Can anything stop Cameron becoming the next PM?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Labour are 7% down in the polls, the longer Blair stays the more damage he does (and I have a feeling he really doesn't care - perhaps thinking that toryboy will be better placed to carry on his Great Work than Brown), the Lib-Dems are going nowhere and Cameron has the press in his pocket, a winning smile and a no beard. Can anything stop him?

Edward Trifle (Ned Trifle IV), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:20 (eighteen years ago)

he might have to start making policy announcements at some point.

Ed (dali), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:24 (eighteen years ago)

Thing is, the way the British electoral system works, it would still take a very hefty swing for the Tories to win. Labour will win the next election but with a hugely reduced majority, followed by a succession of bi-election defeats and a Tory win in 2012 or 2013. Unless the Olympics are the best thing ever or England win a World Cup in that time.

Essentially what I'm saying is that Labour under Blair are in a comparable position now to the Tories under Thatcher in 1990ish. They still managed to win the next election, partly through "let's give this new guy a chance" and partly through just not trusting Kinnock as a potential Prime Minister. I get the feeling Cameron is still perceived of as 'nice but lightweight', which doesn't win elections.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:27 (eighteen years ago)

The Tories who think Tebbit is the second coming (and there are still many of them out there, doing all the donkey work during elections) do not look lightly on giving equal rights to sodomites or consorting with tree-hugging hippies.

So they'll all go and vote Ukip (or BNP), making it much harder for the Tories to win in the marginals.

The sooner people realise Cameron is a lying, two-faced sweet-talking scumbag (not unlike most politicians, I'll grant you) the better.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:31 (eighteen years ago)

Do people care about policies anymore, now that idealogically both main parties are subscribing to a mixed economy with less state intervention and nods to green issues? I thought it was now more about who's a safe pair of hands, trustworthy, tough on crime/terror/insert folk devil.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:35 (eighteen years ago)

Mind you, the lunatic fringe heading off to vote for deluded extremists will hit the Left as well - George Galloway being the new Ralph Nader.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:37 (eighteen years ago)

xpot

I think they'll vote Conservative - isn't that what Cameron's betting on? No matter how 'left' he goes the old school tories desperately want to be back in power where they truly believe they belong so they'll vote for him in the (probably) correct belief that he'll be more right wing when he gets into power.

Edward Trifle (Ned Trifle IV), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:38 (eighteen years ago)

i think matt might be right, but things are going downhill very fast for labour. although the tories have had a bad decade nationally, locally they have not, and i don't think they've been as beaten down as labour were in the '80s. no-one really cares about cash-for-honours, but if you add it to the bankrupt nhs and the state of the home office, labour sneaking through is not a forgone conclusion.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:39 (eighteen years ago)

a friend of my girlfriend said something like or that added up to "the conservatives will definitely win the next election", in 2004

RJG (RJG), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:43 (eighteen years ago)

mark s pointed out not so long ago that, in contrast to an egalitarian drift which some ppl might expect, a far greater proportion of our leading politicans in recent years have been public school types (cf Wilson, Thatcher, Major who were all grammar school kids, Major even trying to make a virtue out of his humble background and lack of paper qualifications iirc). Cameron reminds me of Oliver Letwyn - it doesn't matter how much they try to be 'down with the kids' and populist, ppl can see that they are old Etonians faking it and when that is coupled with the fact that ppl still don't trust the Tories and with good reason, Matt DC's prediction of a shallow Lab victory in the next General Election or two seems quite likely. Mind you, I think a hung parliament is almost as likely as a result of the fragmentation of the vote as dissatisfied Tories cross over to UKIP (and Veritas if that still exists)and possibly even, tho I shudder to think about it, the BNP.

New Mark H (New MarkH), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:43 (eighteen years ago)

question is, how will it all affect turn out? Has the tendency of people to abstain from the vote under the "they're all as bad as each other" principle increased in recent years? I am afraid I haven't been paying sufficient attention to this apsect of the political landscape in recent years as a result of my attention (like so many others' I guess) being deflected towards Iraq and the so-called "war on terror".

New Mark H (New MarkH), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:46 (eighteen years ago)

How many people who abstain don't vote for a reason, and how many just can't be arsed?

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:52 (eighteen years ago)

I've never been convinced by the can't be arsed argument. It takes so little time and its easier than its ever been.

New Mark H (New MarkH), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:53 (eighteen years ago)

Indeed. Which makes the can't be arsed argument so pathetic. Even so, it's still used by a great many people I know, despite me practically throttling them as I point out that people DIED so that they could decide who gets to run the country.

