― dave q, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― MarkH, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― chris, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― michael, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm starting to think maggie would be beeter because then there would be something to fight against. Blairism is Thatcherism by stealth.
― Ed, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sarah, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Pete, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Emma, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Anyway Pete, the house is registered.
― RickyT, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
However it is a good question.
― gareth, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alan Trewartha, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Edna Welthorpe, Mrs, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jonnie, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
on the other hand: blair govt = utterly contemptuous towards traditional systems of opinion-gathering (eg where you the voter put a slip of paper into a lttle box) because THEY REPRESENT ACTUAL OPINION V.POORLY (here they are correct, tho they ae also missing the point, as voting is not primarily intended as an opinion-gathering mechanism, rather as a civil-war-avoiding mechanism). Hence gvt by focus group and spin.
Question: do these hands i. manifest as a Worst of both Worlds combo, ii. merely cancel one another out, iii. fuse in dynamic but little-noticed ways to produce the unexpected (good and/or bad)? Second question: which is matters more, failing to deliver on promised changes, or delivering things you didn't promise (or even imagine)?
Please note: if the Blair gvt's ONLY ACHIEVEMENT is peace in N.Ireland, this possibly puts them ahead of every previous govt since Gladstone (Attlee possibly excepted — but the Attlee govt had many built-in failings also, not least the pervasive centralised bureaucratic managerialism out of which its key achievements sprang). Blair may NOT achieve peace in Ireland, of course, in which case all bets are off.
Chris, you are a cancer on our socirty and I demand empty your own dustbins.
I think this government has done quite a few good things. It's not terribly bold or inspiring and it's not morally blemishless, but I'm happy enough.
― N., Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Nick, I believe you are correct with regards to the legality of using the electoral roll for council tax purposes. This all came out of the Poll Tax thing. However cynicism suggests otherwise since both rolls are kept in the same place. It could certainly be used in a similar way to the TV licence detecting thing (ie they use it, and they they think of another excuse to bang on your door).
To the actual question, I do believe the current government is obsessed with making people like them (hence the spin). Anyone in management knows this is a bad idea, your employees should respect you, not like you and chummy up and want to go to the pub with you. Once they sort this out, and become proud of some of the social changes they have instigated (there has been a massive change in what Q would call the underclass) then they might get into the business of governing properly.
They are also, unfortunately, ceaseless tinkerers.
― Martin, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Pete talking of TV licences you owe me 36.333333333333333333333 etc. pounds for ours.
obv if ppl not your "thing" this is a mixed blessing
― j>e>l, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I voted Lib Dem but I was still glad that Labour defeated the Tories in my constituency, especially for the sheer joy of seeing large swathes of it = ON THE SURFACE the epitome of the Tory idea of "deep country" and mistily-recalled village / seaside life = not actually a Tory MP.
I lived through the Major years, and the government, quite apart from lacking the justification in a democracy for radical change that Thatcher's majorities after 1983 gave her, was insulting, backward, crude, amoral, rotten and vile. You can't say that all those attributes attach themselves so totally to the Blair administration: more to the point they *do* have a vast majority, like it or not. Personally I can't stand Blair, but my ire at this government has slightly mellowed since I realised how much of a child of the free market I am (though of course my views don't always fit together: ie I believe more strongly than even Tony Crosland in state education and against the idea of paying for education, but oppose tight regulation of TV and radio even more than Thatcher did = I loathe and despise the Blair government on the former subject but am happy with them on the latter).
― Robin Carmody, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
b) On the grounds of on one glib comment you are suggesting that Alan T is not all about Ugandan Asians. I get the feeling he may have been refering more to the three day week.
― Alan Trewartha, Thursday, 21 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Norman Phay, Thursday, 21 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Kodanshi, Friday, 22 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)