TS: material possessions vs. experiences

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Looking back over the last 12 months, I seem to have stopped acquiring material possessions and have spent the vast majority of my money on experiences such as holidays, days out with friends, eating out etc ...

I really seem to have lost interest in collecting possessions beyond having a working computer, tv and stereo. And I don't seem to miss it.

Bob Six (bobbysix), Monday, 28 August 2006 00:17 (nineteen years ago)

i bought a printer today even though i really really didn't want to. i'm happy living light these days.

el borracho (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 28 August 2006 00:22 (nineteen years ago)

i don't have a tv here (i left it with my folks in new york), and i haven't had a proper stereo of my own in years. someday if i ever get settled i'll invest, but for now i'd rather not be burdened with lots of STUFF.

el borracho (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 28 August 2006 00:27 (nineteen years ago)

I enjoy my record collection, and having something to play it on. I also enjoy having a computer, a car, and a little bit of musical gear. I could do without much else, I guess. It always amused me, those who do go out and have experiences, yet spend the entirety of them looking through a viewfinder. Sort of a weird hybrid of both.

(And to get off the subject: how do you like LA so far, Jody?)

naus (Robert T), Monday, 28 August 2006 00:49 (nineteen years ago)

(And to get off the subject: how do you like LA so far, Jody?)

it's brilliant and awful and always hilarious. i'm having the time of my life.

el borracho (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 28 August 2006 00:51 (nineteen years ago)

I have too much stuff (which oddly does not seem to stop me from wanting to buy yet more stuff...). I love my things and don't want to part with them. But I have also seen up close what hanging on to every last thing ends up being (at my in-laws house - very crowded and full of junk, so much so that it is uncomfortable and unwelcoming). My solution is to try to de-clutter whenever I find time and when people ask me what I want for Christmas, I often ask for stuff that will be used up (lotions, etc.) or things that are small (I have room for earrings...). Having small children adds to the challenge of getting rid of/not acquiring stuff.

Experiences, while transitory, are better, both because they aren't going to clutter up your space and because they are usually more interesting and fun.

Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Monday, 28 August 2006 00:57 (nineteen years ago)

I spend most of my money on experiences as well, in fact food and drink more than anything else. I'm sort of rethinking this though because most of my friends have a lot MORE money than I do and I simply cannot keep up, and it'd be really nice to buy a CD once in awhile, but I'm not sure where to draw the line.

Maria (Maria), Monday, 28 August 2006 03:40 (nineteen years ago)

(by keeping up, I mean by eating out once a week or whatever)

Maria (Maria), Monday, 28 August 2006 03:40 (nineteen years ago)

i don't really want more stuff but i would like better versions of some of the stuff i have.

electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Monday, 28 August 2006 03:41 (nineteen years ago)

i don't really want more experiences but i would like better versions of some of the experiences i have had.

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:06 (nineteen years ago)

haha that too

electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:07 (nineteen years ago)

The food I buy is material; what I create from it is an experience. Both have their place.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:22 (nineteen years ago)

I like to go to the sort of places that take me entirely out of my element, so I'll take experiences over more stuff every time. Already have more junk than I need anyways, though I am the sort of person that doesn't buy a lot.

ALLAH FROG (Mingus Dew), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:28 (nineteen years ago)

The food I buy is material; what I create from it is an experience. Both have their place.

Wait...haha, I think I may be reading too much into this...

Marmot (marmotwolof), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:32 (nineteen years ago)

i thought the same thing!

electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:32 (nineteen years ago)

experiences every time. basically, possessions kind of become a drag after a time. especially if you can keep your music digitally. i can pretty much throw everything i have with me in a bag, and leave, if i need to. its not even so much that experiences are better than possessions, its the feeling of travelling light, of not being held back by possessions

the thing that is interesting, is that the western trend appears to be: to accumulate signs of material wealth, and to dispose of people, culminating in the stereotype of the lottery winner, in their mansion in the country, with a small close band of people around them, hiding away from potential golddiggers

possessions=protectionism/fear?

