwhile isn't getting on for 5 years since the death of the Labour Party? Maybe a big party in the members' lobby would be a happier event.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fudgepacka - 02:19pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#7 of 16) No, it doesn't burn but you could drop it in a bath of hydrochloric acid and watch is slowly dissolve.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- hwy1318 - 02:28pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#8 of 16) Here's a real chance for some unemployed entrepreneur, produce minitures, they'd go like a "bomb" hopefully. Imagine Mr. Beckham presenting the Argentine captain,maybe Mr. Veron, at the start of the World Cup Final(we are going to be there aren't we?) with such a gift.It would be like a two goal start........ for Argentina! Or, maybe full size replicas could be erected at each of the main railway stations around the country? More seriously, it should be sent to the Falklands along with her, and blown up!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- thegiantrobot - 03:07pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#9 of 16) oooh i like that. Similar end result as well. Why even bother with the marble version?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- billingtonsmythe - 03:10pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#10 of 16) Shame it's not one of those inflatable dolls (orifices included) - Blair would have loved it

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- workshy - 03:11pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#11 of 16) Do what the Taliban did to those statues of Buddha. Wonder if there'd be an international outcry in this case...?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LondonKiwi - 03:28pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#12 of 16) they should break it down into little itty bitty pieces then send them by ever reliable first class mail across the country, then there would be no doubt she'd completely lost her marbles

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- trickywicked - 03:50pm Feb 1, 2002 GMT (#13 of 16) blast her off from cape canaveral and let her burn up in re-entry while we all watch in glorious wide screen panoramic vision on television sets across the world.... then you can put the statue in storage for five years and do what the hell you want with it....

mike hanle y, Saturday, 2 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

That's nothing ... you should hear what some folks have to say about National (ahem, "Reagan") Airport down in DC.

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Saturday, 2 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ha!

Actually my attitude to Mrs Thatcher has become more ambivalent of late - I used to *absolutely despise* her and all she stood for, now the loathing is tempered by the passing of time since "her" decade and by the knowledge that I am one of "Thatcher's children" in that, despite what I may have previously claimed, I am far more individualist and less collectivist than anyone I've ever met who grew up in the 50s / 60s, and that I exploit new freedoms opened to me by the free-market changes she brought about, and would find it hard to fit in this country were it to somehow return to the more insular and tightly-regulated Britain of the pre-Thatcher years.

The most important factor in changing Britain is *not* whether we have a Tory or Labour government at any given time, but whether we have a government that reveres tradition and history or a radical government that tears consensus down. The Thatcher government was the latter while posing as the former so as not to alienate the heartland Tories who'd put it where it was, and in doing so completely undermined the party's fundamental cultural base to render itself unelectable, replaced by a Labour government which had similarly jettisoned its own traditions in favour of a free-market consumerist ethos. And there's something wonderfully enjoyable about exploiting freedoms that the Tories introduced, while knowing full well that traditional Tories would hate me for using them, and that the socio-cultural aftereffects of those freedoms are the very reason why Guildford, Winchester and South Dorset are no longer Tory seats.

Robin Carmody, Saturday, 2 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Which freedoms are you enjoying that you wouldn't have had before, Robin?

Tim, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, I was just about to ask the same question. Freedom to buy your council house? Freedom to pay less top-band income tax (which, I suppose, is something for the loan-stricken former graduate to aim for in their mid-30s)?

Michael Jones, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

robin, do you think thathcerism, economically:

a) anti-tradition. tearing down the paternalistic keynesian consensus.
b) tradition. liberalism in its original laissez-faire conception

and the freedoms you've enjoyed robin. freedoms available to all?

gareth, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Labour inherited low unemployment and low inflation compared to the dire situation in the 70's which Thatcher took on. New Lab have done a reasonable job of keeping these low of course.

The current situation with the Unions is interesting. I think they see a chance for one last stand against a government which has sought to shackle them as effectively as the Tories did. Could be trouble on the way for Tone.

Dr. C, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Labour inherited low unemployment and low inflation compared to the dire situation in the 70's which Thatcher took on.

