― Will M., Sunday, 15 April 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)
― Abbott, Sunday, 15 April 2007 19:14 (eighteen years ago)
― Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 16 April 2007 05:20 (eighteen years ago)
― nathalie, Monday, 16 April 2007 08:04 (eighteen years ago)
― craven, Monday, 16 April 2007 09:07 (eighteen years ago)
― Mark C, Monday, 16 April 2007 10:17 (eighteen years ago)
― accentmonkey, Monday, 16 April 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)
― Grandpont Genie, Monday, 16 April 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
― ledge, Monday, 16 April 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)
― accentmonkey, Monday, 16 April 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)
a recycled parchment
― Snorkels, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 02:03 (seventeen years ago)
ALL OF THEM
― Abbott, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 02:08 (seventeen years ago)
This has been bugging me for quite some time:
DECEPTIVELY
If something is deceptively large, is it larger than it seems or smaller than it seems? I would have to go with it being LARGE, but in a deceptive way, so it actually seems small. But I can never be sure.
― Not the real Village People, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 18:13 (seventeen years ago)
Pretty sure "deceptively large" means something SEEMS smaller than it IS. Ex: in a room with a low ceiling and lots of nooks and crannies, you might not notice that it's really 1000 feet sq.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 18:25 (seventeen years ago)
I have a problem with "went" - the longer I look at it the wronger it looks.
― snoball, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 18:46 (seventeen years ago)
Is 'deceptively large' not just estate agent speak for small?
― AlanSmithee, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 22:15 (seventeen years ago)
Oh hmm, you know, the longer I look at it, the less sure I am. I think part of the problem is that use of "deceptively XX" should prob be with some kind of verb of appearance/perception, ex "looks deceptively small". I'm not sure it's something a building, for example, can be, it can only appear to be.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 22:19 (seventeen years ago)