Are people whose vocabulary consists entirely of pop culture doing themselves a disservice?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
You know the types - a person who quotes a movie/song/television show to make a point, refers to characters in said media in order to frame their life experiences, etc.

I'm finding myself in a quandry about this - are these folks (myself included, sometimes) missing out on a greater set of references? Is there a greater distillation of universal truth than "Star Wars"? Should people who endlessly quote movies and songs, and seem to have that as their only frame of reference, be shunned/put into a corner with others of their ilk? Do we owe them and ourselves something more or better?

This question inspired by an interview with Shaun of The Dead / Spaced creatorsNick Frost, Simon Pegg, and Edgar Wright.

B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:21 (eighteen years ago)

Those guys are worse than Darth Vader!

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:25 (eighteen years ago)

Seriously, people who can't communicate without dropping references to movies make me want to go off on em like Sam Jackson in Pulp Fiction.

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

With great vengeance and furious anger...

Wait. Was that Jules as a pop culture reference or the Bible as a pop culture reference?

B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:32 (eighteen years ago)

are you implying that other references are inherently better than pop culture ones?

Ms Misery, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:33 (eighteen years ago)

WHAT


ok!!!!

Catsupppppppppppppp dude ‫茄蕃‪, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)

i just interviewed those guys!

anyway... dude... they're talking about a movie. and the movies that inspired them to make it.

s1ocki, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:37 (eighteen years ago)

I have a friend like this. He's a bit of a genius but it's funny 'cause I think he brings up references sometimes as a way of implying that I should watch/listen/read the things he's referencing.

Michael White, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:37 (eighteen years ago)

Righto, the idea that Pop Culture refs are inherently inferior to 'high culture' (what is that, exactly? The Louvre? Rachmaninoff?) refs is pretty bankrupt.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)

And vice-versa...

Michael White, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)

Are people whose vocabulary consists entirely of references doing themselves a disservice?

I mean, is there really such a thing as originality any more?

Masonic Boom, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:41 (eighteen years ago)

The book _Generation Echhhh_ wrote about this 13 years ago, comparing Tarantino and the Coen Bros. That there's a danger with a culture solely referring to past culture, reffing cultural signposts without any of the imagination or quality of the things refered to

kingfish, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)

is that a real book? awesome title.

That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:47 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, with cartoons by Evan Dorkin. A great pop artifact from 1994, written as a response to early 90s stuff like Coupland or _Fast Sofa_

kingfish, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)

This is something I worry about, the endless referentialness (is that even a word?) whether it be pop culture or "high culture".

But this may just be a function of my age. People have been saying "nothing new under the sun" since the Old Testament. Perhaps the novelty and/or creativity of former eras stands out so sharply because all of their referential dreck has been washed away by time.

Masonic Boom, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)

'hot fuzz' is some next shit cos you wouldn't get the refs unless a) you were as nerdy as edgar wright and simon pegg but even *they* aren't *that* nerdy because they say they deliberately bought loads of cop films 'as research' when writing it so it's not like it's stuff they 'kust know' b) they put the things they were referring to *in the film itself*. which is funny, but maybe also a bit sad.

That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)

xpost to slocki

I think the OP was inspired by this bit:

AVC: Spaced was primarily based on direct parodies of highly recognizable sources. That's less the case with Shaun, and except in a few cases, not the case at all here. Why move away from that?

EW: I think because you're making a film. When we were doing Spaced, it was more of an aspirational thing, because we're making TV, and part of the charm is, you've got slackers in north London acting out scenes from The Matrix or The Conversation. That was kind of, the characters could only communicate in pop culture. They were of that generation, which is still ongoing, that kind of knows pop culture, music, TV, films, video games, comics, and nothing else. Have no other life experience.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:09 (eighteen years ago)

Bob Fingerman had a great take on this in an early issue of Minimum Wage -- but since quoting it would only make the point further, I'll say no more.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:13 (eighteen years ago)

the onion are a bit off-base there. 'hot fuzz' has loads of references in it.

That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:15 (eighteen years ago)

A lot of my communication with close friends actually consists of "quotes" from comedies e.g. Alan Partridge, Lee & Herring, Peep Show. But at the time I'm not doing this on purpose and usually it's something really subtle or a way of something I would just say anyway, e.g. "Do you see" or "what you've done there is confused x and y"... or I dunno, I can't think of any good examples off the top of my head. But I do worry that people other than those who have watched said shows 900989 times will not get what I mean, and also think I say weird things. I guess it's like a shorthand to convey across the context of the quote as well without bothering to articulate it properly.