-- (688), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:44 (nineteen years ago)

fuck people!! i would gladly trade ILX for a porsche.

the art ensemble of chicago house (vahid), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:45 (nineteen years ago)

"experiences" = fancy word for wasted time.

the art ensemble of chicago house (vahid), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:46 (nineteen years ago)

fuck a meaningful experience that costs money

the art ensemble of chicago house (vahid), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:46 (nineteen years ago)

the other thing is people seem to say

i wish i had *done* this, referring to the past, and regret

and

i wish i could *have* this, referring to the future, and hope

as though people want to have things, to own things, but when it comes to it, afterwards, they actually wished they had done things instead

-- (688), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:57 (nineteen years ago)

false dichotomy

electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Monday, 28 August 2006 04:58 (nineteen years ago)

i had one of those, but it was getting in the way, so i sold it. i dont miss it at all!

-- (688), Monday, 28 August 2006 05:01 (nineteen years ago)

Wait...haha, I think I may be reading too much into this...

Naughty boy. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 August 2006 05:05 (nineteen years ago)

hmm. for me, the most important thing is simply making the most of what i'm doing at the time. which i suppose puts me more in the "experience" camp ... but then it's not like i go into things with any great expectation of how life-changing they might be.

i dunno. i seem to be undergoing a seismic shift in the way i look at life, and i'm a lot happier for it.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 28 August 2006 09:09 (nineteen years ago)

Is this New Labour's new advertising campaign?

Pier Paolo Semolina (noodle vague), Monday, 28 August 2006 09:19 (nineteen years ago)

Ha - inspired thought...

"Prime Minister, there's a whole generation who are priced out of the housing market."


"Right- I want a whole series of placed articles about the benefits of non-materialism - edgy style magazines... champagne life-style on a beer income....

and whilst you're at it, let's look again at the property market - bring me that Momus article you gave me to read over the summer about how much better the japanese have it living in one small room. "


Bob Six (bobbysix), Monday, 28 August 2006 09:58 (nineteen years ago)

I like stuff, but yeah the non-stuff things are better. Plus, you don't get that whole consumerist guilt thing when you live light, I assume.

jel -- (jel), Monday, 28 August 2006 10:08 (nineteen years ago)

You do if you're burning aeroplane fuel out of your arse.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 28 August 2006 10:27 (nineteen years ago)

We're trying to get rid of a whole chunk of stuff right now - I get a good feeling getting rid of things, better (in some kind of warped spiritual way) than when I get new stuff. Flat too small.

Earwig oh! (Mark C), Monday, 28 August 2006 10:34 (nineteen years ago)

I've accumulated mountains of stuff, but ebaying is so damn slow and I hate getting rid of it other ways. I did give away 200 books this month though.

I know the rule is that if you haven't used it for a year, toss it, but then I take stuff out of storage and go "oh, ace! haven't seen/used/read this for ages!"

stet (stet), Monday, 28 August 2006 10:40 (nineteen years ago)

yes, i do that. and then i put it to one side, and it gets buried underneath some other stuff. and then a year later i find it again and go: "oh, ace, i haven't seen this in ages!" etc.

i've got a massive bag of clothes and books to take to a charity shop this week; it will be followed shortly by a mammoth stash of CDs. like mark, i think there's something very satisfying about jettisoning stuff.

i mean, i'm still a typical western consumerist arsehole: i have a flat, a car, a laptop computer and an iPod. two iPods, in fact. three if you count the broken one. but the older i get, the more i realise that all happiness is transitory and ... well, contentment is key. and for fuck's sake, if i can't be content with my car, my flat, my iPods and my general western capitalist cumshot lifestyle, i really am a complete and utter cock.

and any "experiences" i have along the way, such as burning aeroplane fuel out of my arse following a night on the organic cider with stet, are a bonus :)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 28 August 2006 12:03 (nineteen years ago)

The food I buy is material; what I create from it is an experience. Both have their place.
Yes, experience is in your BRAIN and material is around you. Err, no, you just ATE it. :-)

Me, I love to amass things. I don't have much time for travelling as I have to work so much. No, not to buy schtuff,just cause I well, I like to. Y'know, experience. ;-)

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 28 August 2006 12:09 (nineteen years ago)

Selling my CDs has been fantastic, very liberating. Some of them I rip to the hard drive before I ship, and now they're experiences instead of possessions. They're experiences that aren't burdened by the weight of their container anymore.

