Speaking of Donald Rumsfeld...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
did y'all know that he and Dick Cheney, as part of the Ford administration, took part in the MKULTRA cover-up? I had no idea. But peep this:

SCIENTIST'S DEATH HAUNTS FAMILY
By Fredric N. Tulsky, copyright Aug 8, 2002
San Jose Mercury News

The death in 1953 of a government scientist, Frank Olson, in a fall from a New York hotel window, is one of the most notorious cases in CIA history.

Only in 1975 did Olson's family learn that the CIA had slipped LSD into his drink, days before his death. President Ford apologized for an experiment gone awry, and promised that the government would reveal everything about the case.

But newly obtained documents show that the Ford administration continued to conceal information about Olson -- particularly, his role in some of the CIA's most controversial research of the Cold War, on anthrax and other biological weapons.

The documents show that two of the key officials involved in the decision to withhold that information were White House aides Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, today the nation's vice president and secretary of Defense.

``These documents show the lengths to which the government was trying to cover up the truth,'' said the scientist's son, Eric Olson, who gave them to the Mercury News. ``For 22 years there was a coverup. And then, under the guise of revealing everything, there was a new coverup.''

Rumsfeld's office referred questions about the withholding of information to the CIA, where a media officer, Paul Nowack, said that CIA activities related to Frank Olson's death were investigated by the Rockefeller Commission as well as subsequent congressional committees.

``The CIA fully cooperated'' in those investigations, he said, and ``tens of thousands of documents were released.'' If anyone has new information, he said, ``they should contact appropriate authorities.''

Eric Olson has contended for years that his father was murdered to cover up his research for the CIA. At a news conference in Maryland today, he will reveal the results of his long inquiry into his father's death.

The new documents do not prove those allegations. But they do show that the White House officials were concerned about any public revelation of Eric Olson's work.

Contrary to the official explanation that Frank Olson was an Army scientist, Olson worked for the CIA, at the special operations division at Fort Detrick, the Maryland laboratory where biological weapons were tested.

Classified research

Eric Olson said this week that a former colleague and friend of his father's contacted him last year and described some of the closely guarded work his father conducted.

He said the colleague told him his father was among scientists studying the use of LSD and other drugs to enhance interrogations, as Cold War tensions ran high and Americans feared that captured soldiers had been brainwashed in Korea.

In the months before his death, the colleague said, Frank Olson had gone to Europe, where he observed the interrogation of former Nazis and Soviet citizens at a secret U.S. base. And, the colleague said, Frank Olson had knowledge of the U.S. biological weapons program.

Eric Olson contends that in the final days of his life, his father became morally distraught over his work and decided to quit. Personnel records show that agency officials were concerned that he was a security risk. Eric Olson believes the thought of Frank Olson quitting was a motive for the government to want him dead.

In 1993, Eric Olson arranged for his father's body to be unearthed and examined by a forensic scientist, James Starrs. Starrs concluded that Frank Olson had probably been struck on the head and then thrown out of the hotel window.

Starrs' conclusion is one of the tantalizing pieces that Eric Olson has gathered to support his belief that his father was murdered.

Friday, satisfied that he has accomplished what he could, Olson intends to rebury the remains of his father.

In late November 1953, Frank Olson, then 43, joined a group of government officials at a conference at Deep Creek Lodge in western Maryland. For days afterward, Olson was withdrawn. His son, Eric, says his father told his wife that he intended to quit his job.

But Frank Olson did not quit. And on Nov. 23 he went to New York with another government official, where he twice visited Harold A. Abramson, a doctor who was one of the first researchers to study the effects of LSD.

Olson returned to Washington, then went back to New York on Nov. 28 and checked into the Statler Hotel. He was scheduled to enter a sanitarium the next day.

But early in the morning of Nov. 29, Frank Olson went through the window of the hotel room he was sharing with a colleague, Robert Lashbrook. Lashbrook told police that he was awakened by the sound of breaking glass.

The Olson family knew little else. But in 1975, a commission headed by Vice President Nelson Rockefeller issued a report on CIA abuses, and an account in the Washington Post included a mention of an Army scientist who jumped from a New York hotel room days after being slipped LSD in 1953.

``We realized they were talking about my father,'' Eric Olson recalled. Family members talked to reporters about their outrage and said they would sue the government. Days later, the family was invited to the White House to meet President Ford. He assured them that they would be given all information about what happened to Frank Olson.

Soon after, the family was invited to lunch with CIA Director William Colby, who gave them a file of documents that amounted to the CIA investigation into Olson's death. But the documents left many questions unanswered about both his work and the circumstances of his death.

The family was told that a lawsuit was unlikely to succeed. Instead, the administration promised to support a private bill in Congress, through which the family received $750,000 to resolve their claims.

``The express understanding was that the government had promised to give us all information, which clearly meant information about his work relationship with the CIA,'' the Olsons' attorney, David Rudovsky of Philadelphia, said this week. ``It now appears that was not the case.''

