― Dr Morbius, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)
― Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:19 (eighteen years ago)
Ever since he was hired to helm the second Hulk flick, Mr. Leterrier (who also directed Unleashed and both Transporter flicks) has been assuring everyone that it's not a full-bore "sequel," but more of a "reboot," as if Ang Lee's original was something less than sequel-worthy.
― Oilyrags, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:31 (eighteen years ago)
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 16 April 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)
― David R., Monday, 16 April 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)
― David R., Monday, 16 April 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:47 (eighteen years ago)
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 16 April 2007 16:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 16 April 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)
― TOMBOT, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)
― TOMBOT, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Tuomas, Monday, 16 April 2007 17:02 (eighteen years ago)
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 16 April 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)
― horseshoe, Monday, 16 April 2007 17:04 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 16 April 2007 17:05 (eighteen years ago)
― Tuomas, Monday, 16 April 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 16 April 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 16 April 2007 17:07 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 16 April 2007 17:08 (eighteen years ago)
― Tuomas, Monday, 16 April 2007 17:14 (eighteen years ago)
― stevienixed, Monday, 16 April 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
― gff, Monday, 16 April 2007 19:47 (eighteen years ago)
― Nicole, Monday, 16 April 2007 19:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Edward III, Monday, 16 April 2007 19:52 (eighteen years ago)
― rps, Monday, 16 April 2007 19:56 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr. Superman, Monday, 16 April 2007 19:59 (eighteen years ago)
― Nicole, Monday, 16 April 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)
― Tuomas, Monday, 16 April 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)
― river wolf, Monday, 16 April 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)
― Tuomas, Monday, 16 April 2007 20:11 (eighteen years ago)
― David R., Monday, 16 April 2007 20:11 (eighteen years ago)
― M.V., Tuesday, 17 April 2007 02:04 (eighteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 02:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 03:56 (eighteen years ago)
― gershy, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 07:05 (eighteen years ago)
I thought the rumor was that Norton was going to star in a Dr. Strange movie?!
― Gukbe, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 11:09 (eighteen years ago)
― David R., Tuesday, 17 April 2007 13:09 (eighteen years ago)
― David R., Tuesday, 17 April 2007 13:10 (eighteen years ago)
― Nicole, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 13:13 (eighteen years ago)
― Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 13:16 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 13:37 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 13:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Nicole, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 14:04 (eighteen years ago)
― Ben Boyerrr, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 14:18 (eighteen years ago)
― gff, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 14:23 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 14:33 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 14:35 (eighteen years ago)
I think this might turn out to be a lot of fun.
― chap, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:09 (seventeen years ago)
so is it a sequel rather than another origin story? i thought it was going to be the latter, but the trailer looks like it picks up where the Ang Lee one ended.
― Jordan, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:11 (seventeen years ago)
...with Ang Lee picking up The New Yorker issue containing a story by Ann Proulx.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:12 (seventeen years ago)
hahahah!
― s1ocki, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:13 (seventeen years ago)
"I wish I could quit you, Hulk."
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
this is some shitty-looking cgi in the trailer. whatever happened to hiring some steroids freak and painting him green?
― n/a, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:34 (seventeen years ago)
fah ed norton is the worstest ever wtf w/him always playing tough guys when hes obv such a twerp
― jhøshea, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:38 (seventeen years ago)
bruce banner is a twerp, i guess?
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:39 (seventeen years ago)
trailer made him look like some bourne type
― jhøshea, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:40 (seventeen years ago)
acting
― n/a, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
yah hes awful at that
― jhøshea, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
if Hulk sang some Death to Smoochy songs, I'd go
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
for a film snob, you sure like some shitty movies
― n/a, Monday, 9 June 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)
seeing this tonight.
― Simon H., Monday, 9 June 2008 21:15 (seventeen years ago)
The Ang Lee one is a fave film of mine. So shoot me.
― i, grey, Monday, 9 June 2008 21:59 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.jabaccreations.com/Stuff/web%20Graphics2004/ShootingGopher.gif
― omar little, Monday, 9 June 2008 22:35 (seventeen years ago)
the cgi in the trailer really does look like ass.
