News of an 'instant' flu cure

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Conditionally, obviously. But it sure seems promising:

Professor Dimmock has spent more than two decades investigating an entirely new method, that uses a 'protecting virus'. This has now been shown to provide instant protection against all flu symptoms and to slow the development of an influenza infection to such an extent that harmful infections are transformed into a vaccine against that form of influenza.

'Protecting virus' has a significant alteration to one of the virus's genes. The genetic material of a flu virus consists of 8 individual segments of single stranded RNA. Professor Dimmock's protecting influenza virus has a huge but specific deletion of around 80% of the RNA of one of these 8 strands.

This deletion makes the virus harmless and prevents it from reproducing by itself within a cell, so that it cannot spread like a normal influenza virus. However, if it is joined in the cell by another influenza virus, it retains its harmless nature but starts to reproduce - and at a much faster rate than the new influenza virus. This fast reproduction rate - spurred by the new flu infection - means that the new invading influenza is effectively crowded out by the 'protecting virus'. This vastly slows the progress of the new infection, prevents flu symptoms, and gives the body time to develop an immune response to the harmful new invader. In effect the protecting virus converts the virulent virus into a harmless live vaccine.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 16:03 (nineteen years ago)

brilliant

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 16:15 (nineteen years ago)

This could be great or it could lead to some epic Frankenstein-like sci-horror shit.

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:16 (nineteen years ago)

what M. White said

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

Ya - I tried to get rid of a roommate once in a similar manner and it backfired to say the least.

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

that bit of horizontal evolution really fucked us over, didn't it? we're prone to 3,600+ some deadly diseases as opposed to most animals who have about, oh, none or so.

the Adversary (but, still, a friend of yours) (Uri Frendimein), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)

yeah but we have internets.

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)

you mean "pornography"

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:46 (nineteen years ago)

It doesn't matter if we all die.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:49 (nineteen years ago)

Though the necrophiliacs and snuff porn enthusiasts will have a bit of fun before the end.

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:51 (nineteen years ago)

"just a bit of fun"

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)

you mean "pornography"

-- Shakey Mo Collier (audiobo...), October 4th, 2006 9:46 PM. (Shakey Mo Collier)

It doesn't matter if we all die.

-- Ned Raggett (ne...), October 4th, 2006 9:49 PM. (Ned)

This is an interesting thing to think about. If there were no women (or men) on the planet, but you had a stock of porn, would it even be exciting anymore? Or would it be so far into the realm of fantasy that it would lose all it's charm? You might as well masturbate while looking at a rainbow, since you have about the same chance of fucking it.

the Adversary (but, still, a friend of yours) (Uri Frendimein), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 23:59 (nineteen years ago)

Where is your ambition, John? And where is your black car? :-(

ok, maybe 2 posts a day if I'm good (Haberdager), Thursday, 5 October 2006 00:04 (nineteen years ago)

You Can Never Fuck A Rainbow

NokiyaUp (jergins), Thursday, 5 October 2006 00:05 (nineteen years ago)

children's song

NokiyaUp (jergins), Thursday, 5 October 2006 00:05 (nineteen years ago)

you mean "pornography"

-- Shakey Mo Collier (audiobo...), October 4th, 2006 9:46 PM. (Shakey Mo Collier)

It doesn't matter if we all die.

-- Ned Raggett (ne...), October 4th, 2006 9:49 PM. (Ned)

This is an interesting thing to think about. If there were no women (or men) on the planet, but you had a stock of porn, would it even be exciting anymore? Or would it be so far into the realm of fantasy that it would lose all it's charm? You might as well masturbate while looking at a rainbow, since you have about the same chance of fucking it.

-- the Adversary (but, still, a friend of yours) (john@fakemail.com), October 4th, 2006.

Pretend philosophy, not interesting, thx.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 5 October 2006 00:14 (nineteen years ago)

real intellectual snobbery is totally fascinating, however.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 5 October 2006 00:20 (nineteen years ago)

oops

cousin larry bundgee (bundgee), Thursday, 5 October 2006 00:26 (nineteen years ago)

I didn't realize that was even in the realm of philosophy. I was thinking more Deep Thoughts with Jack Handy. Get it? Jack Handy?

the Adversary (but, still, a friend of yours) (Uri Frendimein), Thursday, 5 October 2006 00:40 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe that's what this intro meant:

http://www.accesscable.net/~mccorm/images/deepthoughts.gif

He was jerkin' off to the sunset.

the Adversary (but, still, a friend of yours) (Uri Frendimein), Thursday, 5 October 2006 00:42 (nineteen years ago)

You Can Never Fuck A Rainbow


http://www.vap.co.jp/rainbow/images/rainbow.jpg

C J (C J), Thursday, 5 October 2006 07:07 (nineteen years ago)

I must fight this sickness.

Baaderonixx in the year of the locusts (baaderonixx), Thursday, 5 October 2006 07:32 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.