I won't contest the inflation figures (though, if memory serves, it was coming down in 78-79), but are you *sure* unemployment was lower in '97 than in '79? Those "Labour Isn't Working" Saatchi ads in the winter of '78 were provoked by the (shock, horror) dole figures reaching 1 million; within three years the Tories had tripled that. Yes, it had been steadily falling since the early 90s (?), but I'm not sure it was down to Callaghan levels when Major lost the election.

Michael Jones, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

although it is interesting that there has been a slight softening of the criticism and resentment about the thatcher years. a feeling that her years were somehow necessary to improve the country (subtext: people suffered then so that it would be alright now). i can see why certain people might think this (esp with the passage of time), but one look at the polarized nature of this country today, the creation of the underclass, the lack of public infrastructure, the withdrawal of benefits and the number of homeless disavows me of this notion immediately. thatcherism won the ideological war and changed the landscape to the right (in the process shifting the tories themselves even further to the right in order to be the 'rightist' party)

gareth, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Why don't they simply place the 8ft statue on top of her.

I believe this is what they call killing two birds with one stone.

Trevor, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Unemployment levels in 1997 certainly higher than 1979 - even if (I think) - you use the much fiddled-with claimant count (the measure famously not favoured by economists, or initially by New Labour, but they seem to have stuck with because it runs about 1/3 lower than the ILO version)

Mark Morris, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

DO YOU THINK HER AND REAGAN HAD AN AFFAIR? AND WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO NERDY JOHN MAJOR?

Mike Hanle y, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

He was the lecherous butler spying on them through the door, of course.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Why don't they simply place the 8ft statue on top of her.

I believe this is what they call killing two birds with one stone.

Who's the other bird, Geri Halliwell?

Dan Perry, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Gareth, you're spot on here: indeed I was only thinking earlier today that a lot of the economic theories behind Thatcherism were simply a return to 19th-century Liberalism. They *were* rooted in a tradition, just not the dominant post-war Tory one, and so appeared radical because they broke so strongly with what the Tories had been for a good few decades.

Actually you can scratch some of what I said upthread because my rage at Blair's description of anyone who opposes the involvement of the private sector in public services as "small-c conservative" reminds me of the extent to which the worst excesses of Thatcherite economic theories have poisoned political debate in this country and shifted it all to the right, and of course there are all the malign factors Gareth mentions. But the "freedoms" I had in mind were those brought about by media deregulation, easier access to music and culture from all origins, crumbling of the "island race" mentality etc., and while of course a lot of this is global and related to technological changes that are beyond political control, I do get the feeling that a more statist and less deregulatory government might have made it harder to access these things and tried harder to batten down the hatches and enforce national boundaries. We're back to the paradox again ... a nasty, petty, small-minded little Englander like Mrs T actually strengthening the collapse of that mindset, mainly because her economic theories were more 19th-century Liberal than 1950s Tory. *This* is the thing that fascinates me about her from an ambivalent perspective: I still hate her effects in terms of social polarisation, creation of the "permanent underclass", wreckage of public services etc. as passionately as I always did.

Robin Carmody, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

MAYBE THEY COULD USE THE STATUE AS A GIANT ANT

Mike Hanle y, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Pondering Robin's ambivalence I am belatedly beginning to sympathise with the Ricks of the 80s who screamed 'FASCIST!'. I'm thinking of the turn of the century futurists and all their pro-technology progressivism yoked to fascist ideology. I'm all for shaking things up but given a choice I think I'd rather stick with paternalistic One Nation Toryism.

N., Tuesday, 5 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

paternalistic Toryism = deferential patriotic methodist "old" labourism = one nation stuck in a rut

forget where i read it, but anyway, a transcription of a TV debate between roy hattersley and enoch powell
powell says something breath-takingly reactionary.
"oh come on, enoch, we're not still living in the 19th century!!"
"Oh yessss," hisses Powell, the brummy gollum, "but we aaaaaaare!!"

OK, well now we aren't. Now we're living in 1909.

mark s, Tuesday, 5 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

1909. No one ever talks about 1909. What happened in 1909?

[consults book....]

NOTHING HAPPENED IN 1909.

