A question about climate change/global warming.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
What do you think the reasons are that many people are not willing to consider the possibilities for the human causes for climate change/global warming, despite massive scientific evidence? I'm talking just normal citizens who do not work for the Hoover Institute, Exxon, etc.

I work with several people who refuse to read any articles about it, or even consider ANY information about it, unless its critical of the whole notion. My wife says that most people that she works with are the same (she works in the States...I'm in Canada).
Are they just too lazy? Are they suspicious of any kind of intellectualism? Are they just prone to believe in conspiracy theories?

And I'm not talking here about being being a healthy skeptic. They do not consider ANY of the information.

peepee, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 17:32 (eighteen years ago)

avoidance of guilt.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 17:33 (eighteen years ago)

They don't want to have to change what they are doing, or even consider it. It's the "American way" to do whatever the hell you want and damn the consequences. Apparently.

Sara R-C, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 17:34 (eighteen years ago)

"they can't tell me what to do!"

*shake fist at cabal of liberal scientists*

etc.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)

Also, I think there is a suspicion of scientists having some kind of left wing agenda. (And a scary number of people in the US don't understand even the basics of how science works, which doesn't help either.)

Sara R-C, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)

I think there's a lot of the "well, even if I make changes, no one else is going to" attitude. It's easier to not do anything :(

Incrementalism is never gonna be sexy.

Maybe if the church got involved there'd be more progress. Going green for Jesus, or something. I think there was a documentary about this on the other day. Though, greeny issues are a bit pagan.

There were some good articles about green issues in the last issue of the Idler, "How to Save the World without really trying". Basically, not treating the world as just a resource.

jel --, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)

Doing less is the most noble thing you can do.

jel --, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

I've heard of more evangelical christian churches refocusing on the "stewards of the earth" idea, in Seattle at least.

There's not a lot of direct positive feedback for the actions and efforts of an individual, which makes it hard if not impossible to motivate people to take action. As to not even wanting to know or acknowledge that their choices (added with the choices of others like them) have a global impact, well there's a lot of head-in-the-sand w/r/t science, environment, consumerism, politics - a major part of human nature, we'd just rather not think about it thanks anyway.

Jaq, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:11 (eighteen years ago)

I think it's absorbing right-wing propaganda, which is of course designed to be the easiest to absorb without even thinking about it. Even the word "environment" begins to take on negative connotations in this light, which is weird, but there you are. "Environment" leads to "protecting" leads to "anti-business" leads to "THEY TOOK AWR JARBS!"

Also, from a purely capitalist, profit-motivated perspective, it really *doesn't* make good sense to take steps to change.

kenan, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:19 (eighteen years ago)

In the short term, of course.

kenan, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)

Though, I heard those pesky capitalists are planting crops for biofuel which means less hops for beer = increased prices.

jel --, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)

oh great, more corn.

kenan, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:24 (eighteen years ago)

It never rains but it pours = more evidence of global warming.

jel --, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:24 (eighteen years ago)

not just avoidance of guilt but also denial re a sense of lifestyle inadequacy. people hate being shown that what they've been doing for so long is wrong (generalisation) as it makes them look foolish/ignorant.

blueski, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)

"Also, from a purely capitalist, profit-motivated perspective, it really *doesn't* make good sense to take steps to change."

I don't think this is entirely true - the profit motive to "go green" has grown incredibly strong over the last few years (similar to agribusinesses' desire to "break into" the hugely profitable organic market). Where there's services/products to be developed and delivered and a simultaneous public clamor for those services/products, there is money to be made.

Speaking from my own personal position in the energy field, I would tell any kid coming up who wants to make a shitload of money to get an energy engineering degree.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)

people hate being shown that what they've been doing for so long is wrong (generalisation) as it makes them look foolish/ignorant.

see also 'Creationists' and what have you

blueski, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)

Speaking from my own personal position in the energy field, I would tell any kid coming up who wants to make a shitload of money to get an energy engineering degree.


As someone with a family member who is CLEANING UP on methane digesters, I concur.

