― latebloomer, Thursday, 22 March 2007 07:23 (eighteen years ago)
― stevienixed, Thursday, 22 March 2007 07:53 (eighteen years ago)
― latebloomer, Thursday, 22 March 2007 08:01 (eighteen years ago)
― latebloomer, Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:52 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)
― unfished business, Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:59 (eighteen years ago)
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)
― nathalie, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:17 (eighteen years ago)
― gff, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)
― Ste, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:22 (eighteen years ago)
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)
― Ste, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:35 (eighteen years ago)
― n/a, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:39 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:43 (eighteen years ago)
― Pleasant Plains, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:43 (eighteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:31 (eighteen years ago)
― kenan, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:33 (eighteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:37 (eighteen years ago)
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Spencer Chow, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:41 (eighteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:43 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:44 (eighteen years ago)
― C. Grisso/McCain, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:46 (eighteen years ago)
― Spencer Chow, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:52 (eighteen years ago)
― kenan, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)
― Abbott, Thursday, 22 March 2007 18:45 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 22 March 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)
― Deric W. Haircare, Thursday, 22 March 2007 19:32 (eighteen years ago)
― Spencer Chow, Thursday, 22 March 2007 19:35 (eighteen years ago)
― kenan, Thursday, 22 March 2007 19:37 (eighteen years ago)
― Abbott, Thursday, 22 March 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
― latebloomer, Thursday, 22 March 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
its ok to not cheerlead and thats ok
and cheerleading is also ok
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Monday, 25 August 2025 23:36 (two months ago)
I did like the whole theme of VHS eventually destroying porn theaters
― Andy the Grasshopper, Monday, 25 August 2025 23:37 (two months ago)
apparently The Colonel’s prisonmate was supposed to be Ron Jeremy but his scene got cut or they decided not to shoot it
there has to be more story there -Jeremy spent like a year w PTA taking him to porn shoots etc
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 25 August 2025 23:57 (two months ago)
In light of subsequent developments--not that anyone ever viewed Ron Jeremy as a paragon of virtue--a break for the film. (The scene of the Colonel and his cellmate is eerily similar to a clip that was circulating around then of Richard Speck and his cellmate.)
― clemenza, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 00:33 (two months ago)
love Boogie Nights tbc and think it’s PTA’s most rewatchable / hangoutable until Licorice Pizza. his writer’s love for his horrible or damaging-fuckup characters remains remarkable across the decades, but the dense ensemble of Boogie and their own *decisions* to find community & family keeps them more directly loveable, despite the vast range of desperation and pain-causing across the crew.
totally forgot about Three Kings
VG if you haven’t seen The Big Hit I believe you will both thrill and lol to it. incredible perfs from Lou Diamond Phillips and Bokeem Woodbine too
deems it’s always a coinflip to recommend to but I’m 51% confident of enjoyment
― Nancy Makes Posts (sic), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 01:01 (two months ago)
pls as if i hadnt rented it and then caught it on multiple sky movies repeats the first time round
cheesy but very charming
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 01:15 (two months ago)
ok i will give it a shot!
and sic i 100% agree with you re Boogie Nights having a similar hangout quality to Licorice Pizza. yr otm re PTA’s love for the characters - that is really key and probably the selling point for the whole exercise. there is definitely a clear wistfulness embedded in both movies, that sort of love for “running off and joining the circus” aspect of a found family is really present. also really leaning into characters who would otherwise be deeply unlikeable. Dirk, Rollergirl, Scotty; or Alana & Gary - in the hands of a different filmmaker who maybe put primacy on story over character, the fragility of any of them could easily become brittle and repellent; PTA nurtures it and makes them familiar, letting us see private moments of them scrutinizing or questioning themselves and it draws us in, helps the audience (sometimes) embrace them more and find some relatability buried in the brokenness
or it did for me
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 01:16 (two months ago)
After the warmup of Sydney/Hard Eight he came out of the gate HARD on this one. Really loved it then and now - does such unexpected things either its characters and the bit parts and cameos are unforgettable. Obviously his most direct Scorsese homage but it’s earned, for me. Does several things that other PTA films do, but so so well. Also the joy of Dirk and Brock in the studio laying down the magic on those tapes is alltime.
― assert (matttkkkk), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 01:26 (two months ago)
ugh *with its characters*
Last week the Fighting in the War Room guys and Katie Walsh discussed Punch-Drunk Love, which I haven't watched since 2002 and plan to this weekend.
― hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 09:21 (two months ago)
How appropriate that Boogie Nights came out at the same time as Jackie Brown, a film whose rep has increased over the years cuz it's also a hangout film.
I haven't watched Licorice Pizza since December '21. It's on Amazon Prime fwiw.
― hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 11:47 (two months ago)
I recently rewatched PDL and was kind of shocked by how much I liked it. All the mid2000s tweeness I was afraid would turn me off now didn’t bother me at all. Hector Guzman is amazingly funny. And a great PSH performance
― Heez, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 14:49 (two months ago)
I didn't dislike PDL when I saw it, but even after liking Boogie Nights so much when it was new, I was starting to think of him as a gimmick-driven filmmaker (a rambling anti-epic with a WTF ending, a drama starring Adam Sandler). There Will Be Blood struck me as a maturation.
― cryptosicko, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 14:54 (two months ago)
movie is an all-timer just for Michael Penn’s “Livin’ Thing” story.
― Western® with Bacon Flavor, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 15:08 (two months ago)
I found this pretty stilted when I rewatched it somewhat recently. That charming hangout energy is undercut by the more grandiose Scorsese-ness imo. I never saw this on the big screen though
― rob, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 15:24 (two months ago)
Punch Drunk Love is great! But ignore me, I’m the one who likes Magnolia and didn’t like Phantom Thread.
― Crispy Ambulance Chaser (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 16:32 (two months ago)
I love Magnolia and the haters are dead inside.
― Cow_Art, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 17:00 (two months ago)
Still haven’t seen Phantom Thread but I’ve loved everything he’s done except Inherent Vice which refused to adhere to me.
― Cow_Art, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 17:02 (two months ago)
i havent watched Magnolia in a long time, initially i couldnt get past the offputtingness of Cruises character and i guess i kinda took it to heart
def need to revisit
i like everything else pretty much so Magnolia is kind if a weird blindspot for me
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 17:04 (two months ago)
https://i.imgur.com/si7W1AL.gif
― hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 17:06 (two months ago)
I think Magnolia is great, or at least has enough greatness in it (especially the performances) to balance out whatever might not be great about it as a whole.
Loved Boogie Nights in the theater, one of the all-time great openings, up there with Miami Vice for sudden impact.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 17:21 (two months ago)
magnolia overwroughtpunch drunk love over awkwardphantom thread a masterpiece inherent vice one of my favourite of the decade
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 17:51 (two months ago)
Boogie Nights, Licorice Pizza and Inherent Vice are my top shelf, maybe Master tooI love Phantom Thread and There Will Be Blood but I dont really revist them? Need to rewatch Punch Drunk Love, mighy give that a whirl this week
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 17:53 (two months ago)
^^ this
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 17:56 (two months ago)
ilx already did:poll thomas andersonpoll thomas anderson 2
maybe it's time for PTA poll #3. posters here seem bent on ranking his whole career to date.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 18:04 (two months ago)
Maybe wait until the new one comes out?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 18:09 (two months ago)
posters here seem bent on ranking his whole career to date.
Law of The Andersons: Every discussion of PT or Wes must be derailed by unasked for canon rankings.
― Lithium Just Madison (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 18:15 (two months ago)
I can rewatch TWBB pretty easily, but I have yet to revisit Phantom Thread. Not because I disliked it, but because seeing in in the theater was a strong tonic and I'm still appreciating my solitary viewing.
― slowly imploding (mh), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 18:25 (two months ago)
this may be an unpopular opinion but I find Reilly’s character oddly thin and a bit of a cypher; like the memorable things about him are what Reilly himself brings, and theres great moments & funny bits but as a character I feel like Reed fits in the least with everyone else? idk
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 19:14 (two months ago)
(in Boogie Nights)
Love Reed Rothchild, but he's a total sycophant--to Dirk, to Jack, to Todd Parker.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 19:16 (two months ago)
yeah maybe thats what i’m getting
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 21:34 (two months ago)
Have you ever seen De Palma's Casualties of Wars? He's very similar there--he just wants to be one of the guys and go along with whatever everyone else is doing (which, in De Palma's film, is horrendous).
― clemenza, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 21:55 (two months ago)
I saw Boogie Nights at a theater in Puebla, Mexico. Or maybe Mexico City. But it was pretty strange because when I would be cracking up, nobody else was laughing, whereas the audience was dying of laughter anytime Phillip Seymour Hoffman was onscreen, I presume because they were used to gay men being portrayed as clowns.
