― milo z (mlp), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:15 (eighteen years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:16 (eighteen years ago)
― g00blar (gooblar), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:26 (eighteen years ago)
― ath (ath), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)
― ath (ath), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)
― rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:41 (eighteen years ago)
― If you fuck with Jimmy Mod, you call down the thunder (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)
The way I understand it, he was cast for his first role in 'Freaks & Geeks'; he hung around the production all the time picking Apatow and Paul Feig's brain about the business; he tried his hand at writing stuff and was pretty good; Apatow let him write an 'Undeclared' ep; Apatow recommended him to some showbiz pals to help punch up scripts; he got a job with, and ended up writing a huge chunk of, the 2nd HBO series of Ali G; Apatow put him in '40-Year-Old Virgin'; and they came up with the 'Knocked Up' script themselves.
― Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)
― Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)
(x-post)
― The Homeliness of The Long Distance Punner (Charles McCain), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)
― g00blar (gooblar), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:05 (eighteen years ago)
― rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:07 (eighteen years ago)
― Lukewarm Watery G. Tornado; Less sick than before (The GZeus), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:12 (eighteen years ago)
Me too.
I have such love for Seth Rogan.
― luna (luna.c), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:19 (eighteen years ago)
― Edward Trifle (Ned Trifle IV), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:28 (eighteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)
― If you fuck with Jimmy Mod, you call down the thunder (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:32 (eighteen years ago)
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)
― mizzzell (mizzzell), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)
― Fleischhutliebe! like a warm, furry meatloaf (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:12 (eighteen years ago)
― Chris H. (chrisherbert), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:41 (eighteen years ago)
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:44 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:44 (eighteen years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:46 (eighteen years ago)
― senator second p. newcastle (a_p), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:47 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:50 (eighteen years ago)
― the kwisatz bacharach (sanskrit), Thursday, 8 February 2007 23:04 (eighteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Friday, 9 February 2007 02:37 (eighteen years ago)
― The Yellow Kid (The Yellow Kid), Friday, 9 February 2007 04:25 (eighteen years ago)
― 31g (31g), Friday, 9 February 2007 05:19 (eighteen years ago)
slocki gives it two thumbs up?
― milo z, Thursday, 24 May 2007 02:54 (eighteen years ago)
it's great.
― s1ocki, Thursday, 24 May 2007 03:03 (eighteen years ago)
i liked it even more than 40 year old virgin (which i liked a lot). but same total likeability & charm, and wall-to-wall roffles.
― s1ocki, Thursday, 24 May 2007 03:04 (eighteen years ago)
some of the humour is so filthy, but so good-natured at the same time, it is a really wonderful combination.
Katherine Heigl is a revelation?
― David R., Thursday, 24 May 2007 03:11 (eighteen years ago)
she was awesome
― s1ocki, Thursday, 24 May 2007 03:23 (eighteen years ago)
oh, good. she's so pretty.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 24 May 2007 03:23 (eighteen years ago)
"shimmy shimmy ya" over opening credits
― s1ocki, Thursday, 24 May 2007 03:24 (eighteen years ago)
i really loved this movie
― s1ocki, Thursday, 24 May 2007 03:30 (eighteen years ago)
You should take it behind the school and get it pregnant.
― David R., Thursday, 24 May 2007 03:33 (eighteen years ago)
i can't wait to see this now!
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 24 May 2007 04:08 (eighteen years ago)
xpost lolz
did i mention this movie is full of freaks & geeks alums (prominent haverchuck role!!) and tons of folks from the office show up too??
― s1ocki, Thursday, 24 May 2007 14:12 (eighteen years ago)
Can't he wait until James L. Brooks is dead before becoming James L. Brooks? Hope this new movie isn't 3 hours long and named How About That.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:15 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i dont think she's 'bad' as a performer in 'funny people', it's just that that whole thing didn't work for me
i was more disappointed in eric bana tbh -- it would have been more meta-lol if he'd been bana-from-'munich' -- but again, it was all kind of mistaken
none of judd apatow's films are models of structure or economy
xposts
― moholy-nagl (history mayne), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:16 (fourteen years ago)
bana was great
― Princess TamTam, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:17 (fourteen years ago)
maybe the new movie will be a Get Him To The Greek-style wacky spinoff about Rudd A&R guy's misadventures in the music industry
― some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:19 (fourteen years ago)
ok don't get this whole "apatow is married to a good actress but he shouldn't give her parts in his movies and she should work with other directors for some reason" deal but whatevs
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:20 (fourteen years ago)
Well, quite.