Laurel, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)

Coco from Man or Astro-man? went into biodiesel.:

http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A13678

jel --, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:39 (eighteen years ago)

He makes fuel outta grease from restaurants.

jel --, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)

there's a documentary about some all-girl punk band touring the country doing that

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)

Absolutely Shakey (and Laurel). There's enough momentum behind "green" "renewable" energy right now for people to make serious $$$ for the next decade, minimum. Chemical engineers who focus on organic (hydrocarbons), physicists, even the traditional electrical and mechanical engineering disciplines - all will be in demand, especially with minors in environmental sciences or policies.

Jaq, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)

ahh, see, my dad has worked for years for a company in south Texas that helps refineries fix leaks and comply with EPA regulations. The oil dudes think of my dad as a necessary evil. He is not loved by his clients. My dad, by way of commiseration, perhaps, believes that the EPA is stupid and corrupt and that there is nothing wrong with the environment whatsoever.

kenan, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:00 (eighteen years ago)

the guilt-avoidance and admitting-wrong things are pretty otm, at a deeper level than the r-w talking points thing (which flows out of the first two), but there's at least two other factors i can think of. one is related to the lifestyle thing, but goes a bit deeper - a major change in the social fabric in response to this would deny some people a sense of meaning/purpose in life - it would eliminate not just the existence but the social utility/status of their jobs/defining leisure activities (compare the sagebrush complaints about the spotted owl and horny lizard or whatever it was). the other is that it requires people to think on a macro level, about the world as a system, etc., which many people are unwilling to do/uncomfortable doing probably for a variety of reasons but one big one might be that it makes them feel very small and without much agency in things.

gabbneb, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:09 (eighteen years ago)

the EPA is stupid and corrupt

As with any govt agency, I don't doubt there's truth in this.

Jaq, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)

Also, the simple things each of us can do seem so inconsequential, the bigger things (like putting up a solar panel or windmill) are costly. It all seems so hopeless. Those on the right have a kneejerk reaction to doom-and-gloom. Those who accept the problem tend to bicker about what's worse and better (paper vs. plastic, dishwashers vs. hand-washing dishes). There was a story in our local paper about houses here installing copper tubing in the ground to harness geothermal energy. I sent the article to a family friend who is making building plans - his response was that the enviromental footprint of the copper tubing and excavators and digging outweighed the use of conventional energy systems. It all just gets so confusing that it's easy to throw one's hands up in the air and go for a nice aimless drive while it's still possible.

Maria :D, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:19 (eighteen years ago)

This is all reminding me of when I was in college - my Dad (sort of a country club Republican sort) was pretty annoyed with my going to marches and similar activities. "You young kids think that you can change things..." was I think what he said.

I think it is really bizarre to see people - like him - in their early 60s now - who lived through huge social changes (like, say, the Civil Rights movement) who still don't think that things can be changed. (Of course there is also the fact that a lot of them didn't feel comfortable with those changes and definitely don't want any more change.)

Sara R-C, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:23 (eighteen years ago)

There are a lot of younger people who now have this very romantic notion about the old days, before styrofoam and disposable everything. I think that's partly why baking and knitting have become so hip - the return to traditional crafts and a simpler day. Too bad there's not really any going back. I'd like to see a return to sustainable ways, but without the sexism and repression of the olde days. Is it hip yet for boys to darn socks?

Maria :D, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:29 (eighteen years ago)

Boys are genetically predispositioned not to darn.

kenan, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:34 (eighteen years ago)

I forgot they found a chromosomally linked gene for aversion to needlework. Silly me.

Laurel, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)

My two bits on this:

1. conservative types tend to not believe in systemic/complex causation rather than direct causation. (i.e. you're poor cuz you're lazy and it's your own fault and responsibility, not b/c you're in a system that's fucked)

2. american politics are extremely tribal right now, and agreeing with anything of this stuff is akin to casting your lot in with the dirty hippies. Plus, empiric & objective science has been attacked enough lately so that you can project your political thinking onto scientists, since scientists are all biased and only want a certain political output, and want to silence all dissenting opinions.

