Suicide Baiting: Explain This?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Last night ABC ran a Primetime episode entitled 'Cruel Intentions' on the subject of bullying and teenage harassment bullshit, especially as transmitted via electronic means (myspace, IM, text messaging) and the speed, intensity, etc., with which this vitriol can be carried.

While the program was faintly mediocre (inc. a staged experiment of dubious ethical construct) there was one segment that caught my attention, about a harassed kid ('Ryan'?) who was befriended by a girl who only used him for – shall we call it 'sport'? – daily online mockery. After she baited him into admitting his real-life romantic feelings toward her, she responded with some zinger like 'I was just joking about liking you, I'd never go out with anybody of your type' and continued to rip him to shreds.

Some weeks later Ryan was befriended (IM-wise) by another boy (these kids are like 13 - 15) who helped induce online him to carry out his suicide plan. So Ryan hung himself while his father was away on business, and the other kid got away scott free.

So here's my question: what's the thrill of suicide baiting? Sure there are suicide circles, internet suicides, and the classic 'Jump! Jump! Jump!'approach, but it's difficult to understand how anybody could participate in inducing some desperate person to end their life violently.

Mr. Um (x Jeremy), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

People are insdisiously evil shits; it's not really a mystery!

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:04 (nineteen years ago)

Is this belief naive? And also, does the whole 'I felt depersonalized by the crowd's behavior... I'd never say that on my own...." like sound a little specious?

Vacillatrix (x Jeremy), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:04 (nineteen years ago)

like = line

Vacillatrix (x Jeremy), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:05 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.mindtoss.com/wp-images/nancy_grace.jpg

and what (ooo), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:06 (nineteen years ago)

What belief? (xxpost)

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:06 (nineteen years ago)

the belief that 'young people are insidiously evil'

Vacillatrix (x Jeremy), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:10 (nineteen years ago)

He didn't say 'young people are insidiously evil', he said 'people are insidiously evil'

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:11 (nineteen years ago)

... but kind of interesting that you read it as 'young people are insidiously evil', yes?

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:13 (nineteen years ago)

Very interesting!

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:14 (nineteen years ago)

At least 50% of human interaction is based on cruelty. People do not help each other without some level of self-interest, whether that manifests in tangible or intangible rewards; furthermore, the negotiation of balancing the individual's need to satisify his/her id with society's expected standards of behavior is a constant process of refinement and reassessment. Expecting people to be nice to each other or to have each other's interests in mind is not only naive, it is an open invitation to get used and abused by most of the people you meet.

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)

(xpost to dan) You know what's funny? I actually went back and checked twice to make sure I wasn't right... and I'll be damned. I wonder why I added the 'young'?

But I was thinking about people last night – generally – and I realized I knew exactly among my friend and acquaintances who would be in the 'jump, jump' pack, who would be in the do-nothing pack, and who would be in the race to the top of the building pack. And while I was about 90% certain for 90% of the people I knew, it didn't line up with their day-to-day actions.

Vacillatrix (x Jeremy), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:21 (nineteen years ago)

(day to day actions regarding goodness or badness, cruelty or kindness, whatever)

Vacillatrix (x Jeremy), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:21 (nineteen years ago)

i think most people are relatively good and most of the 'evil' comes from behavior they don't know is cruel. but there is seriously mean shit that occurs. not to dredge it all up, but i remember a classmate of a certain poster who seemed pretty vile.

gear (gear), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:23 (nineteen years ago)

Dan otm, this is something I've quickly learnt, yet, conversely, that knowledge has improved my life no end. :-D

Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:23 (nineteen years ago)

I read that as "Young people..." too! I think it's because "Young" is right below "People" in Dan's screen name.