Nothing wrong in being together for a movie, they obviously like each other.
And hey, if the movie suffers as a result, they don't get to make another one, those the breaks.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:22 (fourteen years ago)
pretty sure no one's in the Telling Judd Apatow What To Do business at the moment.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:23 (fourteen years ago)
given that Funny People's weakest parts hinged on a not very compelling love triangle involving her and that he's building his next movie around her supporting character from a previous movie, my criticism is partly that his drive to make her a star seems to be guiding the content of his movies and probably not for the better
― some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:23 (fourteen years ago)
probably Leslie Mann is
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:23 (fourteen years ago)
touche!
― da croupier, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:24 (fourteen years ago)
lol
― some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:24 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah, it's cute that she shows up, slightly less so that he casts his kids, too, but I really lost patience when he literally played that clip of his kid singing the song from "Cats."
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:25 (fourteen years ago)
he literally played that clip of his kid singing the song from "Cats."
uhhhh
I think I have to watch this now.
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:26 (fourteen years ago)
I may have said this in the Funny People thread, but it is weird to have a "if you spend your life making millions off comedies you don't get to have a wife and kids" hook when Adam Sandler has a wife and kids, Judd Apatow has THESE PARTICULAR wife and kids, and just about every major comedian has a wife and kids.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:27 (fourteen years ago)
I accept that many of Apatow's problems stem from his generosity towards his wife and kids, but it's not Mann's fault: I like her voice and the way she makes nagging funny.
― Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:27 (fourteen years ago)
x-post Sometimes they even have more than one wife, in succession.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:28 (fourteen years ago)
― da croupier, Wednesday, January 19, 2011 10:27 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
i dont think that was the message of funny people at all
― Princess TamTam, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:29 (fourteen years ago)
i think it was more 'if you're a monster it's hard to maintain relationships'
the message of FP: "I can afford to stick Adam Sandler in an unwieldy two-hour-plus comic drama."
― Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:30 (fourteen years ago)
And of course, don't forget that Adam Sandler (despite being Adam Sandler) happens to fit in the narcissistic scheme of things. Former roommate and all that. Surprised he didn't cast, dunno, Ben Stiller in the Bana role.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:32 (fourteen years ago)
that's not exactly different from what I said, but the implication was that his "monster"-hood was based on him being some kazillionaire comedian jerkoff in a tower who couldn't commit, then saw his ex's pleasant life with kids, tried to co-opt it and then was found wanting because he couldn't enjoy Judd's daughter singing CATS. I'm saying that just about every kazillionaire comedian jerkoff succeeds in getting married and having kids.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:32 (fourteen years ago)
but the implication was that his "monster"-hood was based on him being some kazillionaire comedian jerkoff in a tower who couldn't commit
i didnt get that at all - he would've been the same asshole if he was a janitor
― Princess TamTam, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:40 (fourteen years ago)
But boy, would that have been a depressing movie!
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:42 (fourteen years ago)
Seth Rogen learns the valuable lesson that just because your a janitor doesn't mean you get away with being an asshole
― da croupier, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:44 (fourteen years ago)
ok, you have a point
― Princess TamTam, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:46 (fourteen years ago)
Mann is awesome in 40 YO Virgin
― ex-heroin addict tricycle (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:34 (fourteen years ago)
for the record I didn't like this movie (or at least, the second half of it - everything after the Beatles-cover musical montage is excruciating) but TamTam OTM. the message is that Sandler is just a jerk who doesn't like people, he's a complete narcissist, regardless of his profession. His kazillionaire status has just enabled him to indulge this to the fullest. I did appreciate that the movie at least ends with him still basically miserable and alone.
― ex-heroin addict tricycle (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:38 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8x2amoKIWc
― these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Friday, 27 April 2012 18:07 (thirteen years ago)
will watch
― heavy is the head that eats the crayons (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 27 April 2012 20:11 (thirteen years ago)
no jokes about excessive ear hair == not talkin' baout my generation
― Aimless, Saturday, 28 April 2012 01:10 (thirteen years ago)
parents regretting their life choices, how innnnnnnteresting
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 28 April 2012 14:28 (thirteen years ago)
between this and Django Unchained, you must be really excited for Christmas.