N., Tuesday, 5 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

hah!! you see!!

mark s, Tuesday, 5 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I tell a lie. The Girl Guides were founded and there was a general strike in Sweden.

N., Tuesday, 5 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

In 1909 Schoenberg completed Erwartung and thus revolutionised music for the rest of the century.

Terry Shannon, Tuesday, 5 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

also cook and peary said they'd been to the north pole, except they hadn't (also peary's assistant hanson's toes all came off from the cold)

mark s, Tuesday, 5 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

three years pass...
Thatcher the Victorian Liberal?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 30 January 2006 11:25 (nineteen years ago)

"Natural Tories don't have immutable ideological beliefs. They tend to be natural administrators, who won't find time to sit around theorising."

this is bush. really: administrating *what*? already you're confronted with the need to theorize what a government *does*. obviously thatcher cleaved to liberal economic orthodoxy, but in terms of character she was far closer to disraeli's popular jingoistic toryism. not that the analogy really works because no victorian politician would have contemplated the level of public spending (and taxation) that has been the norm since ww1.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Monday, 30 January 2006 11:33 (nineteen years ago)

God, I was reading about Thatcher as a John Bright / Richard Cobden heir back in 1991 on A-level politics.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 30 January 2006 12:07 (nineteen years ago)

Thatcher: The Musical

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Monday, 30 January 2006 12:08 (nineteen years ago)

(NB: this must be the thread we revive when, y'know, *it* happens...)

according to the thing about drinking politicians on bbc4 last night, thatch can put 'em away with the best of them...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 30 January 2006 16:51 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

My god I want to schtup the chick playing Thatcher on C4 right now.

The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Thursday, 12 June 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago)

*BBC4

The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Thursday, 12 June 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago)

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00345/culture-andrea385_345570a.jpg

The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Thursday, 12 June 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago)

in character? it would be some sort of ultimate hatefuck

Just got offed, Thursday, 12 June 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago)

MAYBE THEY COULD USE THE STATUE AS A GIANT ANT
-- Mike Hanle y, Sunday, February 3, 2002 8:00 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark Link

LOL as always.

Eisbaer, Thursday, 12 June 2008 21:16 (sixteen years ago)

: /

Bodrick III, Thursday, 12 June 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago)

My god I want to schtup the chick playing Thatcher on C4 right now.

-- The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics

in character? it would be some sort of ultimate hatefuck

-- Just got offed

I knew I shouldn't have clicked on this thread.

King Boy Pato, Friday, 13 June 2008 05:07 (sixteen years ago)

So, was this produced by The Comic Strip as a follow-up to "Strike" and "GLC"?

It Sure Looks Like It.

(did not watch. I mean! ComeOn!

Mark G, Friday, 13 June 2008 08:39 (sixteen years ago)

So, was this produced by The Comic Strip as a follow-up to "Strike" and "GLC"

eh? really?! i'm amazed anyone can even remember 'GLC'.

piscesx, Friday, 13 June 2008 08:52 (sixteen years ago)

What is it with the BBC? Is this the best their drama department can come up with these days? Hughie Green, Bob Monkhouse, Mary Whitehouse, Margaret Thatcher. Lazy television.

Tom D., Friday, 13 June 2008 08:56 (sixteen years ago)

But cheap.

Dingbod Kesterson, Friday, 13 June 2008 10:42 (sixteen years ago)

And it gets them a guaranteed two page spread in the broadsheet "extra" sections for each episode

The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Friday, 13 June 2008 10:43 (sixteen years ago)

What is it with the BBC? Is this the best their drama department can come up with these days? Hughie Green, Bob Monkhouse, Mary Whitehouse, Margaret Thatcher. Lazy television.

it's not lazy television, it's just that you're getting old. The BBC have always made dramas about the lives of people in the past, it's just now the people of the past are people who were very much part of our present.

Grandpont Genie, Friday, 13 June 2008 10:45 (sixteen years ago)

I don't agree, this smacks of chucking a couple of biographies at a writer and saying "Go away and write something on this person who was famous once, but don't worry too much about it, any old bollocks will do as long as you manage to shoehorn some sex into it." It's commissioned crap from writers who obv. don't have any interest in the subject.