Danny Aioli (Rock Hardy), Monday, 28 August 2006 12:10 (nineteen years ago)

i did that a few years ago too. in fact, selling your stuff can be completely addictive.

that said, i love getting new things, as many new things as possible, and amassing money. gimme.

sunny successor (katharine), Monday, 28 August 2006 12:17 (nineteen years ago)

I'm a sucker for material possessions, although that's not as bad as it sounds. Not shiny, new things, necessarily, or things I've spent money on -- I'm just as happy to get old things for free or second-hand, as long as they interest me somehow. No, it's knowing that SOMEWHERE among my worldly goods I will have Just The Thing to meet some future need. There's not much I like better than being able to say "AHA!" and going to find the perfect lamp base/typing table/rubber stamp tree/piece of vintage jewelry/weird textile/out-of-print book.

Yes, the only thing that stops me from SERIOUSLY hoarding is the fact that Stuff has to be dusted. Cleaning, blech.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 28 August 2006 12:35 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, i'll buy things at flea markets just to satisfy that urge. sometimes i scan/photograph an item and toss the original once i have a pristine digital copy, but it loses something in translation -- the texture, the mustiness, etc.

el borracho (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 28 August 2006 12:39 (nineteen years ago)

"i'm not materialistic, i just like [books, music, travel, choose one, etc]" - C/D?

Maria (Maria), Monday, 28 August 2006 12:52 (nineteen years ago)

anyone who says "i'm not materialistic" - D

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 28 August 2006 12:54 (nineteen years ago)

ts: worthless used books vs million-dollar mcmansions

el borracho (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 28 August 2006 12:54 (nineteen years ago)

Uhh, not to gt all semantic/boring about it but dictionary def of "materialism" includes BOTH preoccupation with objects/comforts AND a rejection of intellectual/spiritual values. Should we nitpick to death whether it's "materialistic" to collect things if you pass them back to others just as easily when the objects meet a need?

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 28 August 2006 13:03 (nineteen years ago)

Sorry, I'm thinking of family friend who had a basement and a whole pole-barn full of odds and ends...in the city he would have been judged a full-fledged crazy hoarder, but out in the country he was just the person you went to when you needed an odd tool, 24 cigar boxes, old barn wood, an antique porcelain stove, pretty much ANYTHING. And he was happy to just give and give it away, if it made someone else's life better. It's the Depression upbringing, I guess, something we won't see much more of as people pass on.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 28 August 2006 13:06 (nineteen years ago)

i suppose the question isn't so much what you have as how willing you are to let it go

el borracho (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 28 August 2006 13:12 (nineteen years ago)

i like that idea, of things just being passed around, of things being transient, having lives of their own even, not *owned*, not hoarded.

over the last 3 or 4 years i have noticed a huge increase in the number of storage facilities, suggesting that people simply do not have room for all the things they have accumulated, yet cannot bear to part with them. i can understand the idea of having some big ol musty place filled with all kinds of interesting detritus, but when people are cramped in tiny flats, and they dont have room for their stuff, what good is it doing anyone in a storage facility?

perhaps im guilty as well, all my records and most of my other accumulated stuff is at my parents. what am i doing? pretending it doesnt exist, really. why don't i just sell/give away the lot? ...perhaps i will! ...maybe just not quite yet though

-- (688), Monday, 28 August 2006 13:14 (nineteen years ago)

i suppose the question isn't so much what you have as how willing you are to let it go

bingo!

-- (688), Monday, 28 August 2006 13:15 (nineteen years ago)

What is the best way to get shot of this stuff for money, then? Amazon marketplace doesn't seem all that quick. Is eBay worth it for hundreds of CDs?

