ROGER EBERT HATES ROLLERBALL!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.suntimes.com/output/ebert1/wkp-news-roller08f.html

Mike Hanle y, Thursday, 14 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, but what does he think of SOOPER TROOPERS?

Sterling Clover, Thursday, 14 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Or CROSSROADS!

David Raposa, Thursday, 14 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Rollerball looks camptastic , i am going on friday at midnight.

anthony, Friday, 15 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

two years pass...
you know it really says something about ebert (who, it must be said, i have a fondness for) that his "great movies: au hasard balthazar" was followed by "great movies: leaving las vegas."

amateur!st (amateurist), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 07:36 (twenty-one years ago)

some of his choices are, um, interesting. but i don't read much into their order - he frequently times great movies reviews to coincide with, say, a dvd release.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone want to tell me what brand of know-nothing-about-movies-at-all-and-therefore-couldn't-be-less-interested-in-lesser-known-films audience he's aiming for by programming Lawrence of Arabia in his "Overlooked Film" festival?

Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)

hahaha!

god i saw leaving las vegas again on tv recently, what a turd.

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)

eric, for his overlooked film festival, every opening night he shows a movie projected from 70mm film. he rationalizes this by saying that 70mm is an overlooked form of film and should be appreciated. you can disagree with him or whatever, but that is what he says.

todd swiss (eliti), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)

that's totally fair enough!

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

"The thing that it's important to remember about Roger Ebert is that he loves big tits"

-Russ Meyer

Sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

haha, it's true. if there's a cute actress in the film he'll give it a good review. oh, and he also pervs out over underage chicks, too. I remember in the review for harry potter 2 he said that the little girl who plays hermione was like a HOTTIE IN TRAINING or something equally gross.

mandee, Wednesday, 28 April 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

It's my fetish and it's freaking me out!

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought the same thing about the actress playing Hermione, actually: "Dude, that chick is gonna be soooo hot when she's older!"
But then I just kept quiet and slid back in my seat in shame. That
is creepy that someone 90 years old like Ebert is saying that.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah but he wrote the first treatment for "who killed bambi"

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)

if there's a cute actress in the film he'll give it a good review.

Yeah, I've noticed that he refuses to give anything with Angelina Jolie or Jennifer Lopez a bad review.

El Diablo Curmudgeonbotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I have yet to see a movie starring Angelina Jolie that I haven't enjoyed.

Yes, I have seen both "Tomb Raider" films.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

ebert's thumb is connected to his dick, they rise together

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)

So he has to jumprope over his arm when he walks?

NA (Nick A.), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I have yet to see a movie starring Angelina Jolie that I haven't enjoyed.

Have you seen that new one with Ethan Hawke in it? Maybe that should be the test, because it looks horrid.

El Diablo Curmudgeonbotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

i like her look in sky captain with the eyepatch and all

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm looking forward to that Sky Captain movie this summer, it looks really...strange. Plus Angelina Jolie.

Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:27 (twenty-one years ago)

She looks great with the eyepatch. I'm surprised at how much I want to see this movie.

El Diablo Curmudgeonbotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)

i think the movie is going to be weird and sucky though.

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I have not seen the one with Ethan Hawke, because, well, it has Ethan Hawke in it.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I know! But visually it looks gorgeous, I'm superficial that way.

x-post

El Diablo Curmudgeonbotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:31 (twenty-one years ago)

you know it was all done in the director's bedroom? he apparently did all the fx and design and stuff on his computer and worked on it for 5 years or something

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I had heard something about that, that was part of what intruiged me.

El Diablo Curmudgeonbotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

"Hermione Granger (Emma Watson, in the early stages of babehood)"

yuck

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I expect the review for Prisoner of Azkaban to be super-creepy in this respect.

El Diablo Curmudgeonbotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)

woah - that is creepy! keep it in your pants dude!