Tom D., Friday, 13 June 2008 10:48 (sixteen years ago)

Unless there are many young and talented writers out there with a burning desire to write about Hughie Green's sexlife, who knows?

Tom D., Friday, 13 June 2008 10:50 (sixteen years ago)

Tom OTM, five years ago it was all "lol let's do a comedy drama about something that happened in Parliament 6 months ago" now it's all "lol 50s and 60s nostalgia be mad popular".

Noodle Vague, Friday, 13 June 2008 11:02 (sixteen years ago)

you can avoid worrying about this by getting rid of yer telly.

Pashmina, Friday, 13 June 2008 11:03 (sixteen years ago)

I only use it for films, sport, Doctor Who and University Challenge.

But you're not seriously doing the "people who complain about one aspect of a medium should never engage with any aspect of that medium" switcheroonie are you Pash?

Noodle Vague, Friday, 13 June 2008 11:04 (sixteen years ago)

Bit drastic Pash

Tom D., Friday, 13 June 2008 11:04 (sixteen years ago)

Also I would also like to use it for well-written original one-off drama but unfortunately the BBC is run by cocks.

Noodle Vague, Friday, 13 June 2008 11:05 (sixteen years ago)

Apparently at one time this stuff was well popular but it doesn't fit so well around BBC3's RITALIN NEWS MINUTE, ALL EPILEPSY ALL THE TIME

Noodle Vague, Friday, 13 June 2008 11:06 (sixteen years ago)

jim i think that's a slightly different face

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 6 February 2009 15:20 (sixteen years ago)

oh i was hoping you would answer, or at least just include reasoning behind why it's definitely much worse. not saying it isn't, just want this to be clearer.

is it not clear enough?!

lex pretend, Friday, 6 February 2009 15:23 (sixteen years ago)

that depends on whether the paragraph after that was the 'correct answer'

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 6 February 2009 15:28 (sixteen years ago)

Thatcher worse than Moyles but that's not really saying much in Moyles' defence.

Holy Suffering Gobi Desert Clit Nun (Matt DC), Friday, 6 February 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)

clear as glass, surrounded by hot air

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 6 February 2009 15:31 (sixteen years ago)

Sorry, what am I doing? I appear to have got involved in a debate on the internet about which racist is worse than the other.

Holy Suffering Gobi Desert Clit Nun (Matt DC), Friday, 6 February 2009 15:33 (sixteen years ago)

Jon Snow used to call a colleague 'Gunga Din'

Henry Frog (Frogman Henry), Friday, 6 February 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)

FFS, Clarkson/Snow/etc., stop apologising/repenting. Anne Boleyn was guillotined, deal with it.

Bernard Braden Misreads Stephen Leacock (Marcello Carlin), Friday, 6 February 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

Sorry, what am I doing? I appear to have got involved in a debate on the internet about which racist is worse than the other.

― Holy Suffering Gobi Desert Clit Nun (Matt DC), Friday, 6 February 2009 15:33 (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

poll

Limoncello Carlin (The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics), Friday, 6 February 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)

Lord Foulkes "It is an absolute outrage of the worst kind. Disabled people will be up in arms about it, Scottish people will be angry – and it should concern all of us that the prime minister has been accused of lying."

ah see i was with him until that final bit (hey dude remember that little bit of trouble in Iraq a few years back?)

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 6 February 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)

Didn't Clarkson have a go at someone who accused him of cottaging or something? Can dish it it out, can't...etc. Also the man is an outrageous liar.

The Unbelievably Insensitive Baroness Vadera (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 6 February 2009 17:28 (sixteen years ago)

Proved by science.

The Unbelievably Insensitive Baroness Vadera (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 6 February 2009 17:28 (sixteen years ago)

I think the One Show should replace Adrain Chiles with Hardeep Singh Kohli, coz he's a much nicer bloke.

jel --, Friday, 6 February 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

nah he's annoying

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 6 February 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

racist

jel --, Friday, 6 February 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)

twice in one day?? what are the chances

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 6 February 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)

I used to like HSK in that sitcom based in Glasgow(?) but when he was on celebrity apprentice (i think it was) he was tremendously annoying.

xp
Obviously this apology is completely meaningless. He meant precisely what he said. His fans will know that he apologised with a twinkle in his eye, and probably agree with him anyway, he gets a shitload of publicity for his crappy tv programme and the bbc ratings go up. Everyone wins.