Danny Aioli (Rock Hardy), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:26 (nineteen years ago)

I might have to disagree with you there, I don't think most people go out of their way to fuck people over at all. It's just that the effects of someone being a shit are far more impactful and long lasting than the effects of people being pleasant. If a hundred people do something quite nice for you in a week, be it as minor as thanking you for something or buying you a drink, and in the same week just one person fucks you over royally, which one is going to stick in your mind? Perhaps this is a naive attitude, but I'd rather think like this and risk maybe being burned than live in a fug of paranoia and doubt towards my fellow humans.

P.S. I do agree with you on the 'no-one acts without self interest' thing, but on a more philosophical level... I think a mature, well adjusted 'nice' person will realise the greatest rewards for oneself are gained by being socially responsible.

Many times xpost to Dan.

chap who would dare to start Raaatpackin (chap), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)

I assume the "50% of human behavior" is an arbitrary figure used for effect. In many cases simply not caring about other people /= active cruelty, for example.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)

The truth is that some young people are oblivious to their twattishness, others fight it, and I try to mix with the latter camp.

Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)

fight harder

gear (gear), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:30 (nineteen years ago)

j/k ; )

gear (gear), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:30 (nineteen years ago)

Interestingly enough, my use of the word "cruelty" has been interpreted as "intentional cruelty" or "active cruelty". And yeah, the 50% was completely arbitrary.

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:33 (nineteen years ago)

I think cruelty implies intent - the deliberate harming of another.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:34 (nineteen years ago)

the initial story doesn't shock me at all. did they interview any of the parties involved?

gear (gear), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:36 (nineteen years ago)

The majority of people I know have lived their lives going out of their way to avoid fucking anybody else over; even, occasionally, to their own detriment. I agree absolutely with gear that people are basically good (if misguided/misinformed) and can think of very, very, very few instances of abject cruelty among the circle of people I know.

Further – there are some people I know (/aspire to be) who NEVER act with deliberate cruelty, unkindness, or hurtful selfishness. Surely if one's actions are guided by casual charity and a kind of generosity of behavior, it's hard to accidentally fall into cruelty or maliciousness. Isn't it?

Vacillatrix (x Jeremy), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:37 (nineteen years ago)

i often transpose words from different lines when i'm reading quickly. after reading that paragraph about pathological youth your eyes went right to young when trying to reorient themselves after that giant off-center bold New Answers. it fit with what you had just read so you made it work!

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:39 (nineteen years ago)

i think most cruelty is unseen

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:40 (nineteen years ago)

gear -- primetime interviewed ryan's father, and the girl who screwed with ryan. though the girl volunteered for the diane sawyer interview, her responses seemed a little glib, a little prideful, and it was hard to shake the suspicion that she was bragging about what she'd done.

Vacillatrix (x Jeremy), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:40 (nineteen years ago)

I hope she falls under a bus. I myself would not push her under that bus; it would be cruel.

Danny Aioli (Rock Hardy), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:47 (nineteen years ago)

To qualify my comment, my real opinion of fellow youngsters is somewhat higher than this, and the word 'twattishness' should really be replaced by 'weakness'; our selfish weaknesses become twattishnesses, one could say, if not snipped at the root before flowering. Therefore, those that do snip are not at all twattish, and I have nothing bad to say about them. These people are the people Vacillatrix is referring to in his post a little way above; those who are naturally good, because they naturally and in the best cases unconsciously destroy any selfishness they have. Such people must be treasured.

Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:49 (nineteen years ago)

I think some of you are deeply deluded about human nature.

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:56 (nineteen years ago)

Or maybe I am; who knows? I do know that a much larger percentage of the people I know who think that people are inherently good have been used and screwed over than the people I know who think that people are inherently selfish and narcissistic (and I know the two stances aren't mutually exclusive so let's all just agree that the customary ILE "false binary" argument can go fuck itself in the ear).

