WHEN WILL PEOPLE LEARN THAT "ihttp" DOES NOT WORK?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

really

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 02:58 (nineteen years ago)

I'm going to go out on a limb and say "never".

― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:05 (nineteen years ago)

http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/breskibabe/Bars/whoknows.jpg

― svend (svend), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:05 (nineteen years ago)

can the html parser like give people a tubgirl for trying to use ihttp?

― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:08 (nineteen years ago)

Aint touchin that rat's nest.

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:11 (nineteen years ago)

who was the guy that said it works fine for him, must be a mac problem

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:11 (nineteen years ago)

It just did work though.

― svend (svend), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:14 (nineteen years ago)

liar

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:16 (nineteen years ago)

ihttp://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j196/joocali/whoknows.jpg

― svend (svend), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:17 (nineteen years ago)

Hrm. Well I did ihttp for the first one too.

― svend (svend), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:18 (nineteen years ago)

you just got sonned in an ihttp beef

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:19 (nineteen years ago)

http://membres.lycos.fr/jackvance/vie/JEEVES.jpg

― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:39 (nineteen years ago)

Works for me and my man Jeeves.

― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:39 (nineteen years ago)

now try and ihttp the black man

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:40 (nineteen years ago)

ihttp://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j196/joocali/whoknows.jpg

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:41 (nineteen years ago)

http://membres.lycos.fr/jackvance/vie/JEEVES.jpg

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:41 (nineteen years ago)

hmm. I wonder if it's --no, no, not goin to look at that code.

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:42 (nineteen years ago)

how hard is it to learn html tags? and it's fun; you're writing in "code", ooh

back in my day all we had were html tags, we made do with and some quotation marks, and yeah, our fingers hurt from the extra typing strain, but we accepted it, it made us stronger, better, we had an edge. there was also this thing called "view -> (page) source" - and in it were all the answers to our questions.

― rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 05:45 (nineteen years ago)

Ha you're old.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 05:47 (nineteen years ago)

i am 24 what are you talking about

― rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 05:52 (nineteen years ago)

Wait, I'm older than rrrrRobyn? I'm old!

― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 05:53 (nineteen years ago)

haha
i am actually 42

― rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 05:55 (nineteen years ago)

minus 10

― rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 05:55 (nineteen years ago)

i mean

― rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 05:57 (nineteen years ago)

plus img src + a href =

― rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 06:07 (nineteen years ago)

rel=treat

― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 06:13 (nineteen years ago)

But hang on, I used ihttp yester . . . oh, now I see what you're doing . . .

― Johnney B English (stigoftdump), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 08:55 (nineteen years ago)

quick question...why was that parsing code removed?

― Lukewarm Watery G. Tornado Is Sicker Than You (The GZeus), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 09:14 (nineteen years ago)

i don't understand this thread.

― is anyone anticipating the new Baaderonixx? (baaderonixx), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 09:16 (nineteen years ago)

http://nonsense.hellfish.org/kuvat/mscc/tissit.png

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 09:27 (nineteen years ago)

I tried ihttp, and it worked for that pic. Hasn't it always been so that ihttp doesn't work for pics above a certain size, so you have to use img src for them?

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 09:29 (nineteen years ago)

it seems to only work with pictures of dudes with moustaches or goatees.

― chaki (chaki), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:15 (nineteen years ago)

http://biodidac.bio.uottawa.ca/ftp/BIODIDAC/Renaud/RENA001P.jpg

― is anyone anticipating the new Baaderonixx? (baaderonixx), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:26 (nineteen years ago)

lol poor cutty

― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:28 (nineteen years ago)

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/baseball/mlb/features/1997/swinginas/1972/images/fingers2.jpg its a size thing btw

― chaki (chaki), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:46 (nineteen years ago)

http://deanoman.com/t238.JPG

Deffo.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:48 (nineteen years ago)

SO GLAD someone finally started this thread.

― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:48 (nineteen years ago)

It's not a size thing. I had problems even with small pictures (see halfway down this thread: Snowballs have flown their arcs).