The Unbelievably Insensitive Baroness Vadera (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 6 February 2009 17:51 (sixteen years ago)

Also a bit of Rachman...
http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.2320099.0.Comedian_Singh_Kohlis_rented_Glasgow_flats_grubby_and_dirty.php

The Unbelievably Insensitive Baroness Vadera (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 6 February 2009 17:52 (sixteen years ago)

The Hardeep geezer is, indeed, annoying. He is not totally without wit, but his superior tone is bad.

the pinefox, Friday, 6 February 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)

apparently The One Show had it's second best ever ratings yesterday

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 6 February 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)

I like that programme where he patronises kids. That's about his level.

The Unbelievably Insensitive Baroness Vadera (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 6 February 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)

Singh that is not Chiles.

The Unbelievably Insensitive Baroness Vadera (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 6 February 2009 18:02 (sixteen years ago)

Adrian Chiles is just awful, I hate his miserabilist everyman act.

jel --, Friday, 6 February 2009 18:27 (sixteen years ago)

According to insiders, Thatcher – who won ITV1 reality series I'm a Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here! in 2005 – was chatting with The One Show host Adrian Chiles and guest Jo Brand about the Australian Open when she described an unnamed player as a "golliwog".

It is thought she was referring to Jo-Wilfried Tsonga of France, who went out of the competition in the quarter finals.

Apparently it has not been mentioned here, but it is now (in many quarters) believed she was actually talking about Gael Monfils of France, who went out of the competition in the 8th finals. No less a stupid & offensive thing to say obv, if this is the case, but a bit more ahem "understandable" in the "but Ronaldinho HAS large teeth" vein.

anatol_merklich, Sunday, 8 February 2009 00:51 (sixteen years ago)

Um, those dolls at Sandringham looked like..
http://images.theage.com.au/ftage/ffximage/2008/06/05/zzMonfils_narrowweb__300x422,0.jpg

...?

Mark G, Monday, 9 February 2009 01:19 (sixteen years ago)

..right?

Mark G, Monday, 9 February 2009 10:21 (sixteen years ago)

Adrian Chiles is one of the few TV presenters I would happily leave my children with for the day. If I had children, that is.

Maximo Park Ji-Sung (Matt DC), Monday, 9 February 2009 10:30 (sixteen years ago)

myleene Klass? Although she seems quite busy...

Mark G, Monday, 9 February 2009 10:31 (sixteen years ago)

i'd leave my kids with her alright.

special guest stars mark bronson, Monday, 9 February 2009 10:33 (sixteen years ago)

What does that even mean?

NotEnough, Monday, 9 February 2009 11:04 (sixteen years ago)

NotEnough knowledge of vulgar slang, morelike

am I selling cardamom or am I selling thyme (DJ Mencap), Monday, 9 February 2009 11:44 (sixteen years ago)

Um, those dolls at Sandringham looked like..
...?
..right?

Awp. Should probably not have said anything but.... what first took me aback with CT's original remark (APART FROM THE OBV)

anatol_merklich, Saturday, 14 February 2009 03:27 (sixteen years ago)

oops tab enter

Awp. Should probably not have said anything but.... what first took me aback with CT's original remark (APART FROM THE OBV) was that apart from CT not yet having entered the post-colonial age apparently -- -- -- Tsonga? Wtf. It seems way unlikely. Dude is a BLOCK of a man, not at all ragdolly! Gael Force at least has spiky comicbook hair. Hence I found that story more credible.

anatol_merklich, Saturday, 14 February 2009 03:33 (sixteen years ago)

Sprinter Dwain Chambers is to make a formal complaint to the BBC after he was the victim of an abusive prank call by the comedian Iain Lee during a phone-in on Radio 5 Live. Lee, who appears regularly on BBC1's One Show, rang a phone-in hosted by Victoria Derbyshire on Monday and, posing as a member of the public called 'Tony', accused Chambers, who served a two-year ban for taking performance-enhancing drugs, of being "whacked up to the eyeballs on goof balls".