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

i think people are inherently good but then again i also don't trust anyone outside of a small circle of people. i guess that's contradictory in some way.

gear (gear), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:01 (nineteen years ago)

i sometimes think i do have a chip on my shoulder about some things. i grew up in a very small town and it was weird, a whole lot of classism and racism and pre-WW2 mindsets. everyone in my tiny town was regarded as 'white trash' by the people from the larger town, the county seat, and shit was divided big time, one on side it was these rich or good looking kids, on another it was the lower class/dorky/unattractive kids, and the former crew was cruel as all get out. i tried to stay out of both but y'know you're gonna get forced into one, and you can guess which one i was! it doesn't help that i looked like a young jandek with bad glasses.

gear (gear), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:10 (nineteen years ago)

My wife was watching this last night - my reaction was, "News flash: kids are mean to each other." Reminds me of that line in Welcome To The Dollhouse: "High school's better than junior high. They'll call you names, but not as much to your face." People in my film class thought Welcome To The Dollhouse was an accurate portrayal of preadolescent life. Do we forget how savage the grade school playground/cafeteria can be, or does it depend on your personal experience?

On the topic of suicide baiting, it probably stems from a mix of a)teenagers' general lack of sense when it comes to actions/consequences, b) the disconnected sterility inherent in online communications, c) morbid curiousity ("is this guy really gonna do it?"), and d) the seductive allure of having a weak-willed person under your command.

Ever visit one of those how-to suicide forums? Creepy stuff.

Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:15 (nineteen years ago)

Asking whether mankind is basically good or basically evil is like asking if we're basically tall or basically short. Doesn't make sense.

Bidfurd (Bidfurd), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:26 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWehZ_ONYpg

wostyntje (wostyntje), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:26 (nineteen years ago)

Asking whether mankind is basically good or basically evil is like asking if we're basically tall or basically short. Doesn't make sense.

If that's your idea of constructing a reasonable analogy, I can see why you think it makes no sense.

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

People as a whole aren't inherently good or evil, they're inherently both at an individual level. So, not only do you have to figure out whether you are dealing with someone else's good nature vs. their evil nature, you also need to figure out if you are relying on your own good nature or evil nature to do so.

BrianB (BrianB), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:30 (nineteen years ago)

I thought of it myself. I was quite proud of it!

Bidfurd (Bidfurd), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:30 (nineteen years ago)

Short, duh.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:32 (nineteen years ago)

Being quite proud of one's own analogies is like fucking a sheep to stand out from the crowd.

Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:35 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, it works well but then you get a urethra full of wool

gear (gear), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:36 (nineteen years ago)

>People do not help each other without some level of self-interest

I'm calling BS.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)

gear, I think you may be fucking the wrong part of the sheep.

xpost

M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)

lol what if the sheep is wearing a trucker hat lmao

and what (ooo), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:48 (nineteen years ago)

xxxpost: Yeah, dude, what have I told you, shear then screw!

Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:51 (nineteen years ago)

this is when the simmering anger rises

gear (gear), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:52 (nineteen years ago)

i don't get ethan's hate of gear -- it's like hating a band for its fans.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)

i like ethan!

gear (gear), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:59 (nineteen years ago)


http://onnachance.com/quiz/geek.jpg


Take the What High School Stereotype Are You? quiz.

Why does my IQ changes? (noodle vague), Saturday, 16 September 2006 12:37 (nineteen years ago)


http://onnachance.com/quiz/teen.jpg


Take the What High School Stereotype Are You? quiz.

my family are disturbingly stable though, i resented my parents not getting divorced so i could play them off against each other for playstations etc

The Real DG (D to thee G), Saturday, 16 September 2006 12:52 (nineteen years ago)


http://onnachance.com/quiz/geek.jpg


Take the What High School Stereotype Are You? quiz.


hahah I don't think so.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Saturday, 16 September 2006 13:07 (nineteen years ago)

Or maybe I am; who knows? I do know that a much larger percentage of the people I know who think that people are inherently good have been used and screwed over than the people I know who think that people are inherently selfish and narcissistic (and I know the two stances aren't mutually exclusive so let's all just agree that the customary ILE "false binary" argument can go fuck itself in the ear).
-- Young Fresh Danny D (djperr...), September 15th, 2006 1:59 PM. (Dan Perry) (link)

I think the problem here, Dan, is that these two stances aren't mutually exclusive. This is what I'd like to call a "false binary".