Not sure if this is what the question meant, tho.

Not the real Village People, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)

yes i said yes they are yes they are yes

gff, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:24 (eighteen years ago)

TS Eliot needs to stop with the 17th century pop culture montage schtick.

Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:25 (eighteen years ago)

my friend, mid-conversation, appropos of ???

"I know, you know, AND THE VEGETABLE LASAGNA KNOWS HAHA HA HA"

apparently it's from a seinfeld episode, but I hate this because i'm always divided between just going "a-ha...yeah..anyways, ha, so..." pretending I know what they're talking about, or just putting the breaks on the conversation and being like -- okay...what's that from then? even though i couldn't care less.

negotiable, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:26 (eighteen years ago)

SHAKESPEARE KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE BOCCACCIO RIPS DUDER

Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)

My urge to relate every event to a quote from The Simpsons has been reigned in over the last few years -- you can do it too much. But I will never stop them from popping into my head.

kenan, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)

sometimes i start to laugh but feel the person searching for some particular reaction, and so half-way through stop and come clean.

negotiable, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

The problem is there really is a Simpsons quote for every situation.

Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

It depends on what you want. Pop culture is essentially about amusement, and if that's what you want it should serve you fine. But it's a relatively closed, self-referencing system and I don't think it can explain much about life. If you want answers you'll eventually end up looking elsewhere. I grew up with it like every American, but I have less use for it as I get older.

fife, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:43 (eighteen years ago)

The problem is there really is a Simpsons quote for every situation.

-- Noodle Vague, Wednesday, April 18, 2007 7:30 PM (13 minutes ago)


OTM. I too have to reign myself in if for nothing else b/c a long explanition of the reference to non-Simpsons watchers is usually required.

Ms Misery, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)

non-Simpsons watchers? You keep those people around?

kenan, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:46 (eighteen years ago)

I've been avoiding this thread because I'm a little too implicated in it, but this:

but it's a relatively closed, self-referencing system and I don't think it can explain much about life.

seems completely untrue to me.

horseshoe, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, well "Pop culture is essentially about amusement" is pretty dumb too.

Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)

I should elaborate. Pop culture as I think of it is something originating out of 20th century American abundance. Consider the narrative end, cinema. When it started out, it was feeding from classical culture, Dante, Shakespeare, etc, as well as contemporary American literature. However as time goes along and newer generations are not familiar with classical culture, the moral questions which were originally imported from classical sources are gradually diluted, corrupted, or abandoned entirely. Is pop cinema not, as it goes along, feeding less from the world and more upon itself? Is it not become more provincial and disengaged from the world at large?

fife, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 18:16 (eighteen years ago)

"Pop culture as I think of it is something originating out of 20th century American abundance. Consider the narrative end, cinema. When it started out, it was feeding from classical culture, Dante, Shakespeare, etc, as well as contemporary American literature."

you're talking out of your arse mate.

That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

xpost did you sleep through modernism or something?

kenan, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)

I don't think early cinema had much to do with modernism if you mean it in the literary sense. It was more an outgrowth of romanticism, no?

fife, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)

Whether it comes from high-falutin' classical sources or Family Guy, people are going to use the shared experience around them for metaphor, and pop culture is, like it or not, a common and pervasive shared experience in these modern times. Arguing whether anybody is doing a disservice to themselves by engaging in low culture is a played out argument. To say nothing of the ridiculous notion that it was all Homer and Bach until the mean ol' 20th century came along.

Still, there's this pervasive bit around geek culture that the original question is raising; endless quoting of the film/game/etc geek canon. I'm not sure whether its doing a disservice, but its certainly notable and -- to many people -- annoying. What bothers me personally is the same thing that Edgar Write references directly, that this sort of constant reference to pop media is indicative of a very narrow life experience. Its a signifier that the person talking might know their Star Wars, but maybe doesn't know much else. And thus is boring.

Jacob, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)

"I don't think early cinema had much to do with modernism if you mean it in the literary sense. It was more an outgrowth of romanticism, no?

-- fife, Wednesday, April 18, 2007 9:43 PM (1 hour ago)"

what the fuck are you on about?

with this and "cinema's roots in dante and shakespeare."

