― félix pié, Monday, 23 April 2007 23:29 (eighteen years ago)
― deeznuts, Monday, 23 April 2007 23:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 24 April 2007 01:24 (eighteen years ago)
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 24 April 2007 01:25 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 01:25 (eighteen years ago)
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 24 April 2007 01:29 (eighteen years ago)
― chicago kevin, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 01:30 (eighteen years ago)
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 02:14 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 03:15 (eighteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)
― tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 04:27 (eighteen years ago)
― m coleman, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 11:02 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 13:51 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael White, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 14:19 (eighteen years ago)
― chicago kevin, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 14:24 (eighteen years ago)
― tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 15:55 (eighteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 26 April 2007 13:45 (eighteen years ago)
― chicago kevin, Thursday, 26 April 2007 14:05 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 26 April 2007 14:21 (eighteen years ago)
Just finished The Fifties, liked it a lot. The only other book of his I'd ever read was Summer of '49, about the Red Sox and Yankees; Bill James once meticulously ripped it apart in an Abstract over factual errors.
Thought The Fifties was a really good panorama of the decade. Impossible to get in everything in 700 pages, but I didn't catch myself saying "What about...?" very often. (I remember thinking there was somebody noticeably missing, but it's slipped my mind now.) Light on film--really nothing except Monroe--and music, too (little bit more, but mostly Presley). Very detailed on American politics, television, and growing middle-class affluence and anxiety. Reasonably attentive to race and the first stirrings of feminism.
The one thing that really hit me (not that this is news) was how some of the same dynamics at work in last year's election were exactly the same 60 years ago. Then it produced Robert Taft and Curtis LeMay and--at the other end of the spectrum--Herb Stempel, now you've got what's-his-name. Anyway, a livelier decade than I'd previously thought.
― clemenza, Friday, 6 January 2017 00:42 (eight years ago)