Fluffy Bear is a man. Do not shoot him. (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 18:07 (nineteen years ago)

O U BICH

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:20 (nineteen years ago)

HAHAHA

Fluffy Bear is a man. Do not shoot him. (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)

noodle vague OTM

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)

1. I believe that people are generally good. Otherwise the world as a whole would be MUCH worse than it is.

2. I believe that there is an unknown- and unknowable- minority that is inclined to act in bad faith/be shitbags. This can be a temporary or chronic state depending entirely on the individual and what kind of day/week/year they've had. I think modern criminological studies are behind me on this.

3. In order to be able to survive, you have to be wary of 2. But to function with people on a regular basis, you also have to assume 1, or you wind up unabombing. Let yourself be surprised by others' kindness, sure, but don't turn into a fucking scrooge in the process.

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:40 (nineteen years ago)

suicide baiting and etc. = #2 and the kid in question will either regret doing it for the rest of his entire life or turn into a Ken Lay, though highly unlikely he'll make that kind of money.

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:42 (nineteen years ago)

kid in question != a he, but overall seems pretty OTM

Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)

It was a he, read the post again. What trish said up there about teenagers not fully comprehending death rings true as well. Childhood bullying's a social activity mostly, i.e. it's as much about showing off to your friends as it is about actively hating the victim. Which isn't to justify, but to place it in the context of assholishness rather than straight-up malice.

No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:48 (nineteen years ago)

assholishness rather than straight-up malice

I don't see as much of a difference here as some people, I guess.

Danny Aioli (Rock Hardy), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:52 (nineteen years ago)

Hmm, yeah, you're talking about the guy who talked him towards suicide, but I got more 'wow, what an awful person' vibes from the description of the girl. Hmm.

Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

was the other kid who induced him to kill himself friends with the girl? do they know who he was and has he said anything about it?

gear (gear), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)

xxpost

I don't see any difference in the outcomes from assholishness and malice, but I figure that you can learn not to be an asshole, or grow out of it, but malice is a more indelible character trait.

No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)

TOMBOT, pretend I am on a ledge...

Butt Dickass (Dick Butkus), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:43 (nineteen years ago)

1. I believe that people are generally good. Otherwise the world as a whole would be MUCH worse than it is.

2. I believe that there is an unknown- and unknowable- minority that is inclined to act in bad faith/be shitbags. This can be a temporary or chronic state depending entirely on the individual and what kind of day/week/year they've had. I think modern criminological studies are behind me on this.

3. In order to be able to survive, you have to be wary of 2. But to function with people on a regular basis, you also have to assume 1, or you wind up unabombing. Let yourself be surprised by others' kindness, sure, but don't turn into a fucking scrooge in the process.

-- TOMBOT (tombo...), September 19th, 2006 10:40 PM. (later)

I second that emotion.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:58 (nineteen years ago)

thirded. i've always answered the "do you think people are basically good or evil" question by pointing out the general orderliness and peace that we all tend to take for granted. if people were basically evil, humanity would never have reached the point where that question could even be asked.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 23:32 (nineteen years ago)

Humans are basically Chaotic Neutral.

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 05:31 (nineteen years ago)

At least 50% of human interaction is based on cruelty.

The author indicts "50% of human interaction," not "50%" of the population, probably because he can't bear to think that he is even among 50% of the population.


People do not help each other without some level of self-interest,

Another generalization of the sort that some people tell themselves to feel better about their own lack of feeling.

whether that manifests in tangible or intangible rewards; furthermore, the negotiation of balancing the individual's need to satisify his/her id with society's expected standards of behavior

"Individual vs. Society" faux dilemma is a sort of fascist mentality.
Or has this just been plagiarized from somewhere else?