― caek, Monday, 9 June 2008 22:50 (seventeen years ago)
The reverse is also true.
― Oilyrags, Monday, 9 June 2008 22:51 (seventeen years ago)
lol
― caek, Monday, 9 June 2008 22:52 (seventeen years ago)
That's just insane.
― rogermexico., Monday, 9 June 2008 23:20 (seventeen years ago)
I liked the Ang Lee one a fair bit at the time but I only saw it once, in the theater
― mh, Monday, 9 June 2008 23:54 (seventeen years ago)
this movie. feh
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 02:07 (seventeen years ago)
A comparison point -- namely, ILE on the first film:
Hulk C/D? (spoilers)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 03:43 (seventeen years ago)
Anyway, tell us how you really feel, s1ocki.
any hulk poodles in this one
― latebloomer, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 03:52 (seventeen years ago)
no poodles
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 04:10 (seventeen years ago)
no cry
agreed!
SPOILERS spoilers SPOILERS
Downey's appearance at the end, and the way everyone went nuts over it (as compared to the near-silence of the rest of the screening), was very instructive.
― Simon H., Tuesday, 10 June 2008 05:54 (seventeen years ago)
ya, and the fact that lou ferrigno's 30 second cameo had more charisma than the entire story arc of cgi hulk
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 06:01 (seventeen years ago)
stan lee also got a big hurrah. when the audience goes that nuts for the cameos you got problems.
oh yeah, I forgot those. lee's cameo was cute.
― Simon H., Tuesday, 10 June 2008 06:02 (seventeen years ago)
did you find it weird that five minutes after the stan lee cameo there was a whole sequence involving a guy named "stanley" who looked like stan lee and ran a pizza parlour we kept being reminded was called "STANLEY'S pizza parlour"?
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 06:04 (seventeen years ago)
my theory is that that was written as an extended cameo role for stan lee but he backed out
yeah that was weird, also that character came out of nowhere! he made some reference to knowing Ross but I don't think that ever got explained, he was just some old dude.
also was Tim Roth's character supposed to be Russian, or English?
― Simon H., Tuesday, 10 June 2008 06:08 (seventeen years ago)
i'm assuming he's a comic reference (stanley)
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 06:10 (seventeen years ago)
probably. still a bit random.
also was it just me or was the only human-seeming character the weird professor that showed up near the end?
― Simon H., Tuesday, 10 June 2008 06:15 (seventeen years ago)
i heard tony starks is in this
― and what, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 13:22 (seventeen years ago)
The Tony Stark appearance is in one of the television trailers so I don't think it's that much of a spoiler (my wife noticed this last night).
hi dere Avengers movie
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 13:23 (seventeen years ago)
I liked this ok, actually. It's no Iron Man, but I enjoyed it way more than I expected.
― latebloomer, Friday, 13 June 2008 06:50 (seventeen years ago)
guardian review:
"Hulk. Smash!" Yes. Hulk. Smash. Yes. Smash. Big Hulk smash. Smash cars. Buildings. Army tanks. Hulk not just smash. Hulk also go rarrr! Then smash again. Smash important, obviously. Smash Hulk's USP. What Hulk smash most? Hulk smash all hope of interesting time in cinema. Hulk take all effort of cinema, effort getting babysitter, effort finding parking, and Hulk put great green fist right through it. Hulk crush all hopes of entertainment. Hulk in boring film. Film co-written by star. Edward Norton. Norton in it. Norton write it. Norton not need gamma-radiation poisoning to get big head. Thing is: Hulk head weirdly small. Compared with rest of big green body.
Hulk not scary. Hulk look like Shrek. Wait. Critic have ... second thought. Hulk look like Shrek when Shrek turn handsome, in Shrek 2. Like Gordon Brown. Hulk rubbish. Hulk not look powerful. Especially when Hulk do jumpy bouncy floaty thing. Over New York buildings. Then Hulk look wussy. Big. Yet wussy. Not good combination. Stan Lee have big cameo. Stan Lee keen on self. Previously Stan Lee just glimpsed. Now Stan in it for 30 seconds. Or more. Stan clearly on roll. Stan even give Robert Downey Jr cameo. As Iron Man. This very irritating. Audience supposed to be excited. Audience nod off. Long ago.