"yeah, but it doesn't make any difference who I vote for, does it?" comes the tedious reply.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:56 (eighteen years ago)

i can't take the ukip threat seriously. i am sure the non-urban tory vote will come through for their guy in the end, if the campaign is done right.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:57 (eighteen years ago)

I think a hung parliament is almost as likely as a result of the fragmentation of the vote as dissatisfied Tories cross over to UKIP (and Veritas if that still exists)and possibly even, tho I shudder to think about it, the BNP.

I don't think there's not enough of them for that to be significant. More significant are those New Labour voters who are basically Tories, and there's rather a lot of them. See also, the Liberal vote collapsing and going to the Tories.

Tom D. (Dada), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:00 (eighteen years ago)

"yeah, but it doesn't make any difference who I vote for, does it?" comes the tedious reply.

But that's the real reason they're not voting, because they don't perceive that they're vote will make any difference, not because they're bone idle. I doubt there's many people out there thinking "God I desperately want Labour / The Tories / AN Other to win this election, but I just can't be fucked to walk a hundred yards and put a cross on a piece of paper, oh woe is me!"

Sir Tehrance HoBB (the pirate king), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:00 (eighteen years ago)

xpost
yeah, but it doesn't make any difference who I vote for, does it?" comes the tedious reply

Tedious it may be but for a lot of people, that's absolutely correct.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:01 (eighteen years ago)

i can't take the ukip threat seriously

They won't do anything come a General Election

Tom D. (Dada), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:01 (eighteen years ago)

i'm not going to vote. it is a bit tedious, but voting labour is taking the 'lesser of two evils' thing to the point of absurdity.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:03 (eighteen years ago)

"yeah, but it doesn't make any difference who I vote for, does it?" comes the tedious reply.

You try finding a left wing party to vote for, for a start

Tom D. (Dada), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:05 (eighteen years ago)

Neither will the bee en pee - a couple of councillors does not a f@scist swing make.

Is it really a two horse race in ur constituency? I mean, round here pretty close.

Johnney B English (stigoftdump), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:05 (eighteen years ago)

i might be moving to london's fashionable east end, putting me in galloway country. lolz.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:06 (eighteen years ago)

xposts

Agreed, I'll do something, but I don't think I'd be able to bring myself to vote Labour. Lib Dem counts as a protest vote around here anyway so maybe them, it's as valid as a spoiled ballot and it'll make their candidate feel a whole vote better.

Matt (Matt), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:07 (eighteen years ago)

Lumping Nader in with Galloway is a vile slur on Nader!

I vote Lib Dem and have considered jopining the party in the past. One reason is that i am very pro-European and they seem to be the only party who really share my stance. I am pro-EU *to a point* but feel that the only real chance to reform it is to be as involved in it as possible.

in the absence of a fair electoral system of my own invention (which I plan to write a book, or at the very least start a website to promote) I consider voting Lib Dem to be the least of multiple evils.

New Mark H (New MarkH), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:08 (eighteen years ago)

Crumbs. Jeremy Corbyn is my MP, so at least I can vote for him with a clear conscience.

Tom D. (Dada), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:10 (eighteen years ago)

i think the 'dissatisfied labour voters voting lib dem' train has well and truly sailed now. they were able to coast on the anti-war ticket but other than that -- and the EU thing which i don't get -- no-one includign them knows what they're about.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:10 (eighteen years ago)

Daerest England, please to get a proper electoral system by the time that I get to cast my first vote, thanks.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:10 (eighteen years ago)

The other key factor here is a whole new generation of voters who are too young to really remember living under a Tory government and with a vivid memory of everything Labour has fucked up.

We could end up with a situation where things swing back and forth between Labour and the Tories every four years for a while, because I really can't see Cameron winning by a 1997-style landslide. But I agree with Tom that the LibDems will be the big losers here.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:11 (eighteen years ago)

"Tedious it may be but for a lot of people, that's absolutely correct."

NO IT'S NOT! If it's a lot of people and they ALL vote for someone, that person gets in.Sixty thousand people sitting at home saying "ho hum, I really like that independent candidate, but there's no point voting for him because he won't get in unless 59,999 other people vote for him" = wrong wrong wrong on so many levels.

"Lumping Nader in with Galloway is a vile slur on Nader!"
I meant more in the 'splitting the leftie vote to allow the right in' sense of things.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:13 (eighteen years ago)

I was at the country fair in the late summer and the tories naturally had a stand there (with UKIP next to them and the countryside alliance on the opposite side of the path) and they were all what you might call archetypal Old Tory, all given out leaflets with DC's grinning face on and supporting their local gay tory MP (Alan Duncan - still the only one actually out I think). They may not have liked it but they like it more than not being in power.