― Sir Tehrance HoBB (the pirate king), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:52 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe it's a density thing?

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:59 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah people are too dense to use img src.

― onimo (onimo), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:26 (nineteen years ago)

B-but-but it takes a lot longer to type!

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:34 (nineteen years ago)

It might help if it didn't say "ihttp works" in the FAQ.

― 31g (31g), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:41 (nineteen years ago)

It does work though

― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:42 (nineteen years ago)

you are a gambling man

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 12:07 (nineteen years ago)

It's never not worked for me

― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 12:08 (nineteen years ago)

I did not know ihttp works. But I have my image tags turned off so all imgs show up as links.

(and I do know html quite well but as someone who's doing it all day the i shortcut here is nice.)

― Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 13:56 (nineteen years ago)

It seems to depend of the hosting site.

― Lukewarm Watery G. Tornado Is Sicker Than You (The GZeus), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 14:01 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.mullsports.com/images/250px-Locknchase.png

― Ste (Fuzzy), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.mullsports.com/images/rtype.gif

― Ste (Fuzzy), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 14:29 (nineteen years ago)

booya!

― Ste (Fuzzy), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 14:29 (nineteen years ago)

timeout

― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

What is that horrible thing up there that looks like two big toes that have grown mouths and sharp little teeth? Because I think I am going to have terrible nightmares forever and I'd like to know exactly what caused it, so I can tell my therapist.

Also, if you use firefox, this plug-in will solve all your HTML needs for you: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/491/

― jennyjennyjenny (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

it depends entirely on size of image, image host, etc etc etc as to whether or not ihttp will work. SO JUST DO THE SAFE THING AND USE IMG SRC, LET'S BE COOL

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 14:55 (nineteen years ago)

jenny OTM, Firefox users are dumm if they don't use BBCodeXtra or Xinha or something like that.

― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 14:58 (nineteen years ago)

but why do you need to do html editing IN firefox?

I use the web developer toolbar which does plenty.

― Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:02 (nineteen years ago)

lol at "bbcode"

― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:07 (nineteen years ago)

usually when you're posting an image, it's a punchline, it's time-sensitive, it's usually half-relevant--

do you really want to take the chance that your image will not post?

that's why we have created IMG SRC, a failsafe method of posting pics, free of charge, right here on ILX.

enjoy!

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:07 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.montesangiorgio.ch/images/otm.jpg

― onimo (onimo), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:08 (nineteen years ago)

There's probably something in the context that causes ihttp to work or not work. E.g., too much or too little whitespace, other text on the same line, odd characters in the URL, etc.. Someone should post the source of a working ihttp at RAFB for comparison .

― A knife to his wife Eve and his credibility. (goodbra), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:37 (nineteen years ago)

The only good thing about ihttp was that it would set the image size in the html, but i don't think that happens

― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:56 (nineteen years ago)

Also, BBCode is the worst thing ever.

― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:57 (nineteen years ago)

fuck an 'img src'

― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:00 (nineteen years ago)

i don't have 'images on' anyway so it's not a big deal if it fucks up (not that it ever does for me at least)

― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:01 (nineteen years ago)

why doesn't it work? It used to work. maybe it will work again one day.

― idirtyvicar.jpg (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:07 (nineteen years ago)

it only works if you have a soul.

― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:10 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.droodles.com/images/drodl213.gif http://www.droodles.com/images/drodl213.gif

― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

hmm

― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:14 (nineteen years ago)

i don't have 'images on' anyway so it's not a big deal if it fucks up (not that it ever does for me at least)

then who cares what you think

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:14 (nineteen years ago)

I also don't have images on so I don't care if my links work for you, the masses, or not!

― Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:15 (nineteen years ago)

who cares who cares

― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:16 (nineteen years ago)

everyone chime in with a righteous "i don't have images on"

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:18 (nineteen years ago)

using Ilx any other way is madness, really.

― Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:19 (nineteen years ago)

no soul dude

― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:20 (nineteen years ago)

http://img68.photobucket.com/albums/v208/PlainsILX/blueski_loves_clicking_on_links.jpg

― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:25 (nineteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.