― tom, Friday, 23 March 2007 10:27 (eighteen years ago)
― A B C, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:07 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:09 (eighteen years ago)
― and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:18 (eighteen years ago)
― and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:19 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:21 (eighteen years ago)
― Sarah, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:26 (eighteen years ago)
― Sarah, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:27 (eighteen years ago)
― Sarah, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:33 (eighteen years ago)
― tom, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:34 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:39 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:41 (eighteen years ago)
― and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:45 (eighteen years ago)
― and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:49 (eighteen years ago)
― 600, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:50 (eighteen years ago)
― tom, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:50 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:53 (eighteen years ago)
― Matt DC, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:54 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:54 (eighteen years ago)
― onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:00 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:08 (eighteen years ago)
― onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:11 (eighteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:11 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:20 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)
― nathalie, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:45 (eighteen years ago)
― Yerac, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:56 (eighteen years ago)
― Masonic Boom, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)
― Yerac, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:04 (eighteen years ago)
― Gukbe, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:08 (eighteen years ago)
― Yerac, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:09 (eighteen years ago)
― and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:30 (eighteen years ago)
― onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:34 (eighteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:44 (eighteen years ago)
― onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:46 (eighteen years ago)
― koogs, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:53 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:10 (eighteen years ago)
― koogs, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:10 (eighteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:19 (eighteen years ago)
― Matt DC, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:25 (eighteen years ago)
― koogs, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:30 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:33 (eighteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:35 (eighteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:37 (eighteen years ago)
― tom, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:50 (eighteen years ago)
the army's secret army of army armies
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 04:08 (fourteen years ago)
far as east asians in american pop culture, i was surprised to see an asian guy in the new fast and furious get the (white) girl. that was pretty unusual. but i still do see WAY more white guy/asian girl pairups on tv and in films than both-asian couples.
most south asian characters on british tv, they seem to be either given english names like that woman from mistresses, so have no relation to any concept of asianness (as if they did, they would prob have to succumb to any number of stereotypes/cliches) and/or seem to only get to be exciting when they are with white/non asian partners. its like some new blanding out of corny liberalism.
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:21 (fourteen years ago)
(dont watch eastenders to know what the asian family in there are like, but they look pretty cardboard)
*its like some new blanding out of corny liberalism (and white male wish fulfillment)
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:22 (fourteen years ago)
it's facking eastenders san, they're all facking cardboard
― until you can see right thru (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:22 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i know but the asian and most of the non white characters in general tbh are really thinly/cornily characterised. they dont feel fleshed out or rounded out as the white characters.
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:25 (fourteen years ago)
id like them to be as crazy/unrealistic/idiotic (in an exciting, rather than boring, worthy) way as the white characters basically.
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:26 (fourteen years ago)
A girl i know was a member of the first Asian family in Eastenders. They were (rightly) written off by most Asian viewers as unrealistic and beset by terrible cliches but there was also a strange sense of pride in a lot of quarters, often from the same people, that there was at least some kind of representation, no matter how tokenistic or stupid.
I've caught bits and pieces of the new family and it just seems to be the same kind of arranged marriage / gay-son-horror / 'you will run family business!' stuff repeated again and again.
― I LOVE BELARUS (ShariVari), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 11:55 (fourteen years ago)
STOP LOOKING AT ME QUAN
― a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Tuesday, May 10, 2011 8:08 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
thought this was hilarious, tbh
― cop a cute abdomen (gbx), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 17:05 (fourteen years ago)
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, May 11, 2011 6:21 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark
heh i was gonna mention this - as soon as i saw the am/wf action in Fast Five, i thought to myself "i bet justin lin considers this his greatest achievement"
― Princess TamTam, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 18:52 (fourteen years ago)
anyway i thought this article wasnt that bad - the slate rebuttal is good too though
― Princess TamTam, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 18:53 (fourteen years ago)
also the part where he talks about amy chua kinda made me want to read her book
― Princess TamTam, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 18:57 (fourteen years ago)
half of my childhood was spent in extremely middle class asian american environments and most of this shit just comes off as whining to me
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 19:05 (fourteen years ago)
then again I kind of just skimmed it to look for lines to laugh at so
After Tran attended one of Mystery's bootcamps, he began to develop his own methods of attraction, concentrating on developing his own holistic approach to the art of seduction. Through his personal blog in which he talked about his adventures in the dating game, his successes and failures, he received a telephone call from a woman whose son was being harassed and bullied at his high school. She had been reading The Asian Playboy's blogs and believed that he could help her son overcome his shyness and help him to be assertive enough to get through the bullying. She paid for Tran to fly out to her home in Canada and he spent three days helping her son improve his confidence and social skills. This chance decision of flying out to Canada was the initial spark for Tran's career, and the starting point of his company, ABCs of Attraction, which he launched in 2005.