If it's a hung parliament I wouldn't bet on the LD's siding with Labour. Locally they've tended to go wherever they can.

Edward Trifle (Ned Trifle IV), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:14 (eighteen years ago)

I think Cameron wil win, and I don't think we will see another Labour government for 10-20 years, I say we but I think the Union will be finished and Scotland will be independent within the next 10-20 years (maybe sooner)

Tom D. (Dada), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:14 (eighteen years ago)

The Lib-Dems may be in the middle and fairly opportunistic, but the membershio (and most of the MPs) are lefties at heart. So it could end up being an interesting "principles V power" debate.

Who gets to snap up Plaid Cymru?

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:16 (eighteen years ago)

They're not lefties

Tom D. (Dada), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:17 (eighteen years ago)

I don't know that Cameron has really come under enough scrutiny as yet, should an election campaign get into full gear a great deal will be made of his monumental inconsistency. Bear in mind that he's widely disliked amongst his own party membership.

Matt (Matt), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:17 (eighteen years ago)

the lib dems are not lefties at heart! a bunch of them are free-market ultras.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:18 (eighteen years ago)

NO IT'S NOT! If it's a lot of people and they ALL vote for someone, that person gets in.Sixty thousand people sitting at home saying "ho hum, I really like that independent candidate, but there's no point voting for him because he won't get in unless 59,999 other people vote for him" = wrong wrong wrong on so many levels.

I think it's highly unlikely that everyone who doesn't vote has the same political viewpoint and would want the same independent candidate to get elected.

leaflets with Matt DC's grinning face on

???

The other key factor here is a whole new generation of voters who are too young to really remember living under a Tory government and with a vivid memory of everything Labour has fucked up.

This is true. You could be well into your early 20s by now and have no memory of Margaret Thatcher.

Sir Tehrance HoBB (the pirate king), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:19 (eighteen years ago)

... the ones who will be setting party policy for the foreseeable future, in fact, the future of the party (xpost)

Tom D. (Dada), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:19 (eighteen years ago)

multi xpost

But people don't vote for independent candidates other than single issue campaigns (eg hospital closures) for most people it's a two way choice between labour and conservatives and for a few, liberals. To many people the colour of the government is more or less irrelevant in how it would impact their day to day life. Not that it's not a justification not to vote but that's the realpolitik of the current political climate.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:20 (eighteen years ago)

Bear in mind that he's widely disliked amongst his own party membership.

Yes, that really hindered Tony Blair didn't it?

Tom D. (Dada), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:21 (eighteen years ago)

I think Labour c. 1994 were much more desperate for a winner than the Tories are now.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:23 (eighteen years ago)

Blair had far wider support amongst grassroots membership than Cameron does. He didn't show his true colours until well into the second term, Clause 4 aside. Labour were desperate enough for a win that they maintained a reasonably untied front, which the Tories as currently stands are failing to do.

xpost precisely

Matt (Matt), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:23 (eighteen years ago)

Every time I forget what David Cameron is really like, I think of King Squit George Osborne.

Pete W (peterw), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:24 (eighteen years ago)

untied = they were all wearing t-shirts and listening to D:ream, obv.

Matt (Matt), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:25 (eighteen years ago)

Blair had far wider support amongst grassroots membership than Cameron does. He didn't show his true colours until well into the second term, Clause 4 aside. Labour were desperate enough for a win that they maintained a reasonably untied front, which the Tories as currently stands are failing to do.

And they had Brown and Prescott to assuage the old school.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:25 (eighteen years ago)

Blair had far wider support amongst grassroots membership than Cameron does.

Support maybe, approval debatable

Tom D. (Dada), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:26 (eighteen years ago)

He didn't show his true colours until well into the second term, Clause 4 aside.

O RLY?

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:26 (eighteen years ago)

Yes.

And they had Brown and Prescott to assuage the old school.

Robin Cook, too.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:27 (eighteen years ago)

Absolutely, the first term was all about the big initiatives. The minimum wage being a case in point.

Matt (Matt), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:29 (eighteen years ago)

new labour stuck to tory spending plans till ?1999; they cut benefits in their first six months. they greenlit iraq in the first half of 2002, less than a year after election victory #2. betcha bottom dollar the plans for the nu-nhs were in place before 2001, though i can't remember that election being fought on anything in particular.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:30 (eighteen years ago)

jack straw??! god almighty.

piscesx, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:40 (sixteen years ago)

I'd rather have Straw than...just about everybody else on that list

Ich Ber ein Binliner (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:41 (sixteen years ago)

Boris at 5/1 is just the bookies laughing all the way to the bank, surely?