Expecting people to be nice to each other or to have each other's interests in mind is not only naive, it is an open invitation to get used and abused by most of the people you meet.

This is the classic excuse assholes tell themselves for, you know, not getting involved when they witness crimes and so forth. Furthermore, this idiot cannot see that there is a difference between "expecting people to be 'nice'" and "expecting people to do the right thing." One can be an honorable and ethical person without being "nice". Certainly, I've never read a behavioral psychology text that discusses the role of "niceness" in society.

I believe that what the writer of the above really means is that to expect others to behave ethically and in a non-abusive manner is to invite abuse. Which is illogical. I have no idea who wrote this, but he sounds like a fifty year old man.

Thank god ilx consists mostly of people in their twenties and thirties, otherwise we'd be reading loads of this tripe from "self-interested", bitter and aging boomers. In my experience those are the people who trot out this stuff the most.

it's a personal (section241), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:03 (nineteen years ago)

*Hides in a corner*

No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:05 (nineteen years ago)

I think Dan had a point, notably with the line 'People do not help each other without some level of self-interest', but obviously this does not apply to everyone and there are those (as I said before) whose good deeds are unconsciously motivated, these generally being the most agreeable of people.

NV, you love humanity really. *goes towards corner holding flashlight*

Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:10 (nineteen years ago)


http://onnachance.com/quiz/teen.jpg


Take the What High School Stereotype Are You? quiz.

EARLY-90S MAN (Enrique), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:13 (nineteen years ago)

I was hiding from the verbal ass-whipping on the horizon when Dan comes back.

I do love humanity. I Love Life.

No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:14 (nineteen years ago)

great song. pulp go mogwai!

Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:18 (nineteen years ago)

Gear - They didn't interview the suicide bater kid, they only interviewed the girl and the father of the kid who committed suicide. The father said that he found the suicide bating messages on his son's computer after his death, and went to the parents of the suicide bater but found that they were "in denial" about their son having a problem and refused to even look at the computer in his bedroom. No connection was made between the girl and the suicide bater.

BrianB (BrianB), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:28 (nineteen years ago)

Perhaps this is a naive attitude, but I'd rather think like this and risk maybe being burned than live in a fug of paranoia and doubt towards my fellow humans.

me too. this is like the grudge thread. if you go around all suspicious-like all the time surely it's more unpleasant being you than if you aren't constantly expecting the worst from people. suspect it's a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy too - so-and-so never trusted me anyway, what's the point, fuck 'em vs no i can' do that to such-and-such, they'd be all broken up.

I do know that a much larger percentage of the people I know who think that people are inherently good have been used and screwed over than the people I know who think that people are inherently selfish and narcissistic

yeah, but i dunno, i think we realign pretty well. i don't feel like i get fucked over that often. sometimes horribly, more frequently just a bit let down, but when it does happen horribly, i'll stomp around glaring for a week/month/whatever but i always know i'm coming back to an even keel and i'm far, far happier when i'm there.

Going by the news, 95% of people are foul shitheads; going by my own experience, the number drops to maybe 5%.

this is true, interesting and relevant. someone up there (govt/murdoch etc) wants us (general populace) to hate and be suspicious of each other, and fuck each other over to get what we want. i haven't entirely fathomed why. some of it is to do with us allowing them more control of our lives and data. insurance companies probably love it. perhaps they fear a mass uprising. i don't know.

i don't think it's entirely to do with cruelty (i am not claiming it is not cruel), but ooh, the DRAMA! imagine! lots of teenagers already feel disconnected from other people, and like nothing ever happens. so here's a juicy something!

emsk ( emsk), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:40 (nineteen years ago)

It's not actually that cynical or pessimisstic to describe people are generally self-interested, or to describe all behavior in terms of which needs it meets for the actor - people get really romantic about this shit and like to overstate what the position really means. Most behavioral research suggests that even people who act "against self-interest" have some secondary gain (as in the meeting of emotional or spiritual needs) in their actions. People who think this is a cold or negative thing to say/think should fucking look within maybe - there's nothing dark or illusion-destroying about honestly describing what people are like. In fact, just such honesty is the only way forward. Any other way actually g ives the cruelty a place to live.