Idea is. Dr Bruce Banner - on run. Keep anger under control. Banner hope not turn into Hulk. Banner live .... in Brazilian slum. Work in factory. Total babe there fancy Banner. Banner quite fancy babe. But Banner not make move. Babe in film to keep guys interested. Until Banner's girlfriend Liv Tyler come into action later. Tyler not mind Hulk thing. Hulk remind her of dad. Steven Tyler. Possibly. Much location work. Overhead shots. Of slums. City of God vibe intended. But this rubbish. Like everything else.
Tim Roth come on. As evil soldier. Fighting Hulk personal for him. Roth typical evil Brit. Roth supposedly working for US army. Yet Roth Brit. Critic annoyed by stereotyping. Roth get injected with serum. Become Hulky supervillain. Smash cars. Tanks. Only with no trousers. Roth groin area ambiguous. Groin area look lumpy. Bumpy. Perhaps odd penis. Perhaps odd trousers. Critic ... not sure.
Same old story. Superhero movie give superhero mirror-image antagonist. Like in Spider-Man 3. Idea rubbish in Spider-Man 3. Idea rubbish here. Hulk versus humanity important thing. Cancelled out here. Basic problem ... critic not believe Hulk angry. Hulk just roar. It not look convincing. Not truly seem angry. Critic think about this. Critic decide why. It because Hulk not swear. Hulk just say: "Hulk. Smash" etc. If Hulk shout C-word ... different matter. Then Hulk look angry. Sound angry. Not here. Hulk genteel.
Critic remember Ang Lee version. Ang Lee version slagged off. Yet rubbish new Hulk film make that look like Citizen Kane. Critic exit cinema miffed. Film take away two hours of critic's life. Critic not get time back. Ever. Rarrrrr."
http://arts.guardian.co.uk/filmandmusic/story/0,,2284938,00.html
― thomp, Friday, 13 June 2008 10:16 (seventeen years ago)
hulk don't read guardian
― latebloomer, Friday, 13 June 2008 10:18 (seventeen years ago)
awesome.
― Simon H., Friday, 13 June 2008 10:51 (seventeen years ago)
ugh concept reviews. i guess at least he didn't write it as a memo from one studio head to another, or as a "pitch."
― s1ocki, Friday, 13 June 2008 14:18 (seventeen years ago)
I don't watch a lot of television, because if you spend all your time on the couch you could become the cat equivalent of a couch potato, which would be one of those pillows with the crocheted message, "If you can't say anything good about someone, sit right here with me." I have kneaded and muzzled such pillows so many times I even know the author of the quotation: Alice Roosevelt Longworth, who on the basis of this pillow must certainly have been a cat lover.
But I confess I watched "Ebert & Roeper" on TV when they reviewed my first movie, "Garfield," two years ago. I was eager to get my first review. Having spent years within the cramped panels of a newspaper comic strip, I gloried in the freedom of the cinema. It allowed me to show off my body language: My languorous stretches, my graceful pirouettes, my daring leaps and bounds, my shameless affection for my owner, Jon (Breckin Meyer).
There will be malcontents who claim I am not the real author of this review, because how could a cat know that after you mention a character in a movie, you include the name of the actor in parentheses? Do these people believe a cat lives in a vacuum? I read all the movie reviews, especially those of Ebert, a graceful and witty prose stylist with profound erudition, whose reviews are worth reading just for themselves, whether or not I have any intention of viewing the movie. I need to read movie reviews because Jon watches DVDs all the time and likes to have me within petting distance, and I need advance warning about movies I will want to avoid, so I can slink off for a snooze under the sofa. Last night, for example, he watched "Cat People" -- which, judging by the soundtrack, had no cats in it.