Chopper Aristotle (Matt DC), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:41 (sixteen years ago)

William Hague 2

Er, what? Is that for real?

― grimly fiendish

Odds taken from oddschecker.com - it's a Ladbrokes book that I can't access without registering but oddschecker is usually very current.

Cool Hand Tiller (onimo), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:42 (sixteen years ago)

Straw would only be next Labour leader in case of total meltdown, say a Tory majority of 100+ seats. He'd be a steady hand during a rebuild.

I'll say it here categorically now: if Cruddas becomes next Labour party leader, I will join the Labour Party and actively canvas for them. A truly great politician with some sensible and workable ideas for bridging the unfairness gaps in this nation.

xxxp

Peter "One Dart" Manley (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:42 (sixteen years ago)

I'd rather have Straw than...just about everybody else on that list

Can't parse this any other way than "bonghits", tbh.

Oreo SB'd Wagon (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:42 (sixteen years ago)

You know that it in Magical Mystery Tour, where Buster Bloodvessel (Ivor Cutler) stands at the top of the aisle, and tells the travellers that "everyone is to enjoy themselves, within the bounds of common british decency" ?

That's Jack Straw as Prime Minister.

okthxbye

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:43 (sixteen years ago)

Liam Fox 16

LOL. Tories must be praying that DC doesn't get hit by a bus one night while cycling home to Notting Hill.

Ich Ber ein Binliner (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:43 (sixteen years ago)

The general feeling in the Tory party is that Hague is the best leader they have had since thatcher he just lead 10 years too soon, make of this what you will.

Ed, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:44 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2533771/tory-leadership-odds.thtml

This is OTM from the comments:
The problem with these kind of lists is that you get to see just how devoid of talent the Tory party is.

You've got a man who has previously failed in the position as favourite (which is like Newcastle constantly bringing back Kevin Keegan as manager and expecting different results)

Cool Hand Tiller (onimo), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:44 (sixteen years ago)

Problem with Dom's promise is that people who give a fuck about ideas for bridging the unfairness gaps in this nation are a tiny wee minority of Labour 2.0 hence Cruddas = next to no chance

Oreo SB'd Wagon (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:44 (sixteen years ago)

But now we're all living in 1948 again, it might be possible

Ich Ber ein Binliner (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:45 (sixteen years ago)

The world is going to have to get a lot, lot worse before people start voting for crazy ideas like economic fairness.

Oreo SB'd Wagon (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:47 (sixteen years ago)

Cruddas has apparently built a proper PLP coalition though amongst backbenchers... forget where I saw the article outlining this.

xxp

Peter "One Dart" Manley (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:47 (sixteen years ago)

The bookies obv. thing he has some chance

Ich Ber ein Binliner (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:47 (sixteen years ago)

Bookies base their odds on how the betting is going. Remember Cruddas won the first round of deputy leadership votes last year so he has a significant (but still minority) support within the party.

Cool Hand Tiller (onimo), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 14:54 (sixteen years ago)

David Davis was on Desert Island Discs on Sunday. Among his choices was "Another Day In Paradise" by top Tory philanthropist Phil Collins.

What a broad smile! It is like a delta! (Marcello Carlin), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago)

Did he have any Kinks in there?

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:10 (sixteen years ago)

"Dead End Street" - to symbolise the path his career is taking

Ich Ber ein Binliner (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:12 (sixteen years ago)

We're all going to be so disappointed when Miliband gets it.

Chopper Aristotle (Matt DC), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:15 (sixteen years ago)

I persist in the hope that he blew it (David Davis style) over the summer

Ich Ber ein Binliner (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:26 (sixteen years ago)

He also picked "Get The Party Started" by Pink because it reminds him of his daughter.

What a broad smile! It is like a delta! (Marcello Carlin), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:27 (sixteen years ago)

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44740000/jpg/_44740953_dd_466getty.jpg

Peter "One Dart" Manley (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:27 (sixteen years ago)

DD ride, anyone?

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago)

(Actually: I'll pass, if it's OK by you.)

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago)

Also, Cameron tottering on his pedestal and Clegg leading the Lib Dems towards oblivion gives me a small hope that the days of the Blairclone might be over - unlikely, I admit

Ich Ber ein Binliner (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago)

No chance for Professor Out Of Vision On Lookylikey Milliband at the moment.