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)

beyond the valley of the dolls was on last night

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I like reading Blount's 'that is creepy' comment as responding to El Diablo's previous post to her most recent one.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)

(As for Sky Captain, the film quality was frickin' strange when I saw the trailer, like it was shot through gauze with two flashlights.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, it looked all 'not quite b&w, not quite color' when i saw the trailer too. looked alot like it might be the 'rocketeer' of summer 2004.

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)

it definitely has a weird quality to it, i think it's gonna be the rocketeer meets the avengers meets the phantom menace.

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)

(when dialogue sounds that bad and wooden in the TRAILER you gotta worry)

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I have to say. I mean, I liked the idea of this film from the opening two or three shots -- and then they started talking. I'll just take the art design book.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)

that eyepatch is pretty rad tho.

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)

TS: Angelina Jolie vs. Robert Wagner

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:55 (twenty-one years ago)

vs. Momus!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Moderator delete my own brain please.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:56 (twenty-one years ago)

eric, for his overlooked film festival, every opening night he shows a movie projected from 70mm film. he rationalizes this by saying that 70mm is an overlooked form of film and should be appreciated.

That's fair enough, I guess. There's no point in hoping that there's many truly overlooked films in that format, either. (Introducing Jaccov Jaccovi's The Chaperone... in 70mm!!!)

Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 29 April 2004 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I guess I should just raise enough money to shoot 90 minutes of 70mm, splice the reels together, and then give it to Ebert. (Hey! I did a sequel to Sleep for $5m on 70mm! It's been overlooked! Screen meh!)

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 29 April 2004 03:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, he called the little actress "in the early stages of
babehood," which is rather careless in this sicko-laden age,
but I don't think it's objectively creepy at all. It's more of
an innocent compliment.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Roger Ebert hates Rollerball?!?!?

He probably hates all sports!!!!

OH SNAP!

sports that involve physical activity.


because he's chubby, see?

It's kinda funny.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)

don't get it

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)

dude's a chubber

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:32 (twenty-one years ago)

"...It's more of an innocent compliment."

Well, DUH! It's just that we all want an excuse to mock Roger Ebert.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)

he's such a lovable looney! roger ebert makes me happy!

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I watched The Shadow the other day and was kind of shocked at just how cheap and campy it is, way more than I even remembered. Ebert probably defended it in the same way he did with Beowulf.

Alex in Baltimore, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:23 (seventeen years ago)

Kevin Smith should stop making movies and just replace Ebert on the show. They're both fat sci-fi geeks who can make a half-decent barb and are prone to overpraising mawkish crap.

da croupier, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:25 (seventeen years ago)

uh

gabbneb, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:25 (seventeen years ago)

what we hate is what we hate about ourselves

and what, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:26 (seventeen years ago)

ebert would probably (in a written review) praise baby's day out by saying something like "This is a story about parenting--about how the most painful thing about it can be learning when to let go. To let Baby have his day out."

s1ocki, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:26 (seventeen years ago)

ha!

horseshoe, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:27 (seventeen years ago)

what we hate is what we hate about ourselves

i am not nor have ever been a sci-fi geek, though I once did share their kinship for the ouvre of Cameron Crowe.

da croupier, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:29 (seventeen years ago)

'I would love to have been a fly on the wall during the production of Baby's Day Out...'

and what, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:31 (seventeen years ago)

"Do you remember your first Day Out? Mine was in Paris, studying there in 1972. I would spend my days at tiny Left Bank cinemas--admiring the French appreciation for the Golden Age of American cinema, and, of course, the women, who seemed as foreign to me as an exotic alien species. My first Day Out was on a rainy January afternoon in St-Germain-des-Près, after a screening of Howard Hawks' great 'Red River.'"

s1ocki, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:38 (seventeen years ago)

"It's not what entails this Baby's Day Out that makes it so enticing -- it's how it's about it. "Slow down, kid, before you hurt yourself!" says one of the crooks in this film, and it's advice even grown-ups like us could stand to appreciate."

and what, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:42 (seventeen years ago)

"And so I've come to the end of this review without talking much about the movie. That's just as well. To really appreciate A Baby's Day Out, one must go beyond the margins of a newspaper or the frame of a computer."

jaymc, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:47 (seventeen years ago)

"If the action is inspired by cartoons, the three kidnappers are inspired by the Three Stooges. They're not really evil, of course, simply stupid and incompetent, as they allow the kid to crawl out of captivity and then somehow can't recapture him even though he's usually in sight."

s1ocki, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:49 (seventeen years ago)

is that the movie about babies that are geniuses?