IOW, young, fresh, full-voiced Danny D is OTM, and I will retract my statement if he does not give me five dollars

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:11 (nineteen years ago)

(also and what 10x otm w/Nancy Grace pic)

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:12 (nineteen years ago)

There's a lot of possibilities between assuming that people generally act out of self-interest and assuming that people are generally bastards who will screw you over given half a chance.

No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:17 (nineteen years ago)

People act out of self-interest. Of course they do.

People are, to varying degrees, predominately empathetic creatures.

As long as we're throwing percentages around, I'd say that 90% of what we are calling cruelty is weakness, stemming from jealousy, fear, the need for peer aproval; etc.

Genuine cruelty (Sorry, I'm too lazy to define my terms) is rare. I've been cruel, and that was mostly when I was younger, but the impulse was infrequent and empathy trumped cruelty. I derived more pain than pleasure from watching others suffer, especially at my behest. I learned from those experiences.

And of course we have ethics, morality and character.

As far as getting fucked over, I don't know how people are definging "fucked over". If, by that, you mean that your friends and family let you down, well of course, people are flawed and selfish even when they have the best intentions. We are bunglers.

When it comes to something more serious, like infidelity, I can tell you that the value of trust is worth more than the pain of betrayal, by a long shot.

What, somebody hurt your feelings? People are basically selfish, mostly good, and clumsy.

Fluffy Bear is a man. Do not shoot him. (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 13:15 (nineteen years ago)

They acting out of self-interest thing isn't really at stake in this particular case though, except maybe as some kind of twisted entertainment value. The main point I think, was that the relative anonymity of the web lets people, especially teens, act out in evil ways against eachother in ways they wouldn't face-to-face, but there are still real-life consequences.

BrianB (BrianB), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 13:24 (nineteen years ago)

I have no idea who wrote this, but he sounds like a fifty year old man.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! In Dana Carvey voice: My name's Dan and I'm a cranky old coot. People are just a bunch of jerks. Why won't you dern kids leave me alone. Stop it with the noise already, I'm tired and scared.

it's a personal, I'd like to ask you to go back to your post, review it critically, and understand why you're an idiot.

Dan, however, is a fifty-year-old man.

Fluffy Bear is a man. Do not shoot him. (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 13:28 (nineteen years ago)

it's a personal = writer of the funniest shit ever

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 14:06 (nineteen years ago)

BTW, this is what I actually look like:

http://barney.gonzaga.edu/~tlarson1/SallyOMalley.jpg

I'M FIFTY!

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 14:08 (nineteen years ago)

I remember reading a news article in the last couple years about an English boy who convinced another boy (online, using multiple characters/usernames and a very complicated storyline) to kill him.

RoxyMuzak© (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

a willing worm. ba da...

The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

The author indicts "50% of human interaction," not "50%" of the population, probably because he can't bear to think that he is even among 50% of the population.

Raise your hand if you're among 50% of the population.

Fluffy Bear, Proud Member of 50% of the Population (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 15:00 (nineteen years ago)

people on their own = usually okay.

people in groups = fucking nutzoid.

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 15:08 (nineteen years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/north_west/5356078.stm

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

Raise your hand if you're among 50% of the population.

What, like right now? I don't have 3 billion people around me at the moment but you never know what will happen on the weekend.

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)

That sounds like a crazy party you're going to.

No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:06 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...
Loosely related...

Boy With AK-47 Confronts Headteacher

A MASKED 13-year-old Missouri boy confronted his headteacher with an AK-47 Kalashnikov assault rifle yesterday, firing the weapon into a ceiling and pleading: "Please don't make me do this."

The unnamed student was wearing a mask and pointed the gun at Steve Gilbreth and Steve Doerr an assistant superintendent at the school in Joplin, Missouri, Jim Simpson a schools superintendent said. ...

