ANother sign the USA is heading into ruin - outsourcing surgery

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061102/ap_on_he_me/outsourcing_health

Can you imagine having to travel to freaking INdia to get surgery? As if surgery isnt bad enough to begin with, now you have to travel thousands of miles for it?


Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 18:50 (eighteen years ago)

Health tourism, what we call it over here, much friendlier term, popping over to France for some light dental surgery and a boot load of Beaujolais is all the rage.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 2 November 2006 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

Well that's one thing, what if you need like a kidney or something - are you going to fly your whole family to Singapore for support?
And why is this stuff so much cheaper in other countries anyway?
DO their doctors have roomates?

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 18:57 (eighteen years ago)

And why is this stuff so much cheaper in other countries anyway?

...is that a serious question?

gbx (skowly), Thursday, 2 November 2006 18:58 (eighteen years ago)

HMOs dude, and unlimited damages in malpractice lawsuits, you guys get gouged.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 2 November 2006 18:58 (eighteen years ago)

I thought HMO's were supposed to make things cheaper.
I kind of suspect insurance companies charge such high premiums and pay little becuase they have to free up the rest of their money to pay for the election campaigns of congress so that no one will ever utter the forbinned words "Let's have a nationalised healthcare system"

"And why is this stuff so much cheaper in other countries anyway?
...is that a serious question?"
Its as serious as you want it to be

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:08 (eighteen years ago)

malpractice insurance is a huge part of it.

gbx (skowly), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:10 (eighteen years ago)

I have heard the arguement of "put a cap on how much people can sue for malpractice and malpractice premiums will go down" - it seems like a good plan, but the question is what should people be allowed to sue for? I definately don't think you should be able to get rich because the doctor screwed up your foot or something. But you should get your medical fees paid off. I heard also it is becuase these cases are tried by juries that are usually sympathetic to the victim before they even hear the case.

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:13 (eighteen years ago)

I think you should get your medical fees and whatever projected costs you'll incur as a result of having your foot screwed up or something, including income if you won't be able to work, future complications, whatever types of modifications to you, your house, your transportation needs that you'll require... All of that can add up to a lot of money, even if you don't include punitive damages, which I think should only be awarded when the doctor totally knew he was fucking something up but went ahead with his treatment plan anyway for whatever fucked up reason.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:17 (eighteen years ago)

also, more and more people mistrust doctors/show up with crazy self-diagnoses/demand to put on designer drugs/think medicine is infallible.

single-payer insurance would alleviate a lot of these problems, simply because if somehow your treatment got fucked, it would be free to get it sorted anyway.

malpractice is serious business, though, and is one of the major reasons we're going to have a doctor shortage (particularly OBGYNS) in the coming years.

xp - right

gbx (skowly), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:18 (eighteen years ago)

It seems like doctors are human and will make mistakes anyway - I'm sure they dont think "This guy smells - as punishment, I'm leaving a scalpel in him." We live in a sue-happy culture

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:19 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.grahamazon.com/sp/index.php

gbx (skowly), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:23 (eighteen years ago)

oh that "litigious society" stuff is bunk

geoff (gcannon), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:23 (eighteen years ago)

UH.

gbx (skowly), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:24 (eighteen years ago)

that's what insurance is for, to help that doctor pay for his mistakes. Sure it was a mistake but if you die from septic shock b/c he left a scalpel in you, you're kids still need to be fed and schooled.

xxpost

Sam rides the beat like a bicycle (Molly Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:24 (eighteen years ago)

we may not have a society where everyone's suing at the drop of a hat, but the tort system is heavily tilted in favor of the litigant seeking damages, not the defendant. plus, when damages are awarded, they're ridiculously over the top.

xp obviously that's what the insurance is for. it's just that doctors are not just paying for patients dead from septic shock, they're paying for small and often unavoidable side effects/patients not caring for themselves post-op, etc.

gbx (skowly), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

The irony is, at least in Maine, lots of the poorest people get top notch healthcare and pay nothing-(Mainecare.) But then if they get a job at Wendy's and start making money they will be dropped and be screwed, unless Wendy's has a top notch healthcare plan, but the premiums will be very high anyways

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

But the level of the punitive damages, not the compensatory ones is what is at stake here. The US taxpayer pays as much for healthcare (as a proportion of GDP) as Britain or Germany and we get our healthcare free at the point of provision you guys have to insure yourselves, or your workplace does doubling the national spend on healthcare. Something is fucked up there.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:28 (eighteen years ago)

I wouldn't be pusprised if lifestyle contributes to healthcare costs rising for everyone - how many studies have shwon that exercise and eating healthy can be great preventative care? I work with a client who has a medical comdition that would be helped by exercise and eating right, but he won't do it. Since he is on Mainecare , everyone who pays taxes here pays for this lack of motivation.

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:30 (eighteen years ago)

healthcare also costs as much as it does because of the uninsured being unable to pay for the healthcare they receive.

someone gets taken to the ER, they get treated, no matter what. if they can't pay for it, rates go up for the next guy.

xp sure, lifestyle is key to preventative medicine. but so is being able to go see a GP on a regular basis.

gbx (skowly), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:32 (eighteen years ago)

2003 gao study showed that a number of factors were driving up malpractice insurance premiums, not just lawsuits as the single factor. didn't sway my dr. brother from not voting for bush like an idiot, tho. (thankfully he lives in oregon.)

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:35 (eighteen years ago)

SOme hospitals here are hemmoraging money and laying off people. Maine has a state healthcare plan though, so we are trying to do something about it.
http://www.dirigohealth.maine.gov/

I have heard people say of the canadian healthcare system taht it is flawed, but at least its there. Fixing a flawed system is easier than having no system. But I still think it will not happen in america due to private business interests influence - Aetna, Blue Cross, Unum...