But I digress. Ebert, the smart and handsome one, gave thumbs up to my first movie, but Roeper, the other one, gave thumbs down and was particularly unkind. He went on forever attacking Ebert for liking "Garfield." This from a man with enough taste to praise "Duma." How very disappointing. One of Roeper's complaints was that I was animated and all of the other characters in the movie were "real." Do you have any idea how a statement like that hurts an actor who has worked all of his life as a media cat? Yes, Richard Roeper, I was animated. Read my lips: I am a character in a comic strip. What Roeper should have done for perfect consistency is complain that Dennis was not animated in "Dennis the Menace."
But forget his review of "Garfield." No use mewling over spilt milk. This week, my new movie comes out, inspired (I am happy to report) by the gratifying box-office success of the previous one. "Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties" is my most ambitious work to date, starring me in a dual role as (ahem) Garfield and also as a British cat named Prince. As in the first movie, I do Bill Murray's voice while playing myself. In my role as Prince, I do the voice of Tim Curry, an actor I have admired ever since Jon took me to a drive-in to see "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" while he smoked human catnip.
I physically perform both roles, which as any cat knows, is easier for a cat than a human, because we are always playing multiple roles, such as looking gratefully toward humans while shooting daggers at dogs. I love the scene where they use visual effects to show both cats at the same time, in a kind of mirror scene inspired by the Marx Brothers.
"Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties" is actually funnier and more charming than the first film. The plot contrives to get me to England in the suitcase of my master, who has flown over to propose to his girlfriend, Liz (Jennifer Love Hewitt), who is attending a conference on animals at Castle Carlyle, which Prince has just inherited from the late Lady Eleanor, a cat lover. With intelligent estate planning, I'm sure we'd see a gratifying rise in the numbers of home-owning cats.
Anyway, Prince is dumped in the river by the unspeakably vile Lord Dargis (Billy Connolly), Lady Eleanor's nephew, who will inherit the castle when Prince dies. He is washed through the sewer systems into London, where he gets his first taste of pub life, while meanwhile I arrive at Castle Carlyle and am mistaken for Prince by the barnyard animals. These are all real animals, and good actors, too; they do the voices of such actors as Bob Hoskins, Richard E. Grant, Jane Horrocks and Rhys Ifans.
That all of these animals can talk goes without saying. No doubt some carpers in the chat rooms will observe that Jon's other pet, a dog, does not speak but only barks. I could give you the name of Jon's dog, but (yawn) frankly I can't be bothered. In this movie, Jon's dog may not be able to speak but can apparently read, which was as much of a surprise to me as to everyone else. Dogs, in my experience, have hyperactivity disorders that prevent them from concentrating on reading, because they are compelled to leap up in a frenzy and bark at every moving object. Some dogs do this to frighten, but most do it as a pathetic attempt to draw attention to themselves.
In any event, my career as a movie star now seems to be the real thing, and I am speaking with my agents about a third Garfield movie, in which I would like my character to be based on Casanova or Neil Armstrong, with a score by Josie and the Pussycats. Whether I get "thumbs up" from Richard Roeper is a matter of profound indifference to me. Profound. (yawn) Really, seriously, pro ...
― and what, Friday, 13 June 2008 14:47 (seventeen years ago)
peter bradshaw is such a shitty critic. i have no idea how he got where he is.
― caek, Friday, 13 June 2008 14:49 (seventeen years ago)
i cant believe the tony stark thing is in the commercial!!!
― s1ocki, Friday, 13 June 2008 14:52 (seventeen years ago)
that review is bad enough to make me reconsider liking the other one. I still enjoy the genital confusion though.
― Simon H., Friday, 13 June 2008 15:14 (seventeen years ago)
remember when we thought this was just like one movie, would have tie-in with Iron Man, and that's it?
― paranormal bully romance (Neanderthal), Thursday, 5 January 2023 15:31 (two years ago)
also this sucked lol.
It really is the 'let's shut this up in the attic and not talk about it' film of the whole deal.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 5 January 2023 16:25 (two years ago)