The FBI's definition of homegrown extremists as "U.S. persons who appear to have assimilated, but reject the cultural values, beliefs and environment of the United States" could apply to disaffected young people of any era, regardless of faith.
"Youth are vulnerable," [Philip Mudd, deputy director of the FBI's national security branch] said, whether it is the Goths of the 1980s or the anti-establishment culture of the late 1960s and early 1970s
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 8 February 2007 15:52 (eighteen years ago)
― sexyDancer (sexyDancer), Thursday, 8 February 2007 15:55 (eighteen years ago)
― The Real Dirty Vicar (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 8 February 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Thursday, 8 February 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)
― kingfishy (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:13 (eighteen years ago)
― Charmmy Kitty's Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (ex machina), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
― kingfishy (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:01 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:02 (eighteen years ago)
― Koogy Bloogies (koogs), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:09 (eighteen years ago)
However, "terrorism" does not arise simply from alientation. It is intensely political. It seeks to destroy some part of the existing political order in order to remove obstacles on the path to some zealously imagined improvement. Before alienated youths become active terrorists, they must embrace some positive political vision -whether it's an Islamic Republic or Kropotkin-style anarchy. Alienation alone is more likely to lead to self-harm, or to random violence.
― Aimless (Aimless), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)