During a floor speech on the topic moments ago, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said the White House has told her it was replacing from five to 10 Senate-confirmed U.S. attorneys with its own interim appointees.
We know of seven who have left during the last couple of months, many under unusual circumstances. Here is our list:
San Francisco - 1/16/07 - Kevin V. Ryan - unclear
Nevada - 1/15/07 - Daniel Bogden - pushed out
San Diego - 1/12/07 - Carole Lam - pushed out
New Mexico - 12/19/06 - David Igleslias - pushed out
Arizona - 12/19/06 - Paul K. Charlton - unclear
Seattle - 12/15/06 - John McKay - unclear; likely pushed out
Little Rock (Ark.) - 12/15/06 - Bud Cummins - pushed out
Feinstein said she also knew of seven, and listed those above. Curiously, she mentioned an eigthth -- from Texas. We haven't been able to identify that one.
Josh Marshall discusses this a bit:
Okay, so we already know that the White House has now taken the unprecedented step of firing at least four and likely seven US Attorneys in the middle of their terms of office -- at least some of whom are in the midst of corruption investigations of Bush administration officials and key Republican lawmakers. We also know that they're taking advantage of a handy provision of the USA Patriot Act that allows the White House to replace these fired USAs with appointees who don't need to be approved by the senate.
Given that these new USAs are being plopped into offices currently investigating Republicans and other administration officials and others into states with 2008 presidential candidates, there's certainly ample opportunity for mischief.
So we're looking into just how the White House is appointing.
Well, let's start with the estimable J. Timothy Griffin, US Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas since December 20th.
If you hadn't heard about Griffin's appointment, don't feel bad, the guy he replaced hadn't either. Griffin's appointment was annouced on December 15th before the then-US Attorney Bud Cummins had even been given a chance to resign. Cummins got the call on his cell phone the same day while he was out hiking with his son. Cummins, who subsequently said he got forced out for political reasons, resigned on the 20th, the same day Griffin was sworn in.
So who's Griffin and what experience does he bring to the job?
Well, top of the list seems to be his stint at the White House where he worked for Karl Rove doing opposition research on Democrats. That was until late last year. According to this Arkansas Times report, for the last ten years -- with the exception of two one year stint -- he has always worked as a Republican party opposition researcher digging up dirt on Democrats. Deputy Research Director for the RNC from 1999-2000. Research Director for the RNC from 2002-2005. Oppo Research Director for Karl Rove 2005-2006. Prior to 1999? Well, he was associate independent counsel investigating Henry Cisneros from 1995-96. After that he went to work for Dan Burton on the Hill to investigate Asian money contributions to the DNC.
Back in 2000, when he was in charge of digging up dirt on Al Gore, he apparently had a poster hanging on the wall behind his desk which read: "On my command - unleash hell on Al."
So clearly, Griffin's a pretty apolitical guy.
Now, why would Karl Rove want his top oppo researcher being the US Attorney in Arkansas for the next two years?
And is Ed Gillespie suiting up to take over the Duke Cunningham investigation in San Diego?
Marshall's concluding hyperbole aside...interesting.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 19:43 (eighteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 19:46 (eighteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 19:56 (eighteen years ago)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)
Asked to respond to 10 written questions regarding his appointment, Griffin provided the following statement: “As a fifth-generation Arkansan and the spouse of an Arkansas native, I love Arkansas and its people. I am honored to have the opportunity to serve the people of Arkansas as U.S. attorney. The strength of this office lies with the many career professionals who work here. My top priority is to ensure that all Arkansans are treated equally under the law. I look forward to working with federal, state and local law enforcement to make Arkansas a safer place to live.”
― Fleischhutliebe! like a warm, furry meatloaf (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)
― baron kickass von awesomehausen (nickalicious), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)
― baron kickass von awesomehausen (nickalicious), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:31 (eighteen years ago)
Circling the wagons for the big grab'n'git...
― hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6349500,00.html
Gonzales bristled at the suggestion by Democratic senators that the Justice Department's request for the resignations of several U.S. attorneys was politically motivated or was intended to circumvent the Senate confirmation process.
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:53 (eighteen years ago)
Senate Judiciary Committee is having a hearing today and will be questioning Gonzales. Head of the committee is Patrick Leahy, who has co-sponsored the bill the close the loophole in the Patriot Act that allows US attorney appointments to bypass congressional approval. Should be interesting...
― Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 15:01 (eighteen years ago)
I'm wondering why none of the US attorneys who were "pushed out" have commented?
― Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
Senate Judiciary Grilling, er, Hearing is tomorrow at 9:30 AM...http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=2473
― Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 18 January 2007 07:05 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002356.php
― TOMB07 (TOMBOT), Thursday, 18 January 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)
People are so shellshocked from Bush's affronts that no one seems to be able to agree whether the DoJ's acquiescence on wiretapping oversight is a good thing or bad thing.
Anybody watch the Senate Judiciary Hearing this morning?
― Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 18 January 2007 16:26 (eighteen years ago)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 18 January 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Thursday, 18 January 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 18 January 2007 16:58 (eighteen years ago)
― Mike Dixn (Mike Dixon), Thursday, 18 January 2007 23:32 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.hatchmusic.com/songs.html
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 18 January 2007 23:48 (eighteen years ago)
― UART variations (ex machina), Friday, 19 January 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)
― Fleischhutliebe! like a warm, furry meatloaf (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Friday, 19 January 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) came to Gonzales's defense, noting that the prosecutors in question were hired by the current administration.
"I find it unusual that some of my colleagues are critical of replacing Bush appointees," Cornyn said.
Hmmmm, maybe because some of them dared to investigate Republican congressman? Story's still getting some coverage. Dems will probably close the loophole in the Patriot Act.
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 19 January 2007 20:29 (eighteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 19 January 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 19 January 2007 22:43 (eighteen years ago)
― Oilyrags, Friday, 20 April 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)
paulose out!!
― gff, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 18:13 (eighteen years ago)
i know nobody outside the twin cities and/or tpm readers will be into this but, whatev. good bye rachel paulose.
― gff, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
what a sleaze:
1. she's accused by subordinates of verbal abuse on the job ("lazy," "black," "pig" etc)
2. no statement of hers appears in any local media, or credible national media, but in an article for the national review, written by powerline's scott thomas, where she/he accuse the 'liberal left' of going after her because she's a woman of color and a federalist society member. it's just amazing: she answers officially lodged accusations of misconduct by giving an interview to a partisan magazine, full of accusations of political victimization by the democratic party.
3. an [unknown-at-this-point] number of lawyers in the MN US atty office threaten resignation over the NR article, DOJ pulls her back to washington, w/o explanation.
― gff, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)
Did somebody mention a BLOOD bath?
― Dr. Acula, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)
was that really worth setting up a fake login? nice work custos
― gff, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)
What's funny is that on PowerLine's own discussion board thread on Paulose, both Johnson and Paulose are getting roundly rubbished.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)
haha awes that's fucking rich
― gff, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 19:07 (eighteen years ago)