It's kinda fun how it's a big shitpile of these folks suddenly seeing the validity of debate, an inability or deliberate decision not to understand how science actually works, and disingeniousness in wanting to put forth a "serious alternative answer," as opposed to trying to scramble around for anything to cudgel the other side.

It's a lot like the intelligent design folks who want their shit taught alongside evolutionary biology as equally valid, yet spend all their money on shit-stirring p.r. instead of actually producing any research(check the budget of Seattle's Discovery Institute), and indeed openly attack those(sincerely interested or not) who want them to publish their research so it can be checked out. The authoritarian folks are now battling the authoritative folks(the ones who actually know their shit and can call others on it).

kingfish, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)

In other words, that traitorous hypocrite Gore and those dirty america-hating hippies are fer it, the Leaders I trust aren't and tell me I shouldn't be either, so i'm agin' it.

That kinda thing.

kingfish, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)

This is becoming less and less of a left vs right wing phenonmenon, as shown by the number of posts on The Corner (like those by Jonah Goldberg) acknowledging that global warming is real. The ones who believe simply distrust Gore-ist alarmism (OMIGOD MILWAUKEE WILL BE UNDERWATER IN 20 YRS).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)

But there's still plenty of folks who attack Gore just for being Gore, which is a political thing, not with the science of it; see all the increased attacks & talking points in the last two days.

hell, there's some douche on Ed Schultz's show right now going off on him.

kingfish, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c90/gradygillan/gwarming.jpg

g®▲Ðұ, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 21:18 (eighteen years ago)

http://content.yieldmanager.edgesuite.net/atoms/e8/ec/e8ec875d042a06ebbcab84d3bea3ce2c.gif

ghost rider, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)

http://cdn5.tribalfusion.com/media/761536.gif

g®▲Ðұ, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)

Things I've heard people say:

"Don't get me started on environmentalists! Soon denying global warming'll be like denying the holocaust. It'll be all "How dare you say it doesn't exist blah blah" (same bloke blamed "this PC world in which we live" for the rise in health and safety measures - my boss blamed lawyers. I think I agree with my boss)

"They ask me to switch off my TV instead of leaving it on standby, saying it saves energy, but have they considered that that so-called "wasted" energy is actually helping to heat my house?"

the next grozart, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 12:23 (eighteen years ago)

These are also the kind of people who have an incredibly high suspicion of scientists, doctors and other professionals. "What's he talking about?! These people! He's not a proper scientist!" etc.

the next grozart, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 12:26 (eighteen years ago)

"The cost of recycling is actually greater than the damage done"

the next grozart, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 12:27 (eighteen years ago)

Recycling IS very expensive and energy-intensive, though

How about Ken Livingstone, eh??

Cleaning up the Big Smoke: Livingstone plans to cut carbon emissions by 60%

and presumably some of the experience gained with this long-term initiative can be imparted to Venezuela through Ken's expertise-in-exchange-for-cheap-oil-for-poor-Londoners deal he struck with Chavez:

Livingstone seals Venezuelan fuel deal

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 12:53 (eighteen years ago)

interesting!

blueski, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 13:08 (eighteen years ago)

follow up information to all those attacks against Gore over the last two day, from the " Tennessee Center for Policy Research" to every rightwing radio show and blogger out there

kingfish, Thursday, 1 March 2007 00:21 (eighteen years ago)

I suspect the biggest reason is that too many people have been preaching catastrophe from too many angles for too long. People are incurious about all sorts of subjects that could be deemed vital or essential. Picking "humans cause global warming" as a topic is really kind of pointless, unless you happen to be a big believer in it. If it's your dogma, then it suddenly it's unreasonable that others don't share your enthusiasm, wonder, or abject fear. Abortion, Iraq, Putin whoring himself around the Middle East, poverty, saving the whales...everyone's got a cause that someone else doesn't care about.

And really, you can't blame people for being at least a little bit jaded, non-plussed, or even cynical on this topic.