― GoT SPOILER ALERT (Gukbe), Saturday, 28 April 2012 14:40 (thirteen years ago)
don't forget The Baz Gatsby. No year-end completism for me.
btw, from the HE blog on This Is 40:
Absent from the trailer is the sweet subplot (I'm not joking) where Rudd's character stakes his money on resurrecting the career of 70's Brit rocker Graham Parker, and Apatow, a fan, cast Parker to appear in the movie as himself - apparently in a larger than usual role, as the musician was shooting scenes for a couple of weeks - alongside his recently reunited band The Rumour. Parker joked to Rolling Stone magazine that his role served as a useful metaphor for failure, but Parker's small, fervent fan-base has been over the moon about it for several months (with a long delayed Kickstarter documentary on Parker put back to capture him walking the red carpet later this year.) Parker also did some songs for the soundtrack.
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 28 April 2012 14:51 (thirteen years ago)
Ok that makes me doubly curious if Apatow's James L Brooks phase will ever play in Peoria.
― da croupier, Saturday, 28 April 2012 15:28 (thirteen years ago)
"Oh man, being 40...dealing with kids, creaky bones, trying to resurrect the careers of the people you idolized in your precocious entertainment-industry-minded youth...you feel me, america?"
― da croupier, Saturday, 28 April 2012 15:29 (thirteen years ago)
and really, what G Parker fan is as young as 40?
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 28 April 2012 15:44 (thirteen years ago)
why i threw "precocious" in there - if anything, I'm proud of the guy for spreading the wealth and not just making it about Loudon Wainwright
― da croupier, Saturday, 28 April 2012 15:45 (thirteen years ago)
I'm guessing Greg Mottola will do the same for Robert Forster.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 28 April 2012 15:50 (thirteen years ago)
Albert Brooks is in this, and the trailer is 5x funnier than the dank slog that was Funny People, so yeah, I'll see it.
― Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Saturday, 28 April 2012 17:13 (thirteen years ago)
this movie is not very good.
― s.clover, Sunday, 17 March 2013 01:13 (twelve years ago)
yeah...not a ton of replay value
― some dude, Sunday, 17 March 2013 01:15 (twelve years ago)
I've always said that Ryan Seacrest's freak out is the best thing about this movie
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 17 March 2013 01:21 (twelve years ago)
(oh, by this movie i was referring to 'this is 40' which is i guess doubly not good)
― s.clover, Sunday, 17 March 2013 01:26 (twelve years ago)
i thought i would relate to its lol-growing-old humor but i don't think this is what growing old is like at all?
― s.clover, Sunday, 17 March 2013 01:27 (twelve years ago)
it is apparently about what being rich is like
― ( ͡° ͜ʖ͡°) (sic), Sunday, 17 March 2013 01:37 (twelve years ago)
it is very long.
― s.clover, Sunday, 17 March 2013 01:42 (twelve years ago)
all movies are about this and it pisses me off
― del griffith, Sunday, 17 March 2013 02:42 (twelve years ago)
ok maybe not PRETTY IN PINK (JOHN HUGES [1986]) but most movies
― del griffith, Sunday, 17 March 2013 02:43 (twelve years ago)
this movie is actually a fascinating character study of two self-indulgent narcissists who make one another miserable and are on the verge of breaking up but then realize that they've alienated everyone else in their life who could serve as a support network by their shitty self-absorbed behavior and anyway there's no way they'd find anyone else willing to put up with their miserable excuses for personalities.
― s.clover, Sunday, 17 March 2013 02:52 (twelve years ago)
yeah this is 40 was dire, it was odd to go from knocked up and seeing his associates popping up in small roles and feeling good about apatow for it (when knocked up came out how long had it been since anyone had seen martin starr?) vs this is 40 where ppl from his various productions pop up in small roles and it feels like they couldn't say no to the boss. loved loved loved 40 yr old virgin, loved knocked up though admittedly have felt zero urge to revisit it (would probably be more interested in watching pineapple express or observe and report again), enjoyed much about funny people, this is 40 was horrid.
― balls, Sunday, 17 March 2013 03:04 (twelve years ago)