Son finds clues

Over the years Eric Olson turned up many clues, real or coincidental. There was, for example, the assassination manual that the CIA declassified in connection with its Guatemala activities. The manual, created in the early 1950s, identified ``the contrived accident'' as ``the most effective technique'' of secret assassination.

``The most efficient accident, in simple assassination, is a fall of 75 feet or more onto a hard surface,'' the manual stated.

Only recently Eric Olson obtained files from a University of California-Davis history professor that showed White House officials had intentionally withheld details of Frank Olson's death from the family.

The professor, Kathryn Olmsted, came across the records at the Gerald Ford library. They included a memo from Dick Cheney, a White House assistant at the time, to Donald Rumsfeld, the chief of staff, on July 11, 1975, one day after the Olsons first held a news conference.

The memo warned that a lawsuit could involve ``the possibility that it might be necessary to disclose highly classified national-security information in connection with any court suit or legislative hearings on a private bill.''

The documents also include memos written by White House counsel Roderick Hills to the president that were routed through Cheney and other officials. ``Dr. Olson's job is so sensitive that it is highly unlikely that we would submit relevant evidence'' to a court, Hills wrote, regarding a potential suit by the Olson family.

``If there is a trial, it is apparent that the Olsons' lawyer will seek to explore all of the circumstances of Dr. Olson's employment as well as those concerning his death. Thus, in the trial it may become apparent that we are concealing evidence for national-security reasons and any settlement or judgment reached thereafter could be perceived as money paid to cover up the activities of the CIA.''

As a result, Hills urged settling the case out of court.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 9 November 2006 05:05 (nineteen years ago)

http://jj.am/gallery/d/10543-1/Eagle911.gif

am0n (am0n), Thursday, 9 November 2006 05:12 (nineteen years ago)

hahaha

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 9 November 2006 05:28 (nineteen years ago)

uh, the san jose mercury news ain't exactly loose change. these memos were found at the gerald ford library.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 9 November 2006 05:31 (nineteen years ago)

one of the most notorious cases in CIA history because the public found out, that is. You don't mean there are clues that the US is using and investigating psychoactive drugs, biological weapons, illegal interrogation methods, torture (albeit of the "I can't believe it's not torture!" type), secret prisons, public deception, assassination, extortion, terrorist methodology, shady scientists, secret aid to rogue nations, financial and other aid to nations that illegally have atomic weapons and use chemical weapons all the time (shalom!), child labor and other stuff I can't think of right now, do you? I'm shocked. Shocked, I tells ya.

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 9 November 2006 06:25 (nineteen years ago)

um, no, read the story (which has been around since 2002, but was not widely reported). at the same time that the ford admin said they'd be honest and truthful with the olsons about MKULTRA, they were determined to keep the olsons - and the public at large - in the dark.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 9 November 2006 06:33 (nineteen years ago)

which ain't exactly surprising, sure, but that's not exactly the point. also considering this relates directly back to CIA assassination manuals and extra-legal torture pre-dubya, it's kind of interesting and revealing.

but what the hell, the dems won, so let's just all be friends with the republicans now, right?

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 9 November 2006 06:35 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, the key point here is: over the last few years when it's become very hard to be proud of your government, it's increasingly revealing to learn that it's often the same fucking names doing the worst things -- there are actual, specific individuals whose names keep coming back pulling the most evil shit, then retreating, dragging everything down

makes me more relieved we've gotten at least one of them out of there

thanks for posting that, hstencil

milton parker (Jon L), Thursday, 9 November 2006 06:51 (nineteen years ago)

no sweat, dude.

ps. here's a pretty interesting ny times mag piece about it:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/01/magazine/01OLSON.html?ei=5070&en=35a64f805499a818&ex=1163134800&pagewanted=print

doesn't mention the rumsfeld/cheney connection, which had yet to be broken.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 9 November 2006 06:59 (nineteen years ago)

makes me more relieved we've gotten at least one of them out of there

Who's being naive now, Marge?


nickn (nickn), Thursday, 9 November 2006 07:50 (nineteen years ago)

great, bidness as usual.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 9 November 2006 15:36 (nineteen years ago)

it's often the same fucking names doing the worst things
see also: negroponte, john

blackmail (blackmail.is.my.life), Thursday, 9 November 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

That Ignatieff article is great, btw.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:21 (nineteen years ago)

I think there's been lots of that stuff around, though--hell, new guy's main biographical point was that he was tied up with Iran-Contra! A few years down the line, especially once the papers come out for this administration (and lord willing the next pres will override the ridiculous executive order that tries to keep Presidential papers out of the public eye), it'll be really interesting to construct timelines for all of these guys.

Someone serialized some of this in a comic for Salon a few years back, I remember.

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:24 (nineteen years ago)

say, how big a medal will rumsfeld get?

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:26 (nineteen years ago)

http://static.crooksandliars.com/2006/11/rummyfingerwave1.jpg

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 10 November 2006 05:46 (nineteen years ago)

speaking of rumsfeld, again.

man, world war II was the most just war.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 10 November 2006 20:32 (nineteen years ago)

there's a bunch abt this in the crazy rulers of the world - one of the most fascinating, absurd movies i've ever seen.

and there's the companion book by the same guy, which i've heard nothing but raves for, but haven't read.

jhoshea megafauna (scoopsnoodle), Friday, 10 November 2006 20:38 (nineteen years ago)

so does nobody even care about the germans wanting to prosecute rummy? or should i start a new thread?