Dandy Don Weiner, Thursday, 1 March 2007 01:35 (eighteen years ago)

Ah......sure I can.

peepee, Sunday, 4 March 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)

......so we're only capable to worry about one cause?

peepee, Sunday, 4 March 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)

we can have as many causes (and crisis) as we want. Some have many, some have few. People have jammed their heads in the sand for eons for a variety of issues.

Dandy Don Weiner, Sunday, 4 March 2007 15:35 (eighteen years ago)

But then why choosing to jam their heads with such an energetic response against it?

peepee, Sunday, 4 March 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)

Instead of consulting a message board of what amounts to like minded people on this subject, maybe it would be more productive to sit down with these people and ask them why it is they think the way they do. That way, you wouldn't have to speculate. Maybe it's your approach to the subject that makes them wave you off. Maybe they'd be willing to consider your perspective on different terms. Are you out to change their mind or simply expose them because you think they are idiots? How is it "energetic" to merely refuse to consider possibilities of humans causing global warming? Sounds pretty passive to me.

Dandy Don Weiner, Sunday, 4 March 2007 16:26 (eighteen years ago)

Ouch!

I'm consulting a message board right now, because I'm at home, and the two people who live in this house have questions, and y'all MIGHT have some insight.

I do not argue with these people. I am calm and non-judgemental with them. I ask them questions. The thing that always gets me , though, is a lack of willingness to read something, or watch something, etc. I get along with these people. We talk in a friendly manner about all kinds of things everyday.

I have asked them why they're so bitterly opposed to the concept, and they usually have no answer except "It's a bunch of bull!", as if they'd rather not discuss it unless we're in agreement that it is a bunch of bull.

Dan, please don't project those nasty traits onto me.

(Am I comming across in a nasty way on this thread?)

peepee, Sunday, 4 March 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)

oh yeah this whole story is insane. the kind of thing we imagine happening in like equatorial guinea or angola, but not “here”

Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 October 2021 12:06 (four years ago)

they cover this in the excellent Drilled podcast, several episodes iirc

Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 October 2021 12:08 (four years ago)

you can start here:

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/s5ep1-lockdown-ad-free/id1439735906?i=1000528536507

Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 October 2021 12:10 (four years ago)

I'm already familiar with the main details but I will give a listen when I have some free time.

The whole thing is so galling, particularly in terms of setting a precedent. Courts are widely recognized as effectively the main mechanism for international environmental justice and even in domestic terms, when I took an environmental policy course our main focus was on the role of the courts. Now we're in a situation where this sort of judicial capture is given a pass, and meanwhile Trump in one term packed the courts, something like a third of current federal appellate judges were appointed by Trump. At least we have coal baron Manchin on 'our' side amirite.

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Friday, 29 October 2021 16:37 (four years ago)

In other news, and in re: the recent US House hearings which questioned executives from major fossil fuel firms, this looks like a pretty good overview of how badly Exxon CEO Darren Woods was lying when he said Exxon's public statements on climate change “are and have always been truthful” and that the company “does not spread disinformation regarding climate change":

https://theconversation.com/what-big-oil-knew-about-climate-change-in-its-own-words-170642

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Friday, 29 October 2021 18:36 (four years ago)

And from Teh Grauniad, this list of America's 'worst climate villains' is worth noting.

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Friday, 29 October 2021 18:40 (four years ago)

From the second link:

In his own words: Woods once called carbon reduction standards “a beauty match, a beauty competition”.

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Friday, 29 October 2021 18:41 (four years ago)

BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to consider limiting EPA's authority to curb greenhouse gases from power plants, will hear appeals from coal-mining companies and Republican-led states

— Greg Stohr (@GregStohr) October 29, 2021

seems bad!!

frogbs, Friday, 29 October 2021 21:23 (four years ago)

"You see, the greenhouse gases from power plants have liberties and rights according the constitution..."

I'm a sovereign jizz citizen (the table is the table), Friday, 29 October 2021 21:44 (four years ago)

"Polluters are people too, my friend..."

