I think it would be a sort of prostitute, only
the client gets arty inspiration instead of
sex??
(to be honest Gale i have no idea :-/ electric
sound of jim's joke was too clevah for me)
also i stayed up drinking with my friend R.
until MUCH TOO LATE last night, and today
have achieved nothing and am barely even
fuzzy when it comes to logic...
― mark s, Sunday, 3 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I think you're probably OTM there (about the muse bit, not about the
joke being to clever)
― electric sound of jim, Sunday, 3 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Okay, I think I can explain, at least in relation to fashion. A
professional muse is someone like Isabella Blow, Katy England or Amanda
Harlech who is generally from a very posh background and likes a bit of
Bohemian. They start out being an assistant at Vogue or some kind of
minor model or stylist and 'discover' a fashion designer. The 'muse'
has style and contacts and the designer (usually a gay man) takes his
inspiration from what she wears, what she says and does after the sixth
bottle of champagne. As the designer gets famous, the 'muse' gets given
a Creative Director job at his atelier and the consumer who stumbles
upon interviews with the guy reads quotes from him saying that she has
some otherworldly quality blah blah blah and glams up the mystery of
being a wooooooman. It's important - initially at least - that the
woman in question does not appear to work for a living, has some kind
of tragic/melancholy mien about her, Evokes A Bygone Era and doesn't
seem so bright. The joke is that the three women I mentioned at the
start now have BIG fashion jobs and are probably working harder than
they believed they would EVER have to (and learnt a few things into the
bargain).
If the man looking for a muse is straight, she will be the first woman
he describes to his long-suffering girlfriend as 'mad'. Within three
months the LSG will have been left by the man for the madwoman, and
hilarity ensues.
Art: see Picasso, Warhol.
Music: see Paul McCartney; *not* John Lennon - the muse is not a mommy
substitute.
I've always thought the whole construct was vaguely sexist, relying on
a certain passivity in the women in question, the way it's written
about in Edgy Fashion Magazines; however *women* can have muses too.
But they don't usually sit on their arse all day eating grapes, talking
about the horrors of being a debutante.
― suzy, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Thanks Suzy .
I understand it now. Sounds better than some other posts.
I just thought that a muse just might be the inspiration for another
person?
― Gale Deslongchamps, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)