That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 20:21 (eighteen years ago)

it didn't have much to do with modernism or with romanticism.

That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 20:22 (eighteen years ago)

six years pass...

I'm getting increasingly uncomfortable being around people whose conversations revolve around making pop culture references. It's becoming so bad that some 50-70% of conversations I'm involved in eventually get diverted into pop culture discussions. Unfortunately, it only takes one person in the conversation to divert it, since after the reference is made, everyone else in the conversation has to prove that they get the reference. At that point, everyone has to drop the subject we were talking about and instead talk about the reference and make other references from that thing. It seem like most of the time, I'm not even having conversations anymore, but instead having a big fluffy pop culture shell with a very thin core of actual substantive dialogue beneath it.

I realize I may not be talking to the most sympathetic crowd here, but is this annoying the living shit out of anyone else? It's starting to trouble me that I don't even know who these people are outside of their tastes in music, movies, books, and youtube videos.

Poliopolice, Monday, 31 March 2014 17:38 (eleven years ago)

it used to annoy the hell out of me when i was younger, but i guess i systematically changed who i hang out with (largely by losing most of my friends and moving over and over to places where i knew no one) until i reached my present state of blissful, 99% pop-culture free conversations. i mean, don't get me wrong, i may talk about breaking bad on occasion or whatever, but no one is going to answer a question by quoting a character, look around the friend circle to see who else got the reference, then act like that's normal. that would be an odd occasion these days, whereas it was once commonplace

Karl Malone, Monday, 31 March 2014 18:14 (eleven years ago)

I did get sick of "I'm Rick James bitch" but over 10 years on Super Troopers references still are hilarious to me so whatever

frogbs, Monday, 31 March 2014 18:19 (eleven years ago)

i'm pretty sure this process is how people started expressing disbelief by saying "really? really? really? seriously? seriously? seriously?", via SNL references

Karl Malone, Monday, 31 March 2014 18:23 (eleven years ago)

When I was young and there were just three television networks and Top 40 radio on AM, making pop culture references still only worked if your conversational partners fell into the correct target demographic. Now that pop culture is balkanized and sliced thinner than delicatessen meats any group which communicates largely in terms of references to television or pop music would have to be homogenous to a ridiculous degree and therefore stultifying.

btw, old people who strive constantly to be 'up on' all the latest pop trends are just as pathetic now as they were when I was a teenager. 95% of all my contemporary pop culture knowledge comes from stumbling over threads on ilx and reading them with a combination of fascination and horror. It's so much easier than actually watching or listening to all that stuff!

Aimless, Monday, 31 March 2014 18:30 (eleven years ago)

h8 when ppl engage with culture

forum enthusiast (wins), Monday, 31 March 2014 18:37 (eleven years ago)

I read a lot of books. This hurls me into an orbital path very far removed from the center of pop culture gravity. Although I engage with an antiquated and highly unpopular culture, it is still a culture and I am engaged.

Aimless, Monday, 31 March 2014 18:46 (eleven years ago)

woah

forum enthusiast (wins), Monday, 31 March 2014 18:49 (eleven years ago)

I'm always a little bummed when someone makes what I think is a really funny joke in the lunchroom and then later I find out it's just a line from the office that everyone else knew.

james franco tur(oll)ing test (Hurting 2), Monday, 31 March 2014 18:52 (eleven years ago)

you can't fool me, wins. you post on I Love Books, too.

Aimless, Monday, 31 March 2014 18:52 (eleven years ago)

sry from The Office

james franco tur(oll)ing test (Hurting 2), Monday, 31 March 2014 18:52 (eleven years ago)

Venn diagram of people who hate this vs. people who say "i don't even own a tv".

polyphonic, Monday, 31 March 2014 18:53 (eleven years ago)

Who are all these "people who say 'i don't even own a tv'" I like never run into them except for people who are "cord cutters" and just have netflix and a roku or whatever.

james franco tur(oll)ing test (Hurting 2), Monday, 31 March 2014 18:56 (eleven years ago)

I have the overcaffinated/hypermediated/ADD'd-out brain that messily/easily makes connections and don't always have enough control at the moment to prevent myself from vocalizing the reference.

Is the annoyance factor coming from just the references or allusions themselves or from the possible superficiality of the pop-cult item referenced?