Three Rings for the Elven Bishop (Dan Peterson), Friday, 29 October 2021 21:49 (four years ago)

it is very bad. and the first of probably many, unfortunately.

"elections have consequences"*

*also blatantly stolen SC seats

Karl Malone, Friday, 29 October 2021 21:51 (four years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCnf46boC3I

Through with “What’s the Buzz” (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 29 October 2021 21:54 (four years ago)

if you want to know where the worst discourse is heading, once again lolico is ahead of the cunt-curve.

"The deal is this: Tuvalu sinks beneath the waves, there is even more flooding than usual in Bangladesh, and in exchange we get pharmaceutical medicine, TV, Reeboks, McDonald’s, air travel, computers, blogs, and all the other apparatus of modern life. That’s a no-brainer.+

— Andrew Lilico (@andrew_lilico) November 2, 2021

edited to reflect developments which occurred (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Tuesday, 2 November 2021 13:09 (four years ago)

jesus christ

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 2 November 2021 13:10 (four years ago)

Muh Reeboks. Muh Filet O Fish. "Tuvalu", lol.

__

When they put their respectable mask on:

Charles talking about “growing global population creating ever-increasing demand on the planet’s finite resources”.

There's a certain kind of person that loves talking about growing populations and climate change... #COP26 pic.twitter.com/JZ0CFoMmvc

— Josh Gabbatiss (@Josh_Gabbatiss) November 1, 2021

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Tuesday, 2 November 2021 14:33 (four years ago)

i didn't know who andrew lilico was and for a second i thought it was like an "accidentally left wing" post

certified juice therapist (harbl), Tuesday, 2 November 2021 14:37 (four years ago)

xpost

Just in case the glaring smug hypocrisy of these inbred twits isn't obvious enough.

Report: Queen Elizabeth secured personal exemption from Scottish climate law

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Tuesday, 2 November 2021 14:38 (four years ago)

Guess the thing about the climate crisis, cause it's such a nebulous problem that we're all guilty of contributing to, is that one can use it project basically any of one's pet issues on to. It's all a matter of scale. Like cosmic insignificance.

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Tuesday, 2 November 2021 18:21 (four years ago)

Fucking royals.

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Tuesday, 2 November 2021 18:21 (four years ago)

crossposting this here

"Although carbon emissions have been increasing rapidly since the Industrial Revolution, it is no accident that 63 percent of all emissions have been produced in these past forty years. Pace the Davos set, these emissions track neither population growth nor consumption from developing states. Their path is unimpeded by the proliferation of eco-conscious marketing schemes, “corporate social responsibility,” and promises (and non-existent realities) of mystical techno-fixes. They track the return to and difficult maintenance of profitability.

As an interdisciplinary team led by chemist Will Steffen demonstrated, in terms of GHG emissions, ocean acidification, rainforest destruction, aquaculture depletion, global warming itself, and so on, climate change tracks not only cumulative GDP growth (as is widely discussed) but such conspicuous features of contemporary global capital as the increased use of telecoms, non-recreational transportation, and foreign direct investment (FDI), which moves from almost zero in the 1960s to trillions by the 2010s. Following Polanyi, they dubbed this “the Great Acceleration.” Such acceleration does not aggregate with population growth; perversely, the relation is inverted. Emissions, resource intensivity, and other climate measures are concentrated where end-point consumption is greatest, as many climate scientists now openly state, among the world’s wealthiest. In the global top wealth and income deciles, population growth is lowest or even negative. And as the rate of population growth is curbing globally, climate change continues its exponential pace. Many climate scientists today go further still, like physicist and social ecologist Julia Steinberger, in arguing the need to push past symptomatic criticisms of biophysical and economic growth towards the clear critique of capital as the “fundamental driver” of climate change."

https://thebaffler.com/salvos/the-extractive-circuit-singh-chaudhary

Linda and Jodie Rocco (map), Tuesday, 2 November 2021 18:38 (four years ago)

one year passes...

Remember how some people would say the worst effects of climate change are in the global South and that Europe wouldn't be affected like anywhere near as hard but in the last year you see things like European river levels dropping off. This is from Spain.