Tran introduced the concept of the ABCDEF structure which incorporates three main components, namely: thoughts, actions, and words. The concept teaches men how to develop their attitudes, change the manner of their dress, and convey sexuality while courting and dating women. The Asian Playboy mainly teaches shy Asian men confidence and communication skills.
Tran appears at a wide range of events and seminars, offering bootcamps which last from three days to several weeks. Each boot camps is designed to help men improve their social interaction skills. The Asian Playboy works along several instructors and coaches including Johnny Wolf, Andrew AKA Showtime, Ozzie AKA The Latino Gentleman and William AKA Man Cannon.
― buzza, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 19:22 (fourteen years ago)
tiger in the sack mother
― goole, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 19:35 (fourteen years ago)
ok I actually read this shit and the entire thing isn't horrible or anything, the scope is just incredibly small. One immediate thought was that the only place where he doesn't really focus on financial success is with the seduction artist shit, which actually is pretty horrible now that I think about it.
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 19:35 (fourteen years ago)
I guess uh in the end my main critique is that the article makes the world seem so small and horrible, and the world is pretty horrible, whatever that means I guess since I've been typing the word a lot I'll keep typing it, but its so horrible in so many new ways to discover during your life
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 19:42 (fourteen years ago)
I sort of know W3sl3y Y@ng from school -- he was my good friend's boyfriend for a while but I never really got to know him [/pointless, unremarkable brag]
Unrelated admission of racist thought: there's this Chinese girl in my basketball weekly clinic -- she's relatively good and I couldn't help but notice that she had a very "disciplined" attitude, like she seemed to focus extra hard on every drill and be very demanding of herself. She also gets on my case about every little thing I do wrong and it's started to piss me off (I'm practically a beginner at basketball and I've been practicing my ass off and making huge progress so I really don't appreciate it). I had this massive urge to start calling her "tiger mother," like to her face, like as in "hey, take it easy there tiger mother." Obviously I don't actually think this is a good idea. Also I think I'm developing a crush on her. That is all.
― bin caught laden (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 20:14 (fourteen years ago)
She sounds pretty annoying.
― Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 20:24 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah, like on one play in a drill I made a bad cut that would have cut off the guy with the ball from getting to the rim, and the coach says to me "Where were you going with that cut?" and SHE says "I don't know coach" -- or we'll be doing some simple full-court running and passing drill where we have to make some ostensible effort to score and she'll actually talk to her group about what she thinks is going wrong and why they're not scoring.
― bin caught laden (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 20:27 (fourteen years ago)
lol pp
― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 21:03 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.noisetosignal.org/images/posts/warushmore09.jpg
l-r: hurting, Chinese tiger girl
― dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 21:53 (fourteen years ago)
it's kinda a harsh double bind cuz nymag are saying azns are pussies, but then if an azn was to be assertive and actually do something about it like shoot up their offices or collude with the chinese govenment in a massive ddos attack on every company that advertises in nymag, ppl would be all 'lol crazns be crazy'
― no xmas for jonchaies (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:38 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-n7aeqMzis
― dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:41 (fourteen years ago)
I actually want this wesley yang fellow and The best of Marc Loi : Facebook Feminist to duke it out
maybe in a kung fu match
because they're both asian, you see
― dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:47 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1S0oFoyucs
damn this is old school. i remember downloading this song on napster. i even made my website peaceoutside . org because of this track hehD0CH0LIDAY 10 months ago
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:51 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMOZRk74QrY
Did Jin get any attention when he did Learn Chinese?
― I LOVE BELARUS (ShariVari), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:54 (fourteen years ago)
I definitely had that tai mai shu mp3 when I was 12
― dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:55 (fourteen years ago)
true fact: mc jin is now in hong kong doing raps for the government
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te-TiL9YVaE
(dude with the bow tie is donald tsang, chief executive of hong kong)
― dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:57 (fourteen years ago)
Ha! That's awesome.
― I LOVE BELARUS (ShariVari), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 23:00 (fourteen years ago)
damn I never would've guessed that that tai mai shu shit would hold up well
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 23:06 (fourteen years ago)
Maybe the whole tiger mother thing prepared me for that article, but i wasn't too upset by it... well, the PUA stuff was kinda depressing. And the article was way too long. And especially by the end it got kind of self-gratifying. So it wasn't actually... good, but I don't know, I do think there is still a painful lack of self-awareness / willing self-blindness to these issues, so I can forgive it a little? The tiger mother article, OTOH, seemed to actually be encouraging those cultural stereotypes to non-Asians, though I think in the end it the sample was selected to court controversy.
