― indian rope trick (bean), Monday, 15 January 2007 21:19 (nineteen years ago)
Oh, and wait. Let's take the two messed-up fifth-graders and make 'em both near 14, charismatic, good-looking, and well-dressed. We wouldn't want to alienate our audience! We wouldn't want to show real troubled kids, but we can leave in the references to their social difficulties. That'll make sense! We can do some pat moralizing at the end about being happy being yourself, even.
Next, we could throw in some glittery golden titles full of vague sentence fragments 'Somewhere beyond the road... ' and 'Somewhere across the stream...' while leaving the gist of the story -- the bulk of Katherine Paterson's novel -- totally out of the picture. Who cares about love and death, when we've got an expensive walking tree? Why should we advertise any actual story points? Surely the heart of this Newbury Award novel (millions of copies sold!) is the oblique referencing of an imaginary kingdom, not the explicit story of a boy coming to grips with his greatest personal tragedy! And - and - and let's get a director/producer of animated films like The Wacky Adventures of Ronald McDonald: The Visitors from Space to helm this flick. That'll show 'em.
quicktime here
― indian rope trick (bean), Monday, 15 January 2007 21:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 January 2007 21:22 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 15 January 2007 21:23 (nineteen years ago)
― indian rope trick (bean), Monday, 15 January 2007 21:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 15 January 2007 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 15 January 2007 22:11 (nineteen years ago)
― baron kickass von awesomehausen (nickalicious), Monday, 15 January 2007 22:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Pork Cheops (willpie), Monday, 15 January 2007 22:58 (nineteen years ago)
I think I'm going to read the book tonight.
― jellybean (jellybean), Monday, 15 January 2007 23:14 (nineteen years ago)
― latebloomer aka freedom williams sr (latebloomer), Monday, 15 January 2007 23:15 (nineteen years ago)
― latebloomer aka freedom williams sr (latebloomer), Monday, 15 January 2007 23:21 (nineteen years ago)
― latebloomer aka freedom williams sr (latebloomer), Monday, 15 January 2007 23:22 (nineteen years ago)
― jambalaya backgammon (grady), Monday, 15 January 2007 23:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Latham Green (mike), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 13:30 (eighteen years ago)
― latebloomer aka freedom williams sr (latebloomer), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 19:58 (eighteen years ago)
― latebloomer aka freedom williams sr (latebloomer), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)
― indian rope trick (bean), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:11 (eighteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)
now that i bring up HC, there does seem to be a funny circularity to all this, what with Peter Jackson being kind of responsible for the ubiquity of CGI these days (maybe)
― geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)
― latebloomer aka freedom williams sr (latebloomer), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)
It'll take a whooooole lot of convincing to get me anywhere near this movie. Of course, I said the same thing about "The Lord of the Rings," but still.
― Hey Jude (Hey Jude), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 01:16 (eighteen years ago)
Q. In what ways has your religious conviction informed your writing? And would you comment on the presence (or lack ) of religious content, specifically Christian, in recent children's literature (say the last fifteen years or so)?
A. I think it was Lewis who said something like: "The book cannot be what the writer is not." What you are will shape your book whether you want it to or not. I am Christian, so that conviction will pervade the book even when I make no conscious effort to teach or preach. Grace and hope will inform everything I write.
You're asking me to comment on fifteen years of 5000 or so books a year. Whew! We live in a Post-Christian society. Therefore, not many of those writers will be Christians or adherents of any of the traditional faiths. Self-consciously Christian (or Jewish or Muslim) writing will be sectarian and tend to propaganda and therefore have very little to say to persons outside that particular faith community. The challenge for those of us who care about our faith and about a hurting world is to tell stories which will carry the words of grace and hope in their bones and sinews and not wear them like fancy dress.
Q. I read that your son had an experience like Jess's in Bridge to Terabithia ... losing a close friend in a freak accident. How did your son respond to the book? Was there a therapeutic value in this for him?
A. David still, now with two little boys of his own, finds Bridge a very difficult book to read. It's too close to the bone. Any therapeutic value the book had was for me, facing not only Lisa's death but my own mortality call. I had cancer that year and was hearing the bell toll.
Q. Have you ever thought about another book for Jesse? Does he still live in your mind, growing older, continuing his art, etc.?
A. No. I feel strongly that Jesse has earned his privacy.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 01:33 (eighteen years ago)