Vacillatrix (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 02:31 (nineteen years ago)

Reader comments from the Joplin Globe website:

Billsmouse writes:
We also have to consider that the Government has told people now a days that they can not punish their kids anymore, the way we adults were punished as kids you can't spank them for being bad, you can't smack them for cussing you out, you have no control over almost anything anymore. And why????? Ask yourself and search deep for the answers.

Lacey writes:
The media's part of the problem as well. Yes I know that we are entitled to know what is going on in our country, but do we have to sensationalize it so much? The only time you ever hear anything about schools is when something tragic happens. Not only do we know that there were shootings, but we have to hear the gory details and visualize what happened. The only thing that this accomplishes is giving other psychos ideas on what they can do, and desensatizing all of us. Instead of wasting time arguing about whether or not it is because we took prayer out of school, why don't we all spend time praying for our schools? Ask God for protection of not only our children, but the children all around the nation. Ask God to bring comfort to the parents and family who have lost their precious child at the hands of these psychos. We were very blessed today that no one was hurt today (physically)

No Spin Please writes:
After watching the 5:00 news I became very concerced that this was turning into an opportunity for the school district to spin this in their favor. I have read accounts on this website, as well as those on national websites. They are both very consistent in regards to the fact that the boy's gun jammed. This can only be attributed to divine intervention. If you know anything about firearms, the AK-47 is still used to this day because of its reliability. I applaud the school districts handling of this event. And as a first hand witness, I think the police departments response time is second to none. The event happened at 7:45 a.m. and I saw them on the seen in less that 2 minutes! My only point is that if the gun hadn't jammed we would not be applauding the school district and the police response time would not matter. We need to do more to prevent this from happening again, because if his gun hadn't jammed I am sure there would have been faculty and student casualties!

Concerned writes:
Schools definitely need more security. Hopefully after today Joplin will take steps to make that happen so nothing like this happens again.

Kathy writes:
I am so sick of hearing how these "children" were mistreated, misunderstood, and whatever else the bleeding hearts can come up with. School shootings have been happening more and more because the punishment is not a punishment at all. It is a slap on the wrist. A true punishment could not be given to the students from Columbine since they killed themselves. In the second school shooting, the students involved should have been put on death row without a chance for parole no matter what their age. Until an example is made of these students doing these unspeakable crime, it will continue to happen. This boy will get off with no punishment because the bleeding hearts will say he didn't know what he was doing. Give me a break. Paddleing is on the books for Joplin schools. They just don't do it for fear of lawsuits. I say bring it on. If parents don't want other people teaching their children lifes lessons, then they need to do it. I always spanked my kids when they go in trouble at the school--no matter what level. The elementary teachers would tell me how they acted that day and I would discipline them accordingly. I DID NOT BEAT THEM. I made them think about what they would get if they acted up. The teachers who had my children loved me because I was more than just talk. They knew I was serious about teaching them manners, morals, and respect for authority. We all need to push for paddling to be put back in Joplin Schools.

Vacillatrix (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 02:44 (nineteen years ago)

Paddleing is on the books for Joplin schools

For a second I thought this was some obscure perjorative slang for a hippy school.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 02:57 (nineteen years ago)

doh, stuffed my html up.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 02:58 (nineteen years ago)

I like the way nobody mentions "easy availability of assault weapons" as a possible reason for school shootings.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 07:47 (nineteen years ago)

Paddling the school canoe.

Oh, you better believe that's a-paddling.

The Real Esteban Buttez (EstieButtez1), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 08:05 (nineteen years ago)

AK47, the very best there is, when you absolutely positively got to kill every motherfucker in the room, accept no substitutes.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 11:46 (nineteen years ago)

AK-47 IS THE TOOL
DON'T MAKE ME ACT THE MOTHERFUCKIN FOOL

chakra khan chakra khan (sanskrit), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 12:52 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.