But at the same time I can slightly cop to AAM's take of "eh we've heard it all before, who carez".
― Nhex, Thursday, 12 May 2011 02:51 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbW-XYqbol0
― buzza, Sunday, 15 May 2011 21:19 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx67ZUY9c2o
― buzza, Saturday, 7 July 2012 20:59 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61fXa9hTowY
Minus: asian tech support guy there to answer the white lady's questionsPlus: white lady actually flirts with asian guy
― i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Friday, 21 June 2013 03:00 (twelve years ago)
i'd say this video is thoroughly unproblematic. he doesn't even seem like a great tech support dude, just a bewildered salesman.
― Treeship, Friday, 21 June 2013 03:09 (twelve years ago)
http://theaerogram.com/how-many-times-has-your-favorite-actor-played-a-guy-named-raj-a-guide/
― 乒乓, Monday, 7 October 2013 13:39 (twelve years ago)
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/jul/08/star-trek-beyond-george-takei-sulu-really-unfortunate
making an asian character gay = another way to ensure the asian male in a major hollywood films doesnt get to 'get the girl'.
― StillAdvance, Friday, 8 July 2016 11:25 (nine years ago)
yeah, a little torn on this one. i get that it's a personal tribute to Takei and in the show's progressive fashionbut ya know, of course it's the Asian guyotoh Harry Kim was probably worse on the whole
― Nhex, Friday, 8 July 2016 11:33 (nine years ago)
personal tribute, shmersonal tribute. its BS.
― StillAdvance, Friday, 8 July 2016 11:35 (nine years ago)
There's nothing wrong or worse about a male character "getting the guy" instead of "getting the girl", and your comments are suggesting you think otherwise. I hope that's not what you actually believe. But I do agree that if the person you're supposedly paying tribute to thinks there's something fishy about your tribute, you should maybe actually listen to them.
― emil.y, Friday, 8 July 2016 13:10 (nine years ago)
"There's nothing wrong or worse about a male character "getting the guy" instead of "getting the girl", and your comments are suggesting you think otherwise. I hope that's not what you actually believe"
theres nothing wrong with it, in isolation.
but looking at the history of asian male representation on american tv and in the movies, i see it as the latest attempt to demean asian heterosexual men.
thats not to say that i think being gay makes one less of a man, but hetero asian men are the majority of asian men in the US, and they are routinely denied sexual agency on screen.
so i cant help but see it as a victory for gay men/gay asians, but not really a victory for the majority of asian men in the US, who are still under represented in hollywood.
basically, its interesting that they will allow a notable asian character to be gay, but wont let him be heterosexual.
― StillAdvance, Friday, 8 July 2016 13:21 (nine years ago)
i hope Simon Pegg dies
― and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Friday, 8 July 2016 13:26 (nine years ago)
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/jul/08/simon-pegg-defends-gay-sulu-after-george-takei-criticism
zzz
― StillAdvance, Friday, 8 July 2016 16:27 (nine years ago)
I want to talk about Crazy, Rich Asians. I enjoyed it for a lot of reasons –– and I was struck by the use of female gaze. It's an old-fashioned kind of movie, but from a significantly different perspective. I suspect it'll be dismissed as conservative rom-com pablum by (white) (male) (American) audiences, but I think there's a lot of canniness to its construction and its politics of representation.
― remy bean, Tuesday, 21 August 2018 23:09 (seven years ago)
there is and there isn't. i mean, it adheres pretty strongly to rom-com cliche and basic story has been done to death a million times...
but i admit i saw it opening night last week just to support the Asian/Asian-American casting and existence of the film. every time I read the factoid about "25 years since The Joy Luck Club!" i palm my face
― Nhex, Wednesday, 22 August 2018 00:46 (seven years ago)
I liked this movie a lot but I don’t really have anything smart to say about it vis a vis Representation. It was a delightful romantic comedy with a phenomenal cast of oughta-be-stars (Michelle Yeoh and Ken Jeong were probably the most famous people in this movie, at least in the USA).
― faculty w1fe (silby), Wednesday, 22 August 2018 00:54 (seven years ago)
Rly the notable thing abt this movie to me is that it’s a big genre movie marketed towards a general audience that really does Just Happen To Be about Asian and Asian-American characters. It didn’t have to do anything to justify itself to white audiences–no “white friend” character added due to studio notes, nothing about being Chinese was the Motivating Problem or Second Act Twist for any of the characters. Certainly it should’ve been a no brainer that such a movie could be successful but maybe the $100 million domestic box office his movie will do will provide the motivation Hollywood needs to make more movies like this.
― faculty w1fe (silby), Wednesday, 22 August 2018 01:05 (seven years ago)
It wont
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 22 August 2018 01:41 (seven years ago)