Alex in Baltimore, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:49 (seventeen years ago)

no, that's Brilliant Babies

s1ocki, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:50 (seventeen years ago)

it's the post-home alone john hughes movie, right?

horseshoe, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:51 (seventeen years ago)

His actual review of Baby's Day Out in full (slocki just quoted it)

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19940701/REVIEWS/407010301/1023

One of the worst sequences in "Baby's Day Out" involves Mantegna hiding the kid under a coat on his lap, while two cops question him. Baby Bink finds Mantegna's lighter, snaps it on, and sets his crotch on fire. The hidden fire lasts forever, it seems, while Mantegna's face tries to mask the pain. Then the cops leave, Mantegna leaps up, his pants burst into flame, and one of his pals saves him by stamping out the fire - grinding his heel into the burning crotch, of course. The sequence was agonizing, but I didn't think it was funny.

one of the few scenes in the film I even remember

da croupier, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:53 (seventeen years ago)

i wanted to see if anyone would notice

s1ocki, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:55 (seventeen years ago)

Baby's Day Out stars a remarkable infant who keeps his composure in the center of chaos. Other child actors might mug to get a point across, but this Baby remains safe, observant and collected. To see him on screen, surrounded by such a glorious mess, is the essence of filmgoing.

and what, Friday, 28 December 2007 20:56 (seventeen years ago)

I'll pretty much watch any shitty comedy where a successful character actor has their crotch pulverized, Chazz P in Little Man is a similar example.

Donal Logue has said that the closest he ever came to quitting acting was when he did a 3 Ninjas movie and the director's translator said his reaction to a kick to the groin wasn't belabored enough. "Not OW! Go OWOWOWOWOWOWOW!"

da croupier, Friday, 28 December 2007 21:00 (seventeen years ago)

the idea of a world without the tao of steve is just... i dont want to think about it.

s1ocki, Friday, 28 December 2007 21:01 (seventeen years ago)

he was good in your precious zodiac

da croupier, Friday, 28 December 2007 21:01 (seventeen years ago)

Juno is a film of such transcendent miracles that I half-expected the title character's child to pop out and perform the sort of majestic feats witnessed in Baby's Day Out.

Chris L, Friday, 28 December 2007 21:10 (seventeen years ago)

I vaguely remember Siskel and Ebert's bitter internecine war over the merits of Cop and a Half.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 28 December 2007 21:20 (seventeen years ago)

What was it about kids' movies that got them going? I remember that one of the biggest fights I've ever seen them get into was over Alaska.

Eric H., Saturday, 29 December 2007 02:06 (seventeen years ago)

Kevin Smith should stop making movies and just replace Ebert on the show. They're both fat sci-fi geeks who can make a half-decent barb and are prone to overpraising mawkish crap.

Tape Store, Saturday, 29 December 2007 02:36 (seventeen years ago)

he was good in your precious zodiac

-- da croupier, Friday, December 28, 2007 4:01 PM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Link

are you trying to sound like dr morbius?

and what, Saturday, 29 December 2007 02:43 (seventeen years ago)

kinda

da croupier, Saturday, 29 December 2007 03:22 (seventeen years ago)

Da. Morbier

gershy, Saturday, 29 December 2007 03:28 (seventeen years ago)

nine months pass...

i kind of like how the grumpy old man-ness has increased in ebert's reviews

The two meet at a club, when Norah needs Nick to pose as her boyfriend to make her ex-boyfriend jealous. He is named Tal (Jay Baruchel). My first Chicago girlfriend was named Tal, which is Hebrew for "the morning dew." I don't think he knows that.