What a broad smile! It is like a delta! (Marcello Carlin), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

They can't both be DD.

xxxxpost

Cool Hand Tiller (onimo), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think either of them are, the one on the right is hiding william hague and a beach football under her shirt.

Ed, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago)

i swear i knew the one on the right. she didn't strike me as a tory when i knew her. or have as large breasts

tissp, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago)

xps
Phil Collins denied he was a tory on Room 101. I didn't believe him.

Fat Penne (Ned Trifle II), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 16:45 (sixteen years ago)

DD's full list.

1. Pachelbel's Canon in D Major
2. Get the Party Started - Pink
3. Another Day in Paradise - Phil Collins
4. Ashokan Farewell - Ungar and Mason
5. Un Bel Di from Madame Butterfly - Puccini
6. Stealing my Democracy - Mundy-Turner
7. Brothers in Arms - Dire Straits
8. Main Theme from Schindler's List

Fat Penne (Ned Trifle II), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago)

I admit that the Mundy-Turner was new to me but what a lyrical masterpeice it is...

I’m as angry as I can be, ‘cause you made such a fool out of me
You dragged me into an illegal war,
Lied about what we’d be fighting for,
So how can I believe in you anymore?

CHORUS (You’re) Stealing my Democracy, Cutting Back on Freedom,
Stealing my Democracy, A little more each day

Well you made yourself some handy laws, so you don’t have to listen to me anymore
I can march in thousands through these city streets, singing about common sense and peace
And you can arrest me without a release
CHORUS

I’m sick of your media spin, papering over the mess we’re in
You say it’s all about what the terrorists do,
But who in the world will protect me from you?
Will anything worthwhile be left when you’re through?
CHORUS

My parents fought for humanity, not this facade you’re selling me
They bought me the right to disagree with you and anything you do

One day I’ll get you out, and there’ll be an end to this fear and doubt
I hope to heaven that I can find someone with the good of the people in mind, Someone who believes in peace in our time, instead of
Stealing my democracy….

Fat Penne (Ned Trifle II), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago)

Wot, no "Yesterday Man"?

Ich Ber ein Binliner (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago)

That Pink song is about taking ecstasy isn't it? DAVIES IN DRUG SONG SHOCKA!!!

Neil S, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

hmm, how about disrupting the state opening of parliament like some kind of rag-week toffs?

Mark G, Wednesday, 3 December 2008 10:33 (sixteen years ago)

(or, whatever it is today)

Mark G, Wednesday, 3 December 2008 10:34 (sixteen years ago)

Shouldn't they be protesting outside Scotland Yard instead, since it seems to have been the Met who authorised Green's arrest?

Brother Belcher (Marcello Carlin), Wednesday, 3 December 2008 12:38 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2008/12/cameron-obama-europe-president

I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE UP TO (Colonel Poo), Friday, 5 December 2008 12:58 (sixteen years ago)

Sweet!

Ich Ber ein Binliner (Tom D.), Friday, 5 December 2008 13:00 (sixteen years ago)

That article piles it on a bit heavily in the second half so I'm kind of dubious about it.

Matt DC, Friday, 5 December 2008 13:26 (sixteen years ago)

Okay I wouldn't normally do this but:

david skitmore
05 December 2008 at 07:10

Cameron's a lightweight!!! and Obama's a great fantastic brilliant world statesman. The left do so love their leaders, it will all end in disappointment. Obama will end up another washout left-wing politician just like president Mugabe.

Matt DC, Friday, 5 December 2008 13:30 (sixteen years ago)

LOLz

Ich Ber ein Binliner (Tom D.), Friday, 5 December 2008 13:32 (sixteen years ago)

That article piles it on a bit heavily in the second half so I'm kind of dubious about it

Yeh, but I really want to believe it, all the same.

grimly fiendish, Friday, 5 December 2008 13:45 (sixteen years ago)

what in the living fuck is this

http://www.chickyog.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/zanulabour-231x300.png

James Mitchell, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago)

Tory call for anarchy?

slag move (onimo), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago)

Clapped out E-head who gets pranked by fake internet reports more than Animal Collective fans has opinions4u, story at 10.

Peter "One Dart" Manley (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 17:06 (sixteen years ago)

"oo, where can I get one of those cooool masks?"

Mark G, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago)

two months pass...

That'll be a 20 point lead now then.

Cynical? Moi?

Bernard Braden Misreads Stephen Leacock (Marcello Carlin), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 11:25 (sixteen years ago)

he probably hired the steven lawrence killers to do it.

meme economist (special guest stars mark bronson), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 11:26 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.