So, that's it then. Well done everyone.
(Is it me or is this story not even not front page news but even not present at all on most news sites anymore?)
― StanM (StanM), Sunday, 28 January 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)
― friday on the porch (lfam), Sunday, 28 January 2007 18:17 (eighteen years ago)
We report. You decide.
― Hunter (Hunter), Sunday, 28 January 2007 19:49 (eighteen years ago)
― aimurchie (aimurchie), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)
It's nothing you don't already know (probably), but there's something shocking all the same when someone joins all the dots for you.
― Ismael Klata (Ismael Klata), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Sunday, 28 January 2007 21:49 (eighteen years ago)
― Edward Trifle (Ned Trifle IV), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)
nice to know stalin's back in full effect. Fucking shit country.
― TOMBO7 (TOMBOT), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortunate_Son_%28Hatfield%29
― UART variations (ex machina), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)
― Ismael Klata (Ismael Klata), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 14:16 (eighteen years ago)
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 04:01 (eighteen years ago)
― gabbneb, Saturday, 3 March 2007 23:45 (eighteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 4 March 2007 00:35 (eighteen years ago)
― Noodle Vague, Sunday, 4 March 2007 03:47 (eighteen years ago)
― mitya, Sunday, 4 March 2007 07:18 (eighteen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6678887.stm
good luck!
― StanM, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 09:22 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.vietnamwar.com/vietcongofficershootsman.jpg
― lfam, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
The UK did it!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6706921.stm
― StanM, Thursday, 31 May 2007 09:04 (eighteen years ago)
Welcome back to the cold war...
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44002000/jpg/_44002813_lugovoi203in_afp.jpg
FYI, The Russian press has uniformly headlined the story today (ie., before Russia's response) as "UK demands Russia change its constitution"
The kind of annoying thing about this is that - although, yes, I understand the difference - it's a difficult rhetorical play for Britain to talk about international terror and then refuse to give up people that Russia label terrorists. And Russia has been so lousy as foreign politics until recently.
― mitya, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)
"UK demands Russia change its constitution"
by hook or by allofmp3 crook
― blueski, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)
berezovsky's hardly a terrorist! can you really arrest people living overseas who simply talk about revolution?
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)
oh it is so on
― blueski, Thursday, 19 July 2007 14:32 (eighteen years ago)
oh i see, you can just kill them instead
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 19 July 2007 14:39 (eighteen years ago)
go UK. I hope moscow blows up
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:17 (eighteen years ago)
hey f-ck you!
― mitya, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)
while i wouldn't say i agree with this argument, the official line is and has long been that berezovsky funds terrorists. given that the us got out in front in 2001/2002 and essentially defined such people were essentially the same as terrorists, end of story. berezovsky's statements earlier this year were just icing on the cake. (plus berezovsky's contacts with whoever that chechen guy is are further proof that he is part of a terrorist grouping.
unfortunately i think the west defined the "rules of the game" such that it's quite difficult to call russia's bluff, even though most sane people see the differences quite clearly.
― mitya, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)
It is time for the UK to show the fleet
― brownie, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)
(also russia passed a law making it legal to kill people living overseas, or at least so i understand from the western press)
― mitya, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)
hells yeah!
this could be brown's 'port stanley moment'.
xpost
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:43 (eighteen years ago)
Our brave boys, ready for action.
http://english.people.com.cn/200601/04/images/0103_C88.jpg
― Ed, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)
the fleet is about three tugboats "manned" by ipod listening eejits but, y'know, wvs
EXACTLY
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)
Look, it is simply unacceptable that a democratic government would kill someone because of their opinions. The UK would NEVER do something like that.
― StanM, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)
ok maybe not all moscow just the kremlin. seriously they make our bunch of gangsters look like brilliant progressives lately
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)
Our brave boys returning from action:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2007/04/05/wiran05a.jpg
I wonder if Putin gives better presents than Amedinhejad?
― Ed, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)
Demand Neckties!
― brownie, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)
this should turn out to be an interesting exercise for NATO
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)
Lugovoi to run for Russian parliament:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/15f1a2c4-6468-11dc-90ea-0000779fd2ac.html
― StanM, Sunday, 16 September 2007 18:24 (eighteen years ago)
...So he gets immunity from prosecutions and cant be extradited to the uk.
― pfunkboy, Sunday, 16 September 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)
well, as if the duma hadn't already been castrated enough
― elan, Sunday, 16 September 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)
i suppose this is the removal of the adam's apple?
Anyone else following the inquiry? Some links:http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/30/alexander-litvinenko-six-things-russia-inquiryhttp://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/28/litvinenko-postmortem-dangerous-inquiry-death
― Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 13:04 (ten years ago)
The 'why' is much more interesting than the 'who' but it's difficult to see the enquiry getting to the bottom of that. It seems fairly clear who the assassins were but there's not much chance of finding out who hired them.
One of the interesting things that might come out is evidence of the extent to which the security services or former security services have gone freelance. The idea that this could only have been pulled off by the state doesn't mean much when the resources of the state, or people with access to those resources, are available for private hire.
― Rainbow DAESH (ShariVari), Tuesday, 3 February 2015 15:56 (ten years ago)