Jordan, Thursday, 2 October 2008 18:49 (sixteen years ago)

Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist is a comedy about two people thrust together for one hilarious, sleepless night of adventure in a world of mix tapes, late-night living, and, live, loud music. Nick (Michael Cera) frequents New York's indie rock scene nursing a broken heart and a vague ability to play the bass. Norah (Kat Dennings) is questioning pretty much all of her assumptions about the world. Though they have nothing in common except for their taste in music, their chance encounter leads to an all-night quest to find a legendary band's secret show and ends up becoming the first date in a romance that could change both their lives.

circa1916, Thursday, 2 October 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

(not Ebert, Sony Pictures synopsis)

circa1916, Thursday, 2 October 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

I'm kind of irritated they stole the names from the Thin Man for this stupid looking movie.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 2 October 2008 23:49 (sixteen years ago)

technically they stole the name for the book

sad man in him room (milo z), Thursday, 2 October 2008 23:53 (sixteen years ago)

I'm sorta hoping that Cera will develop Powell-esque gravitas and wit, though.

(xpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 2 October 2008 23:54 (sixteen years ago)

"technically they stole the name for the book"

I don't understand what you are saying here.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 2 October 2008 23:56 (sixteen years ago)

names, not name

Nick and Norah's was a teen novel before it was a movie.

sad man in him room (milo z), Friday, 3 October 2008 00:02 (sixteen years ago)

the movie is based on a novel

Brosef Stalin (latebloomer), Friday, 3 October 2008 00:02 (sixteen years ago)

x-post

Brosef Stalin (latebloomer), Friday, 3 October 2008 00:02 (sixteen years ago)

Oh I get it (I thought you were saying Hammett stole the names and I was wondering from where?)

Alex in SF, Friday, 3 October 2008 00:07 (sixteen years ago)

i always wanna call it nick and nolte's infinite playlist

s1ocki, Friday, 3 October 2008 03:26 (sixteen years ago)

I'd totally see Nick Nolte's Infinite Playlist.

Alex in SF, Friday, 3 October 2008 03:52 (sixteen years ago)

it is a one minute loop of painful deep-toned caterwauling

remy bean, Friday, 3 October 2008 03:57 (sixteen years ago)

I fear that when the poor man kicks the bucket, this will be the thread that ILX announces it on.

Herb Hitts, Bad Vibe magazine (kenan), Friday, 3 October 2008 06:57 (sixteen years ago)

two months pass...

http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/12/win_ben_steins_mind.html

Ron Polarik, PhD (and what), Wednesday, 3 December 2008 19:42 (sixteen years ago)

absolutely unrelentingly brutal, verging on cruel in its asymmetry! nonetheless deserved.

BIG WORLD HOOS. WEBSTEEN. (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 3 December 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

three years pass...

Roger Ebert
I submit to you that when it comes to smiles, Joey Lauren Adams is right up there with Kerry Washington and Marisa Tomei.

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 13 April 2012 15:10 (thirteen years ago)

eight months pass...

I'm aving a lot of health troubles that are keeping me from doing work and functioning online. Best person to contact is Chaz. Not in best of shape.

Author ~ Coach ~ Goddess (s1ocki), Thursday, 20 December 2012 23:01 (twelve years ago)

:(

Author ~ Coach ~ Goddess (s1ocki), Thursday, 20 December 2012 23:01 (twelve years ago)

five years pass...

"In the film the world of 2018 (referred to in the tagline as 'the not too distant future') is a global corporate state, containing entities such as the Energy Corporation, a global energy monopoly based in Houston, which deals with nominally peer corporations controlling access to all transport, luxury, housing, communication, and food on a global basis."

oh

maura, Monday, 1 January 2018 15:17 (seven years ago)

soylent green is set in 2022 just fyi

pee-wee and the power men (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 1 January 2018 15:27 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.