Limbo (the concept)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Under further review. I've seen a few stories on this over recent years. I also admit this comment:

And I don't think that God would leave the soul of innocent kids hanging in mid-air.

Kinda called up different images that what the poster intended.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 6 October 2006 19:47 (nineteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v48/w1nt3rmut3/anihovercat.gif

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 6 October 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

I think that the idea of limbo is scandalous; to put this upon young babies is an embarrassment to the Catholic church. This is babies who haven't even been given the opportunity to do any wrong or commit any sin. Babies should not need to be baptised before they can get to heaven.
Elaine Murphy, Lanarkshire, Scotland

Lots of things are an embarrassment to lots of churches. It amazes me that so many (apparent) believers don't take the slightest interest in the books they are supposed to believe in.

I can't see how the pope can get around Jesus explicitly saying "unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God."
The Pope would have to say that Jesus was wrong or he would have to say that dead babies go to hell.

If he attempts either of those I think he'll end up wishing he'd stuck with annoying the Muslims.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 6 October 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)

To put it very crudely, because I am only pretending to get Catholicism, the church has final say in understanding the Bible, so I suspect that even appearing to contradict something Jesus said, is within the bounds of the tolerable. The Bible is understood as a product of the God working through the church. The same church that had the authority to canonize the Bible, also has the authority to tell us all what it says. I think Catholic thinking goes something like that, except a whole lot more refined. (Or I could be way off.)

(Also I just noticed that the verse says "man" and not child--voila! There's a wide-open loophole, unless there's something in the Greek that undermines that strict interpretation of "man.")

R_S (RSLaRue), Friday, 6 October 2006 21:04 (nineteen years ago)

http://buckarooblues.com/images/1_25_02/limbo.jpg

(Sorry.)

researching ur life (grady), Friday, 6 October 2006 21:07 (nineteen years ago)

I fully admit that my understanding of Christian theology is lacking in any depth, so forgive me if I'm just being naive, but doesn't the Parable of the Good Samaritan contradict the quote mentioned above?

I know, I know... Contradictions in the bible? Who woulda thunk it. :)

shorty (shorty), Friday, 6 October 2006 21:14 (nineteen years ago)

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42168000/jpg/_42168008_popecut.jpg

"Go to hell, babies!"

latebloomer: just raw dead fucking babies (latebloomer), Saturday, 7 October 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

"Unease has remained over reconciling a Loving God with one who sent babies to limbo and the Church has faced much criticism."

meh, He's done worse.

Slumpman (Slump Man), Saturday, 7 October 2006 21:41 (nineteen years ago)

isnt it accepted by most christian based religions that we are all born sinners? all of this 'poor wee bairns nay did naught, aye?' doesnt really fly.

and these kind of comments:
"And I don't think that God would leave the soul of innocent kids hanging in mid-air."
make me wonder if they are even interviewing catholics. as the child of many generations of irish catholics, it was made very clear to me, by my family and in church, that god doesnt have a whole lot of the compassion going on. this aint happy joy joy protestant good news bible week here.

but if they get rid of limbo, whats the motivation for baptism? why not wait until first holy communion?

also:
Most priests don't talk about the notion of limbo anymore. There is a understanding that it just simply doesn't wash with people," says Mr Walsh.
doesn't wash with people?? i have a huge problem with this attitude in christianity. if someone can have absolute belief in an almighty creator and ruler sitting on a throne in the sky watching and judging each and every person on earth, then Id think anything should wash with them.

and for my own curiosity, whatever happened to purgatory? is that still accepted? where is the line drawn between a sinner who confesses to their preist and goes to heaven direct and a sinner who confesses to their priest but is still labelled a repentant sinner and has to do some time in purgatory?

sunny successor (katharine), Sunday, 8 October 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

"the idealistic police officer who stifled life from the best possible motives: the drunken priest who continued to pass life on."

Ahh dont mind me, but on topic heres nothing to get "rid of" strictly speaking as 'limbo' is not a teaching of the church but,re Gerry upthread, the 'grace of sacramental baptism' is required for 'salvation' so its a bit of a bind about what happens to babies--soem argue infants and other persons who die without being baptised may recieve such grace through a 'baptism of desire' before death.

purgatory last I heard is still going strong, dont think theres any direct line ride for catholics tho

Kiwi (Kiwi), Sunday, 8 October 2006 21:04 (nineteen years ago)

so everyone goes to purgatory first?

sunny successor (katharine), Sunday, 8 October 2006 21:30 (nineteen years ago)

doesn't wash with people?? i have a huge problem with this attitude in christianity. if someone can have absolute belief in an almighty creator and ruler sitting on a throne in the sky watching and judging each and every person on earth, then Id think anything should wash with them.

which is why this is so brilliant: next, catholic church ditches concept of transubstantiation. then, catholic church ditches silly ideas of "heaven" and "hell". then, catholic church ditches notion of "god". whole world promptly gets a bit more realistic and realises we have to fix stuff HERE not in some notional nextlife, hurrah.

emsk ( emsk), Sunday, 8 October 2006 21:43 (nineteen years ago)

I think mortal sinners go straight to hell! But otherwise yeah think so.

Courtenay Isherwood (Kiwi), Sunday, 8 October 2006 21:46 (nineteen years ago)

otoh maybe everyone will run riot and it will be like 28 days later: "no heaven? holy fuck! let me grab what i can right now in THIS life for ME" :(

i sort of wish i could believe in this religious stuff sometimes, it would make things a whole lot easier.

emsk ( emsk), Sunday, 8 October 2006 21:48 (nineteen years ago)

otoh maybe everyone will run riot and it will be like 28 days later: "no heaven? holy fuck! let me grab what i can right now in THIS life for ME" :(

Something us nonbelievers like to do at least once a week, so I hear.

You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Sunday, 8 October 2006 21:51 (nineteen years ago)

if you'd been only holding yourself back from grabbing/raiding/etc because you thought rewards aplenty were awaiting you in your nextlife! don't most nonbelievers who behave well do so because it is OBVIOUSLY THE RIGHT THING TO DO, and not because if you don't GOD WILL SMITE YOU DOWN AND YOU WILL GO TO HELL FOREVER? imagine believing all that and then the threat being removed and all this "suffering" being in vain.

emsk ( emsk), Sunday, 8 October 2006 21:54 (nineteen years ago)

i mean religion is basically a way of controlling people, right?

emsk ( emsk), Sunday, 8 October 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)

it's a moral code, a search for a reason, whatever. some have used it to control people, but there's so much more to it than that. not that i agree with any of it!

and i may have been having a chuckle with my xxpost... :-)

You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Sunday, 8 October 2006 22:09 (nineteen years ago)

This is the only god in my limbo:

http://www.vinyltap.co.uk/gallery/br/bryanl5313070526050730.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 8 October 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)

This would be a state of existence where unbaptised babies, and those unfortunate enough to have been born before Jesus, would not experience pain but neither would they experience the Beatific Vision of God.

How come only Catholics seem to press upon this issue so heavily? I grew up protestant and we do baptism too, but I dont recall any talk about limbo. Maybe I wasn't paying attention (this is highly likely).

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 9 October 2006 03:09 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.