President Frankenstein (kingfish), Monday, 31 March 2014 18:56 (eleven years ago)

I don't actually mind anyone making pop culture references per se, I just get disappointed when I think the person has said something really clever and then I find out it wasn't theirs. But there's one guy in my office who makes seinfeld references for fucking EVERYTHING, and that gets irritating.

james franco tur(oll)ing test (Hurting 2), Monday, 31 March 2014 18:58 (eleven years ago)

its pretty annoying. it's also annoying when when i'm hanging out with people and talking about all kinds of real-life shit and they interrupt a good conversation and go "oh wait you gotta see this youtube video!!!" like even if it is a really funny or good video, it's kind of annoying

marcos, Monday, 31 March 2014 19:00 (eleven years ago)

Present shock

President Frankenstein (kingfish), Monday, 31 March 2014 19:04 (eleven years ago)

I think as a kid I'd feel some sense of awkwardness if I didn't get a reference. These days, I am a lot more likely to feel awkward if people are still fucking making the same stupid-ass comedy film references and I get them.

have a nice blood/orange bitters cocktail (mh), Monday, 31 March 2014 19:04 (eleven years ago)

I went to high school with a dude who was 90% references, conversationally, all to pop culture shit. I think he's a lawyer now, although mostly doing research work. I can only imagine how many minutes it'd be if he defended a case before he started making Darth Vader analogies.

have a nice blood/orange bitters cocktail (mh), Monday, 31 March 2014 19:06 (eleven years ago)

xps: that was my experience with watching Family Guy in the early 2000s. "Oh wow, this is really hilarious. Wait, no, it's basically just quotes from classic movies/shows I hadn't seen yet."

how's life, Monday, 31 March 2014 19:07 (eleven years ago)

Family Guy would probably be more interesting if you were laughing at the characters for being idiots with no ability to see the world other than through the lens of pop culture.

have a nice blood/orange bitters cocktail (mh), Monday, 31 March 2014 19:09 (eleven years ago)

What if that Peter dude on Family Guy is actually one of those aliens from the Star Trek episode 'Darmok'

have a nice blood/orange bitters cocktail (mh), Monday, 31 March 2014 19:10 (eleven years ago)

Shaka, when the walls fell.

polyphonic, Monday, 31 March 2014 19:12 (eleven years ago)

I don't actually mind anyone making pop culture references per se, I just get disappointed when I think the person has said something really clever and then I find out it wasn't theirs.

even more annoying flipside of this is when you say something you think is really clever and someone else goes, 'what is that from?'

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 31 March 2014 19:15 (eleven years ago)

haha yes

james franco tur(oll)ing test (Hurting 2), Monday, 31 March 2014 19:38 (eleven years ago)

Venn diagram of people who hate this vs. people who say "i don't even own a tv".

I'm getting pretty tired of the lazy lobbing of this tired cliche of "not owning a tv" as a go-to way to dismiss someone as a smug, condescending jerk. We all have reasons for consuming what we do, and I can respect people's choices. I don't think twice if someone says "I don't own a tv." To me, that's just a statement, usually made when someone is asking the person a question about TV. It's the natural response.

What I don't care for is people endlessly blathering about whatever it is they are into, whether it's constantly hating on TVs or constantly talking about TV.

Poliopolice, Monday, 31 March 2014 19:57 (eleven years ago)

the dude I know who says "I don't own a tv" is the same one who mentions that he never reads books

have a nice blood/orange bitters cocktail (mh), Monday, 31 March 2014 19:58 (eleven years ago)

Maybe he has a full and rich mental life just engaging with what is in front of him.

Aimless, Monday, 31 March 2014 20:04 (eleven years ago)

Is there a way for me to unpost that venn diagram joke

polyphonic, Monday, 31 March 2014 20:12 (eleven years ago)

Would frequent refs to high culture go down smoother?

President Frankenstein (kingfish), Monday, 31 March 2014 20:12 (eleven years ago)

no

have a nice blood/orange bitters cocktail (mh), Monday, 31 March 2014 20:13 (eleven years ago)

I feel like there's a good comedy sketch there, like a guy who suddenly quotes Ibsen in this chummy way like he expects the whole watercooler crowd to get it.

james franco tur(oll)ing test (Hurting 2), Monday, 31 March 2014 20:14 (eleven years ago)

on the one hand I find it repulsive to bond with others based only on shared consumption of the same media, but on the other, diversifying your outlook or learning about other life experiences that might not be otherwise evident is a good thing

with my luck, people are just watching things that reaffirm their own outlooks

have a nice blood/orange bitters cocktail (mh), Monday, 31 March 2014 20:17 (eleven years ago)

that's generally what people do, ain't it?