There’s drought - and then there’s a super drought! 60% of the Spanish countryside is bone dry. Groundwater eventually runs out - then what..Wheat and barley crops are likely to fail entirely in four regions- & summer yet to come. pic.twitter.com/91mz8sYopf

— Peter Dynes (@PGDynes) April 16, 2023

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 19 April 2023 08:05 (two years ago)

Global South is getting the worst of it for sure but we are going to see bigger effects in Europe pretty fast. All bets are off if water and food supplies are fucked.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 19 April 2023 08:07 (two years ago)

four months pass...

Lol @ this climate scientist. Does he have a mansion on the hill with solar panels?

I hope I am wrong and others may see things differently, but I am expecting effective societal collapse by mid-century, and planning - for my partner and I and our kids - accordingly.https://t.co/ZkZyaR9uBh

— Bill McGuire (@ProfBillMcGuire) September 13, 2023

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 17 September 2023 08:45 (two years ago)

It all depends on what you imagine "effective societal collapse" looks like. If you imagine it looks like the zombie apocalypse, then 'planning accordingly' feels like a joke. If it looks like the breakdown of globalism, food shortages, crumbling infrastructure, electrical brownouts, an increase in regional wars, high unemployment, more poverty and scavenging, increased but not universal violence, corrupt police states flourishing, and other similar outcomes, then some measure of planning and adaptation cold be very helpful, if only to set correct expectations and strengthen one's mental resilience and skill set.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Sunday, 17 September 2023 17:53 (two years ago)

Yeah. I guess so. I interpreted this as the Wikipedia definition so I don’t understand his use of “societal collapse” to describe the possible consequence of a global problem. What society is he talking about?

Allen (etaeoe), Sunday, 17 September 2023 18:21 (two years ago)

FWIW, I think Damian Carrington, author of the article Bill McGuire quotes, uses the more accurate description: “extinction.”

Allen (etaeoe), Sunday, 17 September 2023 18:27 (two years ago)

Extinction at "mid-century" seems far too rapid by even the most alarmist standards, so whatever McGuire thinks "effective societal collapse" means, it feels like it's probably not "extinction". The physical fact of 8,000,000,000 living humans constitute a formidable barrier to extinction within a few decades from climate change alone.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Sunday, 17 September 2023 18:45 (two years ago)

"then some measure of planning and adaptation cold be very helpful, if only to set correct expectations and strengthen one's mental resilience and skill set."

Not sure what form this takes. Name things you can do on your own.

Agree "extinction" in twenty years is alarmist.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 17 September 2023 19:05 (two years ago)

I don't know about extinction, and none of this is my area of expertise at all, but personally I'm expecting some form of collapse within the next 10-15 years. Considering how fast climate change has moved in the past decade, and how much it's accelerating from year to year, and how fragile all of our interconnected systems are, plus the potential for catastrophic events like the collapse of the insect population or the Gulf Stream stopping, it seems unlikely that we'll make it to mid-century with anything like the civilization we have now. Don't really see any way to plan for it, though. I haven't given much thought to saving for retirement because I don't expect to get there.

Lily Dale, Sunday, 17 September 2023 19:27 (two years ago)

I feel that we will probably see in the next five years in the UK:

- Certain types of food shortages
- A fairly catastrophic flood event
- More 40 degree days, more deaths due to heat among the old and poor
- Potential energy crisis, affecting ability to fan and cool your space. So this affects everyone.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 17 September 2023 19:34 (two years ago)

That last one is pure speculation. The first three are based on current trends.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 17 September 2023 19:36 (two years ago)

Name things you can do on your own.

