― , Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Wilfred the Beagle, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― jel, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Gale Deslongchamps, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Norman Phay, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― bnw, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Kerry, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Luke, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― rainy, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― ethan, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― maryann, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
No, it's community (and intelligent community at that) which is the killer ap. That and the fact that, unlike the rest of the web, ILE changes every few seconds, and responds to what you do. Maybe spending three days with the adrenalin, the brainstorming, the give-and-take of a good thread is the best way you could spend those three days. But if it's every day...
My solution to addiction is to go away for three months or so. Take an ILE holiday. Contribute like crazy for three months, then don't even think about the place for three months. Or give up every three minutes, like Gainsbourg did with cigarettes.
What the hell, if it's compelling, it must be good (as the junky said to the vicar).
― Momus, Tuesday, 5 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― N., Tuesday, 5 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jeff W, Tuesday, 5 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm so glad to read this, I feel a lot better now. I can easily justify my behavior with this.
― Sean, Wednesday, 6 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Monday, 21 October 2002 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm assuming that you're coming here because it meets some need (the "bigger problem" you refer to). Although cutting ILE out might address your addiction (only you can determine if this would be appropriate), it won't address the underlying need that the addiction feeds. I suggest that you focus on addressing those underlying needs, thereby disabling the addictive process.
Because most addictions serve to distance you from your own personal pain, setting them aside to look at what is beneath can be very frightening, painful, difficult and even traumatic. For this reason, you will likely benefit from some form of support via a formal or informal therapeutic relationship with a counselor, friend, or family member, or an online or offline support group. You might want to consider some form of 12 step program as a start, but if that approach doesn't sit comfortably with you, try another one. There is no one path to wellness.
Do bear in mind that this is a process. It will likely take a minimum of months, possibly even a year or two -- it's not like throwing an on/off switch. You know what your problems are. Do some research on the net, find books on the subject, read, inform yourself, make a committment to you and your own vision of wellness. Start now.
― ragnfild (ragnfild), Monday, 21 October 2002 17:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 21 October 2002 18:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 21 October 2002 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 21 October 2002 18:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 21 October 2002 19:00 (twenty-two years ago)
break= a rest from all the work you've doing on ILE heh.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 21 October 2002 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 21 October 2002 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 5 January 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)
― cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 5 January 2006 21:46 (nineteen years ago)
― caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Thursday, 5 January 2006 21:50 (nineteen years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 5 January 2006 21:54 (nineteen years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 5 January 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)
― cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 5 January 2006 22:12 (nineteen years ago)
― caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Thursday, 5 January 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 5 January 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)
― cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 5 January 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)