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:36 (eighteen years ago)

American health care is also horrible b/c of the several layers of bureaucracy both with the medical insurance types and the pharma types. Shit would be cheaper by just switching over to Medicaid/care.

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:39 (eighteen years ago)

Maine sounds like an exception in America.

Sam rides the beat like a bicycle (Molly Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:40 (eighteen years ago)

Walmart has that new 4$ drug prescription idea - wouldnt it be odd if Walmart ended up solving america's healthcare crisis?
I bought a bottel of Loratadine (Claritin) the other day, about 50 tabs for like 5$. Its a dollar a pill if you buy brand-name Claritin.
WTF!

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:42 (eighteen years ago)

Actually, civil trials are down, civil damage awards are down (except in med mal (where they have doubled) but plaintiffs only win a third of the time in med mal trials and 9 times out of 10 are bringing suit for permanent disability or death - not the trifling aftercare/lifestyle issues of legend) and punitives only count for 6% of all the damages in civil suits.

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/press/ctc_mmt01.htm

xpost - my understanding is that the list of $4 drugs available at Wal-Mart is pretty small and comprised of drugs that are dirt cheap to begin with anyway. I think I heard it on the radio, so I can't name a source.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:48 (eighteen years ago)

Civil FILINGS are up 19%, though.

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/civil.htm

Lots of interesting stats on that site.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:50 (eighteen years ago)

target and HEB (a TX grocery chain) are now doing generics for $5. yay.

Sam rides the beat like a bicycle (Molly Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:58 (eighteen years ago)

This article sums up the Wal-Mart criticisms I remember hearing.

And back to stats nerdery, this PDF about tort suits is pretty interesting.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:59 (eighteen years ago)

insurance premiums are also effected by the insurance companies' shitty investments. they have to park that premium money SOMEWHERE, and if they make bad investments with that money -- or even if the market takes a nosedive -- then there's a shortfall and SOMEONE (read: policyholders) have to make up the difference.

also, insurance companies are NOTORIOUSLY cheap when it comes to paying their lawyers (ask any lawyer you know -- OK, ask me -- what comes to mind when they hear the term "insurance defense" and get ready for lots of profanity) ... and even if a plaintiff's attorney manages to get a large damages reward for a client, the insurance companies stretch paying that shit out as long as they can get away with.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 2 November 2006 20:00 (eighteen years ago)

Maybe if doctors want malpractice insurance to be less expensive they shouldn't fuck up so much. I'm being half-facetious, but seriously, part of the problem is sleep-deprived, undertrained, overworked doctors, assistants and nurses.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 2 November 2006 20:21 (eighteen years ago)

I dont think they fuck up that much

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Thursday, 2 November 2006 21:43 (eighteen years ago)

This suggests that they do, actually:

http://www.aarp.org/research/health/carequality/Articles/aresearch-import-711-IB35.html#INCIDENCE

The "malpractice insurance" complaint is an easy dodge for the industry. It's somewhat true, but it also dishonestly implies that you're paying too much for healthcare because of those unscrupulous people who keep suing doctors rather than because of flaws in the system. Limiting the amount people can sue for might lower your costs, but it's also going to increase the chance that, if you are harmed by a medical mistake, you can't recover your medical costs, lost wages, etc. Some victory.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 2 November 2006 22:13 (eighteen years ago)

interestingly enough, they have a discussion on "tort reform" and medical malpractice on the american prospect's blog today, which includes several links debunking tort reform as a necessary correction for "out-of-control" medical malpractice suits.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 2 November 2006 23:29 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.ratemd.com/index.jsp

this site could prove useful over time eh?

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Friday, 3 November 2006 12:18 (eighteen years ago)

To answer Mr. Jones' question way up there

'Why is this stuff so much less expensive in other countries anyway'

The answer is (at least in the case of US vs. Canada, UK, much of Europe) that these other countries have their government and national health orgs running their health services, not private corporations. That is, the body at the top of the heath care chain is primarly mandated to provide health care for citizens, whereas in the US the body at the top of the food chain is first obligated to make as much profit for it's shareholders as possible.

Here's an example - I'm a Canadian citizen. I have now lived abroad for about 4 years, and so the last time I returned to Canada my 'heath card' had expired. While I was in Toronto I got an eye infection and had to go to a clinic to get it looked at. When I told them my health card had expired they told me I'd have to pay for their services, as if I were an 'uninsured' person. I saw the doctor, he checked out my eye and wrote me a perscription. They handed me a bill, $40.00 CDN. This represents what the doctor is charging back to OHIP for his time, and some overhead and administrative costs.

Now, go for a visit to the emergency room or a walk-in clinic in the US, and tell me how much the same costs. Probably several hundred dollars based on examples I've seen, including charging up to $40 US for bandages etc on top of various fees. The reason being that every person in the chain that provides you with that service is out to make as big a profit as reasonably possible.

greypejooze (Ryanssssss), Friday, 3 November 2006 13:28 (eighteen years ago)

I assume part of it is because your higher costs are paying for all the uninsured people who end up having to go to the emergency room for healthcare. But yes, one does get the impression that everyone at every level is trying to charge as much as possible and that there's no proper check on it. It's supposed to be a free market system, but there are all kinds of things impeding much of the "competition" that would actually bring prices down.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Friday, 3 November 2006 13:36 (eighteen years ago)

I guess I have adopted a kind of "If you cant beat em join em" attitude by going to school to be an xray tech.

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Saturday, 4 November 2006 01:48 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.