Learn how to sew and repair clothes.
Acquire some simple non-power hand tools.
Get to know your neighbors.
Practice walking longer distances than you usually walk.
Acquire a bicycle and know how to maintain it.
Know what you'd do in a catastrophic flood, fire, or similar event.
Keep thinking clearly.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Sunday, 17 September 2023 22:37 (two years ago)

all good suggestions, would also add farming/plant skills there

out-of-print LaserDisc edition (sleeve), Sunday, 17 September 2023 23:41 (two years ago)

stolen from lucifer's hammer: get a hardcover copy of 'the way things work' and keep it in a ziploc bag

mookieproof, Sunday, 17 September 2023 23:46 (two years ago)

hardcover copy of 'the way things work'

Practical skills and tools are very worthwhile acquisitions, but for me the most important item on my list is keep thinking clearly.

As I understand the world, humans survive very poorly in the absence of a stable shared society of some kind. As the stability of our very large social organization breaks down and can no longer solve the immediate problems of survival, it will elevate the necessity of forming new, more reliable (if smaller and more local) social alliances and finding new modes of stability.

The more quickly the older social contract is shattered, the more drastically those new social compacts will be stressed and the more likely they'll atomize into smaller and smaller groupings. Having practical skills and tools will make things not just easier for yourself, but make you a far more valuable ally in any group you join, but thinking clearly in the face of those stresses will help even more.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Monday, 18 September 2023 00:58 (two years ago)

One takeway from Kim Stanley Robinson's The Ministry For The Future that stood out to me was that even after millions of people dying in climate-related events, nothing really began to pick up until Crash Day - when in the 2030s 60 passenger jets are crashed by drones, then container ships and meat farming are targeted until in the 2040s air travel ends and meat eating declines.

Elvis Telecom, Monday, 18 September 2023 01:55 (two years ago)

i honestly didn't get past the first chapter, which is harrowing as fuck

mookieproof, Monday, 18 September 2023 01:57 (two years ago)

It is harrowing as fuck, but the book is somewhat hopeful and offers some kind of pathway that isn't exercises in prepping and doomerism.

Elvis Telecom, Monday, 18 September 2023 04:17 (two years ago)

iirc that book makes a pretty convincing argument that "adaptation" to climate change will not be an option for millions and millions of people

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 September 2023 07:12 (two years ago)

KSR sounds amazing. Have to read that book.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 18 September 2023 07:49 (two years ago)

I also didn't make it much past the first chapter, though I skimmed ahead some. It hadn't been that long since the heat dome in the PNW when I tried to read it, so it was all horrifyingly easy to imagine.

Lily Dale, Tuesday, 19 September 2023 03:32 (two years ago)

four months pass...
two months pass...

We are getting our answers

Burundi’s capital has been under heavy flood and landslide for over a week now. Many areas affected include Kibenga, Gatumba, Kajaga and so on. Thousands of people forced to flee their homes fearing for their lives. The govt of Burundi & the @UN launched a call for financial aid. pic.twitter.com/4vPyEsjfe7

— African News feed. (@africansinnews) April 21, 2024

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 21 April 2024 08:59 (one year ago)

one month passes...

Tourists are dying from the heat in hiking trips.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jun/16/tourist-dead-greek-island-near-corfu

xyzzzz__, Monday, 17 June 2024 08:29 (one year ago)

300+ dead at Mecca in 50C heat

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jun/18/hundreds-of-hajj-pilgrims-die-in-mecca-from-heat-related-illness

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 19 June 2024 06:56 (one year ago)

500+..

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 19 June 2024 06:58 (one year ago)

1000+

Many thousands have been dying in North India.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jun/24/delhi-heat-stroke-clinic-first-ram-manohar-lohia-hospital

xyzzzz__, Monday, 24 June 2024 09:48 (one year ago)

one month passes...

Can't help thinking this is a rehearsal for all of us soon.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/09/texas-heat-prisons-lawsuit

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 10 August 2024 12:52 (one year ago)

one month passes...
ten months pass...

This is unbelievable.

The high temperature at one of Finland’s northernmost weather stations, in the municipality of Sodankylä (Lapland region) within the Arctic Circle at latitude 67.3°N, reached at least 25°C for 26 days in a row.

Records date back to 1908. pic.twitter.com/l0y34A3y0C

— Nahel Belgherze (@WxNB_) August 6, 2025

xyzzzz__, Friday, 8 August 2025 13:10 (five months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.