Laurel's OTM about depression/war-era hoarding. My grandparents are dreadful/great about stuff like that. Living in the country's handy too, as you *can* keep all this stuff in a huge house and not be tripping over it all the time.

stet (stet), Monday, 28 August 2006 13:18 (nineteen years ago)

As I've muttered elsewhere, I've spent the last couple of years reducing the amount of CDs around, to my overall benefit. You just don't need them all any more, and even though I ripped everything to mp3 and all, I haven't even played those. They're just quietly archived in a much more convenient and non-dust-troubled way.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 August 2006 13:20 (nineteen years ago)

being able to let things go is important, but so is not needing a huge amount of money to maintain your non-materialistic lifestyle in the first place. whether you are paying for experiences or transitory possessions, i think if there's a sense of not having enough, needing to keep up, or being unfulfilled it's at root the same.

my grandfather was like that too, he had an apartment and basement full of stuff he never used, stuff that didn't work, stuff he just wouldn't get rid of in case someday somebody needed it. i think that kind of depression-era-based valuing of possessions is very different because it's not about having a satisfying lifestyle or being a consumerist tool or whatever, it's about trying to never be in a spot where you can't get by again, never wasting anything.

Maria (Maria), Monday, 28 August 2006 13:52 (nineteen years ago)

the thing that is interesting, is that the western trend appears to be: to accumulate signs of material wealth, and to dispose of people, culminating in the stereotype of the lottery winner, in their mansion in the country, with a small close band of people around them, hiding away from potential golddiggers

i would question the implied causality there. i tend to think it works in the opposite direction -- as people lose contact with others and feel less connected to the outside world, they turn to material possessions to soothe themselves and fill the empty spaces. (encouraged by advertising, etc., which cultivates a sense of belonging through shared brand names and gagdets.

i'll mitya halfway (mitya), Monday, 28 August 2006 13:55 (nineteen years ago)

i dunno, the first instinct of people who get rich quick, seems to be to leave, and go shut themselves away in the country?

-- (688), Monday, 28 August 2006 14:00 (nineteen years ago)

Well yes. Being around other people is bad and wrong.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 August 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)

really?

usually the first instinct of people who get rich quick is to spend their money on expensive holidays, expensive shopping days out with friends, eating out at expensive restaurants etc ...

the art ensemble of chicago house (vahid), Monday, 28 August 2006 17:53 (nineteen years ago)

without new music, the trip would've been half ass

PappaWheelie, Olives, Red Wine, Coffee, Scotch, and Me (PappaWheelie 2), Monday, 28 August 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)

really?

No.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 August 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

that was an xpost to 688 (g***th?)

the art ensemble of chicago house (vahid), Monday, 28 August 2006 19:44 (nineteen years ago)

i dunno, the first instinct of people who get rich quick, seems to be to leave, and go shut themselves away in the country?

i guess it depends where you are. i have friends who have simply bought ostentatiously large flats/homes in the city. i'm not sure "shutting yourself away" is exactly the goal, just a byproduct of moving into large and luxurious homes.

i'll mitya halfway (mitya), Monday, 28 August 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

(g***th?)

I'm embarrassed that I just figured this out.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 28 August 2006 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

storage facilities are for your papier-mache cat from 1st grade

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 28 August 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

Wait, I don't mean that I just figured out what the asterisks stood for, I mean it never occurred to me who 688 was.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 28 August 2006 20:47 (nineteen years ago)

goooooth

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 28 August 2006 21:02 (nineteen years ago)

one can only escape the authorites for so long

-- (688), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 08:16 (nineteen years ago)

gareth saying his stuff is *actually* at his parents' place sort of voids the other things he's saying!

i've cut out accumulating stuff by stopping being a fuckwit with money, stopping buying books (now i read them instead), listening to the records i have (a novelty). i still get nuff dvds. it's freed up a lot of money to pay off debts with.

experiences come in all shapes and sizes, people seem to mean 'good experiences with friends'. i haven't really had a holiday in two years.

a rapper singing about hos and bitches and money (Enrique), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 08:30 (nineteen years ago)

is it this bit that it is voiding?

-- (688), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 09:04 (nineteen years ago)

perhaps im guilty as well, all my records and most of my other accumulated stuff is at my parents. what am i doing? pretending it doesnt exist, really. why don't i just sell/give away the lot? ...perhaps i will! ...maybe just not quite yet though

-- (688), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 09:04 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, i'm just saying, though. broadly yes people don't need STUFF and getting rid of it is a fine thing.

if i had more time to experience my possessions, i would think differently.

a rapper singing about hos and bitches and money (Enrique), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 09:06 (nineteen years ago)

having things is an experience.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 09:21 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.