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 10 November 2006 20:56 (nineteen years ago)

It seems like something's being filed with the top German prosecutor rather than the prosecutor himself saying it's on. Judge for yourself.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 November 2006 20:59 (nineteen years ago)

right that's what i posted!

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:04 (nineteen years ago)

so does nobody even care about the germans wanting to prosecute rummy?

no, it's just that i'm curious how they're gunna enforce this, or subpoena his ass over there.

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:20 (nineteen years ago)

In theory he can be extradited once he leaves office but a US judge has to be convinced that there is a case to answer (once a german prosecuter has been so convinced and has made that request). Certainly it would stop him from travelling to any country with an extradition treaty with Germany or to any Schengen country if a German prosecutor was to lay charges.

Ed (dali), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)

Certainly it would stop him from travelling to any country with an extradition treaty with Germany or to any Schengen country if a German prosecutor was to lay charges.

Paraguay or Argentina? LOL NAZIS.

Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Friday, 10 November 2006 21:50 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

does the president know what a fucking asshole donald rumsfeld is?

m coleman, Sunday, 17 May 2009 13:52 (sixteen years ago)

Frank Rich mentioned this shit in today's column. Damn.

Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 17 May 2009 14:08 (sixteen years ago)

That is amazing, what a Moran. Rumsfeld's pow-wow's with his colleagues read like a bad episode of The Office:

“what rumsfeld was most effective in doing,” says a former senior White House official, “was not so much undermining a decision that had yet to be made as finding every way possible to delay the implementation of a decision that had been made and that he didn’t like.” At meetings, he’d throw up every obstacle he could. “Rumsfeld would say, ‘Golly, we haven’t had time to read all of these documents! I mean, this is radical change!’ ” the official adds. “And then, if you suggested that maybe he should’ve read all the documents when everyone first got them a week ago, he’d say: ‘Well! I’ve been all over the world since then! What have you been doing?’ ”

Gerard (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 17 May 2009 14:18 (sixteen years ago)

this just in (from newsweek)

Ever wonder about that secure, undisclosed location where Dick Cheney secreted himself after the 9/11 attacks? Joe Biden reveals the bunker-like room is at the Naval Observatory in Washington, where Cheney lived for eight years and which is now home to Biden. The veep related the story to his head-table dinner mates when he filled in for President Obama at the Gridiron Club earlier this year. He said the young naval officer giving him a tour of the residence showed him the hideaway, which is behind a massive steel door secured by an elaborate lock with a narrow connecting hallway lined with shelves filled with communications equipment. The officer explained that when Cheney was in lock down, this was where his most trusted aides were stationed, an image that Biden conveyed in a way that suggested we shouldn’t be surprised that the policies that emerged were off the wall. Cheney has emerged as the leading critic of the Obama administration on national security, saying the president’s policies are making America less safe, and if there’s another attack, it will be Obama’s fault. This is tough stuff, but as the architect of the Bush administration’s policies on war and torture, he has a much bigger legacy to protect than the president he helped steer onto the shoals.

m coleman, Sunday, 17 May 2009 17:33 (sixteen years ago)

i thought it was a "safehouse" on the pennsylvania/maryland border?

m coleman, Sunday, 17 May 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

dick needs to go on a hunting trip -- permanently

m coleman, Sunday, 17 May 2009 17:35 (sixteen years ago)

afaik he had an "undisclosed location" out near hagerstown maryland, probably a few more elsewhere

rumsfeld's behavior in meetings is so classic.

cnn and the holograms (daria-g), Sunday, 17 May 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)

Cheney vs. Rumsfeld fite will always have Cheney winning in terms of pure evil. Too bad. Rumsfeld would be an MEP in most past administrations (obv Nixon excluded), but not with Cheney in the veep chair.

Aimless, Sunday, 17 May 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.notinkansas.us/Images/rumsfeld-hussein.jpg

Closin' the deal.

Eazy, Monday, 18 May 2009 05:47 (sixteen years ago)

GQ article being quoted everywhere, plus those slides with the biblical quotes. Wow. I hope the Katrina dustup section doesn't get interpreted as a way to let Bush off the hook.

curmudgeon, Monday, 18 May 2009 18:08 (sixteen years ago)

two years pass...

Warms my heart:

http://media.thenewstribune.com/smedia/2011/08/28/00/29/AoL52.St.5.jpg

(Read the story for full context.)

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 17:17 (fourteen years ago)

On-field participant at 9/11 pregame tribute at Yankee Stadium today, escorting veterans onto the field. I'm guessing there were no boos.

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 19:47 (fourteen years ago)

doesn't look too bad for someone who died 211 years ago

diouf est le papa du foot galsen merde lè haters (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 19:48 (fourteen years ago)

i really don't understand america. how was rummy not torn to shreds?

Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 20:11 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.