Nhex, Monday, 31 March 2014 20:27 (eleven years ago)

shh, I'm trying to be an optimist

have a nice blood/orange bitters cocktail (mh), Monday, 31 March 2014 20:42 (eleven years ago)

I'm a little tired of having the same conversations about TV shows over and over again. However, with my sig other and very close friends, a lot of my vocabulary or attempts to communicate are taken from certain pop culture reference points because when we have a shared understanding of the context, it serves as a shorthand that can just *nail* what you're trying to say. It's not like I'm quoting then looking around to see who got it, it's (I think) more subtle than that - a casual line rather than a 'quote', but it means I can sometimes struggle to explain what I mean to people who don't have the shared reference points.
Hard to think of a specific example that will make sense, but ILX memes must work the same way, right?

kinder, Monday, 31 March 2014 21:21 (eleven years ago)

just now, watching the cardinals game broadcast. out of nowhere, a announcer goes "my friends call me the cruiser". they both laugh. 5 seconds later, the other announcer says "lighten up, Francis". they move on without explaining.

i guess i should have stripes memorized or whatever but that's the kind of thing i'm whining about upthread. it's not a big deal in isolation, but some people's conversations consist of about 30%+ references like that, and if you find yourself in the middle of a conversation where 4-5 people who are into doing that it can be living hell.

(indidentally, i guess the cardinals announcer really loves that line: https://twitter.com/DannyMacTV/status/380165221932756993)

Karl Malone, Monday, 31 March 2014 21:40 (eleven years ago)

you'll never take away my obnoxious references to The Critic

Nhex, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 04:18 (eleven years ago)

yessss

have a nice blood/orange bitters cocktail (mh), Tuesday, 1 April 2014 13:42 (eleven years ago)

http://www.npr.org/blogs/parallels/2014/04/01/297155827/what-the-simpsons-says-about-ukraines-language-divide

finally, a story that combines the "people outside the US don't know the Simpsons" idea, current world events, and NPR

have a nice blood/orange bitters cocktail (mh), Tuesday, 1 April 2014 14:29 (eleven years ago)

one of the most unbearable things about hanging out with people even a few years younger than me (I'm 26) is that they recognize NONE of my classic simpsons references :(

Many American citizens are literally paralyzed by (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 1 April 2014 16:33 (eleven years ago)

at least you have ILX, the last bastion for people who can understand early Simpsons references

Nhex, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 16:35 (eleven years ago)

for me I think roughly "Tomacco" is like the Maginot Line

Nhex, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 16:35 (eleven years ago)

ALSO I got a few 'favs' for my recent tweet about "a nightmarish dystopian future of constantly having to explain your Star Wars quotes"

so my answer is that I used to do this, and will probably start doing it again when I figure out what pop-culture references actually translate outside of my most intimate cohort

Many American citizens are literally paralyzed by (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 1 April 2014 16:38 (eleven years ago)

Nhex we're talking, like, blank stares in response to "Ze goggles do nothing" or "I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords"

Many American citizens are literally paralyzed by (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 1 April 2014 16:41 (eleven years ago)

oh gosh i thought i could be young forever but if that's the case then it's all over.

Merdeyeux, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 16:43 (eleven years ago)

it totally is man, it totally is

Nhex, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 16:44 (eleven years ago)

GRAMPA SIMPSON: I used to be "with it", but then they changed what "it" was. Now what I'm with isn't "it", and what's "it" seems weird and scary.

Many American citizens are literally paralyzed by (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 1 April 2014 16:47 (eleven years ago)

real talk tho: it's the people who haven't even seen the first 7 or 8 seasons of the Simpsons (let alone obsessively rewatched them until entire episodes are burned into their memories) who are doing themselves a disservice

Many American citizens are literally paralyzed by (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 1 April 2014 16:51 (eleven years ago)

you kids don't know first eight seasons of the Simpsons? The bong-rattling writing of Conan O'Brien? The etc etc and so on.

Merdeyeux, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 17:02 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.