― Cow_Art, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 22:09 (two months ago)
I haven’t seen every PTA movie but this is unquestionably my favorite of what I’ve seen.
― Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 27 August 2025 12:10 (two months ago)
*checks Wikipedia*
So I’ve only seen five of his movies:
Boogie NightsMagnoliaPunch Drunk LoveThe MasterInherent Vice
― Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 27 August 2025 12:14 (two months ago)
Have you ever seen De Palma's Casualties of Wars? He's very similar there--he just wants to be one of the guys and go along with whatever everyone else is doing (which, in De Palma's film, is horrendous).― clemenza, Tuesday, August 26, 2025 5:55 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink
― clemenza, Tuesday, August 26, 2025 5:55 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink
Brian De Palma is in a room with studio executives. On a whiteboard, he writes "CASUALTIES OF WAR." Then, he adds an "S," which he crosses with two vertical lines.
― peace, man, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 12:23 (two months ago)
🤣
― Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 27 August 2025 12:24 (two months ago)
Admit it, this imaginary scene would become funnier if De Palma then drew dollar signs on each cheek with a Sharpie, then crossed his arms and glared around the room
― Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 27 August 2025 12:26 (two months ago)
Unquestionably mine too, Raymond, and I always love hearing that.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 14:22 (two months ago)
Posted in my FB tennis group a couple of weeks ago (pertaining to a trophy on loan): "Maybe you could see what a modification would cost?"
I can't hear that word without thinking of Don Cheadle and the "TK-421 modification." He approaches comic genius in that scene: "...which, uh, kicks it up another, I don't know, maybe three or four, um, quads per channel, you know. But that's really--that's technical talk. That doesn't really concern you."
― clemenza, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 16:59 (two months ago)
I've gotta start using that out in the world: "That's technical talk. That doesn't really concern you."
― clemenza, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 17:00 (two months ago)
PTA's commentary for this film is great because pretty much the entire film cracks him up, especially anything involving Reilly.
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Wednesday, 27 August 2025 17:05 (two months ago)
this is 1 of my fav films.. the most recent time i caught some of it on cable I was really affected by how dark it gets from little bills murder/suicide into the 80s.. i am maybe getting a little soft as i age and not saying that segment incredibly well done, actually i think thats why its so affecting, but it put me off a bit, not a criticism more just my experience
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 17:45 (two months ago)
fond memory of walking out of this in 1997, two young girls behind me, presumably in response to the final shot, disappointed: "that was it???"
― ryan, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 17:52 (two months ago)
absolutely my favorite movie as a budding teen cinephile for its truly excellent scorsese-pastiche qualities--transposing goodfellas onto pornographers in the valley has a lot more going for it than you'd expect, and the "happy" ending of chosen family, etc is sweetly uncynical.
― ryan, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 17:56 (two months ago)
all to say im not inclined to condescend to the "whizz-bang" precociousness of it all, but actually find a lot empathy being expressed through PTA exorcising his own awkwardness through his characters.
― ryan, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 17:58 (two months ago)
You could've heard a pin drop in the theatre during the final scene when I saw the film in '97. I still remember the two middle aged gay men sitting in front of me turning to each other with a look of "how about that?!"
― cryptosicko, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 18:07 (two months ago)
I still remember being reeled in by the trailer, but what I was hoping for was probably something closer to a Corman-esque film with a great soundtrack. I'm pretty sure I wasn't expecting anything as epic or as complex (I would argue, not everyone would) as what materialized--as much Nashville as Scorsese.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 18:12 (two months ago)
I haven't actually seen it in years and years, but I do remember "Boogie Nights" as a virtuoso work, as self-assured and show-offy and ambitious/audacious as, say, young Spielberg (albeit adjusted to the same everything-goes raised-on-VHS era that begat Tarantino). It's been interesting to watch Anderson come into his own, even if the products of that maturation are ultimately kind of unclassifiable, imo. Some of the most distinctive bits of "Boogie Nights" he borrowed from other places (which lends it a lot of its precociousness), but much of his subsequent work I find harder to place as echoes of those once obvious/blatant influences. I haven't seen it in eons either, but "Punch Drunk Love" at the time seemed like an intentionally break. "Look, I can work in other modes, too!" Iirc Anderson may have even said or implied he set that movie up as a personal change-of-pace challenge.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 18:40 (two months ago)