Encouraged by Derbyshire to air his strident views, 'Tony' then subjected the sprinter to a vitriolic rant, referring to the "goof balls and whack balls" he put into his bloodstream and finishing with the statement: "I'm going to buy your book and I'm going to burn your book without reading it."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/athletics/4582698/Dwain-Chambers-demands-BBC-apology-over-prank-call.html

James Mitchell, Saturday, 14 February 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)

I do wonder on whose side the Daily Mail crew will be on that last one. Will they be able to pass up another chance to have a go at the Beeb's lax standards, or will they want to go for the throat of a notorious drug cheat who possesses the wrong colour of skin for their tastes?

That's what you'd call a real ethical dilemma for them. It would almost be entertaining to watch them wrestle with it.

Stone Monkey, Saturday, 14 February 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

fucking hell iain lee is a massive prick and really needs to bury himself alive out of shame.
why this prickhole is on the one show i dont know.

Henry Frog (Frogman Henry), Saturday, 14 February 2009 20:40 (sixteen years ago)

GHOSTBUSTERS 2 LOL

Henry Frog (Frogman Henry), Saturday, 14 February 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, iain lee is a dude who doesn't really need to exist

Bonkers candy, the Nabisco candy (stevie), Saturday, 14 February 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)

Never mind that the tactics they used to destroy The One Show’s reporter Carol Thatcher were reminiscent of the old East German Stasi, under whose rule people who refused to do and say what they were told were destroyed.

Brilliance, just absolute brilliance.

The Loneliness of the Middle Order Batsman (King Boy Pato), Sunday, 15 February 2009 01:12 (sixteen years ago)

marcello has a column in a tabloid now?

Bonkers candy, the Nabisco candy (stevie), Sunday, 15 February 2009 12:27 (sixteen years ago)

six months pass...

An administrative blunder under the Thatcher government that has only just come to light has opened the door for retailers to sell unauthorised DVDs and video games, including banned films and pornography, to anyone, including under-age children without legal threat.

The Crown Prosecution Service has been told to drop cases relating to offences under the Video Recordings Act, which imposes statutory requirements for videos, DVDs and some video games to be classified and age-rated by the British Board of Film Classification.

The Conservative government’s apparent failure to notify the European Union of the existence of the VRA in 1984 means that the legislation is no longer enforceable in the UK.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5ae7b4c4-90f1-11de-bc99-00144feabdc0.html

James Mitchell, Monday, 24 August 2009 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

UK now officially better than US

Amateur Darraghmatics (darraghmac), Monday, 24 August 2009 22:33 (fifteen years ago)

shit I'd better get a shopping list together for you guys

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 24 August 2009 22:36 (fifteen years ago)

it's there already, it just has big fuck-off circles covering everything, or so i'm led to believe.

Amateur Darraghmatics (darraghmac), Monday, 24 August 2009 22:44 (fifteen years ago)

We already have a perfectly workable system in place whereby 7 year-olds just tell their parents to buy GTA for them in Gamestation.

Someone left the cape out in the rain (Noodle Vague), Monday, 24 August 2009 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

and wait ouside, smoking a fag

Amateur Darraghmatics (darraghmac), Monday, 24 August 2009 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

Oh dear:

"This must be a massive embarrassment to the Tories, especially as David Cameron was the special adviser to the home secretary in 1993 when the law was amended."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8219438.stm

James Mitchell, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 04:43 (fifteen years ago)

Wow, can't wait to hit Dixons or Woolworths and stock up on some banned VHS tapes now.

JTS, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 09:48 (fifteen years ago)

"This must be a massive embarrassment to the Tories, especially as David Cameron was the special adviser to the home secretary in 1993 when the law was amended."

Yeah right. Because Cameron has shown real signs of being electorally hindered by everything the Tories did in the 80s and 90s.

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 09:53 (fifteen years ago)

Still not dead?

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 10:23 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.