Litvinenko poisoning case solved, but...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.tass.ru/eng/level2.html?NewsID=11196820&PageNum=0

So, that's it then. Well done everyone.

(Is it me or is this story not even not front page news but even not present at all on most news sites anymore?)

StanM (StanM), Sunday, 28 January 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)

WHAT A SURPRISE

friday on the porch (lfam), Sunday, 28 January 2007 18:17 (eighteen years ago)

In existence since 1904, the ITAR-TASS News Agency is one of the world's largest international information agencies. The successor to the Soviet TASS news agency, it was re-named in 1992, when Russia proclaimed its sovereignty following the collapse of the USSR. It has retained its status of being the state central information agency.

We report. You decide.

Hunter (Hunter), Sunday, 28 January 2007 19:49 (eighteen years ago)

There's a huge article in the New Yorker this week. I can't link - sorry!
It's very interesting, and sad. And scary.

aimurchie (aimurchie), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)

This is the article: http://www.robertamsterdam.com/New%20Yorker_Specter_1-29-07.pdf

It's nothing you don't already know (probably), but there's something shocking all the same when someone joins all the dots for you.

Ismael Klata (Ismael Klata), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)

Thanks for the link - it's huge indeed, I'll read it asap.

StanM (StanM), Sunday, 28 January 2007 21:49 (eighteen years ago)

I can't get that tass link to work - very suspicious...

Edward Trifle (Ned Trifle IV), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)

thanks for the link to the article.

nice to know stalin's back in full effect. Fucking shit country.

TOMBO7 (TOMBOT), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)

Is our country so different:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortunate_Son_%28Hatfield%29

UART variations (ex machina), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)

Oh, those Russians. At least they have the decency to be totally brazen about it: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,542-2572888,00.html

Ismael Klata (Ismael Klata), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 14:16 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, that New Yorker article is crushingly depressing.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 04:01 (eighteen years ago)

one month passes...
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/US_expert_on_Russian_intelligence_s_03032007.html

gabbneb, Saturday, 3 March 2007 23:45 (eighteen years ago)

unbelievable

first ennis cosby, now this? who will the soviets murder next?

moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 4 March 2007 00:35 (eighteen years ago)

I'm horrified that the Russian government murders ex-pats, as opposed to every other government in the world that dishes out free candy.

Noodle Vague, Sunday, 4 March 2007 03:47 (eighteen years ago)

Meanwhile back in Russia, to the extent that most people know about this, they probably believe the version that Russian law enforcement is trying to push, ie., that Litvinenko was murdered on the orders of someone else among the anti-Putin emigre clique (probably Berezovsky).

To my mind, both theories sound both feasible and stupid enough that they could be true, which is quite sad.

mitya, Sunday, 4 March 2007 07:18 (eighteen years ago)

two months pass...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6678887.stm

good luck!

StanM, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 09:22 (eighteen years ago)

good luck!

http://www.vietnamwar.com/vietcongofficershootsman.jpg

lfam, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)

The UK did it!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6706921.stm

StanM, Thursday, 31 May 2007 09:04 (eighteen years ago)

one month passes...

Welcome back to the cold war...

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44002000/jpg/_44002813_lugovoi203in_afp.jpg

FYI, The Russian press has uniformly headlined the story today (ie., before Russia's response) as "UK demands Russia change its constitution"

The kind of annoying thing about this is that - although, yes, I understand the difference - it's a difficult rhetorical play for Britain to talk about international terror and then refuse to give up people that Russia label terrorists. And Russia has been so lousy as foreign politics until recently.

mitya, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)

"UK demands Russia change its constitution"

by hook or by allofmp3 crook

blueski, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)

berezovsky's hardly a terrorist! can you really arrest people living overseas who simply talk about revolution?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)

oh it is so on

blueski, Thursday, 19 July 2007 14:32 (eighteen years ago)

oh i see, you can just kill them instead

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 19 July 2007 14:39 (eighteen years ago)

go UK. I hope moscow blows up

El Tomboto, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:17 (eighteen years ago)

hey f-ck you!

mitya, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)

berezovsky's hardly a terrorist! can you really arrest people living overseas who simply talk about revolution?

while i wouldn't say i agree with this argument, the official line is and has long been that berezovsky funds terrorists. given that the us got out in front in 2001/2002 and essentially defined such people were essentially the same as terrorists, end of story. berezovsky's statements earlier this year were just icing on the cake. (plus berezovsky's contacts with whoever that chechen guy is are further proof that he is part of a terrorist grouping.

unfortunately i think the west defined the "rules of the game" such that it's quite difficult to call russia's bluff, even though most sane people see the differences quite clearly.

mitya, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)

It is time for the UK to show the fleet

brownie, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)

(also russia passed a law making it legal to kill people living overseas, or at least so i understand from the western press)

mitya, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)

hells yeah!

this could be brown's 'port stanley moment'.

xpost

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:43 (eighteen years ago)

Our brave boys, ready for action.

http://english.people.com.cn/200601/04/images/0103_C88.jpg

Ed, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

the fleet is about three tugboats "manned" by ipod listening eejits but, y'know, wvs

xpost

EXACTLY

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)

Look, it is simply unacceptable that a democratic government would kill someone because of their opinions. The UK would NEVER do something like that.

StanM, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)

ok maybe not all moscow just the kremlin. seriously they make our bunch of gangsters look like brilliant progressives lately

El Tomboto, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

Our brave boys returning from action:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2007/04/05/wiran05a.jpg

I wonder if Putin gives better presents than Amedinhejad?

Ed, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

Demand Neckties!

brownie, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)

this should turn out to be an interesting exercise for NATO

El Tomboto, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)

one month passes...

Lugovoi to run for Russian parliament:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/15f1a2c4-6468-11dc-90ea-0000779fd2ac.html

StanM, Sunday, 16 September 2007 18:24 (eighteen years ago)

...So he gets immunity from prosecutions and cant be extradited to the uk.

pfunkboy, Sunday, 16 September 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)

well, as if the duma hadn't already been castrated enough

elan, Sunday, 16 September 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)

i suppose this is the removal of the adam's apple?

elan, Sunday, 16 September 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)

seven years pass...

The 'why' is much more interesting than the 'who' but it's difficult to see the enquiry getting to the bottom of that. It seems fairly clear who the assassins were but there's not much chance of finding out who hired them.

One of the interesting things that might come out is evidence of the extent to which the security services or former security services have gone freelance. The idea that this could only have been pulled off by the state doesn't mean much when the resources of the state, or people with access to those resources, are available for private hire.

Rainbow